Talk:The Genesis files - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Dynamic camouflage */

2007-05-18T16:31:30Z

Dynamic camouflage

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:31, 18 May 2007
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Dynamic camouflage */

2007-05-18T16:31:30Z

Dynamic camouflage

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:31, 18 May 2007
Line 41:		Line 41:
	* Quicksilver linked it to illusion, but I don't see any sound reason for that. I'm removing that link. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 10:15, 18 May 2007 (EDT)		* Quicksilver linked it to illusion, but I don't see any sound reason for that. I'm removing that link. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 10:15, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
	* Trying out a notes section for unclear items like this. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 10:18, 18 May 2007 (EDT)		* Trying out a notes section for unclear items like this. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 10:18, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
			**Good call on the Notes section -- that way we address the issue without making a definite decision about it. I tweaked the note a bit to be less speculative. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 12:31, 18 May 2007 (EDT)

imported>Ted C: /* Dynamic camouflage */

2007-05-18T14:18:43Z

Dynamic camouflage

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:18, 18 May 2007
Line 36:		Line 36:

	== Dynamic camouflage ==		== Dynamic camouflage ==

	Anybody have any idea what this power could be? [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 21:12, 7 March 2007 (EST)		Anybody have any idea what this power could be? [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 21:12, 7 March 2007 (EST)
	* In my honest opinion, it's invisibility. Dynamic is to use instantaneously (when needed), and what better camouflage than stealth? --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:18, 7 March 2007 (EST)		* In my honest opinion, it's invisibility. Dynamic is to use instantaneously (when needed), and what better camouflage than stealth? --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:18, 7 March 2007 (EST)
	* I don't think the writers ever gave it much thought, personally. However, if I had to guess, I'd say it was the ability to blend in with your surroundings. Kinda like the cover of the OK Go album. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 02:51, 10 March 2007 (EST)		* I don't think the writers ever gave it much thought, personally. However, if I had to guess, I'd say it was the ability to blend in with your surroundings. Kinda like the cover of the OK Go album. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 02:51, 10 March 2007 (EST)
	* Quicksilver linked it to illusion, but I don't see any sound reason for that. I'm removing that link. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 10:15, 18 May 2007 (EDT)		* Quicksilver linked it to illusion, but I don't see any sound reason for that. I'm removing that link. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 10:15, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
			* Trying out a notes section for unclear items like this. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 10:18, 18 May 2007 (EDT)

imported>Ted C: /* Dynamic camouflage */

2007-05-18T14:15:35Z

Dynamic camouflage

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:15, 18 May 2007
Line 40:		Line 40:
	* In my honest opinion, it's invisibility. Dynamic is to use instantaneously (when needed), and what better camouflage than stealth? --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:18, 7 March 2007 (EST)		* In my honest opinion, it's invisibility. Dynamic is to use instantaneously (when needed), and what better camouflage than stealth? --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:18, 7 March 2007 (EST)
	* I don't think the writers ever gave it much thought, personally. However, if I had to guess, I'd say it was the ability to blend in with your surroundings. Kinda like the cover of the OK Go album. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 02:51, 10 March 2007 (EST)		* I don't think the writers ever gave it much thought, personally. However, if I had to guess, I'd say it was the ability to blend in with your surroundings. Kinda like the cover of the OK Go album. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 02:51, 10 March 2007 (EST)
			* Quicksilver linked it to illusion, but I don't see any sound reason for that. I'm removing that link. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 10:15, 18 May 2007 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Dynamic camouflage */

2007-03-10T07:51:19Z

Dynamic camouflage

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:51, 10 March 2007
Line 39:		Line 39:
	Anybody have any idea what this power could be? [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 21:12, 7 March 2007 (EST)		Anybody have any idea what this power could be? [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 21:12, 7 March 2007 (EST)
	* In my honest opinion, it's invisibility. Dynamic is to use instantaneously (when needed), and what better camouflage than stealth? --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:18, 7 March 2007 (EST)		* In my honest opinion, it's invisibility. Dynamic is to use instantaneously (when needed), and what better camouflage than stealth? --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:18, 7 March 2007 (EST)
			* I don't think the writers ever gave it much thought, personally. However, if I had to guess, I'd say it was the ability to blend in with your surroundings. Kinda like the cover of the OK Go album. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 02:51, 10 March 2007 (EST)

imported>Riddler: /* Dynamic camouflage */

2007-03-08T02:18:19Z

Dynamic camouflage

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:18, 8 March 2007
Line 38:		Line 38:

	Anybody have any idea what this power could be? [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 21:12, 7 March 2007 (EST)		Anybody have any idea what this power could be? [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 21:12, 7 March 2007 (EST)
			* In my honest opinion, it's invisibility. Dynamic is to use instantaneously (when needed), and what better camouflage than stealth? --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:18, 7 March 2007 (EST)

imported>Heroe: Dynamic camouflage

2007-03-08T02:12:22Z

Dynamic camouflage

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:12, 8 March 2007
Line 34:		Line 34:
	******** So what we're really saying, then, is that 'Genesis Files' are only <b>a specific subset</b> of the total <i>"research files compiled by Chandra Suresh on the emergence of unusual genetic powers in certain individuals."</i> (quoting the description given on the Genesis Files page. Usually subsets are part of a whole, or part of a bigger set. aka ('Chandra's Files'?) Shouldn't we then create a page for 'Chandra's Files', and then have any subsetted groups listed off of it (which would include the Genesis subset, and possibly the 'Brian Davis' subset of files that Sylar scattered, etc...and we could add any future subsetted groups to this page as well. It just seems to me, that we are focusing on 1 single subset without having a page for the overall group that the subset belongs to.<small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 16:47, 26 February 2007 (EST)</small>		******** So what we're really saying, then, is that 'Genesis Files' are only <b>a specific subset</b> of the total <i>"research files compiled by Chandra Suresh on the emergence of unusual genetic powers in certain individuals."</i> (quoting the description given on the Genesis Files page. Usually subsets are part of a whole, or part of a bigger set. aka ('Chandra's Files'?) Shouldn't we then create a page for 'Chandra's Files', and then have any subsetted groups listed off of it (which would include the Genesis subset, and possibly the 'Brian Davis' subset of files that Sylar scattered, etc...and we could add any future subsetted groups to this page as well. It just seems to me, that we are focusing on 1 single subset without having a page for the overall group that the subset belongs to.<small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 16:47, 26 February 2007 (EST)</small>
	********* I have no problem with an article for Chandra's other files, but this article is not it. It would be like adding [[Jessica's rifle]] to [[Jessica's gun]]; they are different items with different histories. I'd rather see a separate article for the files on evolved humans Chandra has in New York than an overarching article for all of his files. With a few exceptions like [[Isaac's paintings]], most of the Items articles relate to specific items, which makes the About section practical. To use Jessica's guns as a parallel again, an article called "Jessica's firearms" which included both the gun and the rifle wouldn't be as useful as separate articles for each gun because the two guns have separate appearances and histories. I'll go ahead and change the lead text of this article to make it clearer that this applies only to the one set of files (not that it's Gospel or anything, and I think it's already abundantly clear from the rest of the article what is and isn't included). Then you can add whatever article you'd like for his other files.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:18, 26 February 2007 (EST)		********* I have no problem with an article for Chandra's other files, but this article is not it. It would be like adding [[Jessica's rifle]] to [[Jessica's gun]]; they are different items with different histories. I'd rather see a separate article for the files on evolved humans Chandra has in New York than an overarching article for all of his files. With a few exceptions like [[Isaac's paintings]], most of the Items articles relate to specific items, which makes the About section practical. To use Jessica's guns as a parallel again, an article called "Jessica's firearms" which included both the gun and the rifle wouldn't be as useful as separate articles for each gun because the two guns have separate appearances and histories. I'll go ahead and change the lead text of this article to make it clearer that this applies only to the one set of files (not that it's Gospel or anything, and I think it's already abundantly clear from the rest of the article what is and isn't included). Then you can add whatever article you'd like for his other files.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:18, 26 February 2007 (EST)

