Talk:Whitebeard - Revision history

imported>Baldbobbo: /* photo */

2007-10-23T05:15:52Z

photo

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:15, 23 October 2007
(No difference)

imported>Baldbobbo: /* photo */

2007-10-23T05:15:52Z

photo

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:15, 23 October 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:

	==photo==		==photo==

	Are we sure the photo attached to this article is indeed Whitebeard, and not some archery captain that serves him? Why would Whitebeard come to assasinate Kensei without his famous armor? [[User:Bugmuncher\|Bugmuncher]] 01:14, 23 October 2007 (EDT)		Are we sure the photo attached to this article is indeed Whitebeard, and not some archery captain that serves him? Why would Whitebeard come to assasinate Kensei without his famous armor? [[User:Bugmuncher\|Bugmuncher]] 01:14, 23 October 2007 (EDT)
			* The actor you're referring to is credited as Whitebeard. If you notice, he has white streaks in his beard too.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|<font color=#0F004D>Bob</font>]] {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}\|Baldbobbo\| (<span class="plainlinks">[{{SERVER}}/index.php?title=User_talk:Baldbobbo&action=edit&section=new message]</span>) \| ([[User talk:Baldbobbo\|<font color=#0F004D>talk</font>]]) }} 01:15, 23 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>Bugmuncher: /* photo */

2007-10-23T05:14:57Z

photo

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:14, 23 October 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	==photo==		==photo==

	Are we sure the photo attached to this article is indeed Whitebeard, and not some archery captain that serves him? Why would Whitebeard come to assasinate Kensei without his famous armor?		Are we sure the photo attached to this article is indeed Whitebeard, and not some archery captain that serves him? Why would Whitebeard come to assasinate Kensei without his famous armor? [[User:Bugmuncher\|Bugmuncher]] 01:14, 23 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>Bugmuncher at 05:14, 23 October 2007

2007-10-23T05:14:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:14, 23 October 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	To me, the evidence is staggeringly clear that the man on the horse was Whitebeard. Not only are they wearing the exact same thing, both were the leaders of a small group of Japanese warriors who were met by Kensei outside of Kyoto in 1671. Short of actually labeling the guy "Whitebeard" or having a big sign pointing to him, I don't think the writers could have made it clearer who this guy is (good find, Bob!) Is there anybody opposed to moving him out of the 360 stuff and into the episodic stuff? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:52, 5 September 2007 (EDT)		To me, the evidence is staggeringly clear that the man on the horse was Whitebeard. Not only are they wearing the exact same thing, both were the leaders of a small group of Japanese warriors who were met by Kensei outside of Kyoto in 1671. Short of actually labeling the guy "Whitebeard" or having a big sign pointing to him, I don't think the writers could have made it clearer who this guy is (good find, Bob!) Is there anybody opposed to moving him out of the 360 stuff and into the episodic stuff? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:52, 5 September 2007 (EDT)
	* I'm not. --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 20:32, 5 September 2007 (EDT)		* I'm not. --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 20:32, 5 September 2007 (EDT)

			==photo==

			Are we sure the photo attached to this article is indeed Whitebeard, and not some archery captain that serves him? Why would Whitebeard come to assasinate Kensei without his famous armor?

imported>Heroe at 00:32, 6 September 2007

2007-09-06T00:32:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:32, 6 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	To me, the evidence is staggeringly clear that the man on the horse was Whitebeard. Not only are they wearing the exact same thing, both were the leaders of a small group of Japanese warriors who were met by Kensei outside of Kyoto in 1671. Short of actually labeling the guy "Whitebeard" or having a big sign pointing to him, I don't think the writers could have made it clearer who this guy is (good find, Bob!) Is there anybody opposed to moving him out of the 360 stuff and into the episodic stuff? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:52, 5 September 2007 (EDT)		To me, the evidence is staggeringly clear that the man on the horse was Whitebeard. Not only are they wearing the exact same thing, both were the leaders of a small group of Japanese warriors who were met by Kensei outside of Kyoto in 1671. Short of actually labeling the guy "Whitebeard" or having a big sign pointing to him, I don't think the writers could have made it clearer who this guy is (good find, Bob!) Is there anybody opposed to moving him out of the 360 stuff and into the episodic stuff? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:52, 5 September 2007 (EDT)
			* I'm not. --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 20:32, 5 September 2007 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: New page: To me, the evidence is staggeringly clear that the man on the horse was Whitebeard. Not only are they wearing the exact same thing, both were the leaders of a small group of Japanese warri...

2007-09-05T20:52:06Z

New page: To me, the evidence is staggeringly clear that the man on the horse was Whitebeard. Not only are they wearing the exact same thing, both were the leaders of a small group of Japanese warri...

New page

To me, the evidence is staggeringly clear that the man on the horse was Whitebeard. Not only are they wearing the exact same thing, both were the leaders of a small group of Japanese warriors who were met by Kensei outside of Kyoto in 1671. Short of actually labeling the guy "Whitebeard" or having a big sign pointing to him, I don't think the writers could have made it clearer who this guy is (good find, Bob!) Is there anybody opposed to moving him out of the 360 stuff and into the episodic stuff? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:52, 5 September 2007 (EDT)