Template talk:Sectstub - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Full Width / Not Full Width */

2009-08-25T13:59:21Z

Full Width / Not Full Width

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:59, 25 August 2009
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Full Width / Not Full Width */

2009-08-25T13:59:21Z

Full Width / Not Full Width

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:59, 25 August 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:

	When we make the width "100%", it seems to push out other navboxes/floated images. When we make it a set amount of pixels long, it only extends to about halfway of the page and stops (if someone with a large monitor, like me, is looking at it). I remember a time when this template could extend to as long as it need; filling up anybody's monitor but stopping if there is a navbox/floated image. What has happened? --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:37, 25 August 2009 (EDT)		When we make the width "100%", it seems to push out other navboxes/floated images. When we make it a set amount of pixels long, it only extends to about halfway of the page and stops (if someone with a large monitor, like me, is looking at it). I remember a time when this template could extend to as long as it need; filling up anybody's monitor but stopping if there is a navbox/floated image. What has happened? --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:37, 25 August 2009 (EDT)
			* I thought so too, but when I went back through the edit history, I never saw it do what I wanted it to do, which is to extend only as far as it "needs" to extend. My guess is that the table properties were changed somewhere along the way, or something in MediaWiki was changed, or something that's beyond my understanding. :) Personally, I prefer to have it only extend partway across the screen than trying to "clear" infoboxes...but I'm very open to other suggestions. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:59, 25 August 2009 (EDT)

imported>Radicell: /* Full Width / Not Full Width */ new section

2009-08-25T13:37:28Z

Full Width / Not Full Width: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:37, 25 August 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:
	*** I think I got the same problem. --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 00:53, 10 September 2008 (EDT)		*** I think I got the same problem. --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 00:53, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
	**** Yeah, I recently upgraded my Firefox and began getting the same problem. Really makes those new GN character pages ugly, with a huge white space. Is there anyway to fix it? --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 07:05, 11 February 2009 (EST)		**** Yeah, I recently upgraded my Firefox and began getting the same problem. Really makes those new GN character pages ugly, with a huge white space. Is there anyway to fix it? --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 07:05, 11 February 2009 (EST)

			== Full Width / Not Full Width ==

			When we make the width "100%", it seems to push out other navboxes/floated images. When we make it a set amount of pixels long, it only extends to about halfway of the page and stops (if someone with a large monitor, like me, is looking at it). I remember a time when this template could extend to as long as it need; filling up anybody's monitor but stopping if there is a navbox/floated image. What has happened? --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:37, 25 August 2009 (EDT)

imported>Radicell at 12:05, 11 February 2009

2009-02-11T12:05:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:05, 11 February 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	** Oh. Before I upgraded my Firefox, the sectstub template used to work around infoboxes very nicely. But I upgraded and I suppose I lost that nice little feature. :( -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 23:38, 9 September 2008 (EDT)		** Oh. Before I upgraded my Firefox, the sectstub template used to work around infoboxes very nicely. But I upgraded and I suppose I lost that nice little feature. :( -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 23:38, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
	*** I think I got the same problem. --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 00:53, 10 September 2008 (EDT)		*** I think I got the same problem. --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 00:53, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
			**** Yeah, I recently upgraded my Firefox and began getting the same problem. Really makes those new GN character pages ugly, with a huge white space. Is there anyway to fix it? --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 07:05, 11 February 2009 (EST)

imported>SacValleyDweller: /* clearing */

2008-09-10T04:53:15Z

clearing

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:53, 10 September 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:
	*I've seen it, but I'm not sure. I haven't seen any templates be able to do that to where they can fix around the infoboxes. Same with the wikitables.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 22:13, 9 September 2008 (EDT)		*I've seen it, but I'm not sure. I haven't seen any templates be able to do that to where they can fix around the infoboxes. Same with the wikitables.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 22:13, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
	** Oh. Before I upgraded my Firefox, the sectstub template used to work around infoboxes very nicely. But I upgraded and I suppose I lost that nice little feature. :( -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 23:38, 9 September 2008 (EDT)		** Oh. Before I upgraded my Firefox, the sectstub template used to work around infoboxes very nicely. But I upgraded and I suppose I lost that nice little feature. :( -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 23:38, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
			*** I think I got the same problem. --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 00:53, 10 September 2008 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* clearing */

2008-09-10T03:38:36Z

clearing

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:38, 10 September 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Is anybody else having a problem with this template? Whenever it's used near the top of a page, it clears infoboxes, TOCs, and right-floated images. In other words, it makes a huge space, rather than being a flag where text should be. Anybody know a way to fix that? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:10, 9 September 2008 (EDT)		Is anybody else having a problem with this template? Whenever it's used near the top of a page, it clears infoboxes, TOCs, and right-floated images. In other words, it makes a huge space, rather than being a flag where text should be. Anybody know a way to fix that? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:10, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
	*I've seen it, but I'm not sure. I haven't seen any templates be able to do that to where they can fix around the infoboxes. Same with the wikitables.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 22:13, 9 September 2008 (EDT)		*I've seen it, but I'm not sure. I haven't seen any templates be able to do that to where they can fix around the infoboxes. Same with the wikitables.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 22:13, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
			** Oh. Before I upgraded my Firefox, the sectstub template used to work around infoboxes very nicely. But I upgraded and I suppose I lost that nice little feature. :( -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 23:38, 9 September 2008 (EDT)

imported>Baldbobbo: /* clearing */

2008-09-10T02:13:18Z

clearing

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:13, 10 September 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Is anybody else having a problem with this template? Whenever it's used near the top of a page, it clears infoboxes, TOCs, and right-floated images. In other words, it makes a huge space, rather than being a flag where text should be. Anybody know a way to fix that? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:10, 9 September 2008 (EDT)		Is anybody else having a problem with this template? Whenever it's used near the top of a page, it clears infoboxes, TOCs, and right-floated images. In other words, it makes a huge space, rather than being a flag where text should be. Anybody know a way to fix that? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:10, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
			*I've seen it, but I'm not sure. I haven't seen any templates be able to do that to where they can fix around the infoboxes. Same with the wikitables.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 22:13, 9 September 2008 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* clearing */ new section

2008-09-10T02:10:16Z

clearing: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:10, 10 September 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Do we need this? I would think the "needs" variable of the regular [[template:stub\|stub template]] takes care of marking a particular section--plus, it's easier to see than hidden in the middle of a section. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 00:26, 15 March 2007 (EDT)		Do we need this? I would think the "needs" variable of the regular [[template:stub\|stub template]] takes care of marking a particular section--plus, it's easier to see than hidden in the middle of a section. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 00:26, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

			== clearing ==

			Is anybody else having a problem with this template? Whenever it's used near the top of a page, it clears infoboxes, TOCs, and right-floated images. In other words, it makes a huge space, rather than being a flag where text should be. Anybody know a way to fix that? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:10, 9 September 2008 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: New page: Do we need this? I would think the "needs" variable of the regular stub template takes care of marking a particular section--plus, it's easier to see than hidden in the m...

2007-03-15T04:26:08Z

New page: Do we need this? I would think the "needs" variable of the regular stub template takes care of marking a particular section--plus, it's easier to see than hidden in the m...

New page

Do we need this? I would think the "needs" variable of the regular [[template:stub|stub template]] takes care of marking a particular section--plus, it's easier to see than hidden in the middle of a section. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 00:26, 15 March 2007 (EDT)