Theory talk:Caitlin - Revision history

imported>Baldbobbo: /* Hasn't Shown Any */

2007-10-18T19:07:16Z

Hasn't Shown Any

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:07, 18 October 2007
(No difference)

imported>Baldbobbo: /* Hasn't Shown Any */

2007-10-18T19:07:16Z

Hasn't Shown Any

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:07, 18 October 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:
	This could be a note on ''any'' non-powered character's theory page. Caitlin hasn't displayed a power and no one has mentioned her as having one in an interview. I think "hasn't shown any" is a legitimate minus until demonstrated otherwise. As wild as theory pages are allowed to be, we should have ''some'' sort of criteria for evidence.		This could be a note on ''any'' non-powered character's theory page. Caitlin hasn't displayed a power and no one has mentioned her as having one in an interview. I think "hasn't shown any" is a legitimate minus until demonstrated otherwise. As wild as theory pages are allowed to be, we should have ''some'' sort of criteria for evidence.
	*Right. I'm worried that some of the theory pages are becoming discussion pages, which Should Not Happen. The evidence column is for just that: evidence, eithter supporting or refuting the original theory. If there is a volley of ideas on a theory page, they should be combined to one or two pieces of evidence, or removed altogether (and taken to the discussion page). Feel free to trim as needed. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 13:02, 10 October 2007 (EDT)		*Right. I'm worried that some of the theory pages are becoming discussion pages, which Should Not Happen. The evidence column is for just that: evidence, eithter supporting or refuting the original theory. If there is a volley of ideas on a theory page, they should be combined to one or two pieces of evidence, or removed altogether (and taken to the discussion page). Feel free to trim as needed. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 13:02, 10 October 2007 (EDT)
			**I remember clearing out those theory pages when they were one huge, long article that would get edited while I was midway cleaning them out. I can try to run through some of these this weekend, no guarantees.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] <span style="font-size: 7pt;">([[User talk:Baldbobbo\|Talk]])</span> 15:07, 18 October 2007 (EDT)

	===Has a Power===		===Has a Power===

imported>Hardvice at 19:04, 18 October 2007

2007-10-18T19:04:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:04, 18 October 2007
Line 19:		Line 19:
	* Eh? The "[[Theory:Caitlin\|Theorys page for her]]" doesn't have any pictures; were you referring to a different article? Of the three images from Sylar's map, two are female seen here to the right. Neither look like Caitlin and one of them is in Alaska or Canada. --[[User:FissionChips\|FissionChips]] 11:38, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		* Eh? The "[[Theory:Caitlin\|Theorys page for her]]" doesn't have any pictures; were you referring to a different article? Of the three images from Sylar's map, two are female seen here to the right. Neither look like Caitlin and one of them is in Alaska or Canada. --[[User:FissionChips\|FissionChips]] 11:38, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
	*Sorry that wasn't clear, I meant when you go to category theories theres a picture for each theory page I noticed the Caitlin one after looking on the symbols on sylars map and thought they looked similar, I've put up the picture of Caitlin to compare (I think she's the bottom one you posted) I might be wrong but the pictures look a bit similar --[[User:Daveie\|Daveie]] 08:42, 18 October 2007 (EDT)		*Sorry that wasn't clear, I meant when you go to category theories theres a picture for each theory page I noticed the Caitlin one after looking on the symbols on sylars map and thought they looked similar, I've put up the picture of Caitlin to compare (I think she's the bottom one you posted) I might be wrong but the pictures look a bit similar --[[User:Daveie\|Daveie]] 08:42, 18 October 2007 (EDT)
			** I think it's pretty unlikely. The pictures on Sylar's map are from waaaay back in ''One Giant Leap'', long before Caitlin was cast or even conceived, and according to the cast and crew, most are just pictures of ''Heroes'' staffers. I think it's probably just a coincidence.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:04, 18 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>Daveie at 12:42, 18 October 2007

2007-10-18T12:42:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:42, 18 October 2007
Line 16:		Line 16:

	===Has a Power===		===Has a Power===
	[[Image:Symbol_on_map_picture.JPG\|thumb\|right]] [[Image:Symbol sylars map 3.jpg\|thumb\|right]] I think she does have a power because looking through your pictures of the symbol location on sylar's map 3 faces had the symbol drawn on it, one of the faces is Caitlin's (The Theorys page for her has same picture w/o the symbol) --[[User:Daveie\|Daveie]] 10:02, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		[[Image:Symbol_on_map_picture.JPG\|thumb\|right]] [[Image:Symbol sylars map 3.jpg\|thumb\|right]] [[Image:Caitlin.jpg\|thumb\|right]] I think she does have a power because looking through your pictures of the symbol location on sylar's map 3 faces had the symbol drawn on it, one of the faces is Caitlin's (The Theorys page for her has same picture w/o the symbol) --[[User:Daveie\|Daveie]] 10:02, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
	* Eh? The "[[Theory:Caitlin\|Theorys page for her]]" doesn't have any pictures; were you referring to a different article? Of the three images from Sylar's map, two are female seen here to the right. Neither look like Caitlin and one of them is in Alaska or Canada. --[[User:FissionChips\|FissionChips]] 11:38, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		* Eh? The "[[Theory:Caitlin\|Theorys page for her]]" doesn't have any pictures; were you referring to a different article? Of the three images from Sylar's map, two are female seen here to the right. Neither look like Caitlin and one of them is in Alaska or Canada. --[[User:FissionChips\|FissionChips]] 11:38, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
			*Sorry that wasn't clear, I meant when you go to category theories theres a picture for each theory page I noticed the Caitlin one after looking on the symbols on sylars map and thought they looked similar, I've put up the picture of Caitlin to compare (I think she's the bottom one you posted) I might be wrong but the pictures look a bit similar --[[User:Daveie\|Daveie]] 08:42, 18 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>FissionChips: /* Has a Power */

2007-10-17T15:38:12Z

Has a Power

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:38, 17 October 2007
Line 16:		Line 16:

	===Has a Power===		===Has a Power===
	I think she does have a power because looking through your pictures of the symbol location on sylar's map 3 faces had the symbol drawn on it, one of the faces is Caitlin's (The Theorys page for her has same picture w/o the symbol) --[[User:Daveie\|Daveie]] 10:02, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		[[Image:Symbol_on_map_picture.JPG\|thumb\|right]] [[Image:Symbol sylars map 3.jpg\|thumb\|right]] I think she does have a power because looking through your pictures of the symbol location on sylar's map 3 faces had the symbol drawn on it, one of the faces is Caitlin's (The Theorys page for her has same picture w/o the symbol) --[[User:Daveie\|Daveie]] 10:02, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
			* Eh? The "[[Theory:Caitlin\|Theorys page for her]]" doesn't have any pictures; were you referring to a different article? Of the three images from Sylar's map, two are female seen here to the right. Neither look like Caitlin and one of them is in Alaska or Canada. --[[User:FissionChips\|FissionChips]] 11:38, 17 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>Daveie at 14:02, 17 October 2007

2007-10-17T14:02:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:02, 17 October 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:
	This could be a note on ''any'' non-powered character's theory page. Caitlin hasn't displayed a power and no one has mentioned her as having one in an interview. I think "hasn't shown any" is a legitimate minus until demonstrated otherwise. As wild as theory pages are allowed to be, we should have ''some'' sort of criteria for evidence.		This could be a note on ''any'' non-powered character's theory page. Caitlin hasn't displayed a power and no one has mentioned her as having one in an interview. I think "hasn't shown any" is a legitimate minus until demonstrated otherwise. As wild as theory pages are allowed to be, we should have ''some'' sort of criteria for evidence.
	*Right. I'm worried that some of the theory pages are becoming discussion pages, which Should Not Happen. The evidence column is for just that: evidence, eithter supporting or refuting the original theory. If there is a volley of ideas on a theory page, they should be combined to one or two pieces of evidence, or removed altogether (and taken to the discussion page). Feel free to trim as needed. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 13:02, 10 October 2007 (EDT)		*Right. I'm worried that some of the theory pages are becoming discussion pages, which Should Not Happen. The evidence column is for just that: evidence, eithter supporting or refuting the original theory. If there is a volley of ideas on a theory page, they should be combined to one or two pieces of evidence, or removed altogether (and taken to the discussion page). Feel free to trim as needed. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 13:02, 10 October 2007 (EDT)

