Talk:Ryan Odagawa - Revision history

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Rename External Links... */ +sig

2007-08-07T05:11:41Z

Rename External Links...: +sig

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:11, 7 August 2007
(No difference)

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Rename External Links... */ +sig

2007-08-07T05:11:41Z

Rename External Links...: +sig

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:11, 7 August 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:
	****** Looks like your opinion is that its odder to have special header names than to have slightly incorrect ones. It's not that important to me, but it seems a little twisted. Can we still take option (b) and just delete the link(s)?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:47, 7 August 2007 (EDT)		****** Looks like your opinion is that its odder to have special header names than to have slightly incorrect ones. It's not that important to me, but it seems a little twisted. Can we still take option (b) and just delete the link(s)?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:47, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
	******* The use of "External Links" is standard across the wiki. He's saying, and I agree, that changing the name for only a few articles thereby making those articles non-standard is worse than just referring to a Heroes Wiki interview as an external link. I think this is a case of making a mountain out of a molehill. I don't see anything particularly bad about the interviews going in the External Links where they will be located amongst other interview links. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:56, 7 August 2007 (EDT))		******* The use of "External Links" is standard across the wiki. He's saying, and I agree, that changing the name for only a few articles thereby making those articles non-standard is worse than just referring to a Heroes Wiki interview as an external link. I think this is a case of making a mountain out of a molehill. I don't see anything particularly bad about the interviews going in the External Links where they will be located amongst other interview links. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:56, 7 August 2007 (EDT))
	******** Thanks to both of you for explaining. I'll just note that there may be cases were there are no other interviews for the article, and where the other external links like Myspace or fan sites are included. Are we to take those on a case-by-case basis?		******** Thanks to both of you for explaining. I'll just note that there may be cases were there are no other interviews for the article, and where the other external links like Myspace or fan sites are included. Are we to take those on a case-by-case basis?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:11, 7 August 2007 (EDT)

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Rename External Links... */ So we're set with this or will it be case-by-case?

2007-08-07T05:11:22Z

Rename External Links...: So we're set with this or will it be case-by-case?

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:11, 7 August 2007
Line 19:		Line 19:
	*****If we only renamed four articles' headings, then we'd have four articles with nonstandard headings, which seems odd just so we can include a link to an interview which just happens to be hosted on Heroes Wiki, and not some other site. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:31, 7 August 2007 (EDT)		*****If we only renamed four articles' headings, then we'd have four articles with nonstandard headings, which seems odd just so we can include a link to an interview which just happens to be hosted on Heroes Wiki, and not some other site. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:31, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
	****** Looks like your opinion is that its odder to have special header names than to have slightly incorrect ones. It's not that important to me, but it seems a little twisted. Can we still take option (b) and just delete the link(s)?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:47, 7 August 2007 (EDT)		****** Looks like your opinion is that its odder to have special header names than to have slightly incorrect ones. It's not that important to me, but it seems a little twisted. Can we still take option (b) and just delete the link(s)?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:47, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
	******* The use of "External Links" is standard across the wiki. He's saying, and I agree, that changing the name for only a few articles thereby making those articles non-standard is worse than just referring to a Heroes Wiki interview as an external link. I think this is a case of making a mountain out of a molehill. I don't see anything particularly bad about the interviews going in the External Links where they will be located amongst other interview links. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:56, 7 August 2007 (EDT))		******* The use of "External Links" is standard across the wiki. He's saying, and I agree, that changing the name for only a few articles thereby making those articles non-standard is worse than just referring to a Heroes Wiki interview as an external link. I think this is a case of making a mountain out of a molehill. I don't see anything particularly bad about the interviews going in the External Links where they will be located amongst other interview links. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:56, 7 August 2007 (EDT))
			******** Thanks to both of you for explaining. I'll just note that there may be cases were there are no other interviews for the article, and where the other external links like Myspace or fan sites are included. Are we to take those on a case-by-case basis?

imported>Admin: /* Rename External Links... */

2007-08-07T04:56:37Z

Rename External Links...

