Talk:Roxana Castillo - Revision history

imported>Heroe at 01:14, 31 March 2007

2007-03-31T01:14:22Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:14, 31 March 2007
(No difference)

imported>Heroe at 01:14, 31 March 2007

2007-03-31T01:14:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:14, 31 March 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::::::I think there was a discussion thread on another article where someone marked an article for deletion, but it was taken off because a) there's plenty of server space, b) we don't know how the plot will unfold in the future, and c) the articles are there solely for information. Unless the page has something that is completely unrelated to the show, I don't see the need to delete any pages. This is an informational site, and this has information. Granted, it's not that pertinent to the plot, but we have a page for waffles for crying out loud.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Baldbobbo]] 14:21, 25 February 2007 (EST)		::::::I think there was a discussion thread on another article where someone marked an article for deletion, but it was taken off because a) there's plenty of server space, b) we don't know how the plot will unfold in the future, and c) the articles are there solely for information. Unless the page has something that is completely unrelated to the show, I don't see the need to delete any pages. This is an informational site, and this has information. Granted, it's not that pertinent to the plot, but we have a page for waffles for crying out loud.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Baldbobbo]] 14:21, 25 February 2007 (EST)
	:Kill it. --{{User:ohmyn0/sig}} 00:14, 11 March 2007 (EST)		:Kill it. --{{User:ohmyn0/sig}} 00:14, 11 March 2007 (EST)
			::::::: How has this article managed to stay this long? Please, get rid of it. [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe\|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]]</small> 21:14, 30 March 2007 (EDT)

imported>Ohmyn0 at 05:14, 11 March 2007

2007-03-11T05:14:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:14, 11 March 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
			==Deletion==
	As I doubt we'll ever see or hear of Roxana again, I have say this does seem to be a pretty superfluous article. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 16:02, 30 January 2007 (EST)		As I doubt we'll ever see or hear of Roxana again, I have say this does seem to be a pretty superfluous article. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 16:02, 30 January 2007 (EST)
	:Agree, no need for it. No harm in having it though, but superfluous. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 16:05, 30 January 2007 (EST)		:Agree, no need for it. No harm in having it though, but superfluous. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 16:05, 30 January 2007 (EST)
Line 6:		Line 7:
	:::::Kill it. [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 10:20, 25 February 2007 (EST)		:::::Kill it. [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 10:20, 25 February 2007 (EST)
	::::::I think there was a discussion thread on another article where someone marked an article for deletion, but it was taken off because a) there's plenty of server space, b) we don't know how the plot will unfold in the future, and c) the articles are there solely for information. Unless the page has something that is completely unrelated to the show, I don't see the need to delete any pages. This is an informational site, and this has information. Granted, it's not that pertinent to the plot, but we have a page for waffles for crying out loud.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Baldbobbo]] 14:21, 25 February 2007 (EST)		::::::I think there was a discussion thread on another article where someone marked an article for deletion, but it was taken off because a) there's plenty of server space, b) we don't know how the plot will unfold in the future, and c) the articles are there solely for information. Unless the page has something that is completely unrelated to the show, I don't see the need to delete any pages. This is an informational site, and this has information. Granted, it's not that pertinent to the plot, but we have a page for waffles for crying out loud.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Baldbobbo]] 14:21, 25 February 2007 (EST)
			:Kill it. --{{User:ohmyn0/sig}} 00:14, 11 March 2007 (EST)

