Talk:Spinach can - Revision history

imported>Ricard Desi: /* All Keeps */

2009-01-06T23:40:15Z

All Keeps

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:40, 6 January 2009
(No difference)

imported>Ricard Desi: /* All Keeps */

2009-01-06T23:40:15Z

All Keeps

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:40, 6 January 2009
Line 27:		Line 27:
	*********I'm not sure what you're talking about; we don't have any articles for any ladies' handbags. And I disagree; the spinach can isn't important to Sylar's history at all. If it never made its one-time, insignificant appearance in ''[[Powerless]]'', Sylar's character would be exactly the same. The only thing that makes it somewhat notable is the reference to ''Popeye'', but even in that case, it should stay in the notes for ''[[Powerless]]''. It doesn't need its own article. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:43, 3 January 2009 (EST)		*********I'm not sure what you're talking about; we don't have any articles for any ladies' handbags. And I disagree; the spinach can isn't important to Sylar's history at all. If it never made its one-time, insignificant appearance in ''[[Powerless]]'', Sylar's character would be exactly the same. The only thing that makes it somewhat notable is the reference to ''Popeye'', but even in that case, it should stay in the notes for ''[[Powerless]]''. It doesn't need its own article. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:43, 3 January 2009 (EST)
	: WE SHALL KEEP THE SPINACH IT HELPED SYLAR KNOW HE HAD HIS POWERS BACK [[User:Gabriel Bishop\|Gabriel Bishop]] 11:21, 5 January 2009 (EST)Gabriel Bishop		: WE SHALL KEEP THE SPINACH IT HELPED SYLAR KNOW HE HAD HIS POWERS BACK [[User:Gabriel Bishop\|Gabriel Bishop]] 11:21, 5 January 2009 (EST)Gabriel Bishop
			:* Calm down, GB. It helped Sylar in the same way the glass in Chandra's apartment helped Sylar. That is, not at all. It was just what he was testing his power on. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 18:40, 6 January 2009 (EST)
	********Don't you mean, we should*? Everyone apart from you and another person wants to delete it...--[[User:IotV\|IotV]] 11:57, 5 January 2009 (EST)		********Don't you mean, we should*? Everyone apart from you and another person wants to delete it...--[[User:IotV\|IotV]] 11:57, 5 January 2009 (EST)
	* Differential diagnosis, people. I'm siding with deleters. --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 14:18, 6 January 2009 (EST)		* Differential diagnosis, people. I'm siding with deleters. --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 14:18, 6 January 2009 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* All Keeps */

2009-01-06T23:08:07Z

All Keeps

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:08, 6 January 2009
Line 30:		Line 30:
	* Differential diagnosis, people. I'm siding with deleters. --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 14:18, 6 January 2009 (EST)		* Differential diagnosis, people. I'm siding with deleters. --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 14:18, 6 January 2009 (EST)
	** I actually think we should keep it.. It was one of the first things we saw of season 3, and it provided a base for A LOT of theories.. It's a funny reference, which has been confirmed by Allan Arkush. It proved that Sylar got his powers back, and therefore it's an important part of his history. :) [[User:Anonymousheroine\|Anonymousheroine]] 14:30, 6 January 2009 (EST)		** I actually think we should keep it.. It was one of the first things we saw of season 3, and it provided a base for A LOT of theories.. It's a funny reference, which has been confirmed by Allan Arkush. It proved that Sylar got his powers back, and therefore it's an important part of his history. :) [[User:Anonymousheroine\|Anonymousheroine]] 14:30, 6 January 2009 (EST)
			*** Since it's a confirmed reference, I don't mind keeping it around. We have articles that deserve the boot much more than this one. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:08, 6 January 2009 (EST)

