Theory talk:Rapid cell regeneration - Revision history

imported>Intuitive Empath at 19:34, 16 July 2009

2009-07-16T19:34:39Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:34, 16 July 2009
(No difference)

imported>Intuitive Empath at 19:34, 16 July 2009

2009-07-16T19:34:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:34, 16 July 2009
Line 13:		Line 13:
	***** I guess Ted just burnt hot, not radioactive... That's the only explanation. As for Peter and Nathan, we don't know - Nathan was injected with Adam's blood after all... Ad as for Claire's hair - I think it regenerated faster than the rest of her body. -- [[User:Altes\|Altes]] 04:24, 16 July 2009 (EDT)		***** I guess Ted just burnt hot, not radioactive... That's the only explanation. As for Peter and Nathan, we don't know - Nathan was injected with Adam's blood after all... Ad as for Claire's hair - I think it regenerated faster than the rest of her body. -- [[User:Altes\|Altes]] 04:24, 16 July 2009 (EDT)
	****** Yes, but that comes back to my original arguement: Claire's body shouldn't be healing cells that are SUPPOSED to be dead. Logically, her hair shouldn't regenerate. I say the creators just forgot. [[User:Lililedger\|Lavi]] 10:03, 16 July 2009 (EDT)		****** Yes, but that comes back to my original arguement: Claire's body shouldn't be healing cells that are SUPPOSED to be dead. Logically, her hair shouldn't regenerate. I say the creators just forgot. [[User:Lililedger\|Lavi]] 10:03, 16 July 2009 (EDT)
			******* Who knows? Maybe there is a psychological factor in her ability that heals her to what her or her body thinks it should be, or maybe there is a "minimum damage" so that her body will heal, otherwise her hair would grow even if she decided to but it shorter. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 15:34, 16 July 2009 (EDT)

imported>Lililedger: /* Claire's hair */

2009-07-16T14:03:14Z

Claire's hair

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:03, 16 July 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	****Okay, I'm gonna let it drop because I'm pretty sure it was just a small oversight, but her hair never should've 'repaired itself' after being burned by Ted's radioactivity. It should've had to grow back naturally, as her body wouldn't register the absence of dead cells. (Speaking of Ted, I'm AMAZED none of them have cancer...) [[User:Lililedger\|Lavi]] 19:53, 15 July 2009 (EDT)		****Okay, I'm gonna let it drop because I'm pretty sure it was just a small oversight, but her hair never should've 'repaired itself' after being burned by Ted's radioactivity. It should've had to grow back naturally, as her body wouldn't register the absence of dead cells. (Speaking of Ted, I'm AMAZED none of them have cancer...) [[User:Lililedger\|Lavi]] 19:53, 15 July 2009 (EDT)
	***** I guess Ted just burnt hot, not radioactive... That's the only explanation. As for Peter and Nathan, we don't know - Nathan was injected with Adam's blood after all... Ad as for Claire's hair - I think it regenerated faster than the rest of her body. -- [[User:Altes\|Altes]] 04:24, 16 July 2009 (EDT)		***** I guess Ted just burnt hot, not radioactive... That's the only explanation. As for Peter and Nathan, we don't know - Nathan was injected with Adam's blood after all... Ad as for Claire's hair - I think it regenerated faster than the rest of her body. -- [[User:Altes\|Altes]] 04:24, 16 July 2009 (EDT)
			****** Yes, but that comes back to my original arguement: Claire's body shouldn't be healing cells that are SUPPOSED to be dead. Logically, her hair shouldn't regenerate. I say the creators just forgot. [[User:Lililedger\|Lavi]] 10:03, 16 July 2009 (EDT)

imported>Altes: /* Claire's hair */

2009-07-16T08:24:24Z

Claire's hair

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:24, 16 July 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:
	***The your hair will grow back because your roots are alive.--{{User:Catalyst/sig}} 18:33, 15 July 2009 (EDT)		***The your hair will grow back because your roots are alive.--{{User:Catalyst/sig}} 18:33, 15 July 2009 (EDT)
	****Okay, I'm gonna let it drop because I'm pretty sure it was just a small oversight, but her hair never should've 'repaired itself' after being burned by Ted's radioactivity. It should've had to grow back naturally, as her body wouldn't register the absence of dead cells. (Speaking of Ted, I'm AMAZED none of them have cancer...) [[User:Lililedger\|Lavi]] 19:53, 15 July 2009 (EDT)		****Okay, I'm gonna let it drop because I'm pretty sure it was just a small oversight, but her hair never should've 'repaired itself' after being burned by Ted's radioactivity. It should've had to grow back naturally, as her body wouldn't register the absence of dead cells. (Speaking of Ted, I'm AMAZED none of them have cancer...) [[User:Lililedger\|Lavi]] 19:53, 15 July 2009 (EDT)
			***** I guess Ted just burnt hot, not radioactive... That's the only explanation. As for Peter and Nathan, we don't know - Nathan was injected with Adam's blood after all... Ad as for Claire's hair - I think it regenerated faster than the rest of her body. -- [[User:Altes\|Altes]] 04:24, 16 July 2009 (EDT)

imported>Lililedger: /* Claire's hair */

2009-07-15T23:53:06Z

Claire's hair

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:53, 15 July 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	**Then shouldn't only her roots grow back? [[User:Lililedger\|Lavi]] 18:26, 15 July 2009 (EDT)		**Then shouldn't only her roots grow back? [[User:Lililedger\|Lavi]] 18:26, 15 July 2009 (EDT)
	***The your hair will grow back because your roots are alive.--{{User:Catalyst/sig}} 18:33, 15 July 2009 (EDT)		***The your hair will grow back because your roots are alive.--{{User:Catalyst/sig}} 18:33, 15 July 2009 (EDT)
			****Okay, I'm gonna let it drop because I'm pretty sure it was just a small oversight, but her hair never should've 'repaired itself' after being burned by Ted's radioactivity. It should've had to grow back naturally, as her body wouldn't register the absence of dead cells. (Speaking of Ted, I'm AMAZED none of them have cancer...) [[User:Lililedger\|Lavi]] 19:53, 15 July 2009 (EDT)

imported>Catalyst: /* Claire's hair */

2009-07-15T22:33:14Z

Claire's hair

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:33, 15 July 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	*At the root, the hair is alive, you don't feel pain if someone cuts your hair, but you feel pain if someone pulls it. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 12:54, 15 July 2009 (EDT)		*At the root, the hair is alive, you don't feel pain if someone cuts your hair, but you feel pain if someone pulls it. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 12:54, 15 July 2009 (EDT)
	**Then shouldn't only her roots grow back? [[User:Lililedger\|Lavi]] 18:26, 15 July 2009 (EDT)		**Then shouldn't only her roots grow back? [[User:Lililedger\|Lavi]] 18:26, 15 July 2009 (EDT)
			***The your hair will grow back because your roots are alive.--{{User:Catalyst/sig}} 18:33, 15 July 2009 (EDT)

imported>Lililedger: /* Claire's hair */

2009-07-15T22:26:11Z

Claire's hair

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:26, 15 July 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:
	I wasn't sure where to put this little comment, but... As hair is made up of dead skin follicles, should Claire's hair grow back after being burned off? (Or, indeed, grow at all?) [[User:Lililedger\|Lililedger]] 21:43, 14 July 2009 (EDT)		I wasn't sure where to put this little comment, but... As hair is made up of dead skin follicles, should Claire's hair grow back after being burned off? (Or, indeed, grow at all?) [[User:Lililedger\|Lililedger]] 21:43, 14 July 2009 (EDT)
	*At the root, the hair is alive, you don't feel pain if someone cuts your hair, but you feel pain if someone pulls it. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 12:54, 15 July 2009 (EDT)		*At the root, the hair is alive, you don't feel pain if someone cuts your hair, but you feel pain if someone pulls it. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 12:54, 15 July 2009 (EDT)
			**Then shouldn't only her roots grow back? [[User:Lililedger\|Lavi]] 18:26, 15 July 2009 (EDT)

