Theory:Charles Darwin - Revision history

imported>PJDEP: The theory is all over the place, the arguments are weak and untrue....

2010-03-01T00:09:49Z

The theory is all over the place, the arguments are weak and untrue....

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:09, 1 March 2010
(No difference)

imported>PJDEP: The theory is all over the place, the arguments are weak and untrue....

2010-03-01T00:09:49Z

The theory is all over the place, the arguments are weak and untrue....

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:09, 1 March 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	{{plus}} It seems that Heroes is based on Charles Darwin's theories of evolution.<br />		{{plus}} It seems that Heroes is based on Charles Darwin's theories of evolution.<br />
	{{plus}} After formulating his theories, Darwin spent several years debating with himself as to whether he should publish them, or take them to his grave. Supposedly, this was due to his own religious beliefs, but it may have been that he was debating over whether to include mention of evolved humans in his book.<br />		{{plus}} After formulating his theories, Darwin spent several years debating with himself as to whether he should publish them, or take them to his grave. Supposedly, this was due to his own religious beliefs, but it may have been that he was debating over whether to include mention of evolved humans in his book.<br />
	\|-
	\| Charles Darwin was an evolved human, and he realized this when he went to the Galapagos Islands and had a type of Clairsentience. \|\| None \|\| {{note}} Darwin's theories were misguided and eventually disproved. If he was an evolved human with the power of clairsentience, he must not have had a very high level of control over it.<br />
	:{{plus}} Which of Darwin's theories were "misguided", and when were they "disproved"?<br />
	::{{note}} When he denounced all of them near the end of his life.<br />
	:::{{note}} He could have lied, and there's still no mention of the theories being disproved.<br />
	:::{{minus}} You mean when an obscure newspaper claimed that he denounced it while his wife, family, and pretty much anyone who knew him claimed it was slander?<br />
	{{minus}} That ability refers to the history of a single object. For example if you touched a child, you would see his history from when he was a single cell, but you wouldn't be able to see the history of his parents.<br />
	{{minus}} If clairsentience allowed its users to 'see' that far into an object or person's past, then they would be rapidly driven mad by the overwhelming influx of data which they would pick up from their surroundings.<br />
	:{{note}} Sylar and Bridget were never implied to see the entire history of an object at once. It was always bits and pieces. And even if they do see everything, they might be immune to harmful effects of the ability.<br />
	\|-		\|-
	\|}		\|}

imported>PJDEP at 00:08, 1 March 2010

2010-03-01T00:08:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:08, 1 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{theoryheader\|sort=Darwin, Charles\|name=<!--optional override of PAGENAME-->}}		{{theoryheader\|sort=Darwin, Charles\|name=<!--optional override of PAGENAME-->}}
	\|-		\|-
	\| [[Charles Darwin]] secretly knew about the first generations of evolved humans. \|\| None. \|\| {{plus}} Charles Darwin's "Book of Origins" has reference to [[Chandra]]'s Activating Evolution.<br />		\| [[Charles Darwin]] secretly knew about the first generations of evolved humans. \|\| None \|\| {{plus}} Charles Darwin's "Book of Origins" has reference to [[Chandra]]'s Activating Evolution.<br />
	{{plus}} Charles Darwin is one of the first people to talk about evolution in the human race.<br />		{{plus}} Charles Darwin is one of the first people to talk about evolution in the human race.<br />
	{{plus}} It seems that Heroes is based on Charles Darwin's theories of evolution.<br />		{{plus}} It seems that Heroes is based on Charles Darwin's theories of evolution.<br />
	{{plus}} After formulating his theories, Darwin spent several years debating with himself as to whether he should publish them, or take them to his grave. Supposedly, this was due to his own religious beliefs, but it may have been that he was debating over whether to include mention of evolved humans in his book.<br />		{{plus}} After formulating his theories, Darwin spent several years debating with himself as to whether he should publish them, or take them to his grave. Supposedly, this was due to his own religious beliefs, but it may have been that he was debating over whether to include mention of evolved humans in his book.<br />
	\|-		\|-
	\| Charles Darwin was an evolved human, and he realized this when he went to the Galapagos Islands and had a type of Clairsentience. \|\| None. \|\| {{note}} Darwin's theories were misguided and eventually disproved. If he was an evolved human with the power of clairsentience, he must not have had a very high level of control over it.<br />		\| Charles Darwin was an evolved human, and he realized this when he went to the Galapagos Islands and had a type of Clairsentience. \|\| None \|\| {{note}} Darwin's theories were misguided and eventually disproved. If he was an evolved human with the power of clairsentience, he must not have had a very high level of control over it.<br />
	:{{plus}} Which of Darwin's theories were "misguided", and when were they "disproved"?<br />		:{{plus}} Which of Darwin's theories were "misguided", and when were they "disproved"?<br />
	::{{note}} When he denounced all of them near the end of his life.<br />		::{{note}} When he denounced all of them near the end of his life.<br />

