Talk:Product placement - Revision history

imported>Ted C: /* Too bad we don't have a page for Cisco alone. */

2008-12-17T14:40:40Z

Too bad we don't have a page for Cisco alone.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:40, 17 December 2008
(No difference)

imported>Ted C: /* Too bad we don't have a page for Cisco alone. */

2008-12-17T14:40:40Z

Too bad we don't have a page for Cisco alone.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:40, 17 December 2008
Line 70:		Line 70:

	It woulda been cool to note that they're hosting The Simpsons on Myspace. http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&VideoID=21523254 --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 13:20, 8 December 2007 (EST)		It woulda been cool to note that they're hosting The Simpsons on Myspace. http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&VideoID=21523254 --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 13:20, 8 December 2007 (EST)

			==Tracey's Car==
			Anyone feel like grabbing a screencap of Tracey's 350Z? --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 09:40, 17 December 2008 (EST)

imported>Riddler: New section: Too bad we don't have a page for Cisco alone.

2007-12-08T18:20:16Z

New section: Too bad we don't have a page for Cisco alone.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:20, 8 December 2007
Line 66:		Line 66:
	Sylar picks up a can of Spinach at the end of the last episode. Was that a generic brand or some product placement? --[[User:Jordan L.\|Jordan L.]] 18:14, 7 December 2007 (EST)		Sylar picks up a can of Spinach at the end of the last episode. Was that a generic brand or some product placement? --[[User:Jordan L.\|Jordan L.]] 18:14, 7 December 2007 (EST)
	* It appears to be "Bakery" brand canned spinach. I guess that's a generic brand.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 18:27, 7 December 2007 (EST)		* It appears to be "Bakery" brand canned spinach. I guess that's a generic brand.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 18:27, 7 December 2007 (EST)

			== Too bad we don't have a page for Cisco alone. ==

			It woulda been cool to note that they're hosting The Simpsons on Myspace. http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&VideoID=21523254 --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 13:20, 8 December 2007 (EST)

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Spinach */

2007-12-07T23:27:42Z

Spinach

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:27, 7 December 2007
Line 65:		Line 65:

	Sylar picks up a can of Spinach at the end of the last episode. Was that a generic brand or some product placement? --[[User:Jordan L.\|Jordan L.]] 18:14, 7 December 2007 (EST)		Sylar picks up a can of Spinach at the end of the last episode. Was that a generic brand or some product placement? --[[User:Jordan L.\|Jordan L.]] 18:14, 7 December 2007 (EST)
			* It appears to be "Bakery" brand canned spinach. I guess that's a generic brand.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 18:27, 7 December 2007 (EST)

imported>Jordan L.: New section: Spinach

2007-12-07T23:14:05Z

New section: Spinach

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:14, 7 December 2007
Line 61:		Line 61:
	I would like to see some of these items having their own articles. I think that if a product is shown/mentioned in more than one episode it ought to have its own article. For example, [[Nissan Versa]] has its own article. I think we could have one for Greyhound and [[iPod]]. We should also remove references to Nissan Versa in this article since it has a main article. We might also think of just having an article on Nissan in general. --[[User:Pinkkeith\|Pinkkeith]] 11:04, 23 November 2007 (EST)		I would like to see some of these items having their own articles. I think that if a product is shown/mentioned in more than one episode it ought to have its own article. For example, [[Nissan Versa]] has its own article. I think we could have one for Greyhound and [[iPod]]. We should also remove references to Nissan Versa in this article since it has a main article. We might also think of just having an article on Nissan in general. --[[User:Pinkkeith\|Pinkkeith]] 11:04, 23 November 2007 (EST)
	*I don't think we should make individual articles for every product shown on ''Heroes'', or even ones which are shown prominently, like iPod. The only reason [[Nissan]] has a few articles is because they are involved in the production of the show, and because they are [[Portal:Vehicles\|vehicles]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:09, 24 November 2007 (EST)		*I don't think we should make individual articles for every product shown on ''Heroes'', or even ones which are shown prominently, like iPod. The only reason [[Nissan]] has a few articles is because they are involved in the production of the show, and because they are [[Portal:Vehicles\|vehicles]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:09, 24 November 2007 (EST)

