Template talk:PowersTOC - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 04:04, 7 February 2007

2007-02-07T04:04:03Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 04:04, 7 February 2007
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 04:04, 7 February 2007

2007-02-07T04:04:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:04, 7 February 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	**Well, I guess if somebody asked for it, we should probably respect that. Hrrmmph. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 21:17, 6 February 2007 (EST)		**Well, I guess if somebody asked for it, we should probably respect that. Hrrmmph. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 21:17, 6 February 2007 (EST)
	*** I do tend to agree that it's not really needed and would look much cleaner without it, but I suppose it ''is'' a TOC. I can see both sides.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 22:27, 6 February 2007 (EST)		*** I do tend to agree that it's not really needed and would look much cleaner without it, but I suppose it ''is'' a TOC. I can see both sides.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 22:27, 6 February 2007 (EST)
			****Another option is to take all the thories listed under [[Theories:Powers#Powers]] and farm them out to other sections (most would go [[Theories:Miscellaneous#List_of_evolved_humans\|here]], a few [[Theories:Miscellaneous#List_of_articles_related_to_the_Agency_Without_Initials\|here]], and the rest to random other spots), and then get rid of the theories link altogether from the page. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 23:04, 6 February 2007 (EST)

imported>Hardvice at 03:27, 7 February 2007

2007-02-07T03:27:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:27, 7 February 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* I wasn't very keen on putting it there to begin with, but somebody asked.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 21:01, 6 February 2007 (EST)		* I wasn't very keen on putting it there to begin with, but somebody asked.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 21:01, 6 February 2007 (EST)
	**Well, I guess if somebody asked for it, we should probably respect that. Hrrmmph. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 21:17, 6 February 2007 (EST)		**Well, I guess if somebody asked for it, we should probably respect that. Hrrmmph. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 21:17, 6 February 2007 (EST)
			*** I do tend to agree that it's not really needed and would look much cleaner without it, but I suppose it ''is'' a TOC. I can see both sides.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 22:27, 6 February 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 02:17, 7 February 2007

2007-02-07T02:17:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:17, 7 February 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think we should probably take the Fan Theories off this TOC. It's not a power, so it looks out of place. It's also misleading because some might think it jumps right to the theories page. And it makes the TOC taller than it needs to be. Any opposed? — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 20:20, 6 February 2007 (EST)		I think we should probably take the Fan Theories off this TOC. It's not a power, so it looks out of place. It's also misleading because some might think it jumps right to the theories page. And it makes the TOC taller than it needs to be. Any opposed? — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 20:20, 6 February 2007 (EST)
	* I wasn't very keen on putting it there to begin with, but somebody asked.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 21:01, 6 February 2007 (EST)		* I wasn't very keen on putting it there to begin with, but somebody asked.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 21:01, 6 February 2007 (EST)
			**Well, I guess if somebody asked for it, we should probably respect that. Hrrmmph. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 21:17, 6 February 2007 (EST)

imported>Hardvice at 02:01, 7 February 2007

2007-02-07T02:01:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:01, 7 February 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think we should probably take the Fan Theories off this TOC. It's not a power, so it looks out of place. It's also misleading because some might think it jumps right to the theories page. And it makes the TOC taller than it needs to be. Any opposed? — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 20:20, 6 February 2007 (EST)		I think we should probably take the Fan Theories off this TOC. It's not a power, so it looks out of place. It's also misleading because some might think it jumps right to the theories page. And it makes the TOC taller than it needs to be. Any opposed? — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 20:20, 6 February 2007 (EST)
			* I wasn't very keen on putting it there to begin with, but somebody asked.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 21:01, 6 February 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: New page: I think we should probably take the Fan Theories off this TOC. It's not a power, so it looks out of place. It's also misleading because some might think it jumps right to the theories page...

2007-02-07T01:20:51Z

New page: I think we should probably take the Fan Theories off this TOC. It's not a power, so it looks out of place. It's also misleading because some might think it jumps right to the theories page...

New page

I think we should probably take the Fan Theories off this TOC. It's not a power, so it looks out of place. It's also misleading because some might think it jumps right to the theories page. And it makes the TOC taller than it needs to be. Any opposed? — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 20:20, 6 February 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:04, 7 February 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	**Well, I guess if somebody asked for it, we should probably respect that. Hrrmmph. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 21:17, 6 February 2007 (EST)		**Well, I guess if somebody asked for it, we should probably respect that. Hrrmmph. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 21:17, 6 February 2007 (EST)
	*** I do tend to agree that it's not really needed and would look much cleaner without it, but I suppose it ''is'' a TOC. I can see both sides.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 22:27, 6 February 2007 (EST)		*** I do tend to agree that it's not really needed and would look much cleaner without it, but I suppose it ''is'' a TOC. I can see both sides.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 22:27, 6 February 2007 (EST)
			****Another option is to take all the thories listed under [[Theories:Powers#Powers]] and farm them out to other sections (most would go [[Theories:Miscellaneous#List_of_evolved_humans\|here]], a few [[Theories:Miscellaneous#List_of_articles_related_to_the_Agency_Without_Initials\|here]], and the rest to random other spots), and then get rid of the theories link altogether from the page. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 23:04, 6 February 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:27, 7 February 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* I wasn't very keen on putting it there to begin with, but somebody asked.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 21:01, 6 February 2007 (EST)		* I wasn't very keen on putting it there to begin with, but somebody asked.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 21:01, 6 February 2007 (EST)
	**Well, I guess if somebody asked for it, we should probably respect that. Hrrmmph. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 21:17, 6 February 2007 (EST)		**Well, I guess if somebody asked for it, we should probably respect that. Hrrmmph. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 21:17, 6 February 2007 (EST)
			*** I do tend to agree that it's not really needed and would look much cleaner without it, but I suppose it ''is'' a TOC. I can see both sides.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 22:27, 6 February 2007 (EST)