Theory:Unknown assassin - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: Redirecting to Theory:Peter Petrelli

2008-09-23T05:34:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:34, 23 September 2008
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: Redirecting to Theory:Peter Petrelli

2008-09-23T05:34:59Z

Redirecting to Theory:Peter Petrelli

Show changes

imported>Rybo5000 at 10:33, 18 August 2008

2008-08-18T10:33:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:33, 18 August 2008
Line 154:		Line 154:
	\| The assailant is a future Nathan, not staged.		\| The assailant is a future Nathan, not staged.
	\| None.		\| None.
	\|{{note}} A future Nathan could have stopped Nathan from making the same mistake, whatever that may be.		\|{{note}} A future Nathan could have stopped Nathan from making the same mistake, whatever that may be
			{{minus}} By killing himself? Great paradox there, killing your past self.
	\|}		\|}
	{{theorybar}}		{{theorybar}}

imported>Friskymuffin: these two kind of cancel each other out... we dont want debates on theory pages

2008-08-13T18:05:21Z

these two kind of cancel each other out... we dont want debates on theory pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:05, 13 August 2008
Line 35:		Line 35:
	:{{minus}} Peter may not be able to [[time travel]] to a location within the range of that [[empathic mimicry\|ability]] of another version of himself because doing so may create a [[rift]] due to the nature of his power.<br />		:{{minus}} Peter may not be able to [[time travel]] to a location within the range of that [[empathic mimicry\|ability]] of another version of himself because doing so may create a [[rift]] due to the nature of his power.<br />
	{{plus}} If [[Angela]] was determined to keep [[the Company]] secret, and she knew of Peter's ability to time travel (possibly through [[Kaito]]), she could have sent a message through time to Peter's future self asking him to prevent the revelation.<br />		{{plus}} If [[Angela]] was determined to keep [[the Company]] secret, and she knew of Peter's ability to time travel (possibly through [[Kaito]]), she could have sent a message through time to Peter's future self asking him to prevent the revelation.<br />
	:{{minus}} The only known characters to have the abilty to time travel, are Hiro and Peter, therefore, Angela has no means how to send a message to the future.<br />
	::{{plus}} Write a note, lock it in a safety deposit box with orders to open it at a certain time (think Back to the Future 2/3). Send a future-dated email to somebody. There's lots of ways to send a message into the future, it's sending it into the past that's hard.<br />
	{{plus}} Nathan's last words were "Peter." He might not have been calling out to his brother; he might have seen the assailant in the crowd, and was trying to tell the present Peter that the killer was him.<br />		{{plus}} Nathan's last words were "Peter." He might not have been calling out to his brother; he might have seen the assailant in the crowd, and was trying to tell the present Peter that the killer was him.<br />
	{{minus}}Future Peter would not risk being seen on all of the television cameras and by witnesses when he could have easily met Nathan in the hallway where he would have been out of the limelight for an easy kill and a phase back out.<br />		{{minus}}Future Peter would not risk being seen on all of the television cameras and by witnesses when he could have easily met Nathan in the hallway where he would have been out of the limelight for an easy kill and a phase back out.<br />

imported>Maelwys: response

2008-08-13T15:25:12Z

response

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:25, 13 August 2008
Line 36:		Line 36:
	{{plus}} If [[Angela]] was determined to keep [[the Company]] secret, and she knew of Peter's ability to time travel (possibly through [[Kaito]]), she could have sent a message through time to Peter's future self asking him to prevent the revelation.<br />		{{plus}} If [[Angela]] was determined to keep [[the Company]] secret, and she knew of Peter's ability to time travel (possibly through [[Kaito]]), she could have sent a message through time to Peter's future self asking him to prevent the revelation.<br />
	:{{minus}} The only known characters to have the abilty to time travel, are Hiro and Peter, therefore, Angela has no means how to send a message to the future.<br />		:{{minus}} The only known characters to have the abilty to time travel, are Hiro and Peter, therefore, Angela has no means how to send a message to the future.<br />
			::{{plus}} Write a note, lock it in a safety deposit box with orders to open it at a certain time (think Back to the Future 2/3). Send a future-dated email to somebody. There's lots of ways to send a message into the future, it's sending it into the past that's hard.<br />
	{{plus}} Nathan's last words were "Peter." He might not have been calling out to his brother; he might have seen the assailant in the crowd, and was trying to tell the present Peter that the killer was him.<br />		{{plus}} Nathan's last words were "Peter." He might not have been calling out to his brother; he might have seen the assailant in the crowd, and was trying to tell the present Peter that the killer was him.<br />
	{{minus}}Future Peter would not risk being seen on all of the television cameras and by witnesses when he could have easily met Nathan in the hallway where he would have been out of the limelight for an easy kill and a phase back out.<br />		{{minus}}Future Peter would not risk being seen on all of the television cameras and by witnesses when he could have easily met Nathan in the hallway where he would have been out of the limelight for an easy kill and a phase back out.<br />

