Theory talk:Linda Tavara - Revision history

imported>Blood69 at 22:40, 17 March 2010

2010-03-17T22:40:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:40, 17 March 2010
(No difference)

imported>Blood69 at 22:40, 17 March 2010

2010-03-17T22:40:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:40, 17 March 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Linda is twelve in 1963. I doubt we will see her then. But her relations with Primatech or Yamagata Industries remain unclear. But Linda's death in 1972 has never been fully confirmed only implied. [[user:Blood69\|Blood69]] 20:04, 20 February 2010 (AEST)		Linda is twelve in 1963. I doubt we will see her then. But her relations with Primatech or Yamagata Industries remain unclear. But Linda's death in 1972 has never been fully confirmed only implied. [[user:Blood69\|Blood69]] 20:04, 20 February 2010 (AEST)

			Fully confirmed. I always thought there was significant doubt, because the statement about Linda's death was always avoided.--[[User:Blood69\|Blood69]] 18:40, 17 March 2010 (EDT)

imported>Blood69 at 11:03, 20 February 2010

2010-02-20T11:03:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:03, 20 February 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Wasn't Linda confirmed as dead by a writer? Can someone check BTEs for clues on that? [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 20:06, 19 February 2010 (EST)		Wasn't Linda confirmed as dead by a writer? Can someone check BTEs for clues on that? [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 20:06, 19 February 2010 (EST)

	:They gave a response that was vague. Though they were pushed they did not say outright she had died. It was an politicians answer, giving vague answers and half truths that seem conclusive but are not. They were asked if she was dead and they never said yes. They just said it was a timeline of her story, but not that she had died, specifically. [[user:Blood69\|Blood69]] 12:41, 20 February 2010 (~~EST~~)		They gave a response that was vague. Though they were pushed they did not say outright she had died. It was an politicians answer, giving vague answers and half truths that seem conclusive but are not. They were asked if she was dead and they never said yes. They just said it was a timeline of her story, but not that she had died, specifically. [[user:Blood69\|Blood69]] 12:41, 20 February 2010 (AEST)

			Linda is twelve in 1963. I doubt we will see her then. But her relations with Primatech or Yamagata Industries remain unclear. But Linda's death in 1972 has never been fully confirmed only implied. [[user:Blood69\|Blood69]] 20:04, 20 February 2010 (AEST)

imported>Radicell: fix link

2010-02-20T03:35:23Z

fix link

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:35, 20 February 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Wasn't Linda confirmed as dead by a writer? Can someone check BTEs for clues on that? [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 20:06, 19 February 2010 (EST)		Wasn't Linda confirmed as dead by a writer? Can someone check BTEs for clues on that? [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 20:06, 19 February 2010 (EST)

	:They gave a response that was vague. Though they were pushed they did not say outright she had died. It was an politicians answer, giving vague answers and half truths that seem conclusive but are not. They were asked if she was dead and they never said yes. They just said it was a timeline of her story, but not that she had died, specifically. [[Blood69]] 12:41, 20 February 2010 (EST)		:They gave a response that was vague. Though they were pushed they did not say outright she had died. It was an politicians answer, giving vague answers and half truths that seem conclusive but are not. They were asked if she was dead and they never said yes. They just said it was a timeline of her story, but not that she had died, specifically. [[user:Blood69\|Blood69]] 12:41, 20 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Intuitive Empath: No need for a new section, it's still the same topic

2010-02-20T01:49:00Z

No need for a new section, it's still the same topic

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:49, 20 February 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Wasn't Linda confirmed as dead by a writer? Can someone check BTEs for clues on that? [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 20:06, 19 February 2010 (EST)		Wasn't Linda confirmed as dead by a writer? Can someone check BTEs for clues on that? [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 20:06, 19 February 2010 (EST)

		⚫	:They gave a response that was vague. Though they were pushed they did not say outright she had died. It was an politicians answer, giving vague answers and half truths that seem conclusive but are not. They were asked if she was dead and they never said yes. They just said it was a timeline of her story, but not that she had died, specifically. [[Blood69]] 12:41, 20 February 2010 (EST)
	== BTE never stated she was dead ==

⚫	They gave a response that was vague. Though they were pushed they did not say outright she had died. It was an politicians answer, giving vague answers and half truths that seem conclusive but are not. They were asked if she was dead and they never said yes. They just said it was a timeline of her story, but not that she had died, specifically. [[Blood69]] 12:41, 20 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Blood69 at 01:41, 20 February 2010

2010-02-20T01:41:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:41, 20 February 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Wasn't Linda confirmed as dead by a writer? Can someone check BTEs for clues on that? [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 20:06, 19 February 2010 (EST)		Wasn't Linda confirmed as dead by a writer? Can someone check BTEs for clues on that? [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 20:06, 19 February 2010 (EST)

			== BTE never stated she was dead ==

			They gave a response that was vague. Though they were pushed they did not say outright she had died. It was an politicians answer, giving vague answers and half truths that seem conclusive but are not. They were asked if she was dead and they never said yes. They just said it was a timeline of her story, but not that she had died, specifically. [[Blood69]] 12:41, 20 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Intuitive Empath: New page: == Confirmed dead? == Wasn't Linda confirmed as dead by a writer? Can someone check BTEs for clues on that? ~~~~

2010-02-20T01:06:37Z

New page: == Confirmed dead? == Wasn't Linda confirmed as dead by a writer? Can someone check BTEs for clues on that? ~~~~

New page

== Confirmed dead? ==

Wasn't Linda confirmed as dead by a writer? Can someone check BTEs for clues on that? [[User:Intuitive Empath|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath|Contributions]] 20:06, 19 February 2010 (EST)