Talk:Stacy Haiduk - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 21:04, 20 January 2007

2007-01-20T21:04:39Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 21:04, 20 January 2007
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 21:04, 20 January 2007

2007-01-20T21:04:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:04, 20 January 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::: Well now, I guess it would depend on where we cropped the nude ones...--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:43, 20 January 2007 (EST)		::: Well now, I guess it would depend on where we cropped the nude ones...--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:43, 20 January 2007 (EST)
	:::: OK, I found a good one on some polish site. This is a good photo, relatively clear, and definately not of her in-character. Uploading now.-- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 15:46, 20 January 2007 (EST)		:::: OK, I found a good one on some polish site. This is a good photo, relatively clear, and definately not of her in-character. Uploading now.-- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 15:46, 20 January 2007 (EST)
			:::::Nicely done. So it turns out she ''did'' do a proper photo shoot, as preserved by the Poles. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 16:04, 20 January 2007 (EST)

imported>Cuardin at 20:46, 20 January 2007

2007-01-20T20:46:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:46, 20 January 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::: Why can't she just do a proper photo-shoot like any other actor? What is her problem? In theory I agree with you, and if that small image had been of even descent quality, it would have been great. As it is now, if you scale it up, it looks like a 20's news clipping. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 15:35, 20 January 2007 (EST)		::: Why can't she just do a proper photo-shoot like any other actor? What is her problem? In theory I agree with you, and if that small image had been of even descent quality, it would have been great. As it is now, if you scale it up, it looks like a 20's news clipping. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 15:35, 20 January 2007 (EST)
	::: Well now, I guess it would depend on where we cropped the nude ones...--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:43, 20 January 2007 (EST)		::: Well now, I guess it would depend on where we cropped the nude ones...--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:43, 20 January 2007 (EST)
			:::: OK, I found a good one on some polish site. This is a good photo, relatively clear, and definately not of her in-character. Uploading now.-- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 15:46, 20 January 2007 (EST)

imported>Hardvice at 20:43, 20 January 2007

2007-01-20T20:43:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:43, 20 January 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Some other choices include [http://www.classictvhits.com/cast/1437.jpg this good one], [http://www.celebsvideoarchive.com/videos/Stacy%20Haiduk/StacyHaiduk.jpg this odd one], or [http://www.homunculus.com/mugshots/haidukmenu2.jpg this small one]. I don't, however, suggest [http://cytokines.1hwy.com/images/haiduk-charmed-1.jpg this silly one] or any of her many nude ones. :) - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 15:13, 20 January 2007 (EST)		::Some other choices include [http://www.classictvhits.com/cast/1437.jpg this good one], [http://www.celebsvideoarchive.com/videos/Stacy%20Haiduk/StacyHaiduk.jpg this odd one], or [http://www.homunculus.com/mugshots/haidukmenu2.jpg this small one]. I don't, however, suggest [http://cytokines.1hwy.com/images/haiduk-charmed-1.jpg this silly one] or any of her many nude ones. :) - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 15:13, 20 January 2007 (EST)
	::: Why can't she just do a proper photo-shoot like any other actor? What is her problem? In theory I agree with you, and if that small image had been of even descent quality, it would have been great. As it is now, if you scale it up, it looks like a 20's news clipping. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 15:35, 20 January 2007 (EST)		::: Why can't she just do a proper photo-shoot like any other actor? What is her problem? In theory I agree with you, and if that small image had been of even descent quality, it would have been great. As it is now, if you scale it up, it looks like a 20's news clipping. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 15:35, 20 January 2007 (EST)
			::: Well now, I guess it would depend on where we cropped the nude ones...--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:43, 20 January 2007 (EST)

imported>Cuardin at 20:35, 20 January 2007

2007-01-20T20:35:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:35, 20 January 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:None taken - I didn't take the photo. My only objection is that she's in character for another show, and we're trying to get real-world shots. The former one was her headshot, crappy though it may be. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 15:02, 20 January 2007 (EST)		:None taken - I didn't take the photo. My only objection is that she's in character for another show, and we're trying to get real-world shots. The former one was her headshot, crappy though it may be. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 15:02, 20 January 2007 (EST)
	::Some other choices include [http://www.classictvhits.com/cast/1437.jpg this good one], [http://www.celebsvideoarchive.com/videos/Stacy%20Haiduk/StacyHaiduk.jpg this odd one], or [http://www.homunculus.com/mugshots/haidukmenu2.jpg this small one]. I don't, however, suggest [http://cytokines.1hwy.com/images/haiduk-charmed-1.jpg this silly one] or any of her many nude ones. :) - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 15:13, 20 January 2007 (EST)		::Some other choices include [http://www.classictvhits.com/cast/1437.jpg this good one], [http://www.celebsvideoarchive.com/videos/Stacy%20Haiduk/StacyHaiduk.jpg this odd one], or [http://www.homunculus.com/mugshots/haidukmenu2.jpg this small one]. I don't, however, suggest [http://cytokines.1hwy.com/images/haiduk-charmed-1.jpg this silly one] or any of her many nude ones. :) - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 15:13, 20 January 2007 (EST)
			::: Why can't she just do a proper photo-shoot like any other actor? What is her problem? In theory I agree with you, and if that small image had been of even descent quality, it would have been great. As it is now, if you scale it up, it looks like a 20's news clipping. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 15:35, 20 January 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: other suggestions

2007-01-20T20:13:50Z

other suggestions

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:13, 20 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I tok the libery of grabbing a better image of Stacy off of my Kindred: The Embraced DVD. No offene, but the old image of her was kinda crappy. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 14:37, 20 January 2007 (EST)		I tok the libery of grabbing a better image of Stacy off of my Kindred: The Embraced DVD. No offene, but the old image of her was kinda crappy. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 14:37, 20 January 2007 (EST)
	:None taken - I didn't take the photo. My only objection is that she's in character for another show, and we're trying to get real-world shots. The former one was her headshot, crappy though it may be. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 15:02, 20 January 2007 (EST)		:None taken - I didn't take the photo. My only objection is that she's in character for another show, and we're trying to get real-world shots. The former one was her headshot, crappy though it may be. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 15:02, 20 January 2007 (EST)
			::Some other choices include [http://www.classictvhits.com/cast/1437.jpg this good one], [http://www.celebsvideoarchive.com/videos/Stacy%20Haiduk/StacyHaiduk.jpg this odd one], or [http://www.homunculus.com/mugshots/haidukmenu2.jpg this small one]. I don't, however, suggest [http://cytokines.1hwy.com/images/haiduk-charmed-1.jpg this silly one] or any of her many nude ones. :) - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 15:13, 20 January 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 20:02, 20 January 2007

2007-01-20T20:02:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:02, 20 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I tok the libery of grabbing a better image of Stacy off of my Kindred: The Embraced DVD. No offene, but the old image of her was kinda crappy. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 14:37, 20 January 2007 (EST)		I tok the libery of grabbing a better image of Stacy off of my Kindred: The Embraced DVD. No offene, but the old image of her was kinda crappy. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 14:37, 20 January 2007 (EST)
			:None taken - I didn't take the photo. My only objection is that she's in character for another show, and we're trying to get real-world shots. The former one was her headshot, crappy though it may be. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 15:02, 20 January 2007 (EST)

imported>Cuardin: New page: I tok the libery of grabbing a better image of Stacy off of my Kindred: The Embraced DVD. No offene, but the old image of her was kinda crappy. -- ~~~~

2007-01-20T19:37:04Z

New page: I tok the libery of grabbing a better image of Stacy off of my Kindred: The Embraced DVD. No offene, but the old image of her was kinda crappy. -- ~~~~