imported>Anonymousheroine at 19:30, 6 January 2009

2009-01-06T19:30:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, 6 January 2009
Line 29:		Line 29:
	********Don't you mean, we should*? Everyone apart from you and another person wants to delete it...--[[User:IotV\|IotV]] 11:57, 5 January 2009 (EST)		********Don't you mean, we should*? Everyone apart from you and another person wants to delete it...--[[User:IotV\|IotV]] 11:57, 5 January 2009 (EST)
	* Differential diagnosis, people. I'm siding with deleters. --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 14:18, 6 January 2009 (EST)		* Differential diagnosis, people. I'm siding with deleters. --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 14:18, 6 January 2009 (EST)
			** I actually think we should keep it.. It was one of the first things we saw of season 3, and it provided a base for A LOT of theories.. It's a funny reference, which has been confirmed by Allan Arkush. It proved that Sylar got his powers back, and therefore it's an important part of his history. :) [[User:Anonymousheroine\|Anonymousheroine]] 14:30, 6 January 2009 (EST)

imported>DocM: /* All Keeps */

2009-01-06T19:18:18Z

All Keeps

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:18, 6 January 2009
Line 28:		Line 28:
	: WE SHALL KEEP THE SPINACH IT HELPED SYLAR KNOW HE HAD HIS POWERS BACK [[User:Gabriel Bishop\|Gabriel Bishop]] 11:21, 5 January 2009 (EST)Gabriel Bishop		: WE SHALL KEEP THE SPINACH IT HELPED SYLAR KNOW HE HAD HIS POWERS BACK [[User:Gabriel Bishop\|Gabriel Bishop]] 11:21, 5 January 2009 (EST)Gabriel Bishop
	********Don't you mean, we should*? Everyone apart from you and another person wants to delete it...--[[User:IotV\|IotV]] 11:57, 5 January 2009 (EST)		********Don't you mean, we should*? Everyone apart from you and another person wants to delete it...--[[User:IotV\|IotV]] 11:57, 5 January 2009 (EST)
			* Differential diagnosis, people. I'm siding with deleters. --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 14:18, 6 January 2009 (EST)

imported>Gabriel Bishop at 18:32, 6 January 2009

2009-01-06T18:32:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:32, 6 January 2009
Line 27:		Line 27:
	*********I'm not sure what you're talking about; we don't have any articles for any ladies' handbags. And I disagree; the spinach can isn't important to Sylar's history at all. If it never made its one-time, insignificant appearance in ''[[Powerless]]'', Sylar's character would be exactly the same. The only thing that makes it somewhat notable is the reference to ''Popeye'', but even in that case, it should stay in the notes for ''[[Powerless]]''. It doesn't need its own article. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:43, 3 January 2009 (EST)		*********I'm not sure what you're talking about; we don't have any articles for any ladies' handbags. And I disagree; the spinach can isn't important to Sylar's history at all. If it never made its one-time, insignificant appearance in ''[[Powerless]]'', Sylar's character would be exactly the same. The only thing that makes it somewhat notable is the reference to ''Popeye'', but even in that case, it should stay in the notes for ''[[Powerless]]''. It doesn't need its own article. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:43, 3 January 2009 (EST)
	: WE SHALL KEEP THE SPINACH IT HELPED SYLAR KNOW HE HAD HIS POWERS BACK [[User:Gabriel Bishop\|Gabriel Bishop]] 11:21, 5 January 2009 (EST)Gabriel Bishop		: WE SHALL KEEP THE SPINACH IT HELPED SYLAR KNOW HE HAD HIS POWERS BACK [[User:Gabriel Bishop\|Gabriel Bishop]] 11:21, 5 January 2009 (EST)Gabriel Bishop
	*********Don't you mean, we should*? Everyone apart from you and another person wants to delete it...--[[User:IotV\|IotV]] 11:57, 5 January 2009 (EST)		********Don't you mean, we should*? Everyone apart from you and another person wants to delete it...--[[User:IotV\|IotV]] 11:57, 5 January 2009 (EST)

imported>Gabriel Bishop at 18:32, 6 January 2009

2009-01-06T18:32:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:32, 6 January 2009
Line 27:		Line 27:
	*********I'm not sure what you're talking about; we don't have any articles for any ladies' handbags. And I disagree; the spinach can isn't important to Sylar's history at all. If it never made its one-time, insignificant appearance in ''[[Powerless]]'', Sylar's character would be exactly the same. The only thing that makes it somewhat notable is the reference to ''Popeye'', but even in that case, it should stay in the notes for ''[[Powerless]]''. It doesn't need its own article. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:43, 3 January 2009 (EST)		*********I'm not sure what you're talking about; we don't have any articles for any ladies' handbags. And I disagree; the spinach can isn't important to Sylar's history at all. If it never made its one-time, insignificant appearance in ''[[Powerless]]'', Sylar's character would be exactly the same. The only thing that makes it somewhat notable is the reference to ''Popeye'', but even in that case, it should stay in the notes for ''[[Powerless]]''. It doesn't need its own article. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:43, 3 January 2009 (EST)
	: WE SHALL KEEP THE SPINACH IT HELPED SYLAR KNOW HE HAD HIS POWERS BACK [[User:Gabriel Bishop\|Gabriel Bishop]] 11:21, 5 January 2009 (EST)Gabriel Bishop		: WE SHALL KEEP THE SPINACH IT HELPED SYLAR KNOW HE HAD HIS POWERS BACK [[User:Gabriel Bishop\|Gabriel Bishop]] 11:21, 5 January 2009 (EST)Gabriel Bishop
	********** Don't you mean, we should? Everyone apart from you and another person wants to delete it...--[[User:IotV\|IotV]] 11:57, 5 January 2009 (EST)		*********Don't you mean, we should*? Everyone apart from you and another person wants to delete it...--[[User:IotV\|IotV]] 11:57, 5 January 2009 (EST)

imported>IotV: /* All Keeps */

2009-01-05T16:57:55Z

All Keeps

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 5 January 2009
Line 27:		Line 27:
	*********I'm not sure what you're talking about; we don't have any articles for any ladies' handbags. And I disagree; the spinach can isn't important to Sylar's history at all. If it never made its one-time, insignificant appearance in ''[[Powerless]]'', Sylar's character would be exactly the same. The only thing that makes it somewhat notable is the reference to ''Popeye'', but even in that case, it should stay in the notes for ''[[Powerless]]''. It doesn't need its own article. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:43, 3 January 2009 (EST)		*********I'm not sure what you're talking about; we don't have any articles for any ladies' handbags. And I disagree; the spinach can isn't important to Sylar's history at all. If it never made its one-time, insignificant appearance in ''[[Powerless]]'', Sylar's character would be exactly the same. The only thing that makes it somewhat notable is the reference to ''Popeye'', but even in that case, it should stay in the notes for ''[[Powerless]]''. It doesn't need its own article. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:43, 3 January 2009 (EST)
	: WE SHALL KEEP THE SPINACH IT HELPED SYLAR KNOW HE HAD HIS POWERS BACK [[User:Gabriel Bishop\|Gabriel Bishop]] 11:21, 5 January 2009 (EST)Gabriel Bishop		: WE SHALL KEEP THE SPINACH IT HELPED SYLAR KNOW HE HAD HIS POWERS BACK [[User:Gabriel Bishop\|Gabriel Bishop]] 11:21, 5 January 2009 (EST)Gabriel Bishop
			********** Don't you mean, we should? Everyone apart from you and another person wants to delete it...--[[User:IotV\|IotV]] 11:57, 5 January 2009 (EST)

