Talk:The German's informant - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* RGS's interview */

2008-09-06T16:26:13Z

RGS's interview

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:26, 6 September 2008
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* RGS's interview */

2008-09-06T16:26:13Z

RGS's interview

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:26, 6 September 2008
Line 16:		Line 16:
	This is exactly what the German's informant gave him at the bank. So, wouldn't these two be the same?--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 01:41, 6 September 2008 (EDT)		This is exactly what the German's informant gave him at the bank. So, wouldn't these two be the same?--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 01:41, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
	* Potentially, but not necessarily as the informant could have been one of Evs Dropper's helpers. More than likely, I think the informant was one of Julien's clones, in which case the two would be the same. Getting confirmation of this is a different matter.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:59, 6 September 2008 (EDT)		* Potentially, but not necessarily as the informant could have been one of Evs Dropper's helpers. More than likely, I think the informant was one of Julien's clones, in which case the two would be the same. Getting confirmation of this is a different matter.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:59, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
			* I think they're the same, and I think this article should be merged into the Evs Dropper article. I don't think Evs could have been any more clear without spelling it out for us...But that's just me. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 12:26, 6 September 2008 (EDT)

imported>MiamiVolts: /* RGS's interview */ reply

2008-09-06T05:59:05Z

RGS's interview: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:59, 6 September 2008
Line 15:		Line 15:

	This is exactly what the German's informant gave him at the bank. So, wouldn't these two be the same?--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 01:41, 6 September 2008 (EDT)		This is exactly what the German's informant gave him at the bank. So, wouldn't these two be the same?--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 01:41, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
			* Potentially, but not necessarily as the informant could have been one of Evs Dropper's helpers. More than likely, I think the informant was one of Julien's clones, in which case the two would be the same. Getting confirmation of this is a different matter.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:59, 6 September 2008 (EDT)

imported>Baldbobbo: /* RGS's interview */ new section

2008-09-06T05:41:21Z

RGS's interview: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:41, 6 September 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:
	***** Personally I always thought it was Evs... maybe not, but I guess the GN crew/Evs will clear it up sometime soon. -- {{User:Friskymuffin/Sig}} 09:09, 4 July 2008 (EDT)		***** Personally I always thought it was Evs... maybe not, but I guess the GN crew/Evs will clear it up sometime soon. -- {{User:Friskymuffin/Sig}} 09:09, 4 July 2008 (EDT)
	****** Given the introduction to [[Hindsight]], this article should be merged with [[Evsdropr]], right? [[User:Pierre\|Pierre]] 10:56, 19 August 2008 (EDT)		****** Given the introduction to [[Hindsight]], this article should be merged with [[Evsdropr]], right? [[User:Pierre\|Pierre]] 10:56, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

			== RGS's interview ==

			From [[Interview:Evsdropr\|this]]:
			RS: How much briefing did you give the German?

			ED: I gave him some headshots of our three agents and the mission files so he would know what the Company knew.

			This is exactly what the German's informant gave him at the bank. So, wouldn't these two be the same?--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 01:41, 6 September 2008 (EDT)

imported>Pierre at 14:56, 19 August 2008

2008-08-19T14:56:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:56, 19 August 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	**** Uh, I'm not buying that. If Evs knew the German was captured and had saw him/her, Evs should be a lot more vocal to us now. That isn't happening. Obviously, Evs isn't that scared of the Company finding out who the German talked to.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:33, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		**** Uh, I'm not buying that. If Evs knew the German was captured and had saw him/her, Evs should be a lot more vocal to us now. That isn't happening. Obviously, Evs isn't that scared of the Company finding out who the German talked to.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:33, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
	***** Personally I always thought it was Evs... maybe not, but I guess the GN crew/Evs will clear it up sometime soon. -- {{User:Friskymuffin/Sig}} 09:09, 4 July 2008 (EDT)		***** Personally I always thought it was Evs... maybe not, but I guess the GN crew/Evs will clear it up sometime soon. -- {{User:Friskymuffin/Sig}} 09:09, 4 July 2008 (EDT)
			****** Given the introduction to [[Hindsight]], this article should be merged with [[Evsdropr]], right? [[User:Pierre\|Pierre]] 10:56, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

