Template talk:Image-gfdl - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: rmv redlink

2007-09-20T02:08:29Z

rmv redlink

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:08, 20 September 2007
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: rmv redlink

2007-09-20T02:08:29Z

rmv redlink

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:08, 20 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I know there's a difference, and maybe I'm being ignorant, but couldn't we just use [[Template:Image-pd]] instead of [[Template:Image-gfdl]]? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:24, 19 September 2007 (EDT)		I know there's a difference, and maybe I'm being ignorant, but couldn't we just use [[Template:Image-pd]] instead of Template:Image-gfdl? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:24, 19 September 2007 (EDT)
	*Actually, I don't think we need image-pd, and we could just use image-gfdl. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:25, 19 September 2007 (EDT)		*Actually, I don't think we need image-pd, and we could just use image-gfdl. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:25, 19 September 2007 (EDT)
	** The GNU FDL is incompatible with our license. We cannot use any images with it, so we might as well delete the template. Also there's a huge difference between a GNU FDL licensed image and an image in the public domain. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 18:28, 19 September 2007 (EDT))		** The GNU FDL is incompatible with our license. We cannot use any images with it, so we might as well delete the template. Also there's a huge difference between a GNU FDL licensed image and an image in the public domain. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 18:28, 19 September 2007 (EDT))

imported>Hardvice at 00:55, 20 September 2007

2007-09-20T00:55:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:55, 20 September 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	** The GNU FDL is incompatible with our license. We cannot use any images with it, so we might as well delete the template. Also there's a huge difference between a GNU FDL licensed image and an image in the public domain. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 18:28, 19 September 2007 (EDT))		** The GNU FDL is incompatible with our license. We cannot use any images with it, so we might as well delete the template. Also there's a huge difference between a GNU FDL licensed image and an image in the public domain. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 18:28, 19 September 2007 (EDT))
	*** So in this case, should PD have been used? Based on the details of how PD reads, it didn't seem to fit; and how the other read, it did seem to fit. I am fine for using the rite license image, just not sure which one is correct for a personally uploaded and permission given picture that isn't a screenshot or a true PD case. Anyone with clarification on what to use? <small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 09/19/2007 20:50 (EST)</small>		*** So in this case, should PD have been used? Based on the details of how PD reads, it didn't seem to fit; and how the other read, it did seem to fit. I am fine for using the rite license image, just not sure which one is correct for a personally uploaded and permission given picture that isn't a screenshot or a true PD case. Anyone with clarification on what to use? <small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 09/19/2007 20:50 (EST)</small>
			**** Just list the source. It doesn't really need boilerplate text. See any of the images Ryan has gotten from interviewees or email correspondents, or any of the images the ''Heroes'' staffers or cast have uploaded themselves. If the image is actually licensed under the GNU FDL, then it needs to be deleted.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 20:55, 19 September 2007 (EDT)

imported>HiroDynoSlayer: use which?

2007-09-20T00:50:09Z

use which?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:50, 20 September 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	*Actually, I don't think we need image-pd, and we could just use image-gfdl. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:25, 19 September 2007 (EDT)		*Actually, I don't think we need image-pd, and we could just use image-gfdl. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:25, 19 September 2007 (EDT)
	** The GNU FDL is incompatible with our license. We cannot use any images with it, so we might as well delete the template. Also there's a huge difference between a GNU FDL licensed image and an image in the public domain. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 18:28, 19 September 2007 (EDT))		** The GNU FDL is incompatible with our license. We cannot use any images with it, so we might as well delete the template. Also there's a huge difference between a GNU FDL licensed image and an image in the public domain. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 18:28, 19 September 2007 (EDT))
			*** So in this case, should PD have been used? Based on the details of how PD reads, it didn't seem to fit; and how the other read, it did seem to fit. I am fine for using the rite license image, just not sure which one is correct for a personally uploaded and permission given picture that isn't a screenshot or a true PD case. Anyone with clarification on what to use? <small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 09/19/2007 20:50 (EST)</small>

