Talk:Theories:Miscellaneous - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Comicon panel */

2007-07-30T15:33:14Z

Comicon panel

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:33, 30 July 2007
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Comicon panel */

2007-07-30T15:33:14Z

Comicon panel

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:33, 30 July 2007
Line 122:		Line 122:

	In the recent CBR article that showed the Season 2 trailer, Kring confirmed that Uluru (the rock monster) will remain in the comics, so do we now axe the theories about Jessica and/or the Being who might see Molly being Uluru?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:20, 30 July 2007 (EDT)		In the recent CBR article that showed the Season 2 trailer, Kring confirmed that Uluru (the rock monster) will remain in the comics, so do we now axe the theories about Jessica and/or the Being who might see Molly being Uluru?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:20, 30 July 2007 (EDT)
			*I think you handled it the best way possible -- the theories are not necessarily negated, they're just really unlikely now. Putting a note with the minus marking is the way to go. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 11:33, 30 July 2007 (EDT)

imported>MiamiVolts: Comicon panel

2007-07-30T05:20:11Z

Comicon panel

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:20, 30 July 2007
Line 118:		Line 118:
	== Evil Muggles ==		== Evil Muggles ==
	Ahah I really like the Mr. Muggles taking over the world! That's the only use I found on theories page. They are such a mess, this is just the best theorie ever! :) Thanks for pasting it Ice Vision, it still make me laugh :) (ps : I admit I added the gumby part :P) Btw if it had to be deleted again! I'll have to put this one on my personnal page! Blblbl! -- [[User:FrenchFlo\|'''FrenchFlo''']] [[User talk:FrenchFlo\|<span style="font-size:8pt">(talk)</span>]] <span style="border: 1px solid black">[[Wikipedia:Toulouse\|<span style="background-color:blue">  </span><span style="background-color:white">  </span><span style="background-color:red">  </span>]]</span> 16:06, 26 April 2007 (EDT)		Ahah I really like the Mr. Muggles taking over the world! That's the only use I found on theories page. They are such a mess, this is just the best theorie ever! :) Thanks for pasting it Ice Vision, it still make me laugh :) (ps : I admit I added the gumby part :P) Btw if it had to be deleted again! I'll have to put this one on my personnal page! Blblbl! -- [[User:FrenchFlo\|'''FrenchFlo''']] [[User talk:FrenchFlo\|<span style="font-size:8pt">(talk)</span>]] <span style="border: 1px solid black">[[Wikipedia:Toulouse\|<span style="background-color:blue">  </span><span style="background-color:white">  </span><span style="background-color:red">  </span>]]</span> 16:06, 26 April 2007 (EDT)

			== Comicon panel ==

			In the recent CBR article that showed the Season 2 trailer, Kring confirmed that Uluru (the rock monster) will remain in the comics, so do we now axe the theories about Jessica and/or the Being who might see Molly being Uluru?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:20, 30 July 2007 (EDT)

imported>AlanK: /* Once again... waste of space. */

2007-07-13T23:31:35Z

Once again... waste of space.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:31, 13 July 2007
Line 101:		Line 101:
	*****The waffles section is my favorite! :D Looks like Linderman isn't made of waffles after all though :\ --[[User:Frantik\|Frantik]] ([[User talk:Frantik\|Talk]]) 07:29, 6 March 2007 (EST)		*****The waffles section is my favorite! :D Looks like Linderman isn't made of waffles after all though :\ --[[User:Frantik\|Frantik]] ([[User talk:Frantik\|Talk]]) 07:29, 6 March 2007 (EST)
	*****The entire thing is unnecessary, and I think most of them aren't worth having. The waffles section is the best one, and one of the few I enjoy. -[[User:Level\|Lөv]][[User talk:Level\|ө]][[Special:Contributions/Level\|l]] 12:26, 6 March 2007 (EST)		*****The entire thing is unnecessary, and I think most of them aren't worth having. The waffles section is the best one, and one of the few I enjoy. -[[User:Level\|Lөv]][[User talk:Level\|ө]][[Special:Contributions/Level\|l]] 12:26, 6 March 2007 (EST)
	***I think it's unnecessary or wasteful to comment on why theories are unnecessary or wasteful. It's a big Wiki. Try another page.		***I think it's unnecessary or wasteful to comment on why theories are unnecessary or wasteful. It's a big Wiki. Try another page. [[User:AlanK\|AlanK]] 19:29, 13 July 2007 (EDT)
	--[[User:AlanK\|AlanK]] 19:29, 13 July 2007 (EDT)