imported>Gabriel Bishop at 16:21, 5 January 2009

2009-01-05T16:21:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:21, 5 January 2009
Line 26:		Line 26:
	*********I don't think you understand. Thrashmeister said that IF we keep this article, people might as well make articles for purses and glasses. We don't actually have those articles, so they cannot possibly be stupid if they don't exist, and we can't keep them if we don't have them. And how is the can important? Its a cool reference and nothing more. -- {{User:Tristan0709/Signature}} 21:45, 3 January 2009 (EST)		*********I don't think you understand. Thrashmeister said that IF we keep this article, people might as well make articles for purses and glasses. We don't actually have those articles, so they cannot possibly be stupid if they don't exist, and we can't keep them if we don't have them. And how is the can important? Its a cool reference and nothing more. -- {{User:Tristan0709/Signature}} 21:45, 3 January 2009 (EST)
	*********I'm not sure what you're talking about; we don't have any articles for any ladies' handbags. And I disagree; the spinach can isn't important to Sylar's history at all. If it never made its one-time, insignificant appearance in ''[[Powerless]]'', Sylar's character would be exactly the same. The only thing that makes it somewhat notable is the reference to ''Popeye'', but even in that case, it should stay in the notes for ''[[Powerless]]''. It doesn't need its own article. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:43, 3 January 2009 (EST)		*********I'm not sure what you're talking about; we don't have any articles for any ladies' handbags. And I disagree; the spinach can isn't important to Sylar's history at all. If it never made its one-time, insignificant appearance in ''[[Powerless]]'', Sylar's character would be exactly the same. The only thing that makes it somewhat notable is the reference to ''Popeye'', but even in that case, it should stay in the notes for ''[[Powerless]]''. It doesn't need its own article. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:43, 3 January 2009 (EST)
			: WE SHALL KEEP THE SPINACH IT HELPED SYLAR KNOW HE HAD HIS POWERS BACK [[User:Gabriel Bishop\|Gabriel Bishop]] 11:21, 5 January 2009 (EST)Gabriel Bishop