imported>Friskymuffin: + reply

2008-07-04T13:09:46Z

+ reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:09, 4 July 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:
	***They don't tell us because we know the answer already.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 20:22, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		***They don't tell us because we know the answer already.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 20:22, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
	**** Uh, I'm not buying that. If Evs knew the German was captured and had saw him/her, Evs should be a lot more vocal to us now. That isn't happening. Obviously, Evs isn't that scared of the Company finding out who the German talked to.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:33, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		**** Uh, I'm not buying that. If Evs knew the German was captured and had saw him/her, Evs should be a lot more vocal to us now. That isn't happening. Obviously, Evs isn't that scared of the Company finding out who the German talked to.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:33, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
			***** Personally I always thought it was Evs... maybe not, but I guess the GN crew/Evs will clear it up sometime soon. -- {{User:Friskymuffin/Sig}} 09:09, 4 July 2008 (EDT)

imported>MiamiVolts at 00:33, 2 July 2008

2008-07-02T00:33:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:33, 2 July 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Can't we just say it's Evs? I know we're not 100% sure, but can't we just say it's him?--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 19:41, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		Can't we just say it's Evs? I know we're not 100% sure, but can't we just say it's him?--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 19:41, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
	* Yeah, I was wondering about this myself. The intro to the graphic novel confirmed it. If the person worked for Evs, they would have said it and the character wouldn't have been shadowed. Just rename the bastard.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 19:49, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		* Yeah, I was wondering about this myself. The intro to the graphic novel confirmed it. If the person worked for Evs, they would have said it and the character wouldn't have been shadowed. Just rename the bastard.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 19:49, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
	** Evs ~~have~~ a shadowed helper is not improbable, but likely imho. The intro. says that Evs warned the German, but not how Evs warned the German (ie. in person or by messenger). As for claiming that if it was just a helper they would be showed, that is speculation. From the interviews, we know that the writers and artists don't all communicate with one another about everything, so for all we know the writer was told to use a mystery person and that the person's identity would be determined later. So then, the artist portrayed the character as they saw fit. Also, the fact that they don't come right out and say Evsdropr in either part 1 or part 2 is suspicious, imho.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:20, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		** Evs having a shadowed helper is not improbable, but likely imho. The intro. says that Evs warned the German, but not how Evs warned the German (ie. in person or by messenger). As for claiming that if it was just a helper they would be showed, that is speculation. From the interviews, we know that the writers and artists don't all communicate with one another about everything, so for all we know the writer was told to use a mystery person and that the person's identity would be determined later. So then, the artist portrayed the character as they saw fit. Also, the fact that they don't come right out and say Evsdropr in either part 1 or part 2 is suspicious, imho.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:20, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
	***They don't tell us because we know the answer already.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 20:22, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		***They don't tell us because we know the answer already.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 20:22, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
			**** Uh, I'm not buying that. If Evs knew the German was captured and had saw him/her, Evs should be a lot more vocal to us now. That isn't happening. Obviously, Evs isn't that scared of the Company finding out who the German talked to.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:33, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

imported>Citizen: responding

2008-07-02T00:22:35Z

responding

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:22, 2 July 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* Yeah, I was wondering about this myself. The intro to the graphic novel confirmed it. If the person worked for Evs, they would have said it and the character wouldn't have been shadowed. Just rename the bastard.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 19:49, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		* Yeah, I was wondering about this myself. The intro to the graphic novel confirmed it. If the person worked for Evs, they would have said it and the character wouldn't have been shadowed. Just rename the bastard.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 19:49, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
	** Evs have a shadowed helper is not improbable, but likely imho. The intro. says that Evs warned the German, but not how Evs warned the German (ie. in person or by messenger). As for claiming that if it was just a helper they would be showed, that is speculation. From the interviews, we know that the writers and artists don't all communicate with one another about everything, so for all we know the writer was told to use a mystery person and that the person's identity would be determined later. So then, the artist portrayed the character as they saw fit. Also, the fact that they don't come right out and say Evsdropr in either part 1 or part 2 is suspicious, imho.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:20, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		** Evs have a shadowed helper is not improbable, but likely imho. The intro. says that Evs warned the German, but not how Evs warned the German (ie. in person or by messenger). As for claiming that if it was just a helper they would be showed, that is speculation. From the interviews, we know that the writers and artists don't all communicate with one another about everything, so for all we know the writer was told to use a mystery person and that the person's identity would be determined later. So then, the artist portrayed the character as they saw fit. Also, the fact that they don't come right out and say Evsdropr in either part 1 or part 2 is suspicious, imho.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:20, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
			***They don't tell us because we know the answer already.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 20:22, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

imported>MiamiVolts at 00:20, 2 July 2008

2008-07-02T00:20:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:20, 2 July 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Can't we just say it's Evs? I know we're not 100% sure, but can't we just say it's him?--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 19:41, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		Can't we just say it's Evs? I know we're not 100% sure, but can't we just say it's him?--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 19:41, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
	* Yeah, I was wondering about this myself. The intro to the graphic novel confirmed it. If the person worked for Evs, they would have said it and the character wouldn't have been shadowed. Just rename the bastard.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 19:49, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		* Yeah, I was wondering about this myself. The intro to the graphic novel confirmed it. If the person worked for Evs, they would have said it and the character wouldn't have been shadowed. Just rename the bastard.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 19:49, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
	** Evs have a shadowed helper is not improbable, but likely imho. The intro. says that Evs warned the German, but not how Evs warned the German (ie. in person or by messenger). As for claiming that if it was just a helper they would be showed, that is speculation. From the interviews, we know that the writers and artists don't all communicate with one another about everything, so for all we know the writer was told to use a mystery person and that the person's identity would be determined later. So then, the artist portrayed the character as they saw fit. Also, the fact that they don't come right out and ~~saw~~ Evsdropr in either part 1 or part 2 is suspicious, imho.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:20, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		** Evs have a shadowed helper is not improbable, but likely imho. The intro. says that Evs warned the German, but not how Evs warned the German (ie. in person or by messenger). As for claiming that if it was just a helper they would be showed, that is speculation. From the interviews, we know that the writers and artists don't all communicate with one another about everything, so for all we know the writer was told to use a mystery person and that the person's identity would be determined later. So then, the artist portrayed the character as they saw fit. Also, the fact that they don't come right out and say Evsdropr in either part 1 or part 2 is suspicious, imho.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:20, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

