Template talk:Newepisodespoiler - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 05:22, 2 November 2007

2007-11-02T05:22:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:22, 2 November 2007
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 05:22, 2 November 2007

2007-11-02T05:22:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:22, 2 November 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	** To be fair, it only seems to be creating one redlink, to {{nowantedlink\|Spoiler:Newepisodespoiler}}. I'm not sure if we'd want that to ''not'' be a redlink when the template is used or not. I guess probably [[template:nowantedlink]] is the best way to go.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:13, 2 November 2007 (EDT)		** To be fair, it only seems to be creating one redlink, to {{nowantedlink\|Spoiler:Newepisodespoiler}}. I'm not sure if we'd want that to ''not'' be a redlink when the template is used or not. I guess probably [[template:nowantedlink]] is the best way to go.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:13, 2 November 2007 (EDT)
	** To be even more fair, it's really [[Template:Spoiler]] that's doing the redlinking.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:15, 2 November 2007 (EDT)		** To be even more fair, it's really [[Template:Spoiler]] that's doing the redlinking.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:15, 2 November 2007 (EDT)
			***Thanks for the fix. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 01:22, 2 November 2007 (EDT)

imported>Hardvice at 05:15, 2 November 2007

2007-11-02T05:15:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:15, 2 November 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* Maybe we can use the new querylink template here instead of cluttering the article with extra includes and includeonly's?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:09, 2 November 2007 (EDT)		* Maybe we can use the new querylink template here instead of cluttering the article with extra includes and includeonly's?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:09, 2 November 2007 (EDT)
	** To be fair, it only seems to be creating one redlink, to {{nowantedlink\|Spoiler:Newepisodespoiler}}. I'm not sure if we'd want that to ''not'' be a redlink when the template is used or not. I guess probably [[template:nowantedlink]] is the best way to go.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:13, 2 November 2007 (EDT)		** To be fair, it only seems to be creating one redlink, to {{nowantedlink\|Spoiler:Newepisodespoiler}}. I'm not sure if we'd want that to ''not'' be a redlink when the template is used or not. I guess probably [[template:nowantedlink]] is the best way to go.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:13, 2 November 2007 (EDT)
			** To be even more fair, it's really [[Template:Spoiler]] that's doing the redlinking.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:15, 2 November 2007 (EDT)

imported>Hardvice at 05:13, 2 November 2007

2007-11-02T05:13:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:13, 2 November 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The hidden div is still creating redlinks. Would it still work if we stuck the whole thing in an includeonly?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:04, 2 November 2007 (EDT)		The hidden div is still creating redlinks. Would it still work if we stuck the whole thing in an includeonly?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:04, 2 November 2007 (EDT)
	* Maybe we can use the new querylink template here instead of cluttering the article with extra includes and includeonly's?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:09, 2 November 2007 (EDT)		* Maybe we can use the new querylink template here instead of cluttering the article with extra includes and includeonly's?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:09, 2 November 2007 (EDT)
			** To be fair, it only seems to be creating one redlink, to {{nowantedlink\|Spoiler:Newepisodespoiler}}. I'm not sure if we'd want that to ''not'' be a redlink when the template is used or not. I guess probably [[template:nowantedlink]] is the best way to go.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:13, 2 November 2007 (EDT)

imported>MiamiVolts: Maybe use Querylink?

2007-11-02T05:09:26Z

Maybe use Querylink?

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:09, 2 November 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The hidden div is still creating redlinks. Would it still work if we stuck the whole thing in an includeonly?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:04, 2 November 2007 (EDT)		The hidden div is still creating redlinks. Would it still work if we stuck the whole thing in an includeonly?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:04, 2 November 2007 (EDT)
			* Maybe we can use the new querylink template here instead of cluttering the article with extra includes and includeonly's?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:09, 2 November 2007 (EDT)

imported>Hardvice: New page: The hidden div is still creating redlinks. Would it still work if we stuck the whole thing in an includeonly?--~~~~

2007-11-02T05:04:43Z

New page: The hidden div is still creating redlinks. Would it still work if we stuck the whole thing in an includeonly?--~~~~

New page

The hidden div is still creating redlinks. Would it still work if we stuck the whole thing in an includeonly?--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 01:04, 2 November 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:15, 2 November 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* Maybe we can use the new querylink template here instead of cluttering the article with extra includes and includeonly's?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:09, 2 November 2007 (EDT)		* Maybe we can use the new querylink template here instead of cluttering the article with extra includes and includeonly's?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:09, 2 November 2007 (EDT)
	** To be fair, it only seems to be creating one redlink, to {{nowantedlink\|Spoiler:Newepisodespoiler}}. I'm not sure if we'd want that to ''not'' be a redlink when the template is used or not. I guess probably [[template:nowantedlink]] is the best way to go.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:13, 2 November 2007 (EDT)		** To be fair, it only seems to be creating one redlink, to {{nowantedlink\|Spoiler:Newepisodespoiler}}. I'm not sure if we'd want that to ''not'' be a redlink when the template is used or not. I guess probably [[template:nowantedlink]] is the best way to go.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:13, 2 November 2007 (EDT)
			** To be even more fair, it's really [[Template:Spoiler]] that's doing the redlinking.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:15, 2 November 2007 (EDT)