			===Has a Power===
			I think she does have a power because looking through your pictures of the symbol location on sylar's map 3 faces had the symbol drawn on it, one of the faces is Caitlin's (The Theorys page for her has same picture w/o the symbol) --[[User:Daveie\|Daveie]] 10:02, 17 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Hasn't Shown Any */

2007-10-10T17:02:29Z

Hasn't Shown Any

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:02, 10 October 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:

	This could be a note on ''any'' non-powered character's theory page. Caitlin hasn't displayed a power and no one has mentioned her as having one in an interview. I think "hasn't shown any" is a legitimate minus until demonstrated otherwise. As wild as theory pages are allowed to be, we should have ''some'' sort of criteria for evidence.		This could be a note on ''any'' non-powered character's theory page. Caitlin hasn't displayed a power and no one has mentioned her as having one in an interview. I think "hasn't shown any" is a legitimate minus until demonstrated otherwise. As wild as theory pages are allowed to be, we should have ''some'' sort of criteria for evidence.
			*Right. I'm worried that some of the theory pages are becoming discussion pages, which Should Not Happen. The evidence column is for just that: evidence, eithter supporting or refuting the original theory. If there is a volley of ideas on a theory page, they should be combined to one or two pieces of evidence, or removed altogether (and taken to the discussion page). Feel free to trim as needed. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 13:02, 10 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>FissionChips: rmv space to fix link

2007-10-10T16:56:49Z

rmv space to fix link

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:56, 10 October 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:

	==The Great Power Debate==		==The Great Power Debate==
	A section provided for the [[Help talk:Theories# Back-and-forth\|back-and-forth]] occurring on the theory page.		A section provided for the [[Help talk:Theories#Back-and-forth\|back-and-forth]] occurring on the theory page.

	===Hasn't Shown Any===		===Hasn't Shown Any===

imported>FissionChips at 16:54, 10 October 2007

2007-10-10T16:54:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:54, 10 October 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:

	===Hasn't Shown Any===		===Hasn't Shown Any===
		⚫	{{minus}} Caitlin has not exhibited any signs of having a power.
	{\| style="wikitable"
	\|-
⚫	\| {{minus}} Caitlin has not exhibited any signs of having a power.
	:{{note}} That does not mean she doesn't have a power. Angela Petrelli has not exhibited any signs of having a power and yet in an interview it's revealed she does. [http://www.tvguide.com/News-Views/Columnists/Ask-Ausiello/default.aspx?posting=%7BA0808CD2-D6D2-4774-A36E-F6CA4DCC6BA9%7D Ask Ausiello revealed]		:{{note}} That does not mean she doesn't have a power. Angela Petrelli has not exhibited any signs of having a power and yet in an interview it's revealed she does. [http://www.tvguide.com/News-Views/Columnists/Ask-Ausiello/default.aspx?posting=%7BA0808CD2-D6D2-4774-A36E-F6CA4DCC6BA9%7D Ask Ausiello revealed]
	\|-
	\|}

	This could be a note on ''any'' non-powered character's theory page. Caitlin hasn't displayed a power and no one has mentioned her as having one in an interview. I think "hasn't shown any" is a legitimate minus until demonstrated otherwise. As wild as theory pages are allowed to be, we should have ''some'' sort of criteria for evidence.		This could be a note on ''any'' non-powered character's theory page. Caitlin hasn't displayed a power and no one has mentioned her as having one in an interview. I think "hasn't shown any" is a legitimate minus until demonstrated otherwise. As wild as theory pages are allowed to be, we should have ''some'' sort of criteria for evidence.

imported>FissionChips: Moved back-and-forth from theory page.

