User talk:IDoWhatMustBeDone - Revision history

imported>Radicell at 08:12, 30 November 2009

2009-11-30T08:12:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:12, 30 November 2009
(No difference)

imported>Radicell at 08:12, 30 November 2009

2009-11-30T08:12:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:12, 30 November 2009
Line 59:		Line 59:

	Good day, IDoWhatMustBeDone. I've taken a look at your edits, and there's nothing wrong with them, especially for a new user like you. New users often make the mistake of moving pages without discussing it, so there's nothing to worry about there. What is worrying to the rest of us is your attitude here at the wiki -- you seem to think it's your own job to make the wiki better. It isn't. It's the community's. When the rest of the community approaches you about it, you tell them to stay out of your business, instead of trying to discuss the name for the ability. Unfortunately, these are simply not attitudes that members of the community should have when working together. You are free to continue to make edits, but be warned that your edits are under close scrutiny. Please change your attitude to a more friendly one, since a continually hostile user is not a user that we want to be actively editing. Thanks for understanding. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 18:59, 29 November 2009 (EST)		Good day, IDoWhatMustBeDone. I've taken a look at your edits, and there's nothing wrong with them, especially for a new user like you. New users often make the mistake of moving pages without discussing it, so there's nothing to worry about there. What is worrying to the rest of us is your attitude here at the wiki -- you seem to think it's your own job to make the wiki better. It isn't. It's the community's. When the rest of the community approaches you about it, you tell them to stay out of your business, instead of trying to discuss the name for the ability. Unfortunately, these are simply not attitudes that members of the community should have when working together. You are free to continue to make edits, but be warned that your edits are under close scrutiny. Please change your attitude to a more friendly one, since a continually hostile user is not a user that we want to be actively editing. Thanks for understanding. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 18:59, 29 November 2009 (EST)
			*Also, major changes to pages are best discussed first on the article's discussion page. Since you do not run the wiki, if you blatantly try to "improve" the wiki with your grand ideas on everyone's behalf, your edits will be reverted. The wiki is run by every editor that makes contributions, so it's best to go over the changes with ''them'' -- by discussing it on the talk page. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 03:12, 30 November 2009 (EST)

imported>Radicell: /* Your attitude */ new section

2009-11-29T23:59:14Z

Your attitude: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:59, 29 November 2009
Line 55:		Line 55:
	**How dare thee, vile ruffian! By the Queen, I challenge thee to duel for thy honour!--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 14:46, 29 November 2009 (EST)		**How dare thee, vile ruffian! By the Queen, I challenge thee to duel for thy honour!--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 14:46, 29 November 2009 (EST)
	You seem to be very passionate of the wiki. You have good tidings of care. Such as Batman and Gotham City. Sherlock and London. Am I making my point across? --{{User:BoomerDay/Signature}} 15:23, 29 November 2009 (EST)		You seem to be very passionate of the wiki. You have good tidings of care. Such as Batman and Gotham City. Sherlock and London. Am I making my point across? --{{User:BoomerDay/Signature}} 15:23, 29 November 2009 (EST)

			== Your attitude ==

			Good day, IDoWhatMustBeDone. I've taken a look at your edits, and there's nothing wrong with them, especially for a new user like you. New users often make the mistake of moving pages without discussing it, so there's nothing to worry about there. What is worrying to the rest of us is your attitude here at the wiki -- you seem to think it's your own job to make the wiki better. It isn't. It's the community's. When the rest of the community approaches you about it, you tell them to stay out of your business, instead of trying to discuss the name for the ability. Unfortunately, these are simply not attitudes that members of the community should have when working together. You are free to continue to make edits, but be warned that your edits are under close scrutiny. Please change your attitude to a more friendly one, since a continually hostile user is not a user that we want to be actively editing. Thanks for understanding. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 18:59, 29 November 2009 (EST)

imported>BoomerDay at 20:23, 29 November 2009

2009-11-29T20:23:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:23, 29 November 2009
Line 54:		Line 54:
	*Picture me as you will, I am here to improve quality. Nothing more, nothing less.--[[User:IDoWhatMustBeDone\|IDoWhatMustBeDone]] 14:43, 29 November 2009 (EST)		*Picture me as you will, I am here to improve quality. Nothing more, nothing less.--[[User:IDoWhatMustBeDone\|IDoWhatMustBeDone]] 14:43, 29 November 2009 (EST)
	**How dare thee, vile ruffian! By the Queen, I challenge thee to duel for thy honour!--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 14:46, 29 November 2009 (EST)		**How dare thee, vile ruffian! By the Queen, I challenge thee to duel for thy honour!--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 14:46, 29 November 2009 (EST)
			You seem to be very passionate of the wiki. You have good tidings of care. Such as Batman and Gotham City. Sherlock and London. Am I making my point across? --{{User:BoomerDay/Signature}} 15:23, 29 November 2009 (EST)

imported>Jenx222 at 20:06, 29 November 2009

2009-11-29T20:06:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:06, 29 November 2009
Line 47:		Line 47:
	*I do not mean to seem rude, just forceful. I want the quality to rise up, and I'm afraid we cannot wait for those afraid of change to climb aboard. The future waits for no man!--[[User:IDoWhatMustBeDone\|IDoWhatMustBeDone]] 14:42, 29 November 2009 (EST)		*I do not mean to seem rude, just forceful. I want the quality to rise up, and I'm afraid we cannot wait for those afraid of change to climb aboard. The future waits for no man!--[[User:IDoWhatMustBeDone\|IDoWhatMustBeDone]] 14:42, 29 November 2009 (EST)
	** You could say that again. Unfortunately, Tim Kring and his crew are the ones who decide what is what in Heroes, and there were similar cases in the past when everything we speculated was wrong until we received confirmations. Ando's ability, for example, or Sylar's empathic mimicry. Waiting won't make this wiki worse, but hurry may. {{User:Altes/Signature}}		** You could say that again. Unfortunately, Tim Kring and his crew are the ones who decide what is what in Heroes, and there were similar cases in the past when everything we speculated was wrong until we received confirmations. Ando's ability, for example, or Sylar's empathic mimicry. Waiting won't make this wiki worse, but hurry may. