Talk:Unknown female - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* consensus check */

2008-04-02T19:58:48Z

consensus check

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:58, 2 April 2008
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* consensus check */

2008-04-02T19:58:48Z

consensus check

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 2 April 2008
Line 50:		Line 50:
	#--Dunno why we need another consensus when we already trashed this page.{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 17:23, 29 December 2007 (EST)		#--Dunno why we need another consensus when we already trashed this page.{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 17:23, 29 December 2007 (EST)

	**Why is this still around!? --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 14:25, 2 April 2008 (EDT)		*Why is this still around!? --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 14:25, 2 April 2008 (EDT)
			** I had [http://heroeswiki.com/index.php?title=Talk%3AUnknown_female&diff=159278&oldid=159277 asked] for it to be kept for two weeks, and that time has long since expired. You're, right, it's ready to go now. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:58, 2 April 2008 (EDT)

imported>Heroe: /* consensus check */

2008-04-02T18:25:30Z

consensus check

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:25, 2 April 2008
Line 49:		Line 49:
	#--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 21:01, 27 December 2007 (EST)		#--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 21:01, 27 December 2007 (EST)
	#--Dunno why we need another consensus when we already trashed this page.{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 17:23, 29 December 2007 (EST)		#--Dunno why we need another consensus when we already trashed this page.{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 17:23, 29 December 2007 (EST)

			**Why is this still around!? --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 14:25, 2 April 2008 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 03:20, 23 February 2008

2008-02-23T03:20:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:20, 23 February 2008
Line 9:		Line 9:
	** I don't think it has to do with whether or not the woman has a name. It has to do with the content. There isn't anything useful on this page, but journal female 5 does have worthy information. A home is named, a potential power is named, etc.--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 16:39, 12 December 2007 (EST)		** I don't think it has to do with whether or not the woman has a name. It has to do with the content. There isn't anything useful on this page, but journal female 5 does have worthy information. A home is named, a potential power is named, etc.--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 16:39, 12 December 2007 (EST)
	* Delete. --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 21:48, 22 February 2008 (EST)		* Delete. --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 21:48, 22 February 2008 (EST)
			** Actually, as a personal request, I'd like to wait until about March 15. I'm sorry I have to be vague, but I linked to it somewhere I can't say, and I think it would benefit us all if we just wait another two weeks or so. Yes, I know, I'm being very mysterious...If we decide to delete it, that's fine, I just ask for about two weeks. :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:20, 22 February 2008 (EST)

	==Name?==		==Name?==
	If we were ever to get her name (shouldn't be too hard), would she get a page then? As far as I can see Ms. Ammawhatchamacallit is equal in non-theoretical information as [[Carlos Mendez]], so they should either both get a page or not (unless the name is enough for a page, which it hasn't been in the past).--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 21:09, 29 November 2007 (EST)		If we were ever to get her name (shouldn't be too hard), would she get a page then? As far as I can see Ms. Ammawhatchamacallit is equal in non-theoretical information as [[Carlos Mendez]], so they should either both get a page or not (unless the name is enough for a page, which it hasn't been in the past).--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 21:09, 29 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Heroe at 02:48, 23 February 2008

2008-02-23T02:48:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:48, 23 February 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:
	* I think we should '''keep''' this article. We have other articles that are just based on notes without a name (i.e. [[Journal female 5]]), so why not keep this as well? --[[User:Pinkkeith\|Pinkkeith]] 16:34, 12 December 2007 (EST)		* I think we should '''keep''' this article. We have other articles that are just based on notes without a name (i.e. [[Journal female 5]]), so why not keep this as well? --[[User:Pinkkeith\|Pinkkeith]] 16:34, 12 December 2007 (EST)
	** I don't think it has to do with whether or not the woman has a name. It has to do with the content. There isn't anything useful on this page, but journal female 5 does have worthy information. A home is named, a potential power is named, etc.--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 16:39, 12 December 2007 (EST)		** I don't think it has to do with whether or not the woman has a name. It has to do with the content. There isn't anything useful on this page, but journal female 5 does have worthy information. A home is named, a potential power is named, etc.--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 16:39, 12 December 2007 (EST)
			* Delete. --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 21:48, 22 February 2008 (EST)

	==Name?==		==Name?==
	If we were ever to get her name (shouldn't be too hard), would she get a page then? As far as I can see Ms. Ammawhatchamacallit is equal in non-theoretical information as [[Carlos Mendez]], so they should either both get a page or not (unless the name is enough for a page, which it hasn't been in the past).--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 21:09, 29 November 2007 (EST)		If we were ever to get her name (shouldn't be too hard), would she get a page then? As far as I can see Ms. Ammawhatchamacallit is equal in non-theoretical information as [[Carlos Mendez]], so they should either both get a page or not (unless the name is enough for a page, which it hasn't been in the past).--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 21:09, 29 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* consensus check */ fmtg

2008-01-24T03:16:17Z

consensus check: fmtg

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:16, 24 January 2008
Line 37:		Line 37:
	--[[User:Jason Garrick\|Jason Garrick]] 15:32, 29 December 2007 (EST)		--[[User:Jason Garrick\|Jason Garrick]] 15:32, 29 December 2007 (EST)
	# Didn't one of the Interviews answer this? [[User:Therequiembellishere\|Therequiembellishere]] 20:11, 13 January 2008 (EST)		# Didn't one of the Interviews answer this? [[User:Therequiembellishere\|Therequiembellishere]] 20:11, 13 January 2008 (EST)
	-- [[User:ArgentinaSeeHeroes]]		# -- [[User:ArgentinaSeeHeroes]]

	<u>Toss</u><br>		<u>Toss</u><br>
	# --[[User:Ice Vision\|<span style="font-family: tahoma; font-size: 10pt; color:darkgreen">Ice Vision</span>]] [[User talk:Ice Vision\|<span style="font-family: comic sans ms; font-size: 8pt; font-weight: bold; color: blue">(talk)</span>]] 14:08, 27 December 2007 (EST) (was deleted a while ago, and should remain gone)		# --[[User:Ice Vision\|<span style="font-family: tahoma; font-size: 10pt; color:darkgreen">Ice Vision</span>]] [[User talk:Ice Vision\|<span style="font-family: comic sans ms; font-size: 8pt; font-weight: bold; color: blue">(talk)</span>]] 14:08, 27 December 2007 (EST) (was deleted a while ago, and should remain gone)

imported>ArgentinaSeeHeroes: /* consensus check */

2008-01-24T02:55:05Z

consensus check

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:55, 24 January 2008
Line 37:		Line 37:
	--[[User:Jason Garrick\|Jason Garrick]] 15:32, 29 December 2007 (EST)		--[[User:Jason Garrick\|Jason Garrick]] 15:32, 29 December 2007 (EST)
	# Didn't one of the Interviews answer this? [[User:Therequiembellishere\|Therequiembellishere]] 20:11, 13 January 2008 (EST)		# Didn't one of the Interviews answer this? [[User:Therequiembellishere\|Therequiembellishere]] 20:11, 13 January 2008 (EST)
			-- [[User:ArgentinaSeeHeroes]]

	<u>Toss</u><br>		<u>Toss</u><br>
	# --[[User:Ice Vision\|<span style="font-family: tahoma; font-size: 10pt; color:darkgreen">Ice Vision</span>]] [[User talk:Ice Vision\|<span style="font-family: comic sans ms; font-size: 8pt; font-weight: bold; color: blue">(talk)</span>]] 14:08, 27 December 2007 (EST) (was deleted a while ago, and should remain gone)		# --[[User:Ice Vision\|<span style="font-family: tahoma; font-size: 10pt; color:darkgreen">Ice Vision</span>]] [[User talk:Ice Vision\|<span style="font-family: comic sans ms; font-size: 8pt; font-weight: bold; color: blue">(talk)</span>]] 14:08, 27 December 2007 (EST) (was deleted a while ago, and should remain gone)

imported>ArgentinaSeeHeroes: /* Name? */

2008-01-24T02:53:06Z

Name?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:53, 24 January 2008
Line 24:		Line 24:
	* if you look in wikipedia under the company (heroes) it states that Tim Kring said ""we will be seeing more of the five as yet unknown characters, and that they will be played by the same actors featured in the photo." if wikipedia is right her name is really Suzanne Ammaw --[[User:Zoga78\|Zoga78]] ([[User talk:Zoga78\|talk]]) 00:48, 14 December 2007 (EST)		* if you look in wikipedia under the company (heroes) it states that Tim Kring said ""we will be seeing more of the five as yet unknown characters, and that they will be played by the same actors featured in the photo." if wikipedia is right her name is really Suzanne Ammaw --[[User:Zoga78\|Zoga78]] ([[User talk:Zoga78\|talk]]) 00:48, 14 December 2007 (EST)
	**That's a pretty big if. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 06:47, 14 December 2007 (EST)		**That's a pretty big if. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 06:47, 14 December 2007 (EST)
			***I think we must keep in mind that [[Matt Parkman]] write the postits, and Matt suffers Dyslexia, so the names might be wrong. [[User:ArgentinaSeeHeroes]]

	==Mrs. Ammaw==		==Mrs. Ammaw==

imported>Therequiembellishere: /* consensus check */

2008-01-14T01:11:20Z

consensus check

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:11, 14 January 2008
Line 35:		Line 35:
	<u>Keep</u><br>		<u>Keep</u><br>
	--[[User:Jason Garrick\|Jason Garrick]] 15:32, 29 December 2007 (EST)		--[[User:Jason Garrick\|Jason Garrick]] 15:32, 29 December 2007 (EST)
			# Didn't one of the Interviews answer this? [[User:Therequiembellishere\|Therequiembellishere]] 20:11, 13 January 2008 (EST)

	<u>Toss</u><br>		<u>Toss</u><br>

imported>Baldbobbo: /* consensus check */

2007-12-29T22:23:39Z

consensus check

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:23, 29 December 2007
Line 43:		Line 43:
	#--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 18:48, 27 December 2007 (EST)		#--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 18:48, 27 December 2007 (EST)
	#--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 21:01, 27 December 2007 (EST)		#--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 21:01, 27 December 2007 (EST)
			#--Dunno why we need another consensus when we already trashed this page.{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 17:23, 29 December 2007 (EST)