imported>MiamiVolts at 00:20, 2 July 2008

2008-07-02T00:20:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:20, 2 July 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Can't we just say it's Evs? I know we're not 100% sure, but can't we just say it's him?--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 19:41, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		Can't we just say it's Evs? I know we're not 100% sure, but can't we just say it's him?--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 19:41, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
	* Yeah, I was wondering about this myself. The intro to the graphic novel confirmed it. If the person worked for Evs, they would have said it and the character wouldn't have been shadowed. Just rename the bastard.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 19:49, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		* Yeah, I was wondering about this myself. The intro to the graphic novel confirmed it. If the person worked for Evs, they would have said it and the character wouldn't have been shadowed. Just rename the bastard.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 19:49, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
			** Evs have a shadowed helper is not improbable, but likely imho. The intro. says that Evs warned the German, but not how Evs warned the German (ie. in person or by messenger). As for claiming that if it was just a helper they would be showed, that is speculation. From the interviews, we know that the writers and artists don't all communicate with one another about everything, so for all we know the writer was told to use a mystery person and that the person's identity would be determined later. So then, the artist portrayed the character as they saw fit. Also, the fact that they don't come right out and saw Evsdropr in either part 1 or part 2 is suspicious, imho.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:20, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:33, 2 July 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Can't we just say it's Evs? I know we're not 100% sure, but can't we just say it's him?--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 19:41, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		Can't we just say it's Evs? I know we're not 100% sure, but can't we just say it's him?--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 19:41, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
	* Yeah, I was wondering about this myself. The intro to the graphic novel confirmed it. If the person worked for Evs, they would have said it and the character wouldn't have been shadowed. Just rename the bastard.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 19:49, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		* Yeah, I was wondering about this myself. The intro to the graphic novel confirmed it. If the person worked for Evs, they would have said it and the character wouldn't have been shadowed. Just rename the bastard.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 19:49, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
	** Evs ~~have~~ a shadowed helper is not improbable, but likely imho. The intro. says that Evs warned the German, but not how Evs warned the German (ie. in person or by messenger). As for claiming that if it was just a helper they would be showed, that is speculation. From the interviews, we know that the writers and artists don't all communicate with one another about everything, so for all we know the writer was told to use a mystery person and that the person's identity would be determined later. So then, the artist portrayed the character as they saw fit. Also, the fact that they don't come right out and say Evsdropr in either part 1 or part 2 is suspicious, imho.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:20, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		** Evs having a shadowed helper is not improbable, but likely imho. The intro. says that Evs warned the German, but not how Evs warned the German (ie. in person or by messenger). As for claiming that if it was just a helper they would be showed, that is speculation. From the interviews, we know that the writers and artists don't all communicate with one another about everything, so for all we know the writer was told to use a mystery person and that the person's identity would be determined later. So then, the artist portrayed the character as they saw fit. Also, the fact that they don't come right out and say Evsdropr in either part 1 or part 2 is suspicious, imho.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:20, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
	***They don't tell us because we know the answer already.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 20:22, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		***They don't tell us because we know the answer already.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 20:22, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
			**** Uh, I'm not buying that. If Evs knew the German was captured and had saw him/her, Evs should be a lot more vocal to us now. That isn't happening. Obviously, Evs isn't that scared of the Company finding out who the German talked to.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:33, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:22, 2 July 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* Yeah, I was wondering about this myself. The intro to the graphic novel confirmed it. If the person worked for Evs, they would have said it and the character wouldn't have been shadowed. Just rename the bastard.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 19:49, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		* Yeah, I was wondering about this myself. The intro to the graphic novel confirmed it. If the person worked for Evs, they would have said it and the character wouldn't have been shadowed. Just rename the bastard.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 19:49, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
	** Evs have a shadowed helper is not improbable, but likely imho. The intro. says that Evs warned the German, but not how Evs warned the German (ie. in person or by messenger). As for claiming that if it was just a helper they would be showed, that is speculation. From the interviews, we know that the writers and artists don't all communicate with one another about everything, so for all we know the writer was told to use a mystery person and that the person's identity would be determined later. So then, the artist portrayed the character as they saw fit. Also, the fact that they don't come right out and say Evsdropr in either part 1 or part 2 is suspicious, imho.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:20, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		** Evs have a shadowed helper is not improbable, but likely imho. The intro. says that Evs warned the German, but not how Evs warned the German (ie. in person or by messenger). As for claiming that if it was just a helper they would be showed, that is speculation. From the interviews, we know that the writers and artists don't all communicate with one another about everything, so for all we know the writer was told to use a mystery person and that the person's identity would be determined later. So then, the artist portrayed the character as they saw fit. Also, the fact that they don't come right out and say Evsdropr in either part 1 or part 2 is suspicious, imho.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:20, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
			***They don't tell us because we know the answer already.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 20:22, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:20, 2 July 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Can't we just say it's Evs? I know we're not 100% sure, but can't we just say it's him?--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 19:41, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		Can't we just say it's Evs? I know we're not 100% sure, but can't we just say it's him?--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 19:41, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
	* Yeah, I was wondering about this myself. The intro to the graphic novel confirmed it. If the person worked for Evs, they would have said it and the character wouldn't have been shadowed. Just rename the bastard.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 19:49, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		* Yeah, I was wondering about this myself. The intro to the graphic novel confirmed it. If the person worked for Evs, they would have said it and the character wouldn't have been shadowed. Just rename the bastard.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 19:49, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
	** Evs have a shadowed helper is not improbable, but likely imho. The intro. says that Evs warned the German, but not how Evs warned the German (ie. in person or by messenger). As for claiming that if it was just a helper they would be showed, that is speculation. From the interviews, we know that the writers and artists don't all communicate with one another about everything, so for all we know the writer was told to use a mystery person and that the person's identity would be determined later. So then, the artist portrayed the character as they saw fit. Also, the fact that they don't come right out and ~~saw~~ Evsdropr in either part 1 or part 2 is suspicious, imho.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:20, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		** Evs have a shadowed helper is not improbable, but likely imho. The intro. says that Evs warned the German, but not how Evs warned the German (ie. in person or by messenger). As for claiming that if it was just a helper they would be showed, that is speculation. From the interviews, we know that the writers and artists don't all communicate with one another about everything, so for all we know the writer was told to use a mystery person and that the person's identity would be determined later. So then, the artist portrayed the character as they saw fit. Also, the fact that they don't come right out and say Evsdropr in either part 1 or part 2 is suspicious, imho.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:20, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:20, 2 July 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Can't we just say it's Evs? I know we're not 100% sure, but can't we just say it's him?--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 19:41, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		Can't we just say it's Evs? I know we're not 100% sure, but can't we just say it's him?--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 19:41, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
	* Yeah, I was wondering about this myself. The intro to the graphic novel confirmed it. If the person worked for Evs, they would have said it and the character wouldn't have been shadowed. Just rename the bastard.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 19:49, 1 July 2008 (EDT)		* Yeah, I was wondering about this myself. The intro to the graphic novel confirmed it. If the person worked for Evs, they would have said it and the character wouldn't have been shadowed. Just rename the bastard.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 19:49, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
			** Evs have a shadowed helper is not improbable, but likely imho. The intro. says that Evs warned the German, but not how Evs warned the German (ie. in person or by messenger). As for claiming that if it was just a helper they would be showed, that is speculation. From the interviews, we know that the writers and artists don't all communicate with one another about everything, so for all we know the writer was told to use a mystery person and that the person's identity would be determined later. So then, the artist portrayed the character as they saw fit. Also, the fact that they don't come right out and saw Evsdropr in either part 1 or part 2 is suspicious, imho.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:20, 1 July 2008 (EDT)