Theory talk:Hooded killer - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* AFD */

2007-11-25T22:16:50Z

AFD

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:16, 25 November 2007
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* AFD */

2007-11-25T22:16:50Z

AFD

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:16, 25 November 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	==AFD==		==AFD==
	I think this page should be merged with [[Theory:Adam Monroe]]. I know that's unpopular around here, but it would keep the page history for people to see and the redirect can be deleted. Just my opinion.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 16:59, 25 November 2007 (EST)		I think this page should be merged with [[Theory:Adam Monroe]]. I know that's unpopular around here, but it would keep the page history for people to see and the redirect can be deleted. Just my opinion.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 16:59, 25 November 2007 (EST)
			*Yes, you're absolutely right. I didn't know it was afd'ed. I made it a redirect so the history is preserved. A redirect doesn't hurt anything. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 17:16, 25 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Tim Thomason: /* The truth revealed */

2007-11-25T21:59:05Z

The truth revealed

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:59, 25 November 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:
	==The truth revealed==		==The truth revealed==
	So now that Takezo and Adam are the same person, and both are known to be the killer per [[Out of Time]], what shall happen to this page? -- [[User:Riffsyphon1024\|Riffsyphon1024]] 22:27, 5 November 2007 (EST)		So now that Takezo and Adam are the same person, and both are known to be the killer per [[Out of Time]], what shall happen to this page? -- [[User:Riffsyphon1024\|Riffsyphon1024]] 22:27, 5 November 2007 (EST)

			==AFD==
			I think this page should be merged with [[Theory:Adam Monroe]]. I know that's unpopular around here, but it would keep the page history for people to see and the redirect can be deleted. Just my opinion.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 16:59, 25 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Riffsyphon1024: truth revealed?

2007-11-06T03:27:24Z

truth revealed?

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:27, 6 November 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::*Agreed. Initially, we had an influx of theories about waffles and Mr. Muggles, but that's what's "fun" about the fan-side of this site. It's not wikipedia, it's still a fan site. See [[fan powers]] for example. The theory sections are not meant as a means of using canon material, but speculation by fans.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] <span style="font-size: 6pt;">([[User talk:Baldbobbo\|Talk]])</span> 12:01, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		:::*Agreed. Initially, we had an influx of theories about waffles and Mr. Muggles, but that's what's "fun" about the fan-side of this site. It's not wikipedia, it's still a fan site. See [[fan powers]] for example. The theory sections are not meant as a means of using canon material, but speculation by fans.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] <span style="font-size: 6pt;">([[User talk:Baldbobbo\|Talk]])</span> 12:01, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
	:::: awww. I miss having Belichek on there. Besides, you almost have to suspect him of having some kind of strange power over his opponents...[[User:Aapold\|Aapold]] 15:57, 29 October 2007 (EDT)		:::: awww. I miss having Belichek on there. Besides, you almost have to suspect him of having some kind of strange power over his opponents...[[User:Aapold\|Aapold]] 15:57, 29 October 2007 (EDT)

			==The truth revealed==
			So now that Takezo and Adam are the same person, and both are known to be the killer per [[Out of Time]], what shall happen to this page? -- [[User:Riffsyphon1024\|Riffsyphon1024]] 22:27, 5 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Aapold at 19:57, 29 October 2007

