Theory talk:Mr. Muggles - Revision history

imported>Uncanny474: /* Theories being erased - why? */

2009-10-30T12:58:33Z

Theories being erased - why?

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:58, 30 October 2009
(No difference)

imported>Uncanny474: /* Theories being erased - why? */

2009-10-30T12:58:33Z

Theories being erased - why?

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:58, 30 October 2009
Line 45:		Line 45:
	:Because the entire page is completely retarded.{{User:Vanguard/sig}} 00:27, 27 February 2009 (EST)		:Because the entire page is completely retarded.{{User:Vanguard/sig}} 00:27, 27 February 2009 (EST)
	::So? It's theories about MR. MUGGLES. The dog. Who is rarely in the actual show. And except for the ones about him being chuck norris or in cahoots with Waffles, all are feasible in Heroes. If people can live in the internet, than certainly a dog can have powers. Besides, a majority of people enjoy them. That'swhy they're FAN THEORIES.		::So? It's theories about MR. MUGGLES. The dog. Who is rarely in the actual show. And except for the ones about him being chuck norris or in cahoots with Waffles, all are feasible in Heroes. If people can live in the internet, than certainly a dog can have powers. Besides, a majority of people enjoy them. That'swhy they're FAN THEORIES.
			:::Actually, even the one about him being in cahoots with Waffles is possible. Assuming that Waffles is a sentient entity. Which wouldn't surprise me.

imported>Lililedger: /* Theories being erased - why? */

2009-07-15T03:14:32Z

Theories being erased - why?

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:14, 15 July 2009
Line 44:		Line 44:
	* Why the heck are people erasing the best theories on the page? Cut it out. [[User:Ebrown2112\|ebrown2112]] 04:08, 21 February 2009 (EST)		* Why the heck are people erasing the best theories on the page? Cut it out. [[User:Ebrown2112\|ebrown2112]] 04:08, 21 February 2009 (EST)
	:Because the entire page is completely retarded.{{User:Vanguard/sig}} 00:27, 27 February 2009 (EST)		:Because the entire page is completely retarded.{{User:Vanguard/sig}} 00:27, 27 February 2009 (EST)
			::So? It's theories about MR. MUGGLES. The dog. Who is rarely in the actual show. And except for the ones about him being chuck norris or in cahoots with Waffles, all are feasible in Heroes. If people can live in the internet, than certainly a dog can have powers. Besides, a majority of people enjoy them. That'swhy they're FAN THEORIES.

imported>Vanguard: /* Theories being erased - why? */

2009-02-27T05:27:10Z

Theories being erased - why?

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:27, 27 February 2009
Line 43:		Line 43:
	== Theories being erased - why? ==		== Theories being erased - why? ==
	* Why the heck are people erasing the best theories on the page? Cut it out. [[User:Ebrown2112\|ebrown2112]] 04:08, 21 February 2009 (EST)		* Why the heck are people erasing the best theories on the page? Cut it out. [[User:Ebrown2112\|ebrown2112]] 04:08, 21 February 2009 (EST)
			:Because the entire page is completely retarded.{{User:Vanguard/sig}} 00:27, 27 February 2009 (EST)

imported>Ebrown2112 at 09:08, 21 February 2009

2009-02-21T09:08:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:08, 21 February 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	*How do we separate the farcical ones from the feasible ones? I'm afraid that introducing such judgmental policing invites edit wars. Take the first theory on the page: "It is significant that Mr. Muggles licked Claire's blood after her run-in with the garbage disposal." Where one person might see this as a really silly theory (why in the world would it be significant, that's what dogs do!) others might see this as a valid theory (Claire's blood has shown that it has healing powers when injected into a person). Yes, I agree many of the theories here are ridiculous, but if they're valid, our policy has been to leave them alone. That said, I rarely even check the theory pages, so I don't care too much what happens with them. I just like that people have a place to theorize and speculate and to read what others say, even if it's silly. I also appreciate that we don't make judgments on these theories other than pointing out pros and cons. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:55, 9 December 2007 (EST)		*How do we separate the farcical ones from the feasible ones? I'm afraid that introducing such judgmental policing invites edit wars. Take the first theory on the page: "It is significant that Mr. Muggles licked Claire's blood after her run-in with the garbage disposal." Where one person might see this as a really silly theory (why in the world would it be significant, that's what dogs do!) others might see this as a valid theory (Claire's blood has shown that it has healing powers when injected into a person). Yes, I agree many of the theories here are ridiculous, but if they're valid, our policy has been to leave them alone. That said, I rarely even check the theory pages, so I don't care too much what happens with them. I just like that people have a place to theorize and speculate and to read what others say, even if it's silly. I also appreciate that we don't make judgments on these theories other than pointing out pros and cons. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:55, 9 December 2007 (EST)
	**But if I was to go onto Elle's theory page and submit that she was actually a purple kangaroo in disguise or added a theory to Angela's page that Angela likes watching pixies dance and has an army of them in a fishtank in Macau, I'd get blocked as a vandal. Some of the theories CLEARLY make no sense. I say that if a theory is illogical, irrational or lacks citation then it should be deleted or moved to a farcical page. What fun is a theory page when it's stacked full of crap. --[[User:Tesphen\|Tesphen]] 08:46, 10 December 2007 (EST)		**But if I was to go onto Elle's theory page and submit that she was actually a purple kangaroo in disguise or added a theory to Angela's page that Angela likes watching pixies dance and has an army of them in a fishtank in Macau, I'd get blocked as a vandal. Some of the theories CLEARLY make no sense. I say that if a theory is illogical, irrational or lacks citation then it should be deleted or moved to a farcical page. What fun is a theory page when it's stacked full of crap. --[[User:Tesphen\|Tesphen]] 08:46, 10 December 2007 (EST)


