Talk:Tracy Strauss (exposed future) - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Last Name Change */

2009-05-28T02:25:23Z

Last Name Change

← Older revision	Revision as of 02:25, 28 May 2009
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Last Name Change */

2009-05-28T02:25:23Z

Last Name Change

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:25, 28 May 2009
Line 15:		Line 15:

	She is called the "First Lady", meaning at this point she has married Nathan. Why would she not change her last name to Petrelli? [[User:CreedogV\|CreedogV]] 22:01, 27 May 2009 (EDT)		She is called the "First Lady", meaning at this point she has married Nathan. Why would she not change her last name to Petrelli? [[User:CreedogV\|CreedogV]] 22:01, 27 May 2009 (EDT)
			* Not every woman who gets married changes her last name. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:25, 27 May 2009 (EDT)

imported>Ice Vision at 02:08, 28 May 2009

2009-05-28T02:08:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:08, 28 May 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:Yeah - so just like any other character she ought to be listed as having no ''known'' abilities until such is manifested... 19:30, 8 October 2008 (EDT)		:Yeah - so just like any other character she ought to be listed as having no ''known'' abilities until such is manifested... 19:30, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
	* I think we should assume she kept it. Nathan and Matt didn't display their future powers, but we assumed it from them. Besides, even though it's likely it was, we don't know for sure that it's Tracy, so some amount of speculation is needed. [[User:Stevehim\|Stevehim]] 11:56, 9 October 2008 (EDT)		* I think we should assume she kept it. Nathan and Matt didn't display their future powers, but we assumed it from them. Besides, even though it's likely it was, we don't know for sure that it's Tracy, so some amount of speculation is needed. [[User:Stevehim\|Stevehim]] 11:56, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
			**That, and Tracy Strauss is the same person as Tracy Strauss. What a surprise, huh? --{{User:Ice Vision/sig}} 22:08, 27 May 2009 (EDT)

	== Speaking of speculation ==		== Speaking of speculation ==

imported>CreedogV: /* Last Name Change */

2009-05-28T02:01:05Z

Last Name Change

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:01, 28 May 2009
Line 13:		Line 13:
	== Last Name Change ==		== Last Name Change ==

	She is called the "First Lady", meaning at this point she has married Nathan. Why would she not change her last name to Petrelli?		She is called the "First Lady", meaning at this point she has married Nathan. Why would she not change her last name to Petrelli? [[User:CreedogV\|CreedogV]] 22:01, 27 May 2009 (EDT)

imported>CreedogV: Question about last name change

2009-05-28T02:00:42Z

Question about last name change

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:00, 28 May 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Do we even know that this is [[Tracy]] and not [[Barbara]]? I know the pearl necklace is an indicator for Tracy, but it might be there to mislead us. --[[User:Aburu\|Aburu]] 21:57, 16 October 2008 (EDT)		Do we even know that this is [[Tracy]] and not [[Barbara]]? I know the pearl necklace is an indicator for Tracy, but it might be there to mislead us. --[[User:Aburu\|Aburu]] 21:57, 16 October 2008 (EDT)
	:Well they showed this right after Nathan and Tracy had their first kiss, so there's no reason to assume it's not Tracy. Of course, that doesn't mean that possibility is nonexistent, but it's the most rational right now to simply assume it's Tracy. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:15, 29 October 2008 (EDT)		:Well they showed this right after Nathan and Tracy had their first kiss, so there's no reason to assume it's not Tracy. Of course, that doesn't mean that possibility is nonexistent, but it's the most rational right now to simply assume it's Tracy. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:15, 29 October 2008 (EDT)

			== Last Name Change ==

			She is called the "First Lady", meaning at this point she has married Nathan. Why would she not change her last name to Petrelli?

imported>Thrashmeister: /* Speaking of speculation */

2008-10-30T01:15:11Z

Speaking of speculation

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:15, 30 October 2008
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Do we even know that this is [[Tracy]] and not [[Barbara]]? I know the pearl necklace is an indicator for Tracy, but it might be there to mislead us. --[[User:Aburu\|Aburu]] 21:57, 16 October 2008 (EDT)		Do we even know that this is [[Tracy]] and not [[Barbara]]? I know the pearl necklace is an indicator for Tracy, but it might be there to mislead us. --[[User:Aburu\|Aburu]] 21:57, 16 October 2008 (EDT)
			:Well they showed this right after Nathan and Tracy had their first kiss, so there's no reason to assume it's not Tracy. Of course, that doesn't mean that possibility is nonexistent, but it's the most rational right now to simply assume it's Tracy. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:15, 29 October 2008 (EDT)

imported>Aburu: /* Speaking of speculation */ new section

2008-10-17T01:57:16Z

Speaking of speculation: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:57, 17 October 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:Yeah - so just like any other character she ought to be listed as having no ''known'' abilities until such is manifested... 19:30, 8 October 2008 (EDT)		:Yeah - so just like any other character she ought to be listed as having no ''known'' abilities until such is manifested... 19:30, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
	* I think we should assume she kept it. Nathan and Matt didn't display their future powers, but we assumed it from them. Besides, even though it's likely it was, we don't know for sure that it's Tracy, so some amount of speculation is needed. [[User:Stevehim\|Stevehim]] 11:56, 9 October 2008 (EDT)		* I think we should assume she kept it. Nathan and Matt didn't display their future powers, but we assumed it from them. Besides, even though it's likely it was, we don't know for sure that it's Tracy, so some amount of speculation is needed. [[User:Stevehim\|Stevehim]] 11:56, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

			== Speaking of speculation ==

			Do we even know that this is [[Tracy]] and not [[Barbara]]? I know the pearl necklace is an indicator for Tracy, but it might be there to mislead us. --[[User:Aburu\|Aburu]] 21:57, 16 October 2008 (EDT)

imported>Stevehim: /* Ability */

2008-10-09T15:56:29Z

Ability

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:56, 9 October 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Isn't it speculation that she lost it? [[User:Psilaq Remake\|Psilaq Remake]] 19:20, 8 October 2008 (EDT)		Isn't it speculation that she lost it? [[User:Psilaq Remake\|Psilaq Remake]] 19:20, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
	:Yeah - so just like any other character she ought to be listed as having no ''known'' abilities until such is manifested... 19:30, 8 October 2008 (EDT)		:Yeah - so just like any other character she ought to be listed as having no ''known'' abilities until such is manifested... 19:30, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
			* I think we should assume she kept it. Nathan and Matt didn't display their future powers, but we assumed it from them. Besides, even though it's likely it was, we don't know for sure that it's Tracy, so some amount of speculation is needed. [[User:Stevehim\|Stevehim]] 11:56, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

imported>Pierre at 23:30, 8 October 2008

2008-10-08T23:30:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:30, 8 October 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Isn't it speculation that she lost it? [[User:Psilaq Remake\|Psilaq Remake]] 19:20, 8 October 2008 (EDT)		Isn't it speculation that she lost it? [[User:Psilaq Remake\|Psilaq Remake]] 19:20, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
			:Yeah - so just like any other character she ought to be listed as having no ''known'' abilities until such is manifested... 19:30, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

imported>Psilaq Remake at 23:20, 8 October 2008

2008-10-08T23:20:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:20, 8 October 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Ability==		==Ability==
	Isn't it speculation that Tracy has kept her ability? [[User:Pierre\|Pierre]] 18:05, 8 October 2008 (EDT)		Isn't it speculation that Tracy has kept her ability? [[User:Pierre\|Pierre]] 18:05, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

			Isn't it speculation that she lost it? [[User:Psilaq Remake\|Psilaq Remake]] 19:20, 8 October 2008 (EDT)