Talk:Size alteration - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Potential merge */

2015-09-14T19:49:13Z

Potential merge

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:49, 14 September 2015
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Potential merge */

2015-09-14T19:49:13Z

Potential merge

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:49, 14 September 2015
Line 17:		Line 17:
	** Sounds good to me. Anyone else want to weigh in? -[[User:Kon\|Kon]] ([[User talk:Kon\|talk]]) 00:59, 11 September 2015 (EDT)		** Sounds good to me. Anyone else want to weigh in? -[[User:Kon\|Kon]] ([[User talk:Kon\|talk]]) 00:59, 11 September 2015 (EDT)
	*** As far as I can tell "mass manipulation" covers everything "size alteration" does, while the opposite might not be true. Merging is acceptable. -[[User:Level\|Lөv]][[User talk:Level\|ө]][[Special:Contributions/Level\|l]] 02:46, 14 September 2015 (EDT)		*** As far as I can tell "mass manipulation" covers everything "size alteration" does, while the opposite might not be true. Merging is acceptable. -[[User:Level\|Lөv]][[User talk:Level\|ө]][[Special:Contributions/Level\|l]] 02:46, 14 September 2015 (EDT)
			**** I'll take care of it. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:49, 14 September 2015 (EDT)

imported>Level: /* Potential merge */ acceptable

2015-09-14T06:46:25Z

Potential merge: acceptable

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:46, 14 September 2015
Line 16:		Line 16:
	* I would be fine combining the two abilities, as long as the power page is called "mass manipulation" (since the graphic novels are higher in the [[canon]] hierarchy than [[Heroes: Survival]]), and that everything about [[Eric Lee Harrison]] remains calling his ability "size alteration". Anybody opposed? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:02, 30 August 2015 (EDT)		* I would be fine combining the two abilities, as long as the power page is called "mass manipulation" (since the graphic novels are higher in the [[canon]] hierarchy than [[Heroes: Survival]]), and that everything about [[Eric Lee Harrison]] remains calling his ability "size alteration". Anybody opposed? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:02, 30 August 2015 (EDT)
	** Sounds good to me. Anyone else want to weigh in? -[[User:Kon\|Kon]] ([[User talk:Kon\|talk]]) 00:59, 11 September 2015 (EDT)		** Sounds good to me. Anyone else want to weigh in? -[[User:Kon\|Kon]] ([[User talk:Kon\|talk]]) 00:59, 11 September 2015 (EDT)
			*** As far as I can tell "mass manipulation" covers everything "size alteration" does, while the opposite might not be true. Merging is acceptable. -[[User:Level\|Lөv]][[User talk:Level\|ө]][[Special:Contributions/Level\|l]] 02:46, 14 September 2015 (EDT)

imported>Kon: /* Potential merge */

2015-09-11T04:59:48Z

Potential merge

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:59, 11 September 2015
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Sorry to bring up an old argument, but the discussion about whether or not this ability is the same as [[mass manipulation]] was never resolved. Reading through the GNs, the wiki pages and the talk pages, I can find no difference between the two powers at all. The only reason that the two pages are separate that I can see is because the power has two different names ("mass manipulation" and "size alteration"). The Company has been known to give abilities names that differ from their "real" names (for example, [[Chris Coolidge]]'s enhanced synesthesia is referred to as "[[empathic manipulation]]" in his assignment tracker profile), so the pages shouldn't really be separate for that reason, I think. Another reason it was decided to keep them separate at the time was to wait and see if either [[Sylvia]] or [[Eric Lee Harrison\|ELH]] were to demonstrate their powers again in a future iStory or GN, but seeing as five years have passed without another instalment of either, I don't see the ''Heroes Reborn'' writers going back to those storylines now. -[[User:Kon\|Kon]] ([[User talk:Kon\|talk]]) 04:12, 30 August 2015 (EDT)		Sorry to bring up an old argument, but the discussion about whether or not this ability is the same as [[mass manipulation]] was never resolved. Reading through the GNs, the wiki pages and the talk pages, I can find no difference between the two powers at all. The only reason that the two pages are separate that I can see is because the power has two different names ("mass manipulation" and "size alteration"). The Company has been known to give abilities names that differ from their "real" names (for example, [[Chris Coolidge]]'s enhanced synesthesia is referred to as "[[empathic manipulation]]" in his assignment tracker profile), so the pages shouldn't really be separate for that reason, I think. Another reason it was decided to keep them separate at the time was to wait and see if either [[Sylvia]] or [[Eric Lee Harrison\|ELH]] were to demonstrate their powers again in a future iStory or GN, but seeing as five years have passed without another instalment of either, I don't see the ''Heroes Reborn'' writers going back to those storylines now. -[[User:Kon\|Kon]] ([[User talk:Kon\|talk]]) 04:12, 30 August 2015 (EDT)
	* I would be fine combining the two abilities, as long as the power page is called "mass manipulation" (since the graphic novels are higher in the [[canon]] hierarchy than [[Heroes: Survival]]), and that everything about [[Eric Lee Harrison]] remains calling his ability "size alteration". Anybody opposed? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:02, 30 August 2015 (EDT)		* I would be fine combining the two abilities, as long as the power page is called "mass manipulation" (since the graphic novels are higher in the [[canon]] hierarchy than [[Heroes: Survival]]), and that everything about [[Eric Lee Harrison]] remains calling his ability "size alteration". Anybody opposed? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:02, 30 August 2015 (EDT)
			** Sounds good to me. Anyone else want to weigh in? -[[User:Kon\|Kon]] ([[User talk:Kon\|talk]]) 00:59, 11 September 2015 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Potential merge */

2015-08-30T19:02:18Z

Potential merge

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 30 August 2015
Line 14:		Line 14:
	== Potential merge ==		== Potential merge ==
	Sorry to bring up an old argument, but the discussion about whether or not this ability is the same as [[mass manipulation]] was never resolved. Reading through the GNs, the wiki pages and the talk pages, I can find no difference between the two powers at all. The only reason that the two pages are separate that I can see is because the power has two different names ("mass manipulation" and "size alteration"). The Company has been known to give abilities names that differ from their "real" names (for example, [[Chris Coolidge]]'s enhanced synesthesia is referred to as "[[empathic manipulation]]" in his assignment tracker profile), so the pages shouldn't really be separate for that reason, I think. Another reason it was decided to keep them separate at the time was to wait and see if either [[Sylvia]] or [[Eric Lee Harrison\|ELH]] were to demonstrate their powers again in a future iStory or GN, but seeing as five years have passed without another instalment of either, I don't see the ''Heroes Reborn'' writers going back to those storylines now. -[[User:Kon\|Kon]] ([[User talk:Kon\|talk]]) 04:12, 30 August 2015 (EDT)		Sorry to bring up an old argument, but the discussion about whether or not this ability is the same as [[mass manipulation]] was never resolved. Reading through the GNs, the wiki pages and the talk pages, I can find no difference between the two powers at all. The only reason that the two pages are separate that I can see is because the power has two different names ("mass manipulation" and "size alteration"). The Company has been known to give abilities names that differ from their "real" names (for example, [[Chris Coolidge]]'s enhanced synesthesia is referred to as "[[empathic manipulation]]" in his assignment tracker profile), so the pages shouldn't really be separate for that reason, I think. Another reason it was decided to keep them separate at the time was to wait and see if either [[Sylvia]] or [[Eric Lee Harrison\|ELH]] were to demonstrate their powers again in a future iStory or GN, but seeing as five years have passed without another instalment of either, I don't see the ''Heroes Reborn'' writers going back to those storylines now. -[[User:Kon\|Kon]] ([[User talk:Kon\|talk]]) 04:12, 30 August 2015 (EDT)
			* I would be fine combining the two abilities, as long as the power page is called "mass manipulation" (since the graphic novels are higher in the [[canon]] hierarchy than [[Heroes: Survival]]), and that everything about [[Eric Lee Harrison]] remains calling his ability "size alteration". Anybody opposed? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:02, 30 August 2015 (EDT)

imported>Kon at 08:12, 30 August 2015

2015-08-30T08:12:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:12, 30 August 2015
Line 11:		Line 11:
	**Could we possibly open the discussion to rename these terms to something like "Demonstrated" and "Not demonstrated"? If so, where would I do that at? I ask, because "Unconfirmed" makes it seem like they don't have the ability even though there are records from the company saying they do. I would think it would confuse anyone who visits the site. --[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 11:16, 2 December 2009 (EST)		**Could we possibly open the discussion to rename these terms to something like "Demonstrated" and "Not demonstrated"? If so, where would I do that at? I ask, because "Unconfirmed" makes it seem like they don't have the ability even though there are records from the company saying they do. I would think it would confuse anyone who visits the site. --[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 11:16, 2 December 2009 (EST)
	*** Virtually all of the "unconfirmed" abilities are ones that never appear in the show or GNs, but things from the original assignment tracker map, Chandra's journal, or random promotional lists. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 13:01, 2 December 2009 (EST)		*** Virtually all of the "unconfirmed" abilities are ones that never appear in the show or GNs, but things from the original assignment tracker map, Chandra's journal, or random promotional lists. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 13:01, 2 December 2009 (EST)