imported>Admin at 22:32, 19 September 2007

2007-09-19T22:32:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:32, 19 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I know there's a difference, and maybe I'm being ignorant, but couldn't we just use [[Template:Image-pd]] instead of [[Template:Image-gfdl]]? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:24, 19 September 2007 (EDT)		I know there's a difference, and maybe I'm being ignorant, but couldn't we just use [[Template:Image-pd]] instead of [[Template:Image-gfdl]]? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:24, 19 September 2007 (EDT)
	*Actually, I don't think we need image-pd, and we could just use image-gfdl. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:25, 19 September 2007 (EDT)		*Actually, I don't think we need image-pd, and we could just use image-gfdl. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:25, 19 September 2007 (EDT)
	** The GNU FDL is incompatible with our license. We cannot use any images with it, so we might as well delete the template. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 18:28, 19 September 2007 (EDT))		** The GNU FDL is incompatible with our license. We cannot use any images with it, so we might as well delete the template. Also there's a huge difference between a GNU FDL licensed image and an image in the public domain. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 18:28, 19 September 2007 (EDT))

imported>Admin at 22:28, 19 September 2007

2007-09-19T22:28:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:28, 19 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I know there's a difference, and maybe I'm being ignorant, but couldn't we just use [[Template:Image-pd]] instead of [[Template:Image-gfdl]]? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:24, 19 September 2007 (EDT)		I know there's a difference, and maybe I'm being ignorant, but couldn't we just use [[Template:Image-pd]] instead of [[Template:Image-gfdl]]? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:24, 19 September 2007 (EDT)
	*Actually, I don't think we need image-pd, and we could just use image-gfdl. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:25, 19 September 2007 (EDT)		*Actually, I don't think we need image-pd, and we could just use image-gfdl. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:25, 19 September 2007 (EDT)
			** The GNU FDL is incompatible with our license. We cannot use any images with it, so we might as well delete the template. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 18:28, 19 September 2007 (EDT))

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 22:25, 19 September 2007

2007-09-19T22:25:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:25, 19 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I know there's a difference, and maybe I'm being ignorant, but couldn't we just use [[Template:Image-pd]] instead of [[Template:Image-gfdl]]? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:24, 19 September 2007 (EDT)		I know there's a difference, and maybe I'm being ignorant, but couldn't we just use [[Template:Image-pd]] instead of [[Template:Image-gfdl]]? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:24, 19 September 2007 (EDT)
			*Actually, I don't think we need image-pd, and we could just use image-gfdl. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:25, 19 September 2007 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: New page: I know there's a difference, and maybe I'm being ignorant, but couldn't we just use Template:Image-pd instead of Template:Image-gfdl? ~~~~

2007-09-19T22:24:05Z

New page: I know there's a difference, and maybe I'm being ignorant, but couldn't we just use Template:Image-pd instead of Template:Image-gfdl? ~~~~

New page

I know there's a difference, and maybe I'm being ignorant, but couldn't we just use [[Template:Image-pd]] instead of [[Template:Image-gfdl]]? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:24, 19 September 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:55, 20 September 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	** The GNU FDL is incompatible with our license. We cannot use any images with it, so we might as well delete the template. Also there's a huge difference between a GNU FDL licensed image and an image in the public domain. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 18:28, 19 September 2007 (EDT))		** The GNU FDL is incompatible with our license. We cannot use any images with it, so we might as well delete the template. Also there's a huge difference between a GNU FDL licensed image and an image in the public domain. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 18:28, 19 September 2007 (EDT))
	*** So in this case, should PD have been used? Based on the details of how PD reads, it didn't seem to fit; and how the other read, it did seem to fit. I am fine for using the rite license image, just not sure which one is correct for a personally uploaded and permission given picture that isn't a screenshot or a true PD case. Anyone with clarification on what to use? <small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 09/19/2007 20:50 (EST)</small>		*** So in this case, should PD have been used? Based on the details of how PD reads, it didn't seem to fit; and how the other read, it did seem to fit. I am fine for using the rite license image, just not sure which one is correct for a personally uploaded and permission given picture that isn't a screenshot or a true PD case. Anyone with clarification on what to use? <small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 09/19/2007 20:50 (EST)</small>
			**** Just list the source. It doesn't really need boilerplate text. See any of the images Ryan has gotten from interviewees or email correspondents, or any of the images the ''Heroes'' staffers or cast have uploaded themselves. If the image is actually licensed under the GNU FDL, then it needs to be deleted.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 20:55, 19 September 2007 (EDT)