Template talk:Afd - Revision history

imported>Leckie: /* Deletion */

2009-12-23T15:42:42Z

Deletion

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:42, 23 December 2009
(No difference)

imported>Leckie: /* Deletion */

2009-12-23T15:42:42Z

Deletion

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:42, 23 December 2009
Line 17:		Line 17:

	So... Are we going to delete this article, or not? :D {{User:Altes/Signature}}		So... Are we going to delete this article, or not? :D {{User:Altes/Signature}}
			* Lol, I needed a laugh :) -- {{User:Leckie/Signature 6}} 10:42, 23 December 2009 (EST)

imported>Altes: /* Deletion */ new section

2009-12-23T14:50:31Z

Deletion: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:50, 23 December 2009
Line 13:		Line 13:
	***It was kind of annoying that the pages showed up in Wanted Pages, but I think if we do an external link, it should solve that, too.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 14:30, 7 March 2007 (EST)		***It was kind of annoying that the pages showed up in Wanted Pages, but I think if we do an external link, it should solve that, too.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 14:30, 7 March 2007 (EST)
	****That might be a good thing that it shows up. A discussion would be wanted when a page is going to be deleted, even if it's an agreement that it should be deleted. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:39, 7 March 2007 (EST))		****That might be a good thing that it shows up. A discussion would be wanted when a page is going to be deleted, even if it's an agreement that it should be deleted. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:39, 7 March 2007 (EST))

			== Deletion ==

			So... Are we going to delete this article, or not? :D {{User:Altes/Signature}}

imported>Admin: /* Discussion page */

2007-03-07T19:39:07Z

Discussion page

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:39, 7 March 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	**I agree -- it's not too much trouble to go to the discussion page and just type something simple: "This article is nominated for deletion". In fact, I think it's a pretty good idea to keep it because it encourages us to discuss before we delete. Even if there's a reason on the afd tag, it's still a good idea to have a discussion. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 13:17, 7 March 2007 (EST)		**I agree -- it's not too much trouble to go to the discussion page and just type something simple: "This article is nominated for deletion". In fact, I think it's a pretty good idea to keep it because it encourages us to discuss before we delete. Even if there's a reason on the afd tag, it's still a good idea to have a discussion. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 13:17, 7 March 2007 (EST)
	***It was kind of annoying that the pages showed up in Wanted Pages, but I think if we do an external link, it should solve that, too.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 14:30, 7 March 2007 (EST)		***It was kind of annoying that the pages showed up in Wanted Pages, but I think if we do an external link, it should solve that, too.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 14:30, 7 March 2007 (EST)
			****That might be a good thing that it shows up. A discussion would be wanted when a page is going to be deleted, even if it's an agreement that it should be deleted. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:39, 7 March 2007 (EST))

imported>Hardvice at 19:30, 7 March 2007

2007-03-07T19:30:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, 7 March 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	* Wouldn't it be good to provide a link to the discussion page to discuss the deletion even if it doesn't exist already? ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:42, 6 March 2007 (EST))		* Wouldn't it be good to provide a link to the discussion page to discuss the deletion even if it doesn't exist already? ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:42, 6 March 2007 (EST))
	**I agree -- it's not too much trouble to go to the discussion page and just type something simple: "This article is nominated for deletion". In fact, I think it's a pretty good idea to keep it because it encourages us to discuss before we delete. Even if there's a reason on the afd tag, it's still a good idea to have a discussion. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 13:17, 7 March 2007 (EST)		**I agree -- it's not too much trouble to go to the discussion page and just type something simple: "This article is nominated for deletion". In fact, I think it's a pretty good idea to keep it because it encourages us to discuss before we delete. Even if there's a reason on the afd tag, it's still a good idea to have a discussion. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 13:17, 7 March 2007 (EST)
			***It was kind of annoying that the pages showed up in Wanted Pages, but I think if we do an external link, it should solve that, too.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 14:30, 7 March 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Discussion page */

2007-03-07T18:17:42Z

Discussion page

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:17, 7 March 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:

	* Wouldn't it be good to provide a link to the discussion page to discuss the deletion even if it doesn't exist already? ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:42, 6 March 2007 (EST))		* Wouldn't it be good to provide a link to the discussion page to discuss the deletion even if it doesn't exist already? ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:42, 6 March 2007 (EST))
			**I agree -- it's not too much trouble to go to the discussion page and just type something simple: "This article is nominated for deletion". In fact, I think it's a pretty good idea to keep it because it encourages us to discuss before we delete. Even if there's a reason on the afd tag, it's still a good idea to have a discussion. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 13:17, 7 March 2007 (EST)

imported>Admin: Discussion page

2007-03-06T05:42:58Z

Discussion page

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:42, 6 March 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	**Actually, it's not working perfectly yet... but it should work. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:25, 3 March 2007 (EST))		**Actually, it's not working perfectly yet... but it should work. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:25, 3 March 2007 (EST))
	***Yeah, all you have to do is normalize the string and make it all lowercase using <nowiki>{{lc:}}</nowiki> when doing the comparison. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 16:01, 3 March 2007 (EST))		***Yeah, all you have to do is normalize the string and make it all lowercase using <nowiki>{{lc:}}</nowiki> when doing the comparison. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 16:01, 3 March 2007 (EST))

			== Discussion page ==

			* Wouldn't it be good to provide a link to the discussion page to discuss the deletion even if it doesn't exist already? ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:42, 6 March 2007 (EST))

imported>Admin at 21:01, 3 March 2007

2007-03-03T21:01:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:01, 3 March 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	*If you haven't seen my change yet to this template, check it out. Should be able to do the comparison against "Image" by using the ucfirst function in the comparison. Granted it makes no difference for this template, but I also updated [[:Template:Character box]] where it does help. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:23, 3 March 2007 (EST))		*If you haven't seen my change yet to this template, check it out. Should be able to do the comparison against "Image" by using the ucfirst function in the comparison. Granted it makes no difference for this template, but I also updated [[:Template:Character box]] where it does help. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:23, 3 March 2007 (EST))
	**Actually, it's not working perfectly yet... but it should work. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:25, 3 March 2007 (EST))		**Actually, it's not working perfectly yet... but it should work. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:25, 3 March 2007 (EST))
			***Yeah, all you have to do is normalize the string and make it all lowercase using <nowiki>{{lc:}}</nowiki> when doing the comparison. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 16:01, 3 March 2007 (EST))

imported>Admin at 20:25, 3 March 2007

2007-03-03T20:25:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:25, 3 March 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	* Was it really not working? I just checked a few about twenty minutes ago and they looked fine to me.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:19, 3 March 2007 (EST)		* Was it really not working? I just checked a few about twenty minutes ago and they looked fine to me.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:19, 3 March 2007 (EST)
	*If you haven't seen my change yet to this template, check it out. Should be able to do the comparison against "Image" by using the ucfirst function in the comparison. Granted it makes no difference for this template, but I also updated [[:Template:Character box]] where it does help. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:23, 3 March 2007 (EST))		*If you haven't seen my change yet to this template, check it out. Should be able to do the comparison against "Image" by using the ucfirst function in the comparison. Granted it makes no difference for this template, but I also updated [[:Template:Character box]] where it does help. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:23, 3 March 2007 (EST))
			**Actually, it's not working perfectly yet... but it should work. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:25, 3 March 2007 (EST))

imported>Admin: clarification

2007-03-03T20:24:03Z

clarification

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 3 March 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	**Oh, OK. I just didn't want the infobox to get broken. There, since we're testing against user input, I used "mage:" so it will work whether the user types "Image:" or "image:"--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 14:47, 3 March 2007 (EST)		**Oh, OK. I just didn't want the infobox to get broken. There, since we're testing against user input, I used "mage:" so it will work whether the user types "Image:" or "image:"--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 14:47, 3 March 2007 (EST)
	* Was it really not working? I just checked a few about twenty minutes ago and they looked fine to me.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:19, 3 March 2007 (EST)		* Was it really not working? I just checked a few about twenty minutes ago and they looked fine to me.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:19, 3 March 2007 (EST)
	*If you haven't seen my change yet to this template, check it out. Should be able to do the comparison against "Image" by using the ucfirst function in the comparison. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:23, 3 March 2007 (EST))		*If you haven't seen my change yet to this template, check it out. Should be able to do the comparison against "Image" by using the ucfirst function in the comparison. Granted it makes no difference for this template, but I also updated [[:Template:Character box]] where it does help. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:23, 3 March 2007 (EST))