			== Dynamic camouflage ==

			Anybody have any idea what this power could be? [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 21:12, 7 March 2007 (EST)

imported>Hardvice at 23:18, 26 February 2007

2007-02-26T23:18:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:18, 26 February 2007
Line 33:		Line 33:
	******* No. If you read the episode history and the photo caption, it's made very explicit that the "Genesis Files" refers to the ones Mohinder takes from Chandra's apartment in Madras. We can't just label any of Chandra's folders as part of the Genesis File because that implies that they are from the file set Mohinder finds. They're different objects and deserve different articles.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:31, 26 February 2007 (EST)		******* No. If you read the episode history and the photo caption, it's made very explicit that the "Genesis Files" refers to the ones Mohinder takes from Chandra's apartment in Madras. We can't just label any of Chandra's folders as part of the Genesis File because that implies that they are from the file set Mohinder finds. They're different objects and deserve different articles.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:31, 26 February 2007 (EST)
	******** So what we're really saying, then, is that 'Genesis Files' are only <b>a specific subset</b> of the total <i>"research files compiled by Chandra Suresh on the emergence of unusual genetic powers in certain individuals."</i> (quoting the description given on the Genesis Files page. Usually subsets are part of a whole, or part of a bigger set. aka ('Chandra's Files'?) Shouldn't we then create a page for 'Chandra's Files', and then have any subsetted groups listed off of it (which would include the Genesis subset, and possibly the 'Brian Davis' subset of files that Sylar scattered, etc...and we could add any future subsetted groups to this page as well. It just seems to me, that we are focusing on 1 single subset without having a page for the overall group that the subset belongs to.<small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 16:47, 26 February 2007 (EST)</small>		******** So what we're really saying, then, is that 'Genesis Files' are only <b>a specific subset</b> of the total <i>"research files compiled by Chandra Suresh on the emergence of unusual genetic powers in certain individuals."</i> (quoting the description given on the Genesis Files page. Usually subsets are part of a whole, or part of a bigger set. aka ('Chandra's Files'?) Shouldn't we then create a page for 'Chandra's Files', and then have any subsetted groups listed off of it (which would include the Genesis subset, and possibly the 'Brian Davis' subset of files that Sylar scattered, etc...and we could add any future subsetted groups to this page as well. It just seems to me, that we are focusing on 1 single subset without having a page for the overall group that the subset belongs to.<small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 16:47, 26 February 2007 (EST)</small>
			********* I have no problem with an article for Chandra's other files, but this article is not it. It would be like adding [[Jessica's rifle]] to [[Jessica's gun]]; they are different items with different histories. I'd rather see a separate article for the files on evolved humans Chandra has in New York than an overarching article for all of his files. With a few exceptions like [[Isaac's paintings]], most of the Items articles relate to specific items, which makes the About section practical. To use Jessica's guns as a parallel again, an article called "Jessica's firearms" which included both the gun and the rifle wouldn't be as useful as separate articles for each gun because the two guns have separate appearances and histories. I'll go ahead and change the lead text of this article to make it clearer that this applies only to the one set of files (not that it's Gospel or anything, and I think it's already abundantly clear from the rest of the article what is and isn't included). Then you can add whatever article you'd like for his other files.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:18, 26 February 2007 (EST)