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:56, 7 August 2007
Line 19:		Line 19:
	*****If we only renamed four articles' headings, then we'd have four articles with nonstandard headings, which seems odd just so we can include a link to an interview which just happens to be hosted on Heroes Wiki, and not some other site. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:31, 7 August 2007 (EDT)		*****If we only renamed four articles' headings, then we'd have four articles with nonstandard headings, which seems odd just so we can include a link to an interview which just happens to be hosted on Heroes Wiki, and not some other site. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:31, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
	****** Looks like your opinion is that its odder to have special header names than to have slightly incorrect ones. It's not that important to me, but it seems a little twisted. Can we still take option (b) and just delete the link(s)?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:47, 7 August 2007 (EDT)		****** Looks like your opinion is that its odder to have special header names than to have slightly incorrect ones. It's not that important to me, but it seems a little twisted. Can we still take option (b) and just delete the link(s)?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:47, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
			******* The use of "External Links" is standard across the wiki. He's saying, and I agree, that changing the name for only a few articles thereby making those articles non-standard is worse than just referring to a Heroes Wiki interview as an external link. I think this is a case of making a mountain out of a molehill. I don't see anything particularly bad about the interviews going in the External Links where they will be located amongst other interview links. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:56, 7 August 2007 (EDT))

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Rename External Links... */ But the interview is hosted on our site. Huh.

2007-08-07T04:47:48Z

Rename External Links...: But the interview is hosted on our site. Huh.

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:47, 7 August 2007
Line 18:		Line 18:
	**** There's only like four Heroes Wiki interviews, so we'd only have to rename the section header on those four articles, right? I'm not seeing the lot of work...--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:26, 7 August 2007 (EDT)		**** There's only like four Heroes Wiki interviews, so we'd only have to rename the section header on those four articles, right? I'm not seeing the lot of work...--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:26, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
	*****If we only renamed four articles' headings, then we'd have four articles with nonstandard headings, which seems odd just so we can include a link to an interview which just happens to be hosted on Heroes Wiki, and not some other site. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:31, 7 August 2007 (EDT)		*****If we only renamed four articles' headings, then we'd have four articles with nonstandard headings, which seems odd just so we can include a link to an interview which just happens to be hosted on Heroes Wiki, and not some other site. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:31, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
			****** Looks like your opinion is that its odder to have special header names than to have slightly incorrect ones. It's not that important to me, but it seems a little twisted. Can we still take option (b) and just delete the link(s)?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:47, 7 August 2007 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Rename External Links... */

2007-08-07T04:31:18Z

Rename External Links...

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:31, 7 August 2007
Line 17:		Line 17:
	*** Well, I agree that it isn't an external link exactly since it's to an article within the wiki and therefore usually it would go in the Notes or Trivia section probably. However since a majority if interviews are indeed on external sites, I think it makes more sense to bend the rules so to speak and include the Heroes Wiki interview in with the other interviews. If anything "External Links" could be renamed to "Links" perhaps, but that's a lot of work without much actual gain. I think calling it an "external link" isn't too bad. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:21, 7 August 2007 (EDT))		*** Well, I agree that it isn't an external link exactly since it's to an article within the wiki and therefore usually it would go in the Notes or Trivia section probably. However since a majority if interviews are indeed on external sites, I think it makes more sense to bend the rules so to speak and include the Heroes Wiki interview in with the other interviews. If anything "External Links" could be renamed to "Links" perhaps, but that's a lot of work without much actual gain. I think calling it an "external link" isn't too bad. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:21, 7 August 2007 (EDT))
	**** There's only like four Heroes Wiki interviews, so we'd only have to rename the section header on those four articles, right? I'm not seeing the lot of work...--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:26, 7 August 2007 (EDT)		**** There's only like four Heroes Wiki interviews, so we'd only have to rename the section header on those four articles, right? I'm not seeing the lot of work...--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:26, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
			*****If we only renamed four articles' headings, then we'd have four articles with nonstandard headings, which seems odd just so we can include a link to an interview which just happens to be hosted on Heroes Wiki, and not some other site. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:31, 7 August 2007 (EDT)

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Rename External Links... */ Are there more than 4 articles to change? Or am I missing something?