2007-10-29T19:57:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:57, 29 October 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::* Personally, I think you're over-reacting. The theory was meant to be funny. It was added by a user who is most definitely not a vandal. And eventually, we'll find out who the killer is and it will go away. No harm, no foul. If we got rid of all of the theories ''I'' think are ridiculous, we'd have about three theories left.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 05:28, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		::* Personally, I think you're over-reacting. The theory was meant to be funny. It was added by a user who is most definitely not a vandal. And eventually, we'll find out who the killer is and it will go away. No harm, no foul. If we got rid of all of the theories ''I'' think are ridiculous, we'd have about three theories left.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 05:28, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
	:::*Agreed. Initially, we had an influx of theories about waffles and Mr. Muggles, but that's what's "fun" about the fan-side of this site. It's not wikipedia, it's still a fan site. See [[fan powers]] for example. The theory sections are not meant as a means of using canon material, but speculation by fans.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] <span style="font-size: 6pt;">([[User talk:Baldbobbo\|Talk]])</span> 12:01, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		:::*Agreed. Initially, we had an influx of theories about waffles and Mr. Muggles, but that's what's "fun" about the fan-side of this site. It's not wikipedia, it's still a fan site. See [[fan powers]] for example. The theory sections are not meant as a means of using canon material, but speculation by fans.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] <span style="font-size: 6pt;">([[User talk:Baldbobbo\|Talk]])</span> 12:01, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
			:::: awww. I miss having Belichek on there. Besides, you almost have to suspect him of having some kind of strange power over his opponents...[[User:Aapold\|Aapold]] 15:57, 29 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>Baldbobbo: /* Removal of absurd "Bill Bellichek" Theory */

2007-10-16T16:01:12Z

Removal of absurd "Bill Bellichek" Theory

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:01, 16 October 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:* But at what point do we consider non-sequitir and unhelpful edits to be vandalism? Sure, if you speculate within the breadth of the series (i.e. It may be absurd that, say, Mohinder is the Killer or even Molly, but at least it stays within the series scope.) it should be retained until proven false. But if it is something that has no relation to the series in any way outside of mocking the fact that people are creating theories, I think it should be removed and cited as potential vandalism. Or at least held up for a vote as to whether or not it should be retained by the wiki community.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:50, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		:* But at what point do we consider non-sequitir and unhelpful edits to be vandalism? Sure, if you speculate within the breadth of the series (i.e. It may be absurd that, say, Mohinder is the Killer or even Molly, but at least it stays within the series scope.) it should be retained until proven false. But if it is something that has no relation to the series in any way outside of mocking the fact that people are creating theories, I think it should be removed and cited as potential vandalism. Or at least held up for a vote as to whether or not it should be retained by the wiki community.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:50, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
	::* Personally, I think you're over-reacting. The theory was meant to be funny. It was added by a user who is most definitely not a vandal. And eventually, we'll find out who the killer is and it will go away. No harm, no foul. If we got rid of all of the theories ''I'' think are ridiculous, we'd have about three theories left.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 05:28, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		::* Personally, I think you're over-reacting. The theory was meant to be funny. It was added by a user who is most definitely not a vandal. And eventually, we'll find out who the killer is and it will go away. No harm, no foul. If we got rid of all of the theories ''I'' think are ridiculous, we'd have about three theories left.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 05:28, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
			:::*Agreed. Initially, we had an influx of theories about waffles and Mr. Muggles, but that's what's "fun" about the fan-side of this site. It's not wikipedia, it's still a fan site. See [[fan powers]] for example. The theory sections are not meant as a means of using canon material, but speculation by fans.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] <span style="font-size: 6pt;">([[User talk:Baldbobbo\|Talk]])</span> 12:01, 16 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>Hardvice: /* Removal of absurd "Bill Bellichek" Theory */