			== Potential merge ==
			Sorry to bring up an old argument, but the discussion about whether or not this ability is the same as [[mass manipulation]] was never resolved. Reading through the GNs, the wiki pages and the talk pages, I can find no difference between the two powers at all. The only reason that the two pages are separate that I can see is because the power has two different names ("mass manipulation" and "size alteration"). The Company has been known to give abilities names that differ from their "real" names (for example, [[Chris Coolidge]]'s enhanced synesthesia is referred to as "[[empathic manipulation]]" in his assignment tracker profile), so the pages shouldn't really be separate for that reason, I think. Another reason it was decided to keep them separate at the time was to wait and see if either [[Sylvia]] or [[Eric Lee Harrison\|ELH]] were to demonstrate their powers again in a future iStory or GN, but seeing as five years have passed without another instalment of either, I don't see the ''Heroes Reborn'' writers going back to those storylines now. -[[User:Kon\|Kon]] ([[User talk:Kon\|talk]]) 04:12, 30 August 2015 (EDT)

imported>Ricard Desi: /* Confirmed/Unconfirmed */

2009-12-02T18:01:22Z

Confirmed/Unconfirmed

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:01, 2 December 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	* Exactly.--[[User:Referos\|Referos]] 11:08, 2 December 2009 (EST)		* Exactly.--[[User:Referos\|Referos]] 11:08, 2 December 2009 (EST)
	**Could we possibly open the discussion to rename these terms to something like "Demonstrated" and "Not demonstrated"? If so, where would I do that at? I ask, because "Unconfirmed" makes it seem like they don't have the ability even though there are records from the company saying they do. I would think it would confuse anyone who visits the site. --[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 11:16, 2 December 2009 (EST)		**Could we possibly open the discussion to rename these terms to something like "Demonstrated" and "Not demonstrated"? If so, where would I do that at? I ask, because "Unconfirmed" makes it seem like they don't have the ability even though there are records from the company saying they do. I would think it would confuse anyone who visits the site. --[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 11:16, 2 December 2009 (EST)
			*** Virtually all of the "unconfirmed" abilities are ones that never appear in the show or GNs, but things from the original assignment tracker map, Chandra's journal, or random promotional lists. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 13:01, 2 December 2009 (EST)

imported>OutbackZack: /* Confirmed/Unconfirmed */

2009-12-02T16:17:23Z

Confirmed/Unconfirmed

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:17, 2 December 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Just to double check confirmed means it been demonstrated (read or seen) and unconfirmed means not demonstrated even if someone is listed by the company as to having it, correct?--[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 11:05, 2 December 2009 (EST)		Just to double check confirmed means it been demonstrated (read or seen) and unconfirmed means not demonstrated even if someone is listed by the company as to having it, correct?--[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 11:05, 2 December 2009 (EST)
	* Exactly.--[[User:Referos\|Referos]] 11:08, 2 December 2009 (EST)		* Exactly.--[[User:Referos\|Referos]] 11:08, 2 December 2009 (EST)
	**Could we possibly open the discussion to rename these terms to something like "Demonstrated" and "Not demonstrated"? If so, where would I do that at? I ask, because "Unconfirmed" makes it seem like ~~that~~ don't have the ability even though there are records from the company saying they do. I would think it would confuse anyone who visits the site. --[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 11:16, 2 December 2009 (EST)		**Could we possibly open the discussion to rename these terms to something like "Demonstrated" and "Not demonstrated"? If so, where would I do that at? I ask, because "Unconfirmed" makes it seem like they don't have the ability even though there are records from the company saying they do. I would think it would confuse anyone who visits the site. --[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 11:16, 2 December 2009 (EST)