2007-10-10T16:54:39Z

Moved back-and-forth from theory page.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:54, 10 October 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	*Then again, when Ricky did find out, he seemed to take it in stride as well. I wouldn't be surprised if they both have powers, being brother and sister, and they had something to do with what's happened to Peter in the last four months. In all likelihood, the comic is just implying that all Peter needed was love. But hey, this is the theory page. -[[User:Clay\|Clay]] 10:33, 10 October 2007 (EDT)		*Then again, when Ricky did find out, he seemed to take it in stride as well. I wouldn't be surprised if they both have powers, being brother and sister, and they had something to do with what's happened to Peter in the last four months. In all likelihood, the comic is just implying that all Peter needed was love. But hey, this is the theory page. -[[User:Clay\|Clay]] 10:33, 10 October 2007 (EDT)
	** Fair enough. I've massaged the bit about her reaction and added a bit about her keeping Peter's other powers a secret. I think we can agree on those. -- [[User:FissionChips\|FissionChips]] 10:43, 10 October 2007 (EDT)		** Fair enough. I've massaged the bit about her reaction and added a bit about her keeping Peter's other powers a secret. I think we can agree on those. -- [[User:FissionChips\|FissionChips]] 10:43, 10 October 2007 (EDT)

			==The Great Power Debate==
			A section provided for the [[Help talk:Theories# Back-and-forth\|back-and-forth]] occurring on the theory page.

			===Hasn't Shown Any===
			{\| style="wikitable"
			\|-
			\| {{minus}} Caitlin has not exhibited any signs of having a power.
			:{{note}} That does not mean she doesn't have a power. Angela Petrelli has not exhibited any signs of having a power and yet in an interview it's revealed she does. [http://www.tvguide.com/News-Views/Columnists/Ask-Ausiello/default.aspx?posting=%7BA0808CD2-D6D2-4774-A36E-F6CA4DCC6BA9%7D Ask Ausiello revealed]
			\|-
			\|}

			This could be a note on ''any'' non-powered character's theory page. Caitlin hasn't displayed a power and no one has mentioned her as having one in an interview. I think "hasn't shown any" is a legitimate minus until demonstrated otherwise. As wild as theory pages are allowed to be, we should have ''some'' sort of criteria for evidence.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:04, 18 October 2007
Line 19:		Line 19:
	* Eh? The "[[Theory:Caitlin\|Theorys page for her]]" doesn't have any pictures; were you referring to a different article? Of the three images from Sylar's map, two are female seen here to the right. Neither look like Caitlin and one of them is in Alaska or Canada. --[[User:FissionChips\|FissionChips]] 11:38, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		* Eh? The "[[Theory:Caitlin\|Theorys page for her]]" doesn't have any pictures; were you referring to a different article? Of the three images from Sylar's map, two are female seen here to the right. Neither look like Caitlin and one of them is in Alaska or Canada. --[[User:FissionChips\|FissionChips]] 11:38, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
	*Sorry that wasn't clear, I meant when you go to category theories theres a picture for each theory page I noticed the Caitlin one after looking on the symbols on sylars map and thought they looked similar, I've put up the picture of Caitlin to compare (I think she's the bottom one you posted) I might be wrong but the pictures look a bit similar --[[User:Daveie\|Daveie]] 08:42, 18 October 2007 (EDT)		*Sorry that wasn't clear, I meant when you go to category theories theres a picture for each theory page I noticed the Caitlin one after looking on the symbols on sylars map and thought they looked similar, I've put up the picture of Caitlin to compare (I think she's the bottom one you posted) I might be wrong but the pictures look a bit similar --[[User:Daveie\|Daveie]] 08:42, 18 October 2007 (EDT)
			** I think it's pretty unlikely. The pictures on Sylar's map are from waaaay back in ''One Giant Leap'', long before Caitlin was cast or even conceived, and according to the cast and crew, most are just pictures of ''Heroes'' staffers. I think it's probably just a coincidence.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:04, 18 October 2007 (EDT)