	***I personally think we should have a parody template, which clearly states that, yes, we're having a little joke, and that these aren't to be taken seriously. Then you remove problems like this. We could also make '''Heroes Wiki:Humor''' or something similar and write a policy about the use of it in articles/theory pages.--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 08:57, 10 December 2007 (EST)		***I personally think we should have a parody template, which clearly states that, yes, we're having a little joke, and that these aren't to be taken seriously. Then you remove problems like this. We could also make '''Heroes Wiki:Humor''' or something similar and write a policy about the use of it in articles/theory pages.--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 08:57, 10 December 2007 (EST)
	****I agree. [[Image:Chrisyudbsname.JPG\|80px]][[Image:Chrisyudbstalk.JPG\|40px]] 09:10, 10 December 2007 (EST)		****I agree. [[Image:Chrisyudbsname.JPG\|80px]][[Image:Chrisyudbstalk.JPG\|40px]] 09:10, 10 December 2007 (EST)
Line 37:		Line 39:
	==Mr. Muggles is just a dog?==		==Mr. Muggles is just a dog?==
	* This ridiculous theory has been posited thrice. There should be a moratorium. [[User:Ebrown2112\|ebrown2112]] 09:16, 22 December 2008 (EST)		* This ridiculous theory has been posited thrice. There should be a moratorium. [[User:Ebrown2112\|ebrown2112]] 09:16, 22 December 2008 (EST)


			== Theories being erased - why? ==
			* Why the heck are people erasing the best theories on the page? Cut it out. [[User:Ebrown2112\|ebrown2112]] 04:08, 21 February 2009 (EST)

imported>Ebrown2112 at 14:16, 22 December 2008

2008-12-22T14:16:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:16, 22 December 2008
Line 19:		Line 19:
	(EDT)		(EDT)
	* If anyone is coming to Heroes Wiki for "hard facts," they are in some sort of denial of reality. While the vast majority of characters' pages should receive a level of restraint when it comes to farce, a measure of freedom should exist for the pages of characters who are dogs. An even greater degree of freedom should exist when discussing breakfast pastries of all sorts. (I don't think we should limit any sort of decision to waffles, because Heroes may want to focus on Pop-tarts or cheese danishes. Where would we be if we just said is was OK to be farcical about waffles and then we want to joke about toaster strudel?)--[[User:Mtundu\|Mtundu]] 02:22, 22 December 2008 (EST)		* If anyone is coming to Heroes Wiki for "hard facts," they are in some sort of denial of reality. While the vast majority of characters' pages should receive a level of restraint when it comes to farce, a measure of freedom should exist for the pages of characters who are dogs. An even greater degree of freedom should exist when discussing breakfast pastries of all sorts. (I don't think we should limit any sort of decision to waffles, because Heroes may want to focus on Pop-tarts or cheese danishes. Where would we be if we just said is was OK to be farcical about waffles and then we want to joke about toaster strudel?)--[[User:Mtundu\|Mtundu]] 02:22, 22 December 2008 (EST)
			** Waffles are prevalent in the "Heroes" universe. Watch the episode "Our Father" on NBC.com w/ the commentary by Masi Oka and Brea Grant. They talk about waffles non-stop! Well, maybe not non-stop, but at least twice! [[User:Ebrown2112\|ebrown2112]] 09:16, 22 December 2008 (EST)

	==HEY PEOPLE WHO THINK THIS IS ALL SPAM==		==HEY PEOPLE WHO THINK THIS IS ALL SPAM==
Line 33:		Line 34:
	* It's cool. :) Should the word be changed to "surpassed" or "suppressed"? (I know it's a "silly" theory and all...)		* It's cool. :) Should the word be changed to "surpassed" or "suppressed"? (I know it's a "silly" theory and all...)
	* Ha! That's my theory! I'm a math guy, so I regularly use words like encompass and circumscribe! :P -- [[User:Punxas\|Punx]] 14:56, 5 December 2008 (EST)		* Ha! That's my theory! I'm a math guy, so I regularly use words like encompass and circumscribe! :P -- [[User:Punxas\|Punx]] 14:56, 5 December 2008 (EST)

