Talk:Supercharging - Revision history

imported>KonBot: Replaced "Episode:Brave New World" with "Episode:Brave New World (Heroes)"

2015-09-17T08:36:13Z

Replaced "Episode:Brave New World" with "Episode:Brave New World (Heroes)"

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:36, 17 September 2015
(No difference)

imported>KonBot: Replaced "Episode:Brave New World" with "Episode:Brave New World (Heroes)"

2015-09-17T08:36:13Z

Replaced "Episode:Brave New World" with "Episode:Brave New World (Heroes)"

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:36, 17 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{power names\|1\|eos=Ando has said that he can "supercharge" another person's ability (''[[Episode:Brave New World\|Brave New World]]'')}}		{{power names\|1\|eos=Ando has said that he can "supercharge" another person's ability (''[[Episode:Brave New World (Heroes)\|Brave New World]]'')}}
	{\| border="2" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="4" class="wikitable"		{\| border="2" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="4" class="wikitable"
	\|-		\|-

imported>PJDEP at 02:32, 22 February 2010

2010-02-22T02:32:54Z

Show changes

imported>WarGrowlmon18: /* Shocking Hiro's Brain */

2010-02-21T20:26:51Z

Shocking Hiro's Brain

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:26, 21 February 2010
Line 307:		Line 307:
	even though i'm pretty sure there is no real explanation: how could ando shock hiros brain without killing him, where would he know how much voltage to use or how long to use his lightning? --[[User:Angel0941\|Angel0941]]		even though i'm pretty sure there is no real explanation: how could ando shock hiros brain without killing him, where would he know how much voltage to use or how long to use his lightning? --[[User:Angel0941\|Angel0941]]
	*Chances are he didn't know. But it's just a show. He doesn't really have to have it explained or that. It is sci fi after all. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 11:44, 21 February 2010 (EST)		*Chances are he didn't know. But it's just a show. He doesn't really have to have it explained or that. It is sci fi after all. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 11:44, 21 February 2010 (EST)
			**I think he just used a small amount of energy to do it.--[[User:WarGrowlmon18\|WarGrowlmon18]] 15:26, 21 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Mc hammark: /* Rename to "supercharging" */

2010-02-21T16:44:51Z

Rename to "supercharging"

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:44, 21 February 2010
Line 304:		Line 304:
	** "Charging" implies an electric current. Lightning explained. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 18:56, 9 February 2010 (EST)		** "Charging" implies an electric current. Lightning explained. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 18:56, 9 February 2010 (EST)

			==Shocking Hiro's Brain==
	even though i'm pretty sure there is no real explanation: how could ando shock hiros brain without killing him, where would he know how much voltage to use or how long to use his lightning?		even though i'm pretty sure there is no real explanation: how could ando shock hiros brain without killing him, where would he know how much voltage to use or how long to use his lightning? --[[User:Angel0941\|Angel0941]]
			*Chances are he didn't know. But it's just a show. He doesn't really have to have it explained or that. It is sci fi after all. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 11:44, 21 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Angel0941 at 16:22, 21 February 2010

2010-02-21T16:22:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:22, 21 February 2010
Line 303:		Line 303:
	** There has been plenty of explanation on how "supercharging" accounts for all known effects of the ability. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 18:50, 9 February 2010 (EST)		** There has been plenty of explanation on how "supercharging" accounts for all known effects of the ability. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 18:50, 9 February 2010 (EST)
	** "Charging" implies an electric current. Lightning explained. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 18:56, 9 February 2010 (EST)		** "Charging" implies an electric current. Lightning explained. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 18:56, 9 February 2010 (EST)

			even though i'm pretty sure there is no real explanation: how could ando shock hiros brain without killing him, where would he know how much voltage to use or how long to use his lightning?