	==So I think...==		==So I think...==

imported>AlanK: /* Once again... waste of space. */

2007-07-13T23:29:17Z

Once again... waste of space.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:29, 13 July 2007
Line 101:		Line 101:
	*****The waffles section is my favorite! :D Looks like Linderman isn't made of waffles after all though :\ --[[User:Frantik\|Frantik]] ([[User talk:Frantik\|Talk]]) 07:29, 6 March 2007 (EST)		*****The waffles section is my favorite! :D Looks like Linderman isn't made of waffles after all though :\ --[[User:Frantik\|Frantik]] ([[User talk:Frantik\|Talk]]) 07:29, 6 March 2007 (EST)
	*****The entire thing is unnecessary, and I think most of them aren't worth having. The waffles section is the best one, and one of the few I enjoy. -[[User:Level\|Lөv]][[User talk:Level\|ө]][[Special:Contributions/Level\|l]] 12:26, 6 March 2007 (EST)		*****The entire thing is unnecessary, and I think most of them aren't worth having. The waffles section is the best one, and one of the few I enjoy. -[[User:Level\|Lөv]][[User talk:Level\|ө]][[Special:Contributions/Level\|l]] 12:26, 6 March 2007 (EST)
			***I think it's unnecessary or wasteful to comment on why theories are unnecessary or wasteful. It's a big Wiki. Try another page.
			--[[User:AlanK\|AlanK]] 19:29, 13 July 2007 (EDT)

	==So I think...==		==So I think...==

imported>FrenchFlo: /* Manatees */

2007-04-26T20:06:09Z

Manatees

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:06, 26 April 2007
Line 115:		Line 115:

	: I think the whole point of the ridiculous theories is to make fun of people who want to organize the serious theories are out there. Since theories in general are based on your own opinion, I'd rather have them post the silly ones if it justifies somebody else for putting a less-popular theory online that somebody might not have heard otherwise. --[[User:Xmuskrat\|Xmuskrat]] 09:08, 6 April 2007 (EDT)		: I think the whole point of the ridiculous theories is to make fun of people who want to organize the serious theories are out there. Since theories in general are based on your own opinion, I'd rather have them post the silly ones if it justifies somebody else for putting a less-popular theory online that somebody might not have heard otherwise. --[[User:Xmuskrat\|Xmuskrat]] 09:08, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
			== Evil Muggles ==
			Ahah I really like the Mr. Muggles taking over the world! That's the only use I found on theories page. They are such a mess, this is just the best theorie ever! :) Thanks for pasting it Ice Vision, it still make me laugh :) (ps : I admit I added the gumby part :P) Btw if it had to be deleted again! I'll have to put this one on my personnal page! Blblbl! -- [[User:FrenchFlo\|'''FrenchFlo''']] [[User talk:FrenchFlo\|<span style="font-size:8pt">(talk)</span>]] <span style="border: 1px solid black">[[Wikipedia:Toulouse\|<span style="background-color:blue">  </span><span style="background-color:white">  </span><span style="background-color:red">  </span>]]</span> 16:06, 26 April 2007 (EDT)

imported>Xmuskrat: /* Manatees */

2007-04-06T13:08:10Z

Manatees

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:08, 6 April 2007
Line 113:		Line 113:
	==Manatees==		==Manatees==
	I think we should delete those last two theories about the manatees. They're ridiculous and it could be an insult to obiese women. And the thing about manatees feeding waffles to Peter?... Anyone struck that as weird? [[User:Jason Garrick]]		I think we should delete those last two theories about the manatees. They're ridiculous and it could be an insult to obiese women. And the thing about manatees feeding waffles to Peter?... Anyone struck that as weird? [[User:Jason Garrick]]