imported>Intuitive Empath: /* Claire's hair */

2009-07-15T16:54:27Z

Claire's hair

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:54, 15 July 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	==Claire's hair==		==Claire's hair==
	I wasn't sure where to put this little comment, but... As hair is made up of dead skin follicles, should Claire's hair grow back after being burned off? (Or, indeed, grow at all?) [[User:Lililedger\|Lililedger]] 21:43, 14 July 2009 (EDT)		I wasn't sure where to put this little comment, but... As hair is made up of dead skin follicles, should Claire's hair grow back after being burned off? (Or, indeed, grow at all?) [[User:Lililedger\|Lililedger]] 21:43, 14 July 2009 (EDT)
			*At the root, the hair is alive, you don't feel pain if someone cuts your hair, but you feel pain if someone pulls it. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 12:54, 15 July 2009 (EDT)

imported>Lililedger at 01:43, 15 July 2009

2009-07-15T01:43:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:43, 15 July 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	**We should probably mention something very simple in the Notes of [[rapid cell regeneration]], something like, "Claire's healing ability does not seem to affect her pierced ears." -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:06, 19 January 2008 (EST)		**We should probably mention something very simple in the Notes of [[rapid cell regeneration]], something like, "Claire's healing ability does not seem to affect her pierced ears." -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:06, 19 January 2008 (EST)
	**I sancorected, thanks Ice. Hmmmmmmmmmm.... --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 20:35, 19 January 2008 (EST)		**I sancorected, thanks Ice. Hmmmmmmmmmm.... --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 20:35, 19 January 2008 (EST)

			==Claire's hair==
			I wasn't sure where to put this little comment, but... As hair is made up of dead skin follicles, should Claire's hair grow back after being burned off? (Or, indeed, grow at all?) [[User:Lililedger\|Lililedger]] 21:43, 14 July 2009 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: rmv deleted image

2008-10-16T22:20:19Z

rmv deleted image

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:20, 16 October 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Claire does not have pierced ears==		==Claire does not have pierced ears==
	Unless Im mistaken, Clair does not have pierced ears. If I am mistaken, can I have a screenshot of these earings as proof?--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 02:19, 24 November 2007 (EST)		Unless Im mistaken, Clair does not have pierced ears. If I am mistaken, can I have a screenshot of these earings as proof?--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 02:19, 24 November 2007 (EST)
	* Here are a few shots: [[:Image:S320x240.jpg\|1]], [[:Image:Powers claire refinery jump 2.jpg\|2]], [[:Image:Powers future sylar claire pwned.jpg\|3~~]], and [[:Image:Ghost?.jpg\|4~~]]. See all of [[:Category:Images of Claire Bennet\|Claire's images]]. Sometimes Claire wears earrings, sometimes she doesn't. --{{User:Ice Vision/sig}} 14:20, 19 January 2008 (EST)		* Here are a few shots: [[:Image:S320x240.jpg\|1]], [[:Image:Powers claire refinery jump 2.jpg\|2]], and [[:Image:Powers future sylar claire pwned.jpg\|3]]. See all of [[:Category:Images of Claire Bennet\|Claire's images]]. Sometimes Claire wears earrings, sometimes she doesn't. --{{User:Ice Vision/sig}} 14:20, 19 January 2008 (EST)
	**We should probably mention something very simple in the Notes of [[rapid cell regeneration]], something like, "Claire's healing ability does not seem to affect her pierced ears." -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:06, 19 January 2008 (EST)		**We should probably mention something very simple in the Notes of [[rapid cell regeneration]], something like, "Claire's healing ability does not seem to affect her pierced ears." -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:06, 19 January 2008 (EST)
	**I sancorected, thanks Ice. Hmmmmmmmmmm.... --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 20:35, 19 January 2008 (EST)		**I sancorected, thanks Ice. Hmmmmmmmmmm.... --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 20:35, 19 January 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:34, 16 July 2009
Line 13:		Line 13:
	***** I guess Ted just burnt hot, not radioactive... That's the only explanation. As for Peter and Nathan, we don't know - Nathan was injected with Adam's blood after all... Ad as for Claire's hair - I think it regenerated faster than the rest of her body. -- [[User:Altes\|Altes]] 04:24, 16 July 2009 (EDT)		***** I guess Ted just burnt hot, not radioactive... That's the only explanation. As for Peter and Nathan, we don't know - Nathan was injected with Adam's blood after all... Ad as for Claire's hair - I think it regenerated faster than the rest of her body. -- [[User:Altes\|Altes]] 04:24, 16 July 2009 (EDT)
	****** Yes, but that comes back to my original arguement: Claire's body shouldn't be healing cells that are SUPPOSED to be dead. Logically, her hair shouldn't regenerate. I say the creators just forgot. [[User:Lililedger\|Lavi]] 10:03, 16 July 2009 (EDT)		****** Yes, but that comes back to my original arguement: Claire's body shouldn't be healing cells that are SUPPOSED to be dead. Logically, her hair shouldn't regenerate. I say the creators just forgot. [[User:Lililedger\|Lavi]] 10:03, 16 July 2009 (EDT)
			******* Who knows? Maybe there is a psychological factor in her ability that heals her to what her or her body thinks it should be, or maybe there is a "minimum damage" so that her body will heal, otherwise her hair would grow even if she decided to but it shorter. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 15:34, 16 July 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:03, 16 July 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	****Okay, I'm gonna let it drop because I'm pretty sure it was just a small oversight, but her hair never should've 'repaired itself' after being burned by Ted's radioactivity. It should've had to grow back naturally, as her body wouldn't register the absence of dead cells. (Speaking of Ted, I'm AMAZED none of them have cancer...) [[User:Lililedger\|Lavi]] 19:53, 15 July 2009 (EDT)		****Okay, I'm gonna let it drop because I'm pretty sure it was just a small oversight, but her hair never should've 'repaired itself' after being burned by Ted's radioactivity. It should've had to grow back naturally, as her body wouldn't register the absence of dead cells. (Speaking of Ted, I'm AMAZED none of them have cancer...) [[User:Lililedger\|Lavi]] 19:53, 15 July 2009 (EDT)
	***** I guess Ted just burnt hot, not radioactive... That's the only explanation. As for Peter and Nathan, we don't know - Nathan was injected with Adam's blood after all... Ad as for Claire's hair - I think it regenerated faster than the rest of her body. -- [[User:Altes\|Altes]] 04:24, 16 July 2009 (EDT)		***** I guess Ted just burnt hot, not radioactive... That's the only explanation. As for Peter and Nathan, we don't know - Nathan was injected with Adam's blood after all... Ad as for Claire's hair - I think it regenerated faster than the rest of her body. -- [[User:Altes\|Altes]] 04:24, 16 July 2009 (EDT)
			****** Yes, but that comes back to my original arguement: Claire's body shouldn't be healing cells that are SUPPOSED to be dead. Logically, her hair shouldn't regenerate. I say the creators just forgot. [[User:Lililedger\|Lavi]] 10:03, 16 July 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:26, 15 July 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:
	I wasn't sure where to put this little comment, but... As hair is made up of dead skin follicles, should Claire's hair grow back after being burned off? (Or, indeed, grow at all?) [[User:Lililedger\|Lililedger]] 21:43, 14 July 2009 (EDT)		I wasn't sure where to put this little comment, but... As hair is made up of dead skin follicles, should Claire's hair grow back after being burned off? (Or, indeed, grow at all?) [[User:Lililedger\|Lililedger]] 21:43, 14 July 2009 (EDT)
	*At the root, the hair is alive, you don't feel pain if someone cuts your hair, but you feel pain if someone pulls it. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 12:54, 15 July 2009 (EDT)		*At the root, the hair is alive, you don't feel pain if someone cuts your hair, but you feel pain if someone pulls it. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 12:54, 15 July 2009 (EDT)
			**Then shouldn't only her roots grow back? [[User:Lililedger\|Lavi]] 18:26, 15 July 2009 (EDT)