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:39, 7 March 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	**I agree -- it's not too much trouble to go to the discussion page and just type something simple: "This article is nominated for deletion". In fact, I think it's a pretty good idea to keep it because it encourages us to discuss before we delete. Even if there's a reason on the afd tag, it's still a good idea to have a discussion. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 13:17, 7 March 2007 (EST)		**I agree -- it's not too much trouble to go to the discussion page and just type something simple: "This article is nominated for deletion". In fact, I think it's a pretty good idea to keep it because it encourages us to discuss before we delete. Even if there's a reason on the afd tag, it's still a good idea to have a discussion. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 13:17, 7 March 2007 (EST)
	***It was kind of annoying that the pages showed up in Wanted Pages, but I think if we do an external link, it should solve that, too.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 14:30, 7 March 2007 (EST)		***It was kind of annoying that the pages showed up in Wanted Pages, but I think if we do an external link, it should solve that, too.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 14:30, 7 March 2007 (EST)
			****That might be a good thing that it shows up. A discussion would be wanted when a page is going to be deleted, even if it's an agreement that it should be deleted. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:39, 7 March 2007 (EST))

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, 7 March 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	* Wouldn't it be good to provide a link to the discussion page to discuss the deletion even if it doesn't exist already? ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:42, 6 March 2007 (EST))		* Wouldn't it be good to provide a link to the discussion page to discuss the deletion even if it doesn't exist already? ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:42, 6 March 2007 (EST))
	**I agree -- it's not too much trouble to go to the discussion page and just type something simple: "This article is nominated for deletion". In fact, I think it's a pretty good idea to keep it because it encourages us to discuss before we delete. Even if there's a reason on the afd tag, it's still a good idea to have a discussion. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 13:17, 7 March 2007 (EST)		**I agree -- it's not too much trouble to go to the discussion page and just type something simple: "This article is nominated for deletion". In fact, I think it's a pretty good idea to keep it because it encourages us to discuss before we delete. Even if there's a reason on the afd tag, it's still a good idea to have a discussion. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 13:17, 7 March 2007 (EST)
			***It was kind of annoying that the pages showed up in Wanted Pages, but I think if we do an external link, it should solve that, too.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 14:30, 7 March 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:01, 3 March 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	*If you haven't seen my change yet to this template, check it out. Should be able to do the comparison against "Image" by using the ucfirst function in the comparison. Granted it makes no difference for this template, but I also updated [[:Template:Character box]] where it does help. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:23, 3 March 2007 (EST))		*If you haven't seen my change yet to this template, check it out. Should be able to do the comparison against "Image" by using the ucfirst function in the comparison. Granted it makes no difference for this template, but I also updated [[:Template:Character box]] where it does help. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:23, 3 March 2007 (EST))
	**Actually, it's not working perfectly yet... but it should work. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:25, 3 March 2007 (EST))		**Actually, it's not working perfectly yet... but it should work. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:25, 3 March 2007 (EST))
			***Yeah, all you have to do is normalize the string and make it all lowercase using <nowiki>{{lc:}}</nowiki> when doing the comparison. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 16:01, 3 March 2007 (EST))

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:25, 3 March 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	* Was it really not working? I just checked a few about twenty minutes ago and they looked fine to me.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:19, 3 March 2007 (EST)		* Was it really not working? I just checked a few about twenty minutes ago and they looked fine to me.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:19, 3 March 2007 (EST)
	*If you haven't seen my change yet to this template, check it out. Should be able to do the comparison against "Image" by using the ucfirst function in the comparison. Granted it makes no difference for this template, but I also updated [[:Template:Character box]] where it does help. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:23, 3 March 2007 (EST))		*If you haven't seen my change yet to this template, check it out. Should be able to do the comparison against "Image" by using the ucfirst function in the comparison. Granted it makes no difference for this template, but I also updated [[:Template:Character box]] where it does help. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:23, 3 March 2007 (EST))
			**Actually, it's not working perfectly yet... but it should work. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:25, 3 March 2007 (EST))

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 3 March 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	**Oh, OK. I just didn't want the infobox to get broken. There, since we're testing against user input, I used "mage:" so it will work whether the user types "Image:" or "image:"--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 14:47, 3 March 2007 (EST)		**Oh, OK. I just didn't want the infobox to get broken. There, since we're testing against user input, I used "mage:" so it will work whether the user types "Image:" or "image:"--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 14:47, 3 March 2007 (EST)
	* Was it really not working? I just checked a few about twenty minutes ago and they looked fine to me.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:19, 3 March 2007 (EST)		* Was it really not working? I just checked a few about twenty minutes ago and they looked fine to me.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:19, 3 March 2007 (EST)
	*If you haven't seen my change yet to this template, check it out. Should be able to do the comparison against "Image" by using the ucfirst function in the comparison. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:23, 3 March 2007 (EST))		*If you haven't seen my change yet to this template, check it out. Should be able to do the comparison against "Image" by using the ucfirst function in the comparison. Granted it makes no difference for this template, but I also updated [[:Template:Character box]] where it does help. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:23, 3 March 2007 (EST))