			: I think the whole point of the ridiculous theories is to make fun of people who want to organize the serious theories are out there. Since theories in general are based on your own opinion, I'd rather have them post the silly ones if it justifies somebody else for putting a less-popular theory online that somebody might not have heard otherwise. --[[User:Xmuskrat\|Xmuskrat]] 09:08, 6 April 2007 (EDT)

imported>Jason Garrick: /* So I think... */

2007-04-06T03:08:30Z

So I think...

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:08, 6 April 2007
Line 109:		Line 109:
	****If I'm correctly understanding the changes being proposed, we would probably also have to change [[template:theories]] to add a link for substantiated and unsubstantiated theories. Not that big of a deal, though. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 11:58, 1 April 2007 (EDT)		****If I'm correctly understanding the changes being proposed, we would probably also have to change [[template:theories]] to add a link for substantiated and unsubstantiated theories. Not that big of a deal, though. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 11:58, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
	*****I don't know that we'd want to bother linking the original articles to unsubstantiated theories.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 13:39, 1 April 2007 (EDT)		*****I don't know that we'd want to bother linking the original articles to unsubstantiated theories.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 13:39, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
			]

			==Manatees==
			I think we should delete those last two theories about the manatees. They're ridiculous and it could be an insult to obiese women. And the thing about manatees feeding waffles to Peter?... Anyone struck that as weird? [[User:Jason Garrick]]

imported>Hardvice at 17:39, 1 April 2007

2007-04-01T17:39:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:39, 1 April 2007
Line 108:		Line 108:
	***Personally, I don't see any problem having all the theories, with or without citations, on the same page. A lot of really great theories necessarily have no citations, and it'd be a shame to move them or "demote" them because they're unable to be substantiated. The only reason I would be in favor of moving them is because it would roughly cut our behemoth theories pages in half. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 11:57, 1 April 2007 (EDT)		***Personally, I don't see any problem having all the theories, with or without citations, on the same page. A lot of really great theories necessarily have no citations, and it'd be a shame to move them or "demote" them because they're unable to be substantiated. The only reason I would be in favor of moving them is because it would roughly cut our behemoth theories pages in half. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 11:57, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
	****If I'm correctly understanding the changes being proposed, we would probably also have to change [[template:theories]] to add a link for substantiated and unsubstantiated theories. Not that big of a deal, though. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 11:58, 1 April 2007 (EDT)		****If I'm correctly understanding the changes being proposed, we would probably also have to change [[template:theories]] to add a link for substantiated and unsubstantiated theories. Not that big of a deal, though. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 11:58, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
			*****I don't know that we'd want to bother linking the original articles to unsubstantiated theories.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 13:39, 1 April 2007 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* So I think... */

2007-04-01T15:58:28Z

So I think...