			== Spinach ==

			Sylar picks up a can of Spinach at the end of the last episode. Was that a generic brand or some product placement? --[[User:Jordan L.\|Jordan L.]] 18:14, 7 December 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Spliting this article */

2007-11-24T20:09:28Z

Spliting this article

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:09, 24 November 2007
Line 60:		Line 60:
	== Spliting this article ==		== Spliting this article ==
	I would like to see some of these items having their own articles. I think that if a product is shown/mentioned in more than one episode it ought to have its own article. For example, [[Nissan Versa]] has its own article. I think we could have one for Greyhound and [[iPod]]. We should also remove references to Nissan Versa in this article since it has a main article. We might also think of just having an article on Nissan in general. --[[User:Pinkkeith\|Pinkkeith]] 11:04, 23 November 2007 (EST)		I would like to see some of these items having their own articles. I think that if a product is shown/mentioned in more than one episode it ought to have its own article. For example, [[Nissan Versa]] has its own article. I think we could have one for Greyhound and [[iPod]]. We should also remove references to Nissan Versa in this article since it has a main article. We might also think of just having an article on Nissan in general. --[[User:Pinkkeith\|Pinkkeith]] 11:04, 23 November 2007 (EST)
	*I don't think we should make individual articles for every product shown on ''Heroes'', or even ones which are shown prominently, like iPod. The only reason [[Nissan]] has a few articles is because they are involved in the production of the show, and because they are [[Portal:~~vehicles~~\|vehicles]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:09, 24 November 2007 (EST)		*I don't think we should make individual articles for every product shown on ''Heroes'', or even ones which are shown prominently, like iPod. The only reason [[Nissan]] has a few articles is because they are involved in the production of the show, and because they are [[Portal:Vehicles\|vehicles]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:09, 24 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Spliting this article */

2007-11-24T20:09:12Z

Spliting this article

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:09, 24 November 2007
Line 59:		Line 59:

	== Spliting this article ==		== Spliting this article ==
	I would like to see some of these items having their own articles. I think that if a product is shown/mentioned in more than one episode it ought to have its own article. For example, [[Nissan Versa]] has its own article. I think we could have one for [[Greyhound]] and [[iPod]]. We should also remove references to Nissan Versa in this article since it has a main article. We might also think of just having an article on Nissan in general. --[[User:Pinkkeith\|Pinkkeith]] 11:04, 23 November 2007 (EST)		I would like to see some of these items having their own articles. I think that if a product is shown/mentioned in more than one episode it ought to have its own article. For example, [[Nissan Versa]] has its own article. I think we could have one for Greyhound and [[iPod]]. We should also remove references to Nissan Versa in this article since it has a main article. We might also think of just having an article on Nissan in general. --[[User:Pinkkeith\|Pinkkeith]] 11:04, 23 November 2007 (EST)
			*I don't think we should make individual articles for every product shown on ''Heroes'', or even ones which are shown prominently, like iPod. The only reason [[Nissan]] has a few articles is because they are involved in the production of the show, and because they are [[Portal:vehicles\|vehicles]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:09, 24 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Pinkkeith: /* Hmm.. */

2007-11-23T16:04:34Z

Hmm..

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:04, 23 November 2007
Line 57:		Line 57:

	I find it [[irony\|ironic]] that we have links to the websites for the companies plugged in the show. What's that old fake cartoon? "I'm a consumer whore!" "And how."--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 05:13, 31 October 2007 (EDT)		I find it [[irony\|ironic]] that we have links to the websites for the companies plugged in the show. What's that old fake cartoon? "I'm a consumer whore!" "And how."--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 05:13, 31 October 2007 (EDT)

			== Spliting this article ==
			I would like to see some of these items having their own articles. I think that if a product is shown/mentioned in more than one episode it ought to have its own article. For example, [[Nissan Versa]] has its own article. I think we could have one for [[Greyhound]] and [[iPod]]. We should also remove references to Nissan Versa in this article since it has a main article. We might also think of just having an article on Nissan in general. --[[User:Pinkkeith\|Pinkkeith]] 11:04, 23 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Baldbobbo: New section: Hmm..