imported>Sylarbob at 11:25, 28 July 2008

2008-07-28T11:25:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:25, 28 July 2008
Line 128:		Line 128:
	:{{minus}} Judging by both Matt and Peter's reactions, it is very probable that the shooting was not staged.<br />		:{{minus}} Judging by both Matt and Peter's reactions, it is very probable that the shooting was not staged.<br />
	::{{plus}} In order for a staged shooting to be plausible, their reactions were appropriate and consistent with the element of surprise.<br />		::{{plus}} In order for a staged shooting to be plausible, their reactions were appropriate and consistent with the element of surprise.<br />
			::{{plus}} Also, Nathan may have staged the shooting without telling Peter or Matt.<br />
	{{plus}}He was shot in the chest, if he had been shot in the head he couldn't have regenerated with any blood.<br />		{{plus}}He was shot in the chest, if he had been shot in the head he couldn't have regenerated with any blood.<br />
	:{{note}}Shooting in the chest vs. the head may not mean anything anymore since Claire's blood was able to revive Noah, who had been shot in the eye.<br />		:{{note}}Shooting in the chest vs. the head may not mean anything anymore since Claire's blood was able to revive Noah, who had been shot in the eye.<br />

imported>Friskymuffin: edit style

2008-07-18T19:50:20Z

edit style

Show changes

imported>Quagmire1794 at 19:43, 18 July 2008

2008-07-18T19:43:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:43, 18 July 2008
Line 116:		Line 116:
	{{plus}} If the assailant is someone invisible this could explain how they shot Nathan without being immidiatly captured.		{{plus}} If the assailant is someone invisible this could explain how they shot Nathan without being immidiatly captured.
	\|-		\|-
	\| The assailant is a future-Nathan, not staged. \|\| None. \|\|		\| The assailant is a future-Nathan, not staged. \|\| None. \|\|{{note}} Future Nathan could have stopped Nathan from making the same mistake, whatever that may be.
	\|-		\|-
	\|}		\|}

imported>Friskymuffin: edit tags

2008-07-11T01:20:42Z

edit tags

Show changes

imported>Smumdax at 03:21, 8 July 2008

2008-07-08T03:21:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:21, 8 July 2008
Line 78:		Line 78:
	\| The assailant is someone with the power of invisibility. \|\| None\|\| {{Plus}} We see the assailant walk out and then in the next show he is gone. It is possible that the first shot is supposed to represent Peter's point of view and since invisible people can see other invisible people this could explain how he was seen.		\| The assailant is someone with the power of invisibility. \|\| None\|\| {{Plus}} We see the assailant walk out and then in the next show he is gone. It is possible that the first shot is supposed to represent Peter's point of view and since invisible people can see other invisible people this could explain how he was seen.
	{{Plus}} If the assailant is someone invisible this could explain how they shot Nathan without being immidiatly captured.		{{Plus}} If the assailant is someone invisible this could explain how they shot Nathan without being immidiatly captured.
			\|-
			\| The assailant is a future-Nathan, not staged \|\| None \|\| {{plus}}Just because this theory still hasn't been up yet. And also from a quick glimpse at the promo for the webisodes.
	\|-		\|-
	\|}		\|}