imported>HiroDynoSlayer: /* Brian Davis */

2007-02-26T22:35:08Z

Brian Davis

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:35, 26 February 2007
Line 32:		Line 32:
	******* I would be hesitant to rename this page "Chandra's Files" because I think that's too all-encompassing. I think Sanjog's file is a very different thing from the Genesis Files, which are both quite specific names. If we want to make an article for his other files, I would call it something like "Chandra's New York Files" or even just "Chandra's Files", but I wouldn't group GF and SF together. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:18, 26 February 2007 (EST)		******* I would be hesitant to rename this page "Chandra's Files" because I think that's too all-encompassing. I think Sanjog's file is a very different thing from the Genesis Files, which are both quite specific names. If we want to make an article for his other files, I would call it something like "Chandra's New York Files" or even just "Chandra's Files", but I wouldn't group GF and SF together. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:18, 26 February 2007 (EST)
	******* No. If you read the episode history and the photo caption, it's made very explicit that the "Genesis Files" refers to the ones Mohinder takes from Chandra's apartment in Madras. We can't just label any of Chandra's folders as part of the Genesis File because that implies that they are from the file set Mohinder finds. They're different objects and deserve different articles.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:31, 26 February 2007 (EST)		******* No. If you read the episode history and the photo caption, it's made very explicit that the "Genesis Files" refers to the ones Mohinder takes from Chandra's apartment in Madras. We can't just label any of Chandra's folders as part of the Genesis File because that implies that they are from the file set Mohinder finds. They're different objects and deserve different articles.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:31, 26 February 2007 (EST)
			******** So what we're really saying, then, is that 'Genesis Files' are only <b>a specific subset</b> of the total <i>"research files compiled by Chandra Suresh on the emergence of unusual genetic powers in certain individuals."</i> (quoting the description given on the Genesis Files page. Usually subsets are part of a whole, or part of a bigger set. aka ('Chandra's Files'?) Shouldn't we then create a page for 'Chandra's Files', and then have any subsetted groups listed off of it (which would include the Genesis subset, and possibly the 'Brian Davis' subset of files that Sylar scattered, etc...and we could add any future subsetted groups to this page as well. It just seems to me, that we are focusing on 1 single subset without having a page for the overall group that the subset belongs to.<small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 16:47, 26 February 2007 (EST)</small>

imported>Hardvice: clarify

2007-02-26T21:52:03Z

clarify

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:52, 26 February 2007
Line 31:		Line 31:
	****** Maybe the term 'Genesis files' is too specific in the first place. Just because one of Chandra's folders has this label, and we know 'some' folders are within it, it doesn't mean all gentic enhanced folders are within Genesis, and it doesn't mean we should discount other Chandra folders about unusual genetic people. The description of this page states: <i><b>The Genesis files are a series of research files compiled by Chandra Suresh on the emergence of unusual genetic powers in certain individuals.</b></i> Brian Davis' file, whether it is within the Genesis folder itself or not, is still just as much a <i><b>research file compiled by Chandra Suresh on the emergence of unusual genetic powers in certain individuals.</b></i> Perhaps instead of narrowing it down to be called 'Genesis Files' <b>maybe it should just say '<u>Chandra's Files</u>'</b>. My point is, we shouldn't have to proove a folder on genetically enhanced people are 'within' the Genesis files folder should we? Shouldn't any folders by Chandra that involve genetically enhanced individuals be grouped together, until we find a specific reason to group 'Genesis' genetically enhanced people differently than 'non-Genesis' genetically enhanced people. Wouldn't it be more accurate, to simply refer to '<u>Chandra's Files</u> on unusual genetic powers' and then make a note that at least some of the folders have been found to be grouped in a 'Genesis' folder(but we can't confirm its significance yet, or if/why some/all folders are nor are not included within the Genesis folder)? <small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 14:47, 26 February 2007 (EST)</small>		****** Maybe the term 'Genesis files' is too specific in the first place. Just because one of Chandra's folders has this label, and we know 'some' folders are within it, it doesn't mean all gentic enhanced folders are within Genesis, and it doesn't mean we should discount other Chandra folders about unusual genetic people. The description of this page states: <i><b>The Genesis files are a series of research files compiled by Chandra Suresh on the emergence of unusual genetic powers in certain individuals.