Talk:Special (theme) - Revision history

imported>Friskymuffin: /* Synonyms */

2008-05-29T20:35:43Z

Synonyms

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:35, 29 May 2008
(No difference)

imported>Friskymuffin: /* Synonyms */

2008-05-29T20:35:43Z

Synonyms

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:35, 29 May 2008
Line 25:		Line 25:
	Can we include terms like 'extraordinary' in this article as a synonym for special? Especially in the same context - e.g. Claire is told she is "not extraordinary". (<font color="red">[[User:Friskymuffin\|Friskymuffin]] - <small>([[User talk:Friskymuffin\|talk]])</small></font> 16:08, 29 May 2008 (EDT))		Can we include terms like 'extraordinary' in this article as a synonym for special? Especially in the same context - e.g. Claire is told she is "not extraordinary". (<font color="red">[[User:Friskymuffin\|Friskymuffin]] - <small>([[User talk:Friskymuffin\|talk]])</small></font> 16:08, 29 May 2008 (EDT))
	* When someone is NOT special/extraordinary shouldn't be referenced for sure. I'm okay with adding "extraordinary" references as being extraordinary is similar to being special. However, I think there's enough "special" references that we don't really need to do so.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:27, 29 May 2008 (EDT)		* When someone is NOT special/extraordinary shouldn't be referenced for sure. I'm okay with adding "extraordinary" references as being extraordinary is similar to being special. However, I think there's enough "special" references that we don't really need to do so.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:27, 29 May 2008 (EDT)
			** Fair enough... I've added something about Mohinder from The Line, but if you think its irrelevant then I don't mind it being erased. (<font color="red">[[User:Friskymuffin\|Friskymuffin]] - <small>([[User talk:Friskymuffin\|talk]])</small></font> 16:35, 29 May 2008 (EDT))

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Synonyms */

2008-05-29T20:27:50Z

Synonyms

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:27, 29 May 2008
Line 24:		Line 24:

	Can we include terms like 'extraordinary' in this article as a synonym for special? Especially in the same context - e.g. Claire is told she is "not extraordinary". (<font color="red">[[User:Friskymuffin\|Friskymuffin]] - <small>([[User talk:Friskymuffin\|talk]])</small></font> 16:08, 29 May 2008 (EDT))		Can we include terms like 'extraordinary' in this article as a synonym for special? Especially in the same context - e.g. Claire is told she is "not extraordinary". (<font color="red">[[User:Friskymuffin\|Friskymuffin]] - <small>([[User talk:Friskymuffin\|talk]])</small></font> 16:08, 29 May 2008 (EDT))
			* When someone is NOT special/extraordinary shouldn't be referenced for sure. I'm okay with adding "extraordinary" references as being extraordinary is similar to being special. However, I think there's enough "special" references that we don't really need to do so.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:27, 29 May 2008 (EDT)

imported>Friskymuffin: /* Synonyms */

2008-05-29T20:08:53Z

Synonyms

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:08, 29 May 2008
Line 23:		Line 23:
	== Synonyms ==		== Synonyms ==

	Can we include terms like 'extraordinary' in this article as a synonym for special? Especially in the same context - e.g. Claire is told she is "not extraordinary".		Can we include terms like 'extraordinary' in this article as a synonym for special? Especially in the same context - e.g. Claire is told she is "not extraordinary". (<font color="red">[[User:Friskymuffin\|Friskymuffin]] - <small>([[User talk:Friskymuffin\|talk]])</small></font> 16:08, 29 May 2008 (EDT))

imported>Friskymuffin: /* Synonyms */ new section

2008-05-29T20:08:38Z

Synonyms: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:08, 29 May 2008
Line 20:		Line 20:
	***Should this be moved then, or not? :)--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 11:05, 28 December 2007 (EST)		***Should this be moved then, or not? :)--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 11:05, 28 December 2007 (EST)
	**** I think it should be moved to the main mainspace, and that moving it to "Special (theme)" and adding see alsos to this article and "Graphic Novel:Special" makes the most sense.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 13:36, 28 December 2007 (EST)		**** I think it should be moved to the main mainspace, and that moving it to "Special (theme)" and adding see alsos to this article and "Graphic Novel:Special" makes the most sense.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 13:36, 28 December 2007 (EST)

			== Synonyms ==

			Can we include terms like 'extraordinary' in this article as a synonym for special? Especially in the same context - e.g. Claire is told she is "not extraordinary".

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Ready? */

2008-05-29T11:05:30Z

Ready?

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:05, 29 May 2008
Line 12:		Line 12:
	***** tumbleweed--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 03:32, 10 December 2007 (EST)		***** tumbleweed--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 03:32, 10 December 2007 (EST)
	****** I think it'd be perfect for a mainspace move, I could try and find some more graphic novel occurrences if so. (<font color="red">[[User:Friskymuffin\|Friskymuffin]] - <small>([[User talk:Friskymuffin\|talk]])</small></font> 04:44, 29 May 2008 (EDT))		****** I think it'd be perfect for a mainspace move, I could try and find some more graphic novel occurrences if so. (<font color="red">[[User:Friskymuffin\|Friskymuffin]] - <small>([[User talk:Friskymuffin\|talk]])</small></font> 04:44, 29 May 2008 (EDT))
			******* This page is already in the main namespace. It was [http://heroeswiki.com/index.php?title=Special_%28theme%29&diff=147969&oldid=147602 moved] exactly five months ago. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 07:05, 29 May 2008 (EDT)

	== Special the novel ==		== Special the novel ==

imported>Friskymuffin: /* Ready? */

2008-05-29T08:44:13Z

Ready?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:44, 29 May 2008
Line 11:		Line 11:
	**** That's probably because I rarely proofread my edits...--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 15:53, 30 November 2007 (EST)		**** That's probably because I rarely proofread my edits...--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 15:53, 30 November 2007 (EST)
	***** tumbleweed--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 03:32, 10 December 2007 (EST)		***** tumbleweed--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 03:32, 10 December 2007 (EST)
			****** I think it'd be perfect for a mainspace move, I could try and find some more graphic novel occurrences if so. (<font color="red">[[User:Friskymuffin\|Friskymuffin]] - <small>([[User talk:Friskymuffin\|talk]])</small></font> 04:44, 29 May 2008 (EDT))

	== Special the novel ==		== Special the novel ==
	If this is moved, it might cause problems with [[Special]] (which redirects to the [[Graphic Novel:Special\|graphic novel]]).--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 15:35, 11 December 2007 (EST)		If this is moved, it might cause problems with [[Special]] (which redirects to the [[Graphic Novel:Special\|graphic novel]]).--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 15:35, 11 December 2007 (EST)

imported>Lost Soul: User talk:Lost Soul/Special moved to Talk:Special (theme): consensus

2007-12-29T17:35:04Z

User talk:Lost Soul/Special moved to Talk:Special (theme): consensus

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:35, 29 December 2007
(No difference)

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Special the novel */

2007-12-28T18:36:03Z

Special the novel

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:36, 28 December 2007
Line 16:		Line 16:
	**...Or "special (theme)". -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:49, 15 December 2007 (EST)		**...Or "special (theme)". -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:49, 15 December 2007 (EST)
	***Should this be moved then, or not? :)--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 11:05, 28 December 2007 (EST)		***Should this be moved then, or not? :)--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 11:05, 28 December 2007 (EST)
			**** I think it should be moved to the main mainspace, and that moving it to "Special (theme)" and adding see alsos to this article and "Graphic Novel:Special" makes the most sense.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 13:36, 28 December 2007 (EST)

imported>Lost Soul: Should we move this, or no?

2007-12-28T16:05:26Z

Should we move this, or no?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:05, 28 December 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:
	* I agree, but there's not really much choice unless we make "Special" a disambig article. We could also add a "See also" to this page and the graphic novel. Lastly, another option would be to create a "theme" namespace since there are probably enough theme articles to warrant one.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:29, 14 December 2007 (EST)		* I agree, but there's not really much choice unless we make "Special" a disambig article. We could also add a "See also" to this page and the graphic novel. Lastly, another option would be to create a "theme" namespace since there are probably enough theme articles to warrant one.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:29, 14 December 2007 (EST)
	**...Or "special (theme)". -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:49, 15 December 2007 (EST)		**...Or "special (theme)". -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:49, 15 December 2007 (EST)
			***Should this be moved then, or not? :)--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 11:05, 28 December 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:35, 29 May 2008
Line 25:		Line 25:
	Can we include terms like 'extraordinary' in this article as a synonym for special? Especially in the same context - e.g. Claire is told she is "not extraordinary". (<font color="red">[[User:Friskymuffin\|Friskymuffin]] - <small>([[User talk:Friskymuffin\|talk]])</small></font> 16:08, 29 May 2008 (EDT))		Can we include terms like 'extraordinary' in this article as a synonym for special? Especially in the same context - e.g. Claire is told she is "not extraordinary". (<font color="red">[[User:Friskymuffin\|Friskymuffin]] - <small>([[User talk:Friskymuffin\|talk]])</small></font> 16:08, 29 May 2008 (EDT))
	* When someone is NOT special/extraordinary shouldn't be referenced for sure. I'm okay with adding "extraordinary" references as being extraordinary is similar to being special. However, I think there's enough "special" references that we don't really need to do so.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:27, 29 May 2008 (EDT)		* When someone is NOT special/extraordinary shouldn't be referenced for sure. I'm okay with adding "extraordinary" references as being extraordinary is similar to being special. However, I think there's enough "special" references that we don't really need to do so.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:27, 29 May 2008 (EDT)
			** Fair enough... I've added something about Mohinder from The Line, but if you think its irrelevant then I don't mind it being erased. (<font color="red">[[User:Friskymuffin\|Friskymuffin]] - <small>([[User talk:Friskymuffin\|talk]])</small></font> 16:35, 29 May 2008 (EDT))

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:44, 29 May 2008
Line 11:		Line 11:
	**** That's probably because I rarely proofread my edits...--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 15:53, 30 November 2007 (EST)		**** That's probably because I rarely proofread my edits...--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 15:53, 30 November 2007 (EST)
	***** tumbleweed--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 03:32, 10 December 2007 (EST)		***** tumbleweed--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 03:32, 10 December 2007 (EST)
			****** I think it'd be perfect for a mainspace move, I could try and find some more graphic novel occurrences if so. (<font color="red">[[User:Friskymuffin\|Friskymuffin]] - <small>([[User talk:Friskymuffin\|talk]])</small></font> 04:44, 29 May 2008 (EDT))

	== Special the novel ==		== Special the novel ==
	If this is moved, it might cause problems with [[Special]] (which redirects to the [[Graphic Novel:Special\|graphic novel]]).--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 15:35, 11 December 2007 (EST)		If this is moved, it might cause problems with [[Special]] (which redirects to the [[Graphic Novel:Special\|graphic novel]]).--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 15:35, 11 December 2007 (EST)