imported>Intuitive Empath at 23:46, 28 December 2009

2009-12-28T23:46:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:46, 28 December 2009
Line 13:		Line 13:
	{{minus}} That ability refers to the history of a single object. For example if you touched a child, you would see his history from when he was a single cell, but you wouldn't be able to see the history of his parents.<br />		{{minus}} That ability refers to the history of a single object. For example if you touched a child, you would see his history from when he was a single cell, but you wouldn't be able to see the history of his parents.<br />
	{{minus}} If clairsentience allowed its users to 'see' that far into an object or person's past, then they would be rapidly driven mad by the overwhelming influx of data which they would pick up from their surroundings.<br />		{{minus}} If clairsentience allowed its users to 'see' that far into an object or person's past, then they would be rapidly driven mad by the overwhelming influx of data which they would pick up from their surroundings.<br />
			:{{note}} Sylar and Bridget were never implied to see the entire history of an object at once. It was always bits and pieces. And even if they do see everything, they might be immune to harmful effects of the ability.<br />
	\|-		\|-
	\|}		\|}

imported>D and d 123 at 00:23, 28 December 2009

2009-12-28T00:23:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:23, 28 December 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	{{plus}} Charles Darwin is one of the first people to talk about evolution in the human race.<br />		{{plus}} Charles Darwin is one of the first people to talk about evolution in the human race.<br />
	{{plus}} It seems that Heroes is based on Charles Darwin's theories of evolution.<br />		{{plus}} It seems that Heroes is based on Charles Darwin's theories of evolution.<br />
	{{plus}} After formulating his theories, Darwin spent several years debating with himself as to whether he should publish them, or take them to his grave. Supposedly, this was due to his own religious beliefs, but it may have been that he was debating over whether to include mention evolved humans in his book.<br />		{{plus}} After formulating his theories, Darwin spent several years debating with himself as to whether he should publish them, or take them to his grave. Supposedly, this was due to his own religious beliefs, but it may have been that he was debating over whether to include mention of evolved humans in his book.<br />
	\|-		\|-
	\| Charles Darwin was an evolved human, and he realized this when he went to the Galapagos Islands and had a type of ~~Clairesentience~~. \|\| None. \|\| {{note}} Darwin's theories were misguided and eventually disproved. If he was an evolved human with the power of clairsentience, he must not have had a very high level of control over it.<br />		\| Charles Darwin was an evolved human, and he realized this when he went to the Galapagos Islands and had a type of Clairsentience. \|\| None. \|\| {{note}} Darwin's theories were misguided and eventually disproved. If he was an evolved human with the power of clairsentience, he must not have had a very high level of control over it.<br />
	:{{plus}} Which of Darwin's theories were "misguided", and when were they "disproved"?<br />		:{{plus}} Which of Darwin's theories were "misguided", and when were they "disproved"?<br />
	::{{note}} When he denounced all of them near the end of his life.<br />		::{{note}} When he denounced all of them near the end of his life.<br />
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:::{{minus}} You mean when an obscure newspaper claimed that he denounced it while his wife, family, and pretty much anyone who knew him claimed it was slander?<br />		:::{{minus}} You mean when an obscure newspaper claimed that he denounced it while his wife, family, and pretty much anyone who knew him claimed it was slander?<br />
	{{minus}} That ability refers to the history of a single object. For example if you touched a child, you would see his history from when he was a single cell, but you wouldn't be able to see the history of his parents.<br />		{{minus}} That ability refers to the history of a single object. For example if you touched a child, you would see his history from when he was a single cell, but you wouldn't be able to see the history of his parents.<br />
			{{minus}} If clairsentience allowed its users to 'see' that far into an object or person's past, then they would be rapidly driven mad by the overwhelming influx of data which they would pick up from their surroundings.<br />
	\|-		\|-
	\|}		\|}

imported>D and d 123 at 21:57, 21 December 2009

2009-12-21T21:57:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:57, 21 December 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	{{plus}} Charles Darwin is one of the first people to talk about evolution in the human race.<br />		{{plus}} Charles Darwin is one of the first people to talk about evolution in the human race.<br />
	{{plus}} It seems that Heroes is based on Charles Darwin's theories of evolution.<br />		{{plus}} It seems that Heroes is based on Charles Darwin's theories of evolution.<br />
			{{plus}} After formulating his theories, Darwin spent several years debating with himself as to whether he should publish them, or take them to his grave. Supposedly, this was due to his own religious beliefs, but it may have been that he was debating over whether to include mention evolved humans in his book.<br />
	\|-		\|-
	\| Charles Darwin was an evolved human, and he realized this when he went to the Galapagos Islands and had a type of Clairesentience. \|\| None. \|\| {{note}} Darwin's theories were misguided and eventually disproved. If he was an evolved human with the power of clairsentience, he must not have had a very high level of control over it.<br />		\| Charles Darwin was an evolved human, and he realized this when he went to the Galapagos Islands and had a type of Clairesentience. \|\| None. \|\| {{note}} Darwin's theories were misguided and eventually disproved. If he was an evolved human with the power of clairsentience, he must not have had a very high level of control over it.<br />