New page

I tok the libery of grabbing a better image of Stacy off of my Kindred: The Embraced DVD. No offene, but the old image of her was kinda crappy. -- [[User:Cuardin|Cuardin]] 14:37, 20 January 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:04, 20 January 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::: Well now, I guess it would depend on where we cropped the nude ones...--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:43, 20 January 2007 (EST)		::: Well now, I guess it would depend on where we cropped the nude ones...--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:43, 20 January 2007 (EST)
	:::: OK, I found a good one on some polish site. This is a good photo, relatively clear, and definately not of her in-character. Uploading now.-- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 15:46, 20 January 2007 (EST)		:::: OK, I found a good one on some polish site. This is a good photo, relatively clear, and definately not of her in-character. Uploading now.-- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 15:46, 20 January 2007 (EST)
			:::::Nicely done. So it turns out she ''did'' do a proper photo shoot, as preserved by the Poles. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 16:04, 20 January 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:46, 20 January 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::: Why can't she just do a proper photo-shoot like any other actor? What is her problem? In theory I agree with you, and if that small image had been of even descent quality, it would have been great. As it is now, if you scale it up, it looks like a 20's news clipping. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 15:35, 20 January 2007 (EST)		::: Why can't she just do a proper photo-shoot like any other actor? What is her problem? In theory I agree with you, and if that small image had been of even descent quality, it would have been great. As it is now, if you scale it up, it looks like a 20's news clipping. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 15:35, 20 January 2007 (EST)
	::: Well now, I guess it would depend on where we cropped the nude ones...--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:43, 20 January 2007 (EST)		::: Well now, I guess it would depend on where we cropped the nude ones...--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:43, 20 January 2007 (EST)
			:::: OK, I found a good one on some polish site. This is a good photo, relatively clear, and definately not of her in-character. Uploading now.-- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 15:46, 20 January 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:43, 20 January 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Some other choices include [http://www.classictvhits.com/cast/1437.jpg this good one], [http://www.celebsvideoarchive.com/videos/Stacy%20Haiduk/StacyHaiduk.jpg this odd one], or [http://www.homunculus.com/mugshots/haidukmenu2.jpg this small one]. I don't, however, suggest [http://cytokines.1hwy.com/images/haiduk-charmed-1.jpg this silly one] or any of her many nude ones. :) - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 15:13, 20 January 2007 (EST)		::Some other choices include [http://www.classictvhits.com/cast/1437.jpg this good one], [http://www.celebsvideoarchive.com/videos/Stacy%20Haiduk/StacyHaiduk.jpg this odd one], or [http://www.homunculus.com/mugshots/haidukmenu2.jpg this small one]. I don't, however, suggest [http://cytokines.1hwy.com/images/haiduk-charmed-1.jpg this silly one] or any of her many nude ones. :) - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 15:13, 20 January 2007 (EST)
	::: Why can't she just do a proper photo-shoot like any other actor? What is her problem? In theory I agree with you, and if that small image had been of even descent quality, it would have been great. As it is now, if you scale it up, it looks like a 20's news clipping. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 15:35, 20 January 2007 (EST)		::: Why can't she just do a proper photo-shoot like any other actor? What is her problem? In theory I agree with you, and if that small image had been of even descent quality, it would have been great. As it is now, if you scale it up, it looks like a 20's news clipping. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 15:35, 20 January 2007 (EST)
			::: Well now, I guess it would depend on where we cropped the nude ones...--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:43, 20 January 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:35, 20 January 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:None taken - I didn't take the photo. My only objection is that she's in character for another show, and we're trying to get real-world shots. The former one was her headshot, crappy though it may be. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 15:02, 20 January 2007 (EST)		:None taken - I didn't take the photo. My only objection is that she's in character for another show, and we're trying to get real-world shots. The former one was her headshot, crappy though it may be. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 15:02, 20 January 2007 (EST)
	::Some other choices include [http://www.classictvhits.com/cast/1437.jpg this good one], [http://www.celebsvideoarchive.com/videos/Stacy%20Haiduk/StacyHaiduk.jpg this odd one], or [http://www.homunculus.com/mugshots/haidukmenu2.jpg this small one]. I don't, however, suggest [http://cytokines.1hwy.com/images/haiduk-charmed-1.jpg this silly one] or any of her many nude ones. :) - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 15:13, 20 January 2007 (EST)		::Some other choices include [http://www.classictvhits.com/cast/1437.jpg this good one], [http://www.celebsvideoarchive.com/videos/Stacy%20Haiduk/StacyHaiduk.jpg this odd one], or [http://www.homunculus.com/mugshots/haidukmenu2.jpg this small one]. I don't, however, suggest [http://cytokines.1hwy.com/images/haiduk-charmed-1.jpg this silly one] or any of her many nude ones. :) - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 15:13, 20 January 2007 (EST)
			::: Why can't she just do a proper photo-shoot like any other actor? What is her problem? In theory I agree with you, and if that small image had been of even descent quality, it would have been great. As it is now, if you scale it up, it looks like a 20's news clipping. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 15:35, 20 January 2007 (EST)