</b></i> Brian Davis' file, whether it is within the Genesis folder itself or not, is still just as much a <i><b>research file compiled by Chandra Suresh on the emergence of unusual genetic powers in certain individuals.</b></i> Perhaps instead of narrowing it down to be called 'Genesis Files' <b>maybe it should just say '<u>Chandra's Files</u>'</b>. My point is, we shouldn't have to proove a folder on genetically enhanced people are 'within' the Genesis files folder should we? Shouldn't any folders by Chandra that involve genetically enhanced individuals be grouped together, until we find a specific reason to group 'Genesis' genetically enhanced people differently than 'non-Genesis' genetically enhanced people. Wouldn't it be more accurate, to simply refer to '<u>Chandra's Files</u> on unusual genetic powers' and then make a note that at least some of the folders have been found to be grouped in a 'Genesis' folder(but we can't confirm its significance yet, or if/why some/all folders are nor are not included within the Genesis folder)? <small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 14:47, 26 February 2007 (EST)</small>
	******* I would be hesitant to rename this page "Chandra's Files" because I think that's too all-encompassing. I think Sanjog's file is a very different thing from the Genesis Files, which are both quite specific names. If we want to make an article for his other files, I would call it something like "Chandra's New York Files" or even just "Chandra's Files", but I wouldn't group GF and SF together. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:18, 26 February 2007 (EST)		******* I would be hesitant to rename this page "Chandra's Files" because I think that's too all-encompassing. I think Sanjog's file is a very different thing from the Genesis Files, which are both quite specific names. If we want to make an article for his other files, I would call it something like "Chandra's New York Files" or even just "Chandra's Files", but I wouldn't group GF and SF together. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:18, 26 February 2007 (EST)
	******* No. If you read the episode history and the photo caption, it's made very explicit that the "Genesis Files" refers to the ones Mohinder takes from Chandra's apartment in Madras. We can't just label any of Chandra's folders as part of the Genesis File because that implies that they are from the file set Mohinder finds. They're different objects.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:31, 26 February 2007 (EST)		******* No. If you read the episode history and the photo caption, it's made very explicit that the "Genesis Files" refers to the ones Mohinder takes from Chandra's apartment in Madras. We can't just label any of Chandra's folders as part of the Genesis File because that implies that they are from the file set Mohinder finds. They're different objects and deserve different articles.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:31, 26 February 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:31, 18 May 2007
Line 41:		Line 41:
	* Quicksilver linked it to illusion, but I don't see any sound reason for that. I'm removing that link. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 10:15, 18 May 2007 (EDT)		* Quicksilver linked it to illusion, but I don't see any sound reason for that. I'm removing that link. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 10:15, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
	* Trying out a notes section for unclear items like this. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 10:18, 18 May 2007 (EDT)		* Trying out a notes section for unclear items like this. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 10:18, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
			**Good call on the Notes section -- that way we address the issue without making a definite decision about it. I tweaked the note a bit to be less speculative. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 12:31, 18 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:18, 18 May 2007
Line 36:		Line 36:

	== Dynamic camouflage ==		== Dynamic camouflage ==

	Anybody have any idea what this power could be? [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 21:12, 7 March 2007 (EST)		Anybody have any idea what this power could be? [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 21:12, 7 March 2007 (EST)
	* In my honest opinion, it's invisibility. Dynamic is to use instantaneously (when needed), and what better camouflage than stealth? --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:18, 7 March 2007 (EST)		* In my honest opinion, it's invisibility. Dynamic is to use instantaneously (when needed), and what better camouflage than stealth? --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:18, 7 March 2007 (EST)
	* I don't think the writers ever gave it much thought, personally. However, if I had to guess, I'd say it was the ability to blend in with your surroundings. Kinda like the cover of the OK Go album. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 02:51, 10 March 2007 (EST)		* I don't think the writers ever gave it much thought, personally. However, if I had to guess, I'd say it was the ability to blend in with your surroundings. Kinda like the cover of the OK Go album. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 02:51, 10 March 2007 (EST)
	* Quicksilver linked it to illusion, but I don't see any sound reason for that. I'm removing that link. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 10:15, 18 May 2007 (EDT)		* Quicksilver linked it to illusion, but I don't see any sound reason for that. I'm removing that link. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 10:15, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
			* Trying out a notes section for unclear items like this. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 10:18, 18 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:15, 18 May 2007
Line 40:		Line 40:
	* In my honest opinion, it's invisibility. Dynamic is to use instantaneously (when needed), and what better camouflage than stealth? --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:18, 7 March 2007 (EST)		* In my honest opinion, it's invisibility. Dynamic is to use instantaneously (when needed), and what better camouflage than stealth? --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:18, 7 March 2007 (EST)
	* I don't think the writers ever gave it much thought, personally. However, if I had to guess, I'd say it was the ability to blend in with your surroundings. Kinda like the cover of the OK Go album. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 02:51, 10 March 2007 (EST)		* I don't think the writers ever gave it much thought, personally. However, if I had to guess, I'd say it was the ability to blend in with your surroundings. Kinda like the cover of the OK Go album. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 02:51, 10 March 2007 (EST)
			* Quicksilver linked it to illusion, but I don't see any sound reason for that. I'm removing that link. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 10:15, 18 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:51, 10 March 2007
Line 39:		Line 39:
	Anybody have any idea what this power could be? [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 21:12, 7 March 2007 (EST)		Anybody have any idea what this power could be? [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 21:12, 7 March 2007 (EST)
	* In my honest opinion, it's invisibility. Dynamic is to use instantaneously (when needed), and what better camouflage than stealth? --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:18, 7 March 2007 (EST)		* In my honest opinion, it's invisibility. Dynamic is to use instantaneously (when needed), and what better camouflage than stealth? --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:18, 7 March 2007 (EST)
			* I don't think the writers ever gave it much thought, personally. However, if I had to guess, I'd say it was the ability to blend in with your surroundings. Kinda like the cover of the OK Go album. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 02:51, 10 March 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:18, 26 February 2007
Line 33:		Line 33:
	******* No. If you read the episode history and the photo caption, it's made very explicit that the "Genesis Files" refers to the ones Mohinder takes from Chandra's apartment in Madras. We can't just label any of Chandra's folders as part of the Genesis File because that implies that they are from the file set Mohinder finds. They're different objects and deserve different articles.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:31, 26 February 2007 (EST)		******* No. If you read the episode history and the photo caption, it's made very explicit that the "Genesis Files" refers to the ones Mohinder takes from Chandra's apartment in Madras. We can't just label any of Chandra's folders as part of the Genesis File because that implies that they are from the file set Mohinder finds. They're different objects and deserve different articles.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:31, 26 February 2007 (EST)
	******** So what we're really saying, then, is that 'Genesis Files' are only <b>a specific subset</b> of the total <i>"research files compiled by Chandra Suresh on the emergence of unusual genetic powers in certain individuals."</i> (quoting the description given on the Genesis Files page. Usually subsets are part of a whole, or part of a bigger set. aka ('Chandra's Files'?) Shouldn't we then create a page for 'Chandra's Files', and then have any subsetted groups listed off of it (which would include the Genesis subset, and possibly the 'Brian Davis' subset of files that Sylar scattered, etc...and we could add any future subsetted groups to this page as well. It just seems to me, that we are focusing on 1 single subset without having a page for the overall group that the subset belongs to.<small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 16:47, 26 February 2007 (EST)</small>		******** So what we're really saying, then, is that 'Genesis Files' are only <b>a specific subset</b> of the total <i>"research files compiled by Chandra Suresh on the emergence of unusual genetic powers in certain individuals."</i> (quoting the description given on the Genesis Files page. Usually subsets are part of a whole, or part of a bigger set. aka ('Chandra's Files'?) Shouldn't we then create a page for 'Chandra's Files', and then have any subsetted groups listed off of it (which would include the Genesis subset, and possibly the 'Brian Davis' subset of files that Sylar scattered, etc...and we could add any future subsetted groups to this page as well. It just seems to me, that we are focusing on 1 single subset without having a page for the overall group that the subset belongs to.<small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 16:47, 26 February 2007 (EST)</small>
			********* I have no problem with an article for Chandra's other files, but this article is not it. It would be like adding [[Jessica's rifle]] to [[Jessica's gun]]; they are different items with different histories. I'd rather see a separate article for the files on evolved humans Chandra has in New York than an overarching article for all of his files. With a few exceptions like [[Isaac's paintings]], most of the Items articles relate to specific items, which makes the About section practical. To use Jessica's guns as a parallel again, an article called "Jessica's firearms" which included both the gun and the rifle wouldn't be as useful as separate articles for each gun because the two guns have separate appearances and histories. I'll go ahead and change the lead text of this article to make it clearer that this applies only to the one set of files (not that it's Gospel or anything, and I think it's already abundantly clear from the rest of the article what is and isn't included). Then you can add whatever article you'd like for his other files.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:18, 26 February 2007 (EST)