User talk:Gargyloveswolfy - Revision history

imported>Gargyloveswolfy: /* Prepositions */

2007-02-15T00:28:55Z

Prepositions

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:28, 15 February 2007
(No difference)

imported>Gargyloveswolfy: /* Prepositions */

2007-02-15T00:28:55Z

Prepositions

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:28, 15 February 2007
Line 29:		Line 29:
	Just out of curiosity, where on earth did you get the idea that "prepositions never start a sentence"? Prepositions frequently start sentences, and there's nothing ungrammatical about it. There is a usage (''not'' grammar) rule about prepositions ''ending'' sentences, and a usage (''not'' grammar) rule about conjunctions starting sentences, but I have never heard of a rule against starting sentences with prepositions. Considering lots of fairly famous works (including the Bible) begin with prepositions, I sure hope they aren't teaching this anywhere.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:32, 14 February 2007 (EST)		Just out of curiosity, where on earth did you get the idea that "prepositions never start a sentence"? Prepositions frequently start sentences, and there's nothing ungrammatical about it. There is a usage (''not'' grammar) rule about prepositions ''ending'' sentences, and a usage (''not'' grammar) rule about conjunctions starting sentences, but I have never heard of a rule against starting sentences with prepositions. Considering lots of fairly famous works (including the Bible) begin with prepositions, I sure hope they aren't teaching this anywhere.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:32, 14 February 2007 (EST)

	**I am either seriously confused or my byatch of a English 11 teacher taught me wrong. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 19:28, 14 February 2007 (EST)		*I am either seriously confused or my byatch of a English 11 teacher taught me wrong. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 19:28, 14 February 2007 (EST)

imported>Gargyloveswolfy: /* Prepositions */

2007-02-15T00:28:32Z

Prepositions

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:28, 15 February 2007
Line 28:		Line 28:
	==Prepositions==		==Prepositions==
	Just out of curiosity, where on earth did you get the idea that "prepositions never start a sentence"? Prepositions frequently start sentences, and there's nothing ungrammatical about it. There is a usage (''not'' grammar) rule about prepositions ''ending'' sentences, and a usage (''not'' grammar) rule about conjunctions starting sentences, but I have never heard of a rule against starting sentences with prepositions. Considering lots of fairly famous works (including the Bible) begin with prepositions, I sure hope they aren't teaching this anywhere.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:32, 14 February 2007 (EST)		Just out of curiosity, where on earth did you get the idea that "prepositions never start a sentence"? Prepositions frequently start sentences, and there's nothing ungrammatical about it. There is a usage (''not'' grammar) rule about prepositions ''ending'' sentences, and a usage (''not'' grammar) rule about conjunctions starting sentences, but I have never heard of a rule against starting sentences with prepositions. Considering lots of fairly famous works (including the Bible) begin with prepositions, I sure hope they aren't teaching this anywhere.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:32, 14 February 2007 (EST)

			**I am either seriously confused or my byatch of a English 11 teacher taught me wrong. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 19:28, 14 February 2007 (EST)

imported>Hardvice at 23:32, 14 February 2007

2007-02-14T23:32:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:32, 14 February 2007
Line 25:		Line 25:

	The info about Claire's age and birthday are already noted in the [[Claire#Notes\|Notes]] section of her page. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:16, 14 February 2007 (EST)		The info about Claire's age and birthday are already noted in the [[Claire#Notes\|Notes]] section of her page. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:16, 14 February 2007 (EST)

			==Prepositions==
			Just out of curiosity, where on earth did you get the idea that "prepositions never start a sentence"? Prepositions frequently start sentences, and there's nothing ungrammatical about it. There is a usage (''not'' grammar) rule about prepositions ''ending'' sentences, and a usage (''not'' grammar) rule about conjunctions starting sentences, but I have never heard of a rule against starting sentences with prepositions. Considering lots of fairly famous works (including the Bible) begin with prepositions, I sure hope they aren't teaching this anywhere.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:32, 14 February 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: Claire's age

2007-02-14T19:16:22Z

Claire's age

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:16, 14 February 2007
Line 21:		Line 21:
	**Okay, but I hope you understand why I did it. I was hoping to resolve the whole [[Clach]] vs. the detraction with Zach's de-gaying. I realize I started it by adding it in the first place. However, I am hoping that the segement will be simply history for now on, understand? --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 14:01, 10 February 2007 (EST)		**Okay, but I hope you understand why I did it. I was hoping to resolve the whole [[Clach]] vs. the detraction with Zach's de-gaying. I realize I started it by adding it in the first place. However, I am hoping that the segement will be simply history for now on, understand? --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 14:01, 10 February 2007 (EST)
	***I understand completely. :) Now that the controversy section has been removed from the article there's probably not even reason for anyone to add to the relevant discussion on the talk pages. If someone does chime in, best to probably ignore it since it's moot now anyway. Once the discussion's been dead for about 30 days or so it will be moved onto a separate archive page and hardly ever even looked at again. :) ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:04, 10 February 2007 (EST))		***I understand completely. :) Now that the controversy section has been removed from the article there's probably not even reason for anyone to add to the relevant discussion on the talk pages. If someone does chime in, best to probably ignore it since it's moot now anyway. Once the discussion's been dead for about 30 days or so it will be moved onto a separate archive page and hardly ever even looked at again. :) ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:04, 10 February 2007 (EST))

			== Claire's age ==

			The info about Claire's age and birthday are already noted in the [[Claire#Notes\|Notes]] section of her page. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:16, 14 February 2007 (EST)

imported>Admin: /* Talk pages */ clarification

2007-02-10T19:05:46Z

Talk pages: clarification

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:05, 10 February 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:

	**Okay, but I hope you understand why I did it. I was hoping to resolve the whole [[Clach]] vs. the detraction with Zach's de-gaying. I realize I started it by adding it in the first place. However, I am hoping that the segement will be simply history for now on, understand? --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 14:01, 10 February 2007 (EST)		**Okay, but I hope you understand why I did it. I was hoping to resolve the whole [[Clach]] vs. the detraction with Zach's de-gaying. I realize I started it by adding it in the first place. However, I am hoping that the segement will be simply history for now on, understand? --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 14:01, 10 February 2007 (EST)
	***I understand completely. :) Now that the controversy section has been removed from the article there's probably not even reason for anyone to add to the relevant discussion on the talk pages. If someone does chime in, best to probably ignore it since it's moot now anyway. Once the discussion's been dead for about 30 days or so it will go onto an archive page and hardly ever even looked at again. :) ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:04, 10 February 2007 (EST))		***I understand completely. :) Now that the controversy section has been removed from the article there's probably not even reason for anyone to add to the relevant discussion on the talk pages. If someone does chime in, best to probably ignore it since it's moot now anyway. Once the discussion's been dead for about 30 days or so it will be moved onto a separate archive page and hardly ever even looked at again. :) ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:04, 10 February 2007 (EST))

imported>Admin: /* Talk pages */

2007-02-10T19:04:45Z

Talk pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:04, 10 February 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:

	**Okay, but I hope you understand why I did it. I was hoping to resolve the whole [[Clach]] vs. the detraction with Zach's de-gaying. I realize I started it by adding it in the first place. However, I am hoping that the segement will be simply history for now on, understand? --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 14:01, 10 February 2007 (EST)		**Okay, but I hope you understand why I did it. I was hoping to resolve the whole [[Clach]] vs. the detraction with Zach's de-gaying. I realize I started it by adding it in the first place. However, I am hoping that the segement will be simply history for now on, understand? --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 14:01, 10 February 2007 (EST)
			***I understand completely. :) Now that the controversy section has been removed from the article there's probably not even reason for anyone to add to the relevant discussion on the talk pages. If someone does chime in, best to probably ignore it since it's moot now anyway. Once the discussion's been dead for about 30 days or so it will go onto an archive page and hardly ever even looked at again. :) ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:04, 10 February 2007 (EST))

imported>Gargyloveswolfy: /* Talk pages */

2007-02-10T19:01:50Z

Talk pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:01, 10 February 2007
Line 18:		Line 18:

	* Hi, Gargyloveswolfy. I restored the content on the Clach [[Talk:Clach\|talk page]] since we don't remove discussions from talk pages. In time after there are no more additions to the discussion it'll be placed on an Archive page off of the talk page, but discussions never actually get deleted. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 13:58, 10 February 2007 (EST))		* Hi, Gargyloveswolfy. I restored the content on the Clach [[Talk:Clach\|talk page]] since we don't remove discussions from talk pages. In time after there are no more additions to the discussion it'll be placed on an Archive page off of the talk page, but discussions never actually get deleted. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 13:58, 10 February 2007 (EST))

			**Okay, but I hope you understand why I did it. I was hoping to resolve the whole [[Clach]] vs. the detraction with Zach's de-gaying. I realize I started it by adding it in the first place. However, I am hoping that the segement will be simply history for now on, understand? --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 14:01, 10 February 2007 (EST)

imported>Admin: Talk pages

2007-02-10T18:58:28Z

Talk pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:58, 10 February 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:
	******Well, of course. It's not like I want to spend all day on this article, either ... particularly the day after a new episode when there are better things I could be doing. I just don't want it to degenerate into a warzone, and hostile tones will do that.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:35, 6 February 2007 (EST)		******Well, of course. It's not like I want to spend all day on this article, either ... particularly the day after a new episode when there are better things I could be doing. I just don't want it to degenerate into a warzone, and hostile tones will do that.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:35, 6 February 2007 (EST)
	*******Fine. But, I'll be in a editing back-n-forth war zone myself all day. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 16:37, 6 February 2007 (EST)		*******Fine. But, I'll be in a editing back-n-forth war zone myself all day. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 16:37, 6 February 2007 (EST)

			== Talk pages ==

			* Hi, Gargyloveswolfy. I restored the content on the Clach [[Talk:Clach\|talk page]] since we don't remove discussions from talk pages. In time after there are no more additions to the discussion it'll be placed on an Archive page off of the talk page, but discussions never actually get deleted. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 13:58, 10 February 2007 (EST))

imported>Gargyloveswolfy: /* Edit summary tone */

2007-02-06T21:37:58Z

Edit summary tone

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:37, 6 February 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:
	*****Very well, but I just want to point out one little fact (because there is no way it's a corciendence this is all taking place today of all days) that Nathan was revealed as Claire's bio-daddy and that some Paire shippers are feeling vandictive. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 16:30, 6 February 2007 (EST)		*****Very well, but I just want to point out one little fact (because there is no way it's a corciendence this is all taking place today of all days) that Nathan was revealed as Claire's bio-daddy and that some Paire shippers are feeling vandictive. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 16:30, 6 February 2007 (EST)
	******Well, of course. It's not like I want to spend all day on this article, either ... particularly the day after a new episode when there are better things I could be doing. I just don't want it to degenerate into a warzone, and hostile tones will do that.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:35, 6 February 2007 (EST)		******Well, of course. It's not like I want to spend all day on this article, either ... particularly the day after a new episode when there are better things I could be doing. I just don't want it to degenerate into a warzone, and hostile tones will do that.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:35, 6 February 2007 (EST)
			*******Fine. But, I'll be in a editing back-n-forth war zone myself all day. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 16:37, 6 February 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:37, 6 February 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:
	*****Very well, but I just want to point out one little fact (because there is no way it's a corciendence this is all taking place today of all days) that Nathan was revealed as Claire's bio-daddy and that some Paire shippers are feeling vandictive. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 16:30, 6 February 2007 (EST)		*****Very well, but I just want to point out one little fact (because there is no way it's a corciendence this is all taking place today of all days) that Nathan was revealed as Claire's bio-daddy and that some Paire shippers are feeling vandictive. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 16:30, 6 February 2007 (EST)
	******Well, of course. It's not like I want to spend all day on this article, either ... particularly the day after a new episode when there are better things I could be doing. I just don't want it to degenerate into a warzone, and hostile tones will do that.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:35, 6 February 2007 (EST)		******Well, of course. It's not like I want to spend all day on this article, either ... particularly the day after a new episode when there are better things I could be doing. I just don't want it to degenerate into a warzone, and hostile tones will do that.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:35, 6 February 2007 (EST)
			*******Fine. But, I'll be in a editing back-n-forth war zone myself all day. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 16:37, 6 February 2007 (EST)