imported>OutbackZack: /* Confirmed/Unconfirmed */

2009-12-02T16:16:45Z

Confirmed/Unconfirmed

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:16, 2 December 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Just to double check confirmed means it been demonstrated (read or seen) and unconfirmed means not demonstrated even if someone is listed by the company as to having it, correct?--[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 11:05, 2 December 2009 (EST)		Just to double check confirmed means it been demonstrated (read or seen) and unconfirmed means not demonstrated even if someone is listed by the company as to having it, correct?--[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 11:05, 2 December 2009 (EST)
	* Exactly.--[[User:Referos\|Referos]] 11:08, 2 December 2009 (EST)		* Exactly.--[[User:Referos\|Referos]] 11:08, 2 December 2009 (EST)
			**Could we possibly open the discussion to rename these terms to something like "Demonstrated" and "Not demonstrated"? If so, where would I do that at? I ask, because "Unconfirmed" makes it seem like that don't have the ability even though there are records from the company saying they do. I would think it would confuse anyone who visits the site. --[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 11:16, 2 December 2009 (EST)

imported>Referos: /* Confirmed/Unconfirmed */

2009-12-02T16:08:07Z

Confirmed/Unconfirmed

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:08, 2 December 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Just to double check confirmed means it been demonstrated (read or seen) and unconfirmed means not demonstrated even if someone is listed by the company as to having it, correct?--[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 11:05, 2 December 2009 (EST)		Just to double check confirmed means it been demonstrated (read or seen) and unconfirmed means not demonstrated even if someone is listed by the company as to having it, correct?--[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 11:05, 2 December 2009 (EST)
			* Exactly.--[[User:Referos\|Referos]] 11:08, 2 December 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:01, 2 December 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	* Exactly.--[[User:Referos\|Referos]] 11:08, 2 December 2009 (EST)		* Exactly.--[[User:Referos\|Referos]] 11:08, 2 December 2009 (EST)
	**Could we possibly open the discussion to rename these terms to something like "Demonstrated" and "Not demonstrated"? If so, where would I do that at? I ask, because "Unconfirmed" makes it seem like they don't have the ability even though there are records from the company saying they do. I would think it would confuse anyone who visits the site. --[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 11:16, 2 December 2009 (EST)		**Could we possibly open the discussion to rename these terms to something like "Demonstrated" and "Not demonstrated"? If so, where would I do that at? I ask, because "Unconfirmed" makes it seem like they don't have the ability even though there are records from the company saying they do. I would think it would confuse anyone who visits the site. --[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 11:16, 2 December 2009 (EST)
			*** Virtually all of the "unconfirmed" abilities are ones that never appear in the show or GNs, but things from the original assignment tracker map, Chandra's journal, or random promotional lists. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 13:01, 2 December 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:17, 2 December 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Just to double check confirmed means it been demonstrated (read or seen) and unconfirmed means not demonstrated even if someone is listed by the company as to having it, correct?--[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 11:05, 2 December 2009 (EST)		Just to double check confirmed means it been demonstrated (read or seen) and unconfirmed means not demonstrated even if someone is listed by the company as to having it, correct?--[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 11:05, 2 December 2009 (EST)
	* Exactly.--[[User:Referos\|Referos]] 11:08, 2 December 2009 (EST)		* Exactly.--[[User:Referos\|Referos]] 11:08, 2 December 2009 (EST)
	**Could we possibly open the discussion to rename these terms to something like "Demonstrated" and "Not demonstrated"? If so, where would I do that at? I ask, because "Unconfirmed" makes it seem like ~~that~~ don't have the ability even though there are records from the company saying they do. I would think it would confuse anyone who visits the site. --[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 11:16, 2 December 2009 (EST)		**Could we possibly open the discussion to rename these terms to something like "Demonstrated" and "Not demonstrated"? If so, where would I do that at? I ask, because "Unconfirmed" makes it seem like they don't have the ability even though there are records from the company saying they do. I would think it would confuse anyone who visits the site. --[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 11:16, 2 December 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:16, 2 December 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Just to double check confirmed means it been demonstrated (read or seen) and unconfirmed means not demonstrated even if someone is listed by the company as to having it, correct?--[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 11:05, 2 December 2009 (EST)		Just to double check confirmed means it been demonstrated (read or seen) and unconfirmed means not demonstrated even if someone is listed by the company as to having it, correct?--[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 11:05, 2 December 2009 (EST)
	* Exactly.--[[User:Referos\|Referos]] 11:08, 2 December 2009 (EST)		* Exactly.--[[User:Referos\|Referos]] 11:08, 2 December 2009 (EST)
			**Could we possibly open the discussion to rename these terms to something like "Demonstrated" and "Not demonstrated"? If so, where would I do that at? I ask, because "Unconfirmed" makes it seem like that don't have the ability even though there are records from the company saying they do. I would think it would confuse anyone who visits the site. --[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 11:16, 2 December 2009 (EST)