imported>Intuitive Empath at 21:00, 8 February 2009

2009-02-08T21:00:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:00, 8 February 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::{{note}} When he denounced all of them near the end of his life.<br />		::{{note}} When he denounced all of them near the end of his life.<br />
	:::{{note}} He could have lied, and there's still no mention of the theories being disproved.<br />		:::{{note}} He could have lied, and there's still no mention of the theories being disproved.<br />
	:::{{minus}} You mean when an obscure newspaper claimed that he denounced it while his wife, family, and pretty much anyone who knew him claimed it was slander?		:::{{minus}} You mean when an obscure newspaper claimed that he denounced it while his wife, family, and pretty much anyone who knew him claimed it was slander?<br />
	{{minus}} That ability refers to the history of a single object. For example if you touched a child, you would see his history from when he was a single cell, but you wouldn't be able to see the history of his parents.<br />		{{minus}} That ability refers to the history of a single object. For example if you touched a child, you would see his history from when he was a single cell, but you wouldn't be able to see the history of his parents.<br />
	\|-		\|-

imported>Sonixunite at 20:18, 8 February 2009

2009-02-08T20:18:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:18, 8 February 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::{{note}} When he denounced all of them near the end of his life.<br />		::{{note}} When he denounced all of them near the end of his life.<br />
	:::{{note}} He could have lied, and there's still no mention of the theories being disproved.<br />		:::{{note}} He could have lied, and there's still no mention of the theories being disproved.<br />
			:::{{minus}} You mean when an obscure newspaper claimed that he denounced it while his wife, family, and pretty much anyone who knew him claimed it was slander?
	{{minus}} That ability refers to the history of a single object. For example if you touched a child, you would see his history from when he was a single cell, but you wouldn't be able to see the history of his parents.<br />		{{minus}} That ability refers to the history of a single object. For example if you touched a child, you would see his history from when he was a single cell, but you wouldn't be able to see the history of his parents.<br />
	\|-		\|-

imported>Intuitive Empath at 15:54, 2 February 2009

2009-02-02T15:54:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:54, 2 February 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:::{{note}} He could have lied, and there's still no mention of the theories being disproved.<br />		:::{{note}} He could have lied, and there's still no mention of the theories being disproved.<br />
	{{minus}} That ability refers to the history of a single object. For example if you touched a child, you would see his history from when he was a single cell, but you wouldn't be able to see the history of his parents.<br />		{{minus}} That ability refers to the history of a single object. For example if you touched a child, you would see his history from when he was a single cell, but you wouldn't be able to see the history of his parents.<br />
			\|-
	\|}		\|}
	{{theorybar}}		{{theorybar}}

imported>Intuitive Empath at 15:54, 2 February 2009

2009-02-02T15:54:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:54, 2 February 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	\| Charles Darwin was an evolved human, and he realized this when he went to the Galapagos Islands and had a type of Clairesentience. \|\| None. \|\| {{note}} Darwin's theories were misguided and eventually disproved. If he was an evolved human with the power of clairsentience, he must not have had a very high level of control over it.<br />		\| Charles Darwin was an evolved human, and he realized this when he went to the Galapagos Islands and had a type of Clairesentience. \|\| None. \|\| {{note}} Darwin's theories were misguided and eventually disproved. If he was an evolved human with the power of clairsentience, he must not have had a very high level of control over it.<br />
	:{{plus}} Which of Darwin's theories were "misguided", and when were they "disproved"?<br />		:{{plus}} Which of Darwin's theories were "misguided", and when were they "disproved"?<br />
	::{{note}} ~~when~~ he denounced all of them near the end of his life.<br />		::{{note}} When he denounced all of them near the end of his life.<br />
			:::{{note}} He could have lied, and there's still no mention of the theories being disproved.<br />
	{{minus}} That ability refers to the history of a single object. For example if you touched a child, you would see his history from when he was a single cell, but you wouldn't be able to see the history of his parents.<br />		{{minus}} That ability refers to the history of a single object. For example if you touched a child, you would see his history from when he was a single cell, but you wouldn't be able to see the history of his parents.<br />
	\|}		\|}