			==Mr. Muggles is just a dog?==
			* This ridiculous theory has been posited thrice. There should be a moratorium. [[User:Ebrown2112\|ebrown2112]] 09:16, 22 December 2008 (EST)

imported>Mtundu at 07:23, 22 December 2008

2008-12-22T07:23:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:23, 22 December 2008
Line 18:		Line 18:
	******* Of course Mr. Muggles and waffles have negligible plot significance. That's why some users make up outlandish and silly "theories" for their theory pages, and not for Elle's or Angela's. Man, some folks need to relax.		******* Of course Mr. Muggles and waffles have negligible plot significance. That's why some users make up outlandish and silly "theories" for their theory pages, and not for Elle's or Angela's. Man, some folks need to relax.
	(EDT)		(EDT)
	~~******~~ If anyone is coming to Heroes Wiki for "hard facts," they are in some sort of denial of reality. While the vast majority of characters' pages should receive a level of restraint when it comes to farce, a measure of freedom should exist for the pages of characters who are dogs. An even greater degree of freedom should exist when discussing breakfast pastries of all sorts. (I don't think we should limit any sort of decision to waffles, because Heroes may want to focus on Pop-tarts or cheese danishes. Where would we be if we just said is was OK to be farcical about waffles and then we want to joke about toaster strudel?)--[[User:Mtundu\|Mtundu]] 02:22, 22 December 2008 (EST)		* If anyone is coming to Heroes Wiki for "hard facts," they are in some sort of denial of reality. While the vast majority of characters' pages should receive a level of restraint when it comes to farce, a measure of freedom should exist for the pages of characters who are dogs. An even greater degree of freedom should exist when discussing breakfast pastries of all sorts. (I don't think we should limit any sort of decision to waffles, because Heroes may want to focus on Pop-tarts or cheese danishes. Where would we be if we just said is was OK to be farcical about waffles and then we want to joke about toaster strudel?)--[[User:Mtundu\|Mtundu]] 02:22, 22 December 2008 (EST)

	==HEY PEOPLE WHO THINK THIS IS ALL SPAM==		==HEY PEOPLE WHO THINK THIS IS ALL SPAM==

imported>Mtundu at 07:22, 22 December 2008

2008-12-22T07:22:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:22, 22 December 2008
Line 18:		Line 18:
	******* Of course Mr. Muggles and waffles have negligible plot significance. That's why some users make up outlandish and silly "theories" for their theory pages, and not for Elle's or Angela's. Man, some folks need to relax.		******* Of course Mr. Muggles and waffles have negligible plot significance. That's why some users make up outlandish and silly "theories" for their theory pages, and not for Elle's or Angela's. Man, some folks need to relax.
	(EDT)		(EDT)
			******** If anyone is coming to Heroes Wiki for "hard facts," they are in some sort of denial of reality. While the vast majority of characters' pages should receive a level of restraint when it comes to farce, a measure of freedom should exist for the pages of characters who are dogs. An even greater degree of freedom should exist when discussing breakfast pastries of all sorts. (I don't think we should limit any sort of decision to waffles, because Heroes may want to focus on Pop-tarts or cheese danishes. Where would we be if we just said is was OK to be farcical about waffles and then we want to joke about toaster strudel?)--[[User:Mtundu\|Mtundu]] 02:22, 22 December 2008 (EST)

	==HEY PEOPLE WHO THINK THIS IS ALL SPAM==		==HEY PEOPLE WHO THINK THIS IS ALL SPAM==

imported>Punxas at 19:56, 5 December 2008

2008-12-05T19:56:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:56, 5 December 2008
Line 31:		Line 31:
	*Sorry about that definition thing on the actual theory page, I never thought of it as a discussion. :/ [[User:Psilaq Remake\|Psilaq Remake]] 16:00, 1 December 2008 (EST)		*Sorry about that definition thing on the actual theory page, I never thought of it as a discussion. :/ [[User:Psilaq Remake\|Psilaq Remake]] 16:00, 1 December 2008 (EST)
	* It's cool. :) Should the word be changed to "surpassed" or "suppressed"? (I know it's a "silly" theory and all...)		* It's cool. :) Should the word be changed to "surpassed" or "suppressed"? (I know it's a "silly" theory and all...)
			* Ha! That's my theory! I'm a math guy, so I regularly use words like encompass and circumscribe! :P -- [[User:Punxas\|Punx]] 14:56, 5 December 2008 (EST)

imported>Ebrown2112 at 15:57, 3 December 2008

2008-12-03T15:57:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:57, 3 December 2008
Line 30:		Line 30:
	** 3: bring about, accomplish <encompass a task>		** 3: bring about, accomplish <encompass a task>
	*Sorry about that definition thing on the actual theory page, I never thought of it as a discussion. :/ [[User:Psilaq Remake\|Psilaq Remake]] 16:00, 1 December 2008 (EST)		*Sorry about that definition thing on the actual theory page, I never thought of it as a discussion. :/ [[User:Psilaq Remake\|Psilaq Remake]] 16:00, 1 December 2008 (EST)
	* It's cool. :) Should the word be changed to "surpassed"? (I know it's a "silly" theory and all...)		* It's cool. :) Should the word be changed to "surpassed" or "suppressed"? (I know it's a "silly" theory and all...)