imported>Tristan0709: sign my comment

2009-01-04T02:45:02Z

sign my comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:45, 4 January 2009
Line 24:		Line 24:
	******* I'm for deletion too. [[User:IotV\|IotV]] 20.11, 3 January 2009 (GMT)		******* I'm for deletion too. [[User:IotV\|IotV]] 20.11, 3 January 2009 (GMT)
	********well ryan took off the deletion so i guess he isnt up for it [[User:Gabriel Bishop\|Gabriel Bishop]] 15:19, 3 January 2009 (EST) Gabriel Bishop		********well ryan took off the deletion so i guess he isnt up for it [[User:Gabriel Bishop\|Gabriel Bishop]] 15:19, 3 January 2009 (EST) Gabriel Bishop
	*********I don't think you understand. Thrashmeister said that IF we keep this article, people might as well make articles for purses and glasses. We don't actually have those articles, so they cannot possibly be stupid if they don't exist, and we can't keep them if we don't have them. And how is the can important? Its a cool reference and nothing more.		*********I don't think you understand. Thrashmeister said that IF we keep this article, people might as well make articles for purses and glasses. We don't actually have those articles, so they cannot possibly be stupid if they don't exist, and we can't keep them if we don't have them. And how is the can important? Its a cool reference and nothing more. -- {{User:Tristan0709/Signature}} 21:45, 3 January 2009 (EST)
	*********I'm not sure what you're talking about; we don't have any articles for any ladies' handbags. And I disagree; the spinach can isn't important to Sylar's history at all. If it never made its one-time, insignificant appearance in ''[[Powerless]]'', Sylar's character would be exactly the same. The only thing that makes it somewhat notable is the reference to ''Popeye'', but even in that case, it should stay in the notes for ''[[Powerless]]''. It doesn't need its own article. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:43, 3 January 2009 (EST)		*********I'm not sure what you're talking about; we don't have any articles for any ladies' handbags. And I disagree; the spinach can isn't important to Sylar's history at all. If it never made its one-time, insignificant appearance in ''[[Powerless]]'', Sylar's character would be exactly the same. The only thing that makes it somewhat notable is the reference to ''Popeye'', but even in that case, it should stay in the notes for ''[[Powerless]]''. It doesn't need its own article. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:43, 3 January 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:40, 6 January 2009
Line 27:		Line 27:
	*********I'm not sure what you're talking about; we don't have any articles for any ladies' handbags. And I disagree; the spinach can isn't important to Sylar's history at all. If it never made its one-time, insignificant appearance in ''[[Powerless]]'', Sylar's character would be exactly the same. The only thing that makes it somewhat notable is the reference to ''Popeye'', but even in that case, it should stay in the notes for ''[[Powerless]]''. It doesn't need its own article. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:43, 3 January 2009 (EST)		*********I'm not sure what you're talking about; we don't have any articles for any ladies' handbags. And I disagree; the spinach can isn't important to Sylar's history at all. If it never made its one-time, insignificant appearance in ''[[Powerless]]'', Sylar's character would be exactly the same. The only thing that makes it somewhat notable is the reference to ''Popeye'', but even in that case, it should stay in the notes for ''[[Powerless]]''. It doesn't need its own article. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:43, 3 January 2009 (EST)
	: WE SHALL KEEP THE SPINACH IT HELPED SYLAR KNOW HE HAD HIS POWERS BACK [[User:Gabriel Bishop\|Gabriel Bishop]] 11:21, 5 January 2009 (EST)Gabriel Bishop		: WE SHALL KEEP THE SPINACH IT HELPED SYLAR KNOW HE HAD HIS POWERS BACK [[User:Gabriel Bishop\|Gabriel Bishop]] 11:21, 5 January 2009 (EST)Gabriel Bishop
			:* Calm down, GB. It helped Sylar in the same way the glass in Chandra's apartment helped Sylar. That is, not at all. It was just what he was testing his power on. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 18:40, 6 January 2009 (EST)
	********Don't you mean, we should*? Everyone apart from you and another person wants to delete it...--[[User:IotV\|IotV]] 11:57, 5 January 2009 (EST)		********Don't you mean, we should*? Everyone apart from you and another person wants to delete it...--[[User:IotV\|IotV]] 11:57, 5 January 2009 (EST)
	* Differential diagnosis, people. I'm siding with deleters. --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 14:18, 6 January 2009 (EST)		* Differential diagnosis, people. I'm siding with deleters. --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 14:18, 6 January 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, 6 January 2009
Line 29:		Line 29:
	********Don't you mean, we should*? Everyone apart from you and another person wants to delete it...--[[User:IotV\|IotV]] 11:57, 5 January 2009 (EST)		********Don't you mean, we should*? Everyone apart from you and another person wants to delete it...--[[User:IotV\|IotV]] 11:57, 5 January 2009 (EST)