imported>Intuitive Empath: /* New Image? */

2010-02-10T00:08:41Z

New Image?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:08, 10 February 2010
Line 193:		Line 193:
	*I prefer the second one, as it demonstrates the ability more.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 23:33, 17 January 2010 (EST)		*I prefer the second one, as it demonstrates the ability more.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 23:33, 17 January 2010 (EST)
	*If we're keeping the name "Red Lightning", then the second image. --[[User:Powermimic\|Powermimic]] 05:08, 19 January 2010 (EST)		*If we're keeping the name "Red Lightning", then the second image. --[[User:Powermimic\|Powermimic]] 05:08, 19 January 2010 (EST)

			=== Second try ===

			Since we got to see Ando supercharging someone's ability again, does this mean we can use an image of that to his ability? Him supercharging Hiro looked much better than supercharging Daphne. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 19:08, 9 February 2010 (EST)

	== Name of Ando's ability ==		== Name of Ando's ability ==

imported>Ricard Desi: /* Rename to "supercharging" */

2010-02-09T23:56:09Z

Rename to "supercharging"

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:56, 9 February 2010
Line 298:		Line 298:
	* I still think Red Lightning is the proper choice. Not only has it been said numerous, numerous times on the show, it's been named in interviews too. The "Super charging" can be explained by the "lightning" aspect, in that electricity charges things. Supercharging doesn't describe the lightning aspect, and since we have two usable names, I think they one which describes it more clearly should be the one we use.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 16:54, 9 February 2010 (EST)		* I still think Red Lightning is the proper choice. Not only has it been said numerous, numerous times on the show, it's been named in interviews too. The "Super charging" can be explained by the "lightning" aspect, in that electricity charges things. Supercharging doesn't describe the lightning aspect, and since we have two usable names, I think they one which describes it more clearly should be the one we use.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 16:54, 9 February 2010 (EST)
	** There has been plenty of explanation on how "supercharging" accounts for all known effects of the ability. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 18:50, 9 February 2010 (EST)		** There has been plenty of explanation on how "supercharging" accounts for all known effects of the ability. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 18:50, 9 February 2010 (EST)
			** "Charging" implies an electric current. Lightning explained. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 18:56, 9 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Intuitive Empath at 23:50, 9 February 2010

2010-02-09T23:50:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:50, 9 February 2010
Line 297:		Line 297:
	***********See my point above, similar names do not mean that they're the same ability.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 15:44, 9 February 2010 (EST)		***********See my point above, similar names do not mean that they're the same ability.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 15:44, 9 February 2010 (EST)
	* I still think Red Lightning is the proper choice. Not only has it been said numerous, numerous times on the show, it's been named in interviews too. The "Super charging" can be explained by the "lightning" aspect, in that electricity charges things. Supercharging doesn't describe the lightning aspect, and since we have two usable names, I think they one which describes it more clearly should be the one we use.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 16:54, 9 February 2010 (EST)		* I still think Red Lightning is the proper choice. Not only has it been said numerous, numerous times on the show, it's been named in interviews too. The "Super charging" can be explained by the "lightning" aspect, in that electricity charges things. Supercharging doesn't describe the lightning aspect, and since we have two usable names, I think they one which describes it more clearly should be the one we use.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 16:54, 9 February 2010 (EST)
			** There has been plenty of explanation on how "supercharging" accounts for all known effects of the ability. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 18:50, 9 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Riddler: /* Rename to "supercharging" */

2010-02-09T21:54:50Z

Rename to "supercharging"