2007-08-07T04:26:48Z

Rename External Links...: Are there more than 4 articles to change? Or am I missing something?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:26, 7 August 2007
Line 16:		Line 16:
	***** An interview is an interview. I'd disagree that it's necessarily any more special (though it's definitely well done :) ); I think it makes sense to organize them with the other interviews. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:21, 7 August 2007 (EDT))		***** An interview is an interview. I'd disagree that it's necessarily any more special (though it's definitely well done :) ); I think it makes sense to organize them with the other interviews. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:21, 7 August 2007 (EDT))
	*** Well, I agree that it isn't an external link exactly since it's to an article within the wiki and therefore usually it would go in the Notes or Trivia section probably. However since a majority if interviews are indeed on external sites, I think it makes more sense to bend the rules so to speak and include the Heroes Wiki interview in with the other interviews. If anything "External Links" could be renamed to "Links" perhaps, but that's a lot of work without much actual gain. I think calling it an "external link" isn't too bad. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:21, 7 August 2007 (EDT))		*** Well, I agree that it isn't an external link exactly since it's to an article within the wiki and therefore usually it would go in the Notes or Trivia section probably. However since a majority if interviews are indeed on external sites, I think it makes more sense to bend the rules so to speak and include the Heroes Wiki interview in with the other interviews. If anything "External Links" could be renamed to "Links" perhaps, but that's a lot of work without much actual gain. I think calling it an "external link" isn't too bad. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:21, 7 August 2007 (EDT))
			**** There's only like four Heroes Wiki interviews, so we'd only have to rename the section header on those four articles, right? I'm not seeing the lot of work...--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:26, 7 August 2007 (EDT)

imported>Admin: /* Rename External Links... */

2007-08-07T04:21:50Z

Rename External Links...

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:21, 7 August 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:
	**** We have a primary website, why not a primary interview? I guess I don't get it, cause to me the fact that it was done by a heroeswiki user makes it more important.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:13, 7 August 2007 (EDT)		**** We have a primary website, why not a primary interview? I guess I don't get it, cause to me the fact that it was done by a heroeswiki user makes it more important.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:13, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
	***** An interview is an interview. I'd disagree that it's necessarily any more special (though it's definitely well done :) ); I think it makes sense to organize them with the other interviews. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:21, 7 August 2007 (EDT))		***** An interview is an interview. I'd disagree that it's necessarily any more special (though it's definitely well done :) ); I think it makes sense to organize them with the other interviews. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:21, 7 August 2007 (EDT))
	*** Well, I agree that it isn't an external link and therefore usually it would go in the Notes or Trivia section probably. However since a majority if interviews are indeed on external sites, I think it makes more sense to bend the rules so to speak and include the Heroes Wiki interview in with the other interviews. If anything "External Links" could be renamed to "Links" perhaps, but that's a lot of work without much actual gain. I think calling it an "external link" isn't too bad. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:21, 7 August 2007 (EDT))		*** Well, I agree that it isn't an external link exactly since it's to an article within the wiki and therefore usually it would go in the Notes or Trivia section probably. However since a majority if interviews are indeed on external sites, I think it makes more sense to bend the rules so to speak and include the Heroes Wiki interview in with the other interviews. If anything "External Links" could be renamed to "Links" perhaps, but that's a lot of work without much actual gain. I think calling it an "external link" isn't too bad. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:21, 7 August 2007 (EDT))

imported>Admin at 04:21, 7 August 2007

2007-08-07T04:21:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:21, 7 August 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:
	*** That somehow implies a greater importance to the interview than it actually is. It's just an interview and should be included with other interviews. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:06, 7 August 2007 (EDT)		*** That somehow implies a greater importance to the interview than it actually is. It's just an interview and should be included with other interviews. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:06, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
	**** We have a primary website, why not a primary interview? I guess I don't get it, cause to me the fact that it was done by a heroeswiki user makes it more important.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:13, 7 August 2007 (EDT)		**** We have a primary website, why not a primary interview? I guess I don't get it, cause to me the fact that it was done by a heroeswiki user makes it more important.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:13, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
			***** An interview is an interview. I'd disagree that it's necessarily any more special (though it's definitely well done :) ); I think it makes sense to organize them with the other interviews. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:21, 7 August 2007 (EDT))
			*** Well, I agree that it isn't an external link and therefore usually it would go in the Notes or Trivia section probably. However since a majority if interviews are indeed on external sites, I think it makes more sense to bend the rules so to speak and include the Heroes Wiki interview in with the other interviews. If anything "External Links" could be renamed to "Links" perhaps, but that's a lot of work without much actual gain. I think calling it an "external link" isn't too bad. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:21, 7 August 2007 (EDT))