	* Differential diagnosis, people. I'm siding with deleters. --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 14:18, 6 January 2009 (EST)		* Differential diagnosis, people. I'm siding with deleters. --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 14:18, 6 January 2009 (EST)
			** I actually think we should keep it.. It was one of the first things we saw of season 3, and it provided a base for A LOT of theories.. It's a funny reference, which has been confirmed by Allan Arkush. It proved that Sylar got his powers back, and therefore it's an important part of his history. :) [[User:Anonymousheroine\|Anonymousheroine]] 14:30, 6 January 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:18, 6 January 2009
Line 28:		Line 28:
	: WE SHALL KEEP THE SPINACH IT HELPED SYLAR KNOW HE HAD HIS POWERS BACK [[User:Gabriel Bishop\|Gabriel Bishop]] 11:21, 5 January 2009 (EST)Gabriel Bishop		: WE SHALL KEEP THE SPINACH IT HELPED SYLAR KNOW HE HAD HIS POWERS BACK [[User:Gabriel Bishop\|Gabriel Bishop]] 11:21, 5 January 2009 (EST)Gabriel Bishop
	********Don't you mean, we should*? Everyone apart from you and another person wants to delete it...--[[User:IotV\|IotV]] 11:57, 5 January 2009 (EST)		********Don't you mean, we should*? Everyone apart from you and another person wants to delete it...--[[User:IotV\|IotV]] 11:57, 5 January 2009 (EST)
			* Differential diagnosis, people. I'm siding with deleters. --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 14:18, 6 January 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:32, 6 January 2009
Line 27:		Line 27:
	*********I'm not sure what you're talking about; we don't have any articles for any ladies' handbags. And I disagree; the spinach can isn't important to Sylar's history at all. If it never made its one-time, insignificant appearance in ''[[Powerless]]'', Sylar's character would be exactly the same. The only thing that makes it somewhat notable is the reference to ''Popeye'', but even in that case, it should stay in the notes for ''[[Powerless]]''. It doesn't need its own article. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:43, 3 January 2009 (EST)		*********I'm not sure what you're talking about; we don't have any articles for any ladies' handbags. And I disagree; the spinach can isn't important to Sylar's history at all. If it never made its one-time, insignificant appearance in ''[[Powerless]]'', Sylar's character would be exactly the same. The only thing that makes it somewhat notable is the reference to ''Popeye'', but even in that case, it should stay in the notes for ''[[Powerless]]''. It doesn't need its own article. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:43, 3 January 2009 (EST)
	: WE SHALL KEEP THE SPINACH IT HELPED SYLAR KNOW HE HAD HIS POWERS BACK [[User:Gabriel Bishop\|Gabriel Bishop]] 11:21, 5 January 2009 (EST)Gabriel Bishop		: WE SHALL KEEP THE SPINACH IT HELPED SYLAR KNOW HE HAD HIS POWERS BACK [[User:Gabriel Bishop\|Gabriel Bishop]] 11:21, 5 January 2009 (EST)Gabriel Bishop
	*********Don't you mean, we should*? Everyone apart from you and another person wants to delete it...--[[User:IotV\|IotV]] 11:57, 5 January 2009 (EST)		********Don't you mean, we should*? Everyone apart from you and another person wants to delete it...--[[User:IotV\|IotV]] 11:57, 5 January 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:32, 6 January 2009
Line 27:		Line 27:
	*********I'm not sure what you're talking about; we don't have any articles for any ladies' handbags. And I disagree; the spinach can isn't important to Sylar's history at all. If it never made its one-time, insignificant appearance in ''[[Powerless]]'', Sylar's character would be exactly the same. The only thing that makes it somewhat notable is the reference to ''Popeye'', but even in that case, it should stay in the notes for ''[[Powerless]]''. It doesn't need its own article. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:43, 3 January 2009 (EST)		*********I'm not sure what you're talking about; we don't have any articles for any ladies' handbags. And I disagree; the spinach can isn't important to Sylar's history at all. If it never made its one-time, insignificant appearance in ''[[Powerless]]'', Sylar's character would be exactly the same. The only thing that makes it somewhat notable is the reference to ''Popeye'', but even in that case, it should stay in the notes for ''[[Powerless]]''. It doesn't need its own article. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:43, 3 January 2009 (EST)
	: WE SHALL KEEP THE SPINACH IT HELPED SYLAR KNOW HE HAD HIS POWERS BACK [[User:Gabriel Bishop\|Gabriel Bishop]] 11:21, 5 January 2009 (EST)Gabriel Bishop		: WE SHALL KEEP THE SPINACH IT HELPED SYLAR KNOW HE HAD HIS POWERS BACK [[User:Gabriel Bishop\|Gabriel Bishop]] 11:21, 5 January 2009 (EST)Gabriel Bishop
	********** Don't you mean, we should? Everyone apart from you and another person wants to delete it...--[[User:IotV\|IotV]] 11:57, 5 January 2009 (EST)		*********Don't you mean, we should*? Everyone apart from you and another person wants to delete it...--[[User:IotV\|IotV]] 11:57, 5 January 2009 (EST)