2007-10-16T09:28:28Z

Removal of absurd "Bill Bellichek" Theory

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:28, 16 October 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	* See [[Help:Theories]]. The only grounds for removing a theory is if proves true or proves false. Merely silly or absurd theories which are technically possible should not be removed. See most anything on [[Theory:Mr. Muggles]] or [[Theory:Waffles]]. Listing a theory on the page merely ''reports that the theory exists''. It is not an ''endorsement of the theory itself''.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:44, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		* See [[Help:Theories]]. The only grounds for removing a theory is if proves true or proves false. Merely silly or absurd theories which are technically possible should not be removed. See most anything on [[Theory:Mr. Muggles]] or [[Theory:Waffles]]. Listing a theory on the page merely ''reports that the theory exists''. It is not an ''endorsement of the theory itself''.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:44, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
	:* But at what point do we consider non-sequitir and unhelpful edits to be vandalism? Sure, if you speculate within the breadth of the series (i.e. It may be absurd that, say, Mohinder is the Killer or even Molly, but at least it stays within the series scope.) it should be retained until proven false. But if it is something that has no relation to the series in any way outside of mocking the fact that people are creating theories, I think it should be removed and cited as potential vandalism. Or at least held up for a vote as to whether or not it should be retained by the wiki community.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:50, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		:* But at what point do we consider non-sequitir and unhelpful edits to be vandalism? Sure, if you speculate within the breadth of the series (i.e. It may be absurd that, say, Mohinder is the Killer or even Molly, but at least it stays within the series scope.) it should be retained until proven false. But if it is something that has no relation to the series in any way outside of mocking the fact that people are creating theories, I think it should be removed and cited as potential vandalism. Or at least held up for a vote as to whether or not it should be retained by the wiki community.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:50, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
			::* Personally, I think you're over-reacting. The theory was meant to be funny. It was added by a user who is most definitely not a vandal. And eventually, we'll find out who the killer is and it will go away. No harm, no foul. If we got rid of all of the theories ''I'' think are ridiculous, we'd have about three theories left.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 05:28, 16 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>Jyhash: /* Removal of absurd "Bill Bellichek" Theory */

2007-10-16T08:50:48Z

Removal of absurd "Bill Bellichek" Theory

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:50, 16 October 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I'm Going to remove the ridiculous and non-sequitir theory that an NFL Football coach is the hooded killer. If anyone has a problem with that feel free to revert to an earlier page edit and be ready to give a good reason why.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:26, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		I'm Going to remove the ridiculous and non-sequitir theory that an NFL Football coach is the hooded killer. If anyone has a problem with that feel free to revert to an earlier page edit and be ready to give a good reason why.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:26, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
	* See [[Help:Theories]]. The only grounds for removing a theory is if proves true or proves false. Merely silly or absurd theories which are technically possible should not be removed. See most anything on [[Theory:Mr. Muggles]] or [[Theory:Waffles]]. Listing a theory on the page merely ''reports that the theory exists''. It is not an ''endorsement of the theory itself''.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:44, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		* See [[Help:Theories]]. The only grounds for removing a theory is if proves true or proves false. Merely silly or absurd theories which are technically possible should not be removed. See most anything on [[Theory:Mr. Muggles]] or [[Theory:Waffles]]. Listing a theory on the page merely ''reports that the theory exists''. It is not an ''endorsement of the theory itself''.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:44, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
	:* ~~but~~ at what point do we consider non-sequitir and unhelpful edits to be vandalism. Sure, if you speculate within the breadth of the series (i.e. It may be absurd that, say, Mohinder is the Killer or even Molly, but at least it stays within the series scope.) it should be retained until proven false. But if it is something that has no relation to the series in any way outside of mocking the fact that people are creating theories, I think it should be removed and cited as potential vandalism. Or at least held up for a vote as to whether or not it should be retained by the wiki community.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:50, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		:* But at what point do we consider non-sequitir and unhelpful edits to be vandalism? Sure, if you speculate within the breadth of the series (i.e. It may be absurd that, say, Mohinder is the Killer or even Molly, but at least it stays within the series scope.) it should be retained until proven false. But if it is something that has no relation to the series in any way outside of mocking the fact that people are creating theories, I think it should be removed and cited as potential vandalism. Or at least held up for a vote as to whether or not it should be retained by the wiki community.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:50, 16 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>Jyhash: /* Removal of absurd "Bill Bellichek" Theory */

2007-10-16T08:50:18Z

Removal of absurd "Bill Bellichek" Theory

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:50, 16 October 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I'm Going to remove the ridiculous and non-sequitir theory that an NFL Football coach is the hooded killer. If anyone has a problem with that feel free to revert to an earlier page edit and be ready to give a good reason why.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:26, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		I'm Going to remove the ridiculous and non-sequitir theory that an NFL Football coach is the hooded killer. If anyone has a problem with that feel free to revert to an earlier page edit and be ready to give a good reason why.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:26, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
	* See [[Help:Theories]]. The only grounds for removing a theory is if proves true or proves false. Merely silly or absurd theories which are technically possible should not be removed. See most anything on [[Theory:Mr. Muggles]] or [[Theory:Waffles]]. Listing a theory on the page merely ''reports that the theory exists''. It is not an ''endorsement of the theory itself''.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:44, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		* See [[Help:Theories]]. The only grounds for removing a theory is if proves true or proves false. Merely silly or absurd theories which are technically possible should not be removed. See most anything on [[Theory:Mr. Muggles]] or [[Theory:Waffles]]. Listing a theory on the page merely ''reports that the theory exists''. It is not an ''endorsement of the theory itself''.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:44, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
			:* but at what point do we consider non-sequitir and unhelpful edits to be vandalism. Sure, if you speculate within the breadth of the series (i.e. It may be absurd that, say, Mohinder is the Killer or even Molly, but at least it stays within the series scope.) it should be retained until proven false. But if it is something that has no relation to the series in any way outside of mocking the fact that people are creating theories, I think it should be removed and cited as potential vandalism. Or at least held up for a vote as to whether or not it should be retained by the wiki community.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:50, 16 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>Hardvice at 08:44, 16 October 2007

2007-10-16T08:44:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:44, 16 October 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Removal of absurd "Bill Bellichek" Theory==		==Removal of absurd "Bill Bellichek" Theory==
	I'm Going to remove the ridiculous and non-sequitir theory that an NFL Football coach is the hooded killer. If anyone has a problem with that feel free to revert to an earlier page edit and be ready to give a good reason why.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:26, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		I'm Going to remove the ridiculous and non-sequitir theory that an NFL Football coach is the hooded killer. If anyone has a problem with that feel free to revert to an earlier page edit and be ready to give a good reason why.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:26, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
			* See [[Help:Theories]]. The only grounds for removing a theory is if proves true or proves false. Merely silly or absurd theories which are technically possible should not be removed. See most anything on [[Theory:Mr. Muggles]] or [[Theory:Waffles]]. Listing a theory on the page merely ''reports that the theory exists''. It is not an ''endorsement of the theory itself''.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:44, 16 October 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:57, 29 October 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::* Personally, I think you're over-reacting. The theory was meant to be funny. It was added by a user who is most definitely not a vandal. And eventually, we'll find out who the killer is and it will go away. No harm, no foul. If we got rid of all of the theories ''I'' think are ridiculous, we'd have about three theories left.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 05:28, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		::* Personally, I think you're over-reacting. The theory was meant to be funny. It was added by a user who is most definitely not a vandal. And eventually, we'll find out who the killer is and it will go away. No harm, no foul. If we got rid of all of the theories ''I'' think are ridiculous, we'd have about three theories left.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 05:28, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
	:::*Agreed. Initially, we had an influx of theories about waffles and Mr. Muggles, but that's what's "fun" about the fan-side of this site. It's not wikipedia, it's still a fan site. See [[fan powers]] for example. The theory sections are not meant as a means of using canon material, but speculation by fans.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] <span style="font-size: 6pt;">([[User talk:Baldbobbo\|Talk]])</span> 12:01, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		:::*Agreed. Initially, we had an influx of theories about waffles and Mr. Muggles, but that's what's "fun" about the fan-side of this site. It's not wikipedia, it's still a fan site. See [[fan powers]] for example. The theory sections are not meant as a means of using canon material, but speculation by fans.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] <span style="font-size: 6pt;">([[User talk:Baldbobbo\|Talk]])</span> 12:01, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
			:::: awww. I miss having Belichek on there. Besides, you almost have to suspect him of having some kind of strange power over his opponents...[[User:Aapold\|Aapold]] 15:57, 29 October 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:01, 16 October 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:* But at what point do we consider non-sequitir and unhelpful edits to be vandalism? Sure, if you speculate within the breadth of the series (i.e. It may be absurd that, say, Mohinder is the Killer or even Molly, but at least it stays within the series scope.) it should be retained until proven false. But if it is something that has no relation to the series in any way outside of mocking the fact that people are creating theories, I think it should be removed and cited as potential vandalism. Or at least held up for a vote as to whether or not it should be retained by the wiki community.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:50, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		:* But at what point do we consider non-sequitir and unhelpful edits to be vandalism? Sure, if you speculate within the breadth of the series (i.e. It may be absurd that, say, Mohinder is the Killer or even Molly, but at least it stays within the series scope.) it should be retained until proven false. But if it is something that has no relation to the series in any way outside of mocking the fact that people are creating theories, I think it should be removed and cited as potential vandalism. Or at least held up for a vote as to whether or not it should be retained by the wiki community.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:50, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
	::* Personally, I think you're over-reacting. The theory was meant to be funny. It was added by a user who is most definitely not a vandal. And eventually, we'll find out who the killer is and it will go away. No harm, no foul. If we got rid of all of the theories ''I'' think are ridiculous, we'd have about three theories left.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 05:28, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		::* Personally, I think you're over-reacting. The theory was meant to be funny. It was added by a user who is most definitely not a vandal. And eventually, we'll find out who the killer is and it will go away. No harm, no foul. If we got rid of all of the theories ''I'' think are ridiculous, we'd have about three theories left.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 05:28, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
			:::*Agreed. Initially, we had an influx of theories about waffles and Mr. Muggles, but that's what's "fun" about the fan-side of this site. It's not wikipedia, it's still a fan site. See [[fan powers]] for example. The theory sections are not meant as a means of using canon material, but speculation by fans.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] <span style="font-size: 6pt;">([[User talk:Baldbobbo\|Talk]])</span> 12:01, 16 October 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:28, 16 October 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	* See [[Help:Theories]]. The only grounds for removing a theory is if proves true or proves false. Merely silly or absurd theories which are technically possible should not be removed. See most anything on [[Theory:Mr. Muggles]] or [[Theory:Waffles]]. Listing a theory on the page merely ''reports that the theory exists''. It is not an ''endorsement of the theory itself''.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:44, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		* See [[Help:Theories]]. The only grounds for removing a theory is if proves true or proves false. Merely silly or absurd theories which are technically possible should not be removed. See most anything on [[Theory:Mr. Muggles]] or [[Theory:Waffles]]. Listing a theory on the page merely ''reports that the theory exists''. It is not an ''endorsement of the theory itself''.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:44, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
	:* But at what point do we consider non-sequitir and unhelpful edits to be vandalism? Sure, if you speculate within the breadth of the series (i.e. It may be absurd that, say, Mohinder is the Killer or even Molly, but at least it stays within the series scope.) it should be retained until proven false. But if it is something that has no relation to the series in any way outside of mocking the fact that people are creating theories, I think it should be removed and cited as potential vandalism. Or at least held up for a vote as to whether or not it should be retained by the wiki community.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:50, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		:* But at what point do we consider non-sequitir and unhelpful edits to be vandalism? Sure, if you speculate within the breadth of the series (i.e. It may be absurd that, say, Mohinder is the Killer or even Molly, but at least it stays within the series scope.) it should be retained until proven false. But if it is something that has no relation to the series in any way outside of mocking the fact that people are creating theories, I think it should be removed and cited as potential vandalism. Or at least held up for a vote as to whether or not it should be retained by the wiki community.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:50, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
			::* Personally, I think you're over-reacting. The theory was meant to be funny. It was added by a user who is most definitely not a vandal. And eventually, we'll find out who the killer is and it will go away. No harm, no foul. If we got rid of all of the theories ''I'' think are ridiculous, we'd have about three theories left.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 05:28, 16 October 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:50, 16 October 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I'm Going to remove the ridiculous and non-sequitir theory that an NFL Football coach is the hooded killer. If anyone has a problem with that feel free to revert to an earlier page edit and be ready to give a good reason why.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:26, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		I'm Going to remove the ridiculous and non-sequitir theory that an NFL Football coach is the hooded killer. If anyone has a problem with that feel free to revert to an earlier page edit and be ready to give a good reason why.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:26, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
	* See [[Help:Theories]]. The only grounds for removing a theory is if proves true or proves false. Merely silly or absurd theories which are technically possible should not be removed. See most anything on [[Theory:Mr. Muggles]] or [[Theory:Waffles]]. Listing a theory on the page merely ''reports that the theory exists''. It is not an ''endorsement of the theory itself''.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:44, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		* See [[Help:Theories]]. The only grounds for removing a theory is if proves true or proves false. Merely silly or absurd theories which are technically possible should not be removed. See most anything on [[Theory:Mr. Muggles]] or [[Theory:Waffles]]. Listing a theory on the page merely ''reports that the theory exists''. It is not an ''endorsement of the theory itself''.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:44, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
	:* ~~but~~ at what point do we consider non-sequitir and unhelpful edits to be vandalism. Sure, if you speculate within the breadth of the series (i.e. It may be absurd that, say, Mohinder is the Killer or even Molly, but at least it stays within the series scope.) it should be retained until proven false. But if it is something that has no relation to the series in any way outside of mocking the fact that people are creating theories, I think it should be removed and cited as potential vandalism. Or at least held up for a vote as to whether or not it should be retained by the wiki community.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:50, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		:* But at what point do we consider non-sequitir and unhelpful edits to be vandalism? Sure, if you speculate within the breadth of the series (i.e. It may be absurd that, say, Mohinder is the Killer or even Molly, but at least it stays within the series scope.) it should be retained until proven false. But if it is something that has no relation to the series in any way outside of mocking the fact that people are creating theories, I think it should be removed and cited as potential vandalism. Or at least held up for a vote as to whether or not it should be retained by the wiki community.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:50, 16 October 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:50, 16 October 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I'm Going to remove the ridiculous and non-sequitir theory that an NFL Football coach is the hooded killer. If anyone has a problem with that feel free to revert to an earlier page edit and be ready to give a good reason why.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:26, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		I'm Going to remove the ridiculous and non-sequitir theory that an NFL Football coach is the hooded killer. If anyone has a problem with that feel free to revert to an earlier page edit and be ready to give a good reason why.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:26, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
	* See [[Help:Theories]]. The only grounds for removing a theory is if proves true or proves false. Merely silly or absurd theories which are technically possible should not be removed. See most anything on [[Theory:Mr. Muggles]] or [[Theory:Waffles]]. Listing a theory on the page merely ''reports that the theory exists''. It is not an ''endorsement of the theory itself''.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:44, 16 October 2007 (EDT)		* See [[Help:Theories]]. The only grounds for removing a theory is if proves true or proves false. Merely silly or absurd theories which are technically possible should not be removed. See most anything on [[Theory:Mr. Muggles]] or [[Theory:Waffles]]. Listing a theory on the page merely ''reports that the theory exists''. It is not an ''endorsement of the theory itself''.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:44, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
			:* but at what point do we consider non-sequitir and unhelpful edits to be vandalism. Sure, if you speculate within the breadth of the series (i.e. It may be absurd that, say, Mohinder is the Killer or even Molly, but at least it stays within the series scope.) it should be retained until proven false. But if it is something that has no relation to the series in any way outside of mocking the fact that people are creating theories, I think it should be removed and cited as potential vandalism. Or at least held up for a vote as to whether or not it should be retained by the wiki community.--[[User:Jyhash\|JYHash]] 04:50, 16 October 2007 (EDT)