2007-10-31T09:13:36Z

New section: Hmm..

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:13, 31 October 2007
Line 53:		Line 53:
	** As I noted, I think that it's ''conspicuous'' that Copy Kingdom is not a real-world company. I would have expected NBC to work out a deal with FedEx-Kinko's, OfficeMax, or some other company that provides document services. It stood out enough to me to rate a bullet under Trivia. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 18:05, 26 September 2007 (EDT)		** As I noted, I think that it's ''conspicuous'' that Copy Kingdom is not a real-world company. I would have expected NBC to work out a deal with FedEx-Kinko's, OfficeMax, or some other company that provides document services. It stood out enough to me to rate a bullet under Trivia. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 18:05, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
	*** I'm not really convinced that instances where the show '''hasn't''' plugged some company really need to be mentioned on a product placement page, but it doesn't seem like a big deal either way. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 18:10, 26 September 2007 (EDT))		*** I'm not really convinced that instances where the show '''hasn't''' plugged some company really need to be mentioned on a product placement page, but it doesn't seem like a big deal either way. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 18:10, 26 September 2007 (EDT))

			== Hmm.. ==

			I find it [[irony\|ironic]] that we have links to the websites for the companies plugged in the show. What's that old fake cartoon? "I'm a consumer whore!" "And how."--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 05:13, 31 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>Admin at 22:10, 26 September 2007

2007-09-26T22:10:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:10, 26 September 2007
Line 52:		Line 52:
	* If [[Copy Kingdom]] specifically isn't a real-life business, then why include it on this article? ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 17:55, 26 September 2007 (EDT))		* If [[Copy Kingdom]] specifically isn't a real-life business, then why include it on this article? ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 17:55, 26 September 2007 (EDT))
	** As I noted, I think that it's ''conspicuous'' that Copy Kingdom is not a real-world company. I would have expected NBC to work out a deal with FedEx-Kinko's, OfficeMax, or some other company that provides document services. It stood out enough to me to rate a bullet under Trivia. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 18:05, 26 September 2007 (EDT)		** As I noted, I think that it's ''conspicuous'' that Copy Kingdom is not a real-world company. I would have expected NBC to work out a deal with FedEx-Kinko's, OfficeMax, or some other company that provides document services. It stood out enough to me to rate a bullet under Trivia. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 18:05, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
			*** I'm not really convinced that instances where the show '''hasn't''' plugged some company really need to be mentioned on a product placement page, but it doesn't seem like a big deal either way. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 18:10, 26 September 2007 (EDT))

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:10, 26 September 2007
Line 52:		Line 52:
	* If [[Copy Kingdom]] specifically isn't a real-life business, then why include it on this article? ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 17:55, 26 September 2007 (EDT))		* If [[Copy Kingdom]] specifically isn't a real-life business, then why include it on this article? ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 17:55, 26 September 2007 (EDT))
	** As I noted, I think that it's ''conspicuous'' that Copy Kingdom is not a real-world company. I would have expected NBC to work out a deal with FedEx-Kinko's, OfficeMax, or some other company that provides document services. It stood out enough to me to rate a bullet under Trivia. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 18:05, 26 September 2007 (EDT)		** As I noted, I think that it's ''conspicuous'' that Copy Kingdom is not a real-world company. I would have expected NBC to work out a deal with FedEx-Kinko's, OfficeMax, or some other company that provides document services. It stood out enough to me to rate a bullet under Trivia. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 18:05, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
			*** I'm not really convinced that instances where the show '''hasn't''' plugged some company really need to be mentioned on a product placement page, but it doesn't seem like a big deal either way. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 18:10, 26 September 2007 (EDT))