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Rename External Links... */ I don't get it, I guess

2007-08-07T04:13:23Z

Rename External Links...: I don't get it, I guess

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:13, 7 August 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:
	** This is bigger than just this one interview. As we will probably do a multitude more interviews over the history of the show, how about we put this in the infobox?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:53, 6 August 2007 (EDT)		** This is bigger than just this one interview. As we will probably do a multitude more interviews over the history of the show, how about we put this in the infobox?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:53, 6 August 2007 (EDT)
	*** That somehow implies a greater importance to the interview than it actually is. It's just an interview and should be included with other interviews. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:06, 7 August 2007 (EDT)		*** That somehow implies a greater importance to the interview than it actually is. It's just an interview and should be included with other interviews. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:06, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
			**** We have a primary website, why not a primary interview? I guess I don't get it, cause to me the fact that it was done by a heroeswiki user makes it more important.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:13, 7 August 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:26, 7 August 2007
Line 16:		Line 16:
	***** An interview is an interview. I'd disagree that it's necessarily any more special (though it's definitely well done :) ); I think it makes sense to organize them with the other interviews. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:21, 7 August 2007 (EDT))		***** An interview is an interview. I'd disagree that it's necessarily any more special (though it's definitely well done :) ); I think it makes sense to organize them with the other interviews. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:21, 7 August 2007 (EDT))
	*** Well, I agree that it isn't an external link exactly since it's to an article within the wiki and therefore usually it would go in the Notes or Trivia section probably. However since a majority if interviews are indeed on external sites, I think it makes more sense to bend the rules so to speak and include the Heroes Wiki interview in with the other interviews. If anything "External Links" could be renamed to "Links" perhaps, but that's a lot of work without much actual gain. I think calling it an "external link" isn't too bad. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:21, 7 August 2007 (EDT))		*** Well, I agree that it isn't an external link exactly since it's to an article within the wiki and therefore usually it would go in the Notes or Trivia section probably. However since a majority if interviews are indeed on external sites, I think it makes more sense to bend the rules so to speak and include the Heroes Wiki interview in with the other interviews. If anything "External Links" could be renamed to "Links" perhaps, but that's a lot of work without much actual gain. I think calling it an "external link" isn't too bad. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:21, 7 August 2007 (EDT))
			**** There's only like four Heroes Wiki interviews, so we'd only have to rename the section header on those four articles, right? I'm not seeing the lot of work...--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:26, 7 August 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:21, 7 August 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:
	**** We have a primary website, why not a primary interview? I guess I don't get it, cause to me the fact that it was done by a heroeswiki user makes it more important.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:13, 7 August 2007 (EDT)		**** We have a primary website, why not a primary interview? I guess I don't get it, cause to me the fact that it was done by a heroeswiki user makes it more important.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:13, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
	***** An interview is an interview. I'd disagree that it's necessarily any more special (though it's definitely well done :) ); I think it makes sense to organize them with the other interviews. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:21, 7 August 2007 (EDT))		***** An interview is an interview. I'd disagree that it's necessarily any more special (though it's definitely well done :) ); I think it makes sense to organize them with the other interviews. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:21, 7 August 2007 (EDT))
	*** Well, I agree that it isn't an external link and therefore usually it would go in the Notes or Trivia section probably. However since a majority if interviews are indeed on external sites, I think it makes more sense to bend the rules so to speak and include the Heroes Wiki interview in with the other interviews. If anything "External Links" could be renamed to "Links" perhaps, but that's a lot of work without much actual gain. I think calling it an "external link" isn't too bad. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:21, 7 August 2007 (EDT))		*** Well, I agree that it isn't an external link exactly since it's to an article within the wiki and therefore usually it would go in the Notes or Trivia section probably. However since a majority if interviews are indeed on external sites, I think it makes more sense to bend the rules so to speak and include the Heroes Wiki interview in with the other interviews. If anything "External Links" could be renamed to "Links" perhaps, but that's a lot of work without much actual gain. I think calling it an "external link" isn't too bad. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:21, 7 August 2007 (EDT))