imported>Baldbobbo at 19:21, 25 February 2007

2007-02-25T19:21:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:21, 25 February 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::::I agree, it's good info (and we have less important trivia throughout the site as well). However, I'm still not sure it merits its own article. The name can be found just as prominently on the screencap of the article as well as on the ''[[Odessa Register]]'' article. I'm just not seeing how Roxana Castillo is more deserving of an article than some of our [[evolved humans]]. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 13:39, 3 February 2007 (EST)		::::I agree, it's good info (and we have less important trivia throughout the site as well). However, I'm still not sure it merits its own article. The name can be found just as prominently on the screencap of the article as well as on the ''[[Odessa Register]]'' article. I'm just not seeing how Roxana Castillo is more deserving of an article than some of our [[evolved humans]]. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 13:39, 3 February 2007 (EST)
	:::::Kill it. [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 10:20, 25 February 2007 (EST)		:::::Kill it. [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 10:20, 25 February 2007 (EST)
			::::::I think there was a discussion thread on another article where someone marked an article for deletion, but it was taken off because a) there's plenty of server space, b) we don't know how the plot will unfold in the future, and c) the articles are there solely for information. Unless the page has something that is completely unrelated to the show, I don't see the need to delete any pages. This is an informational site, and this has information. Granted, it's not that pertinent to the plot, but we have a page for waffles for crying out loud.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Baldbobbo]] 14:21, 25 February 2007 (EST)

imported>Heroe at 15:20, 25 February 2007

2007-02-25T15:20:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:20, 25 February 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::I like the fact this was here, because I didn't previously catch the name of the reporter for the article. That's very good worthless trivia kinda stuff and might even be useful to someone who's venturing into fanfic. Just arguing for the pro side of this article. It might prove more useful in the future if the name ever comes up again in the show. -- [[User:ZachsMind\|ZachsMind]] 08:51, 3 February 2007 (EST)		:::I like the fact this was here, because I didn't previously catch the name of the reporter for the article. That's very good worthless trivia kinda stuff and might even be useful to someone who's venturing into fanfic. Just arguing for the pro side of this article. It might prove more useful in the future if the name ever comes up again in the show. -- [[User:ZachsMind\|ZachsMind]] 08:51, 3 February 2007 (EST)
	::::I agree, it's good info (and we have less important trivia throughout the site as well). However, I'm still not sure it merits its own article. The name can be found just as prominently on the screencap of the article as well as on the ''[[Odessa Register]]'' article. I'm just not seeing how Roxana Castillo is more deserving of an article than some of our [[evolved humans]]. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 13:39, 3 February 2007 (EST)		::::I agree, it's good info (and we have less important trivia throughout the site as well). However, I'm still not sure it merits its own article. The name can be found just as prominently on the screencap of the article as well as on the ''[[Odessa Register]]'' article. I'm just not seeing how Roxana Castillo is more deserving of an article than some of our [[evolved humans]]. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 13:39, 3 February 2007 (EST)
			:::::Kill it. [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 10:20, 25 February 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 18:39, 3 February 2007

2007-02-03T18:39:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:39, 3 February 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Not to invoke the good old slippery slope, but we know less about her than some of the unlinked folks listed on [[The List]]...--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:30, 30 January 2007 (EST)		::Not to invoke the good old slippery slope, but we know less about her than some of the unlinked folks listed on [[The List]]...--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:30, 30 January 2007 (EST)
	:::I like the fact this was here, because I didn't previously catch the name of the reporter for the article. That's very good worthless trivia kinda stuff and might even be useful to someone who's venturing into fanfic. Just arguing for the pro side of this article. It might prove more useful in the future if the name ever comes up again in the show. -- [[User:ZachsMind\|ZachsMind]] 08:51, 3 February 2007 (EST)		:::I like the fact this was here, because I didn't previously catch the name of the reporter for the article. That's very good worthless trivia kinda stuff and might even be useful to someone who's venturing into fanfic. Just arguing for the pro side of this article. It might prove more useful in the future if the name ever comes up again in the show. -- [[User:ZachsMind\|ZachsMind]] 08:51, 3 February 2007 (EST)
			::::I agree, it's good info (and we have less important trivia throughout the site as well). However, I'm still not sure it merits its own article. The name can be found just as prominently on the screencap of the article as well as on the ''[[Odessa Register]]'' article. I'm just not seeing how Roxana Castillo is more deserving of an article than some of our [[evolved humans]]. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 13:39, 3 February 2007 (EST)

imported>ZachsMind: pro side

2007-02-03T13:51:41Z

pro side

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:51, 3 February 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Agree, no need for it. No harm in having it though, but superfluous. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 16:05, 30 January 2007 (EST)		:Agree, no need for it. No harm in having it though, but superfluous. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 16:05, 30 January 2007 (EST)
	::Not to invoke the good old slippery slope, but we know less about her than some of the unlinked folks listed on [[The List]]...--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:30, 30 January 2007 (EST)		::Not to invoke the good old slippery slope, but we know less about her than some of the unlinked folks listed on [[The List]]...--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:30, 30 January 2007 (EST)
			:::I like the fact this was here, because I didn't previously catch the name of the reporter for the article. That's very good worthless trivia kinda stuff and might even be useful to someone who's venturing into fanfic. Just arguing for the pro side of this article. It might prove more useful in the future if the name ever comes up again in the show. -- [[User:ZachsMind\|ZachsMind]] 08:51, 3 February 2007 (EST)

imported>Hardvice at 21:30, 30 January 2007

2007-01-30T21:30:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:30, 30 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	As I doubt we'll ever see or hear of Roxana again, I have say this does seem to be a pretty superfluous article. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 16:02, 30 January 2007 (EST)		As I doubt we'll ever see or hear of Roxana again, I have say this does seem to be a pretty superfluous article. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 16:02, 30 January 2007 (EST)
	:Agree, no need for it. No harm in having it though, but superfluous. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 16:05, 30 January 2007 (EST)		:Agree, no need for it. No harm in having it though, but superfluous. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 16:05, 30 January 2007 (EST)
			::Not to invoke the good old slippery slope, but we know less about her than some of the unlinked folks listed on [[The List]]...--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:30, 30 January 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 21:05, 30 January 2007

2007-01-30T21:05:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:05, 30 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	As I doubt we'll ever see or hear of Roxana again, I have say this does seem to be a pretty superfluous article. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 16:02, 30 January 2007 (EST)		As I doubt we'll ever see or hear of Roxana again, I have say this does seem to be a pretty superfluous article. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 16:02, 30 January 2007 (EST)
			:Agree, no need for it. No harm in having it though, but superfluous. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 16:05, 30 January 2007 (EST)

imported>Ted C: New page: As I doubt we'll ever see or hear of Roxana again, I have say this does seem to be a pretty superfluous article. --~~~~

2007-01-30T21:02:50Z

New page: As I doubt we'll ever see or hear of Roxana again, I have say this does seem to be a pretty superfluous article. --~~~~

New page

As I doubt we'll ever see or hear of Roxana again, I have say this does seem to be a pretty superfluous article. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 16:02, 30 January 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:21, 25 February 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::::I agree, it's good info (and we have less important trivia throughout the site as well). However, I'm still not sure it merits its own article. The name can be found just as prominently on the screencap of the article as well as on the ''[[Odessa Register]]'' article. I'm just not seeing how Roxana Castillo is more deserving of an article than some of our [[evolved humans]]. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 13:39, 3 February 2007 (EST)		::::I agree, it's good info (and we have less important trivia throughout the site as well). However, I'm still not sure it merits its own article. The name can be found just as prominently on the screencap of the article as well as on the ''[[Odessa Register]]'' article. I'm just not seeing how Roxana Castillo is more deserving of an article than some of our [[evolved humans]]. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 13:39, 3 February 2007 (EST)
	:::::Kill it. [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 10:20, 25 February 2007 (EST)		:::::Kill it. [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 10:20, 25 February 2007 (EST)
			::::::I think there was a discussion thread on another article where someone marked an article for deletion, but it was taken off because a) there's plenty of server space, b) we don't know how the plot will unfold in the future, and c) the articles are there solely for information. Unless the page has something that is completely unrelated to the show, I don't see the need to delete any pages. This is an informational site, and this has information. Granted, it's not that pertinent to the plot, but we have a page for waffles for crying out loud.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Baldbobbo]] 14:21, 25 February 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:20, 25 February 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::I like the fact this was here, because I didn't previously catch the name of the reporter for the article. That's very good worthless trivia kinda stuff and might even be useful to someone who's venturing into fanfic. Just arguing for the pro side of this article. It might prove more useful in the future if the name ever comes up again in the show. -- [[User:ZachsMind\|ZachsMind]] 08:51, 3 February 2007 (EST)		:::I like the fact this was here, because I didn't previously catch the name of the reporter for the article. That's very good worthless trivia kinda stuff and might even be useful to someone who's venturing into fanfic. Just arguing for the pro side of this article. It might prove more useful in the future if the name ever comes up again in the show. -- [[User:ZachsMind\|ZachsMind]] 08:51, 3 February 2007 (EST)
	::::I agree, it's good info (and we have less important trivia throughout the site as well). However, I'm still not sure it merits its own article. The name can be found just as prominently on the screencap of the article as well as on the ''[[Odessa Register]]'' article. I'm just not seeing how Roxana Castillo is more deserving of an article than some of our [[evolved humans]]. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 13:39, 3 February 2007 (EST)		::::I agree, it's good info (and we have less important trivia throughout the site as well). However, I'm still not sure it merits its own article. The name can be found just as prominently on the screencap of the article as well as on the ''[[Odessa Register]]'' article. I'm just not seeing how Roxana Castillo is more deserving of an article than some of our [[evolved humans]]. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 13:39, 3 February 2007 (EST)
			:::::Kill it. [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 10:20, 25 February 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:39, 3 February 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Not to invoke the good old slippery slope, but we know less about her than some of the unlinked folks listed on [[The List]]...--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:30, 30 January 2007 (EST)		::Not to invoke the good old slippery slope, but we know less about her than some of the unlinked folks listed on [[The List]]...--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:30, 30 January 2007 (EST)
	:::I like the fact this was here, because I didn't previously catch the name of the reporter for the article. That's very good worthless trivia kinda stuff and might even be useful to someone who's venturing into fanfic. Just arguing for the pro side of this article. It might prove more useful in the future if the name ever comes up again in the show. -- [[User:ZachsMind\|ZachsMind]] 08:51, 3 February 2007 (EST)		:::I like the fact this was here, because I didn't previously catch the name of the reporter for the article. That's very good worthless trivia kinda stuff and might even be useful to someone who's venturing into fanfic. Just arguing for the pro side of this article. It might prove more useful in the future if the name ever comes up again in the show. -- [[User:ZachsMind\|ZachsMind]] 08:51, 3 February 2007 (EST)
			::::I agree, it's good info (and we have less important trivia throughout the site as well). However, I'm still not sure it merits its own article. The name can be found just as prominently on the screencap of the article as well as on the ''[[Odessa Register]]'' article. I'm just not seeing how Roxana Castillo is more deserving of an article than some of our [[evolved humans]]. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 13:39, 3 February 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:51, 3 February 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Agree, no need for it. No harm in having it though, but superfluous. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 16:05, 30 January 2007 (EST)		:Agree, no need for it. No harm in having it though, but superfluous. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 16:05, 30 January 2007 (EST)
	::Not to invoke the good old slippery slope, but we know less about her than some of the unlinked folks listed on [[The List]]...--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:30, 30 January 2007 (EST)		::Not to invoke the good old slippery slope, but we know less about her than some of the unlinked folks listed on [[The List]]...--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:30, 30 January 2007 (EST)
			:::I like the fact this was here, because I didn't previously catch the name of the reporter for the article. That's very good worthless trivia kinda stuff and might even be useful to someone who's venturing into fanfic. Just arguing for the pro side of this article. It might prove more useful in the future if the name ever comes up again in the show. -- [[User:ZachsMind\|ZachsMind]] 08:51, 3 February 2007 (EST)