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 9 February 2010
Line 296:		Line 296:
	**********You're forgetting the point, what about Paulette's ability? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 15:43, 9 February 2010 (EST)		**********You're forgetting the point, what about Paulette's ability? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 15:43, 9 February 2010 (EST)
	***********See my point above, similar names do not mean that they're the same ability.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 15:44, 9 February 2010 (EST)		***********See my point above, similar names do not mean that they're the same ability.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 15:44, 9 February 2010 (EST)
			* I still think Red Lightning is the proper choice. Not only has it been said numerous, numerous times on the show, it's been named in interviews too. The "Super charging" can be explained by the "lightning" aspect, in that electricity charges things. Supercharging doesn't describe the lightning aspect, and since we have two usable names, I think they one which describes it more clearly should be the one we use.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 16:54, 9 February 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:26, 21 February 2010
Line 307:		Line 307:
	even though i'm pretty sure there is no real explanation: how could ando shock hiros brain without killing him, where would he know how much voltage to use or how long to use his lightning? --[[User:Angel0941\|Angel0941]]		even though i'm pretty sure there is no real explanation: how could ando shock hiros brain without killing him, where would he know how much voltage to use or how long to use his lightning? --[[User:Angel0941\|Angel0941]]
	*Chances are he didn't know. But it's just a show. He doesn't really have to have it explained or that. It is sci fi after all. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 11:44, 21 February 2010 (EST)		*Chances are he didn't know. But it's just a show. He doesn't really have to have it explained or that. It is sci fi after all. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 11:44, 21 February 2010 (EST)
			**I think he just used a small amount of energy to do it.--[[User:WarGrowlmon18\|WarGrowlmon18]] 15:26, 21 February 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:56, 9 February 2010
Line 298:		Line 298:
	* I still think Red Lightning is the proper choice. Not only has it been said numerous, numerous times on the show, it's been named in interviews too. The "Super charging" can be explained by the "lightning" aspect, in that electricity charges things. Supercharging doesn't describe the lightning aspect, and since we have two usable names, I think they one which describes it more clearly should be the one we use.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 16:54, 9 February 2010 (EST)		* I still think Red Lightning is the proper choice. Not only has it been said numerous, numerous times on the show, it's been named in interviews too. The "Super charging" can be explained by the "lightning" aspect, in that electricity charges things. Supercharging doesn't describe the lightning aspect, and since we have two usable names, I think they one which describes it more clearly should be the one we use.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 16:54, 9 February 2010 (EST)
	** There has been plenty of explanation on how "supercharging" accounts for all known effects of the ability. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 18:50, 9 February 2010 (EST)		** There has been plenty of explanation on how "supercharging" accounts for all known effects of the ability. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 18:50, 9 February 2010 (EST)
			** "Charging" implies an electric current. Lightning explained. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 18:56, 9 February 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:50, 9 February 2010
Line 297:		Line 297:
	***********See my point above, similar names do not mean that they're the same ability.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 15:44, 9 February 2010 (EST)		***********See my point above, similar names do not mean that they're the same ability.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 15:44, 9 February 2010 (EST)
	* I still think Red Lightning is the proper choice. Not only has it been said numerous, numerous times on the show, it's been named in interviews too. The "Super charging" can be explained by the "lightning" aspect, in that electricity charges things. Supercharging doesn't describe the lightning aspect, and since we have two usable names, I think they one which describes it more clearly should be the one we use.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 16:54, 9 February 2010 (EST)		* I still think Red Lightning is the proper choice. Not only has it been said numerous, numerous times on the show, it's been named in interviews too. The "Super charging" can be explained by the "lightning" aspect, in that electricity charges things. Supercharging doesn't describe the lightning aspect, and since we have two usable names, I think they one which describes it more clearly should be the one we use.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 16:54, 9 February 2010 (EST)
			** There has been plenty of explanation on how "supercharging" accounts for all known effects of the ability. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 18:50, 9 February 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 9 February 2010
Line 296:		Line 296:
	**********You're forgetting the point, what about Paulette's ability? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 15:43, 9 February 2010 (EST)		**********You're forgetting the point, what about Paulette's ability? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 15:43, 9 February 2010 (EST)
	***********See my point above, similar names do not mean that they're the same ability.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 15:44, 9 February 2010 (EST)		***********See my point above, similar names do not mean that they're the same ability.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 15:44, 9 February 2010 (EST)
			* I still think Red Lightning is the proper choice. Not only has it been said numerous, numerous times on the show, it's been named in interviews too. The "Super charging" can be explained by the "lightning" aspect, in that electricity charges things. Supercharging doesn't describe the lightning aspect, and since we have two usable names, I think they one which describes it more clearly should be the one we use.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 16:54, 9 February 2010 (EST)