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:58, 1 April 2007
Line 107:		Line 107:
	** Actually, the more I think about it, the more I think that could work. We could move everything without at least 1 citation to "unsubstantiated theories" or "conjecture" or something. Sure, there'd be a couple not-completely-retarded theories on it, but really, even the most plausible theory that's based on pure speculation is not really the same as a well-supported theory. And it doesn't require any sort of value judgment, and it preserves people's oh-so-precious theories, while separating the <s>wheat from the chaff</s> slightly more edible chaff from the wholly unpalatable chaff.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 00:13, 1 April 2007 (EDT)		** Actually, the more I think about it, the more I think that could work. We could move everything without at least 1 citation to "unsubstantiated theories" or "conjecture" or something. Sure, there'd be a couple not-completely-retarded theories on it, but really, even the most plausible theory that's based on pure speculation is not really the same as a well-supported theory. And it doesn't require any sort of value judgment, and it preserves people's oh-so-precious theories, while separating the <s>wheat from the chaff</s> slightly more edible chaff from the wholly unpalatable chaff.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 00:13, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
	***Personally, I don't see any problem having all the theories, with or without citations, on the same page. A lot of really great theories necessarily have no citations, and it'd be a shame to move them or "demote" them because they're unable to be substantiated. The only reason I would be in favor of moving them is because it would roughly cut our behemoth theories pages in half. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 11:57, 1 April 2007 (EDT)		***Personally, I don't see any problem having all the theories, with or without citations, on the same page. A lot of really great theories necessarily have no citations, and it'd be a shame to move them or "demote" them because they're unable to be substantiated. The only reason I would be in favor of moving them is because it would roughly cut our behemoth theories pages in half. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 11:57, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
			****If I'm correctly understanding the changes being proposed, we would probably also have to change [[template:theories]] to add a link for substantiated and unsubstantiated theories. Not that big of a deal, though. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 11:58, 1 April 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:39, 1 April 2007
Line 108:		Line 108:
	***Personally, I don't see any problem having all the theories, with or without citations, on the same page. A lot of really great theories necessarily have no citations, and it'd be a shame to move them or "demote" them because they're unable to be substantiated. The only reason I would be in favor of moving them is because it would roughly cut our behemoth theories pages in half. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 11:57, 1 April 2007 (EDT)		***Personally, I don't see any problem having all the theories, with or without citations, on the same page. A lot of really great theories necessarily have no citations, and it'd be a shame to move them or "demote" them because they're unable to be substantiated. The only reason I would be in favor of moving them is because it would roughly cut our behemoth theories pages in half. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 11:57, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
	****If I'm correctly understanding the changes being proposed, we would probably also have to change [[template:theories]] to add a link for substantiated and unsubstantiated theories. Not that big of a deal, though. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 11:58, 1 April 2007 (EDT)		****If I'm correctly understanding the changes being proposed, we would probably also have to change [[template:theories]] to add a link for substantiated and unsubstantiated theories. Not that big of a deal, though. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 11:58, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
			*****I don't know that we'd want to bother linking the original articles to unsubstantiated theories.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 13:39, 1 April 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:58, 1 April 2007
Line 107:		Line 107:
	** Actually, the more I think about it, the more I think that could work. We could move everything without at least 1 citation to "unsubstantiated theories" or "conjecture" or something. Sure, there'd be a couple not-completely-retarded theories on it, but really, even the most plausible theory that's based on pure speculation is not really the same as a well-supported theory. And it doesn't require any sort of value judgment, and it preserves people's oh-so-precious theories, while separating the <s>wheat from the chaff</s> slightly more edible chaff from the wholly unpalatable chaff.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 00:13, 1 April 2007 (EDT)		** Actually, the more I think about it, the more I think that could work. We could move everything without at least 1 citation to "unsubstantiated theories" or "conjecture" or something. Sure, there'd be a couple not-completely-retarded theories on it, but really, even the most plausible theory that's based on pure speculation is not really the same as a well-supported theory. And it doesn't require any sort of value judgment, and it preserves people's oh-so-precious theories, while separating the <s>wheat from the chaff</s> slightly more edible chaff from the wholly unpalatable chaff.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 00:13, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
	***Personally, I don't see any problem having all the theories, with or without citations, on the same page. A lot of really great theories necessarily have no citations, and it'd be a shame to move them or "demote" them because they're unable to be substantiated. The only reason I would be in favor of moving them is because it would roughly cut our behemoth theories pages in half. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 11:57, 1 April 2007 (EDT)		***Personally, I don't see any problem having all the theories, with or without citations, on the same page. A lot of really great theories necessarily have no citations, and it'd be a shame to move them or "demote" them because they're unable to be substantiated. The only reason I would be in favor of moving them is because it would roughly cut our behemoth theories pages in half. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 11:57, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
			****If I'm correctly understanding the changes being proposed, we would probably also have to change [[template:theories]] to add a link for substantiated and unsubstantiated theories. Not that big of a deal, though. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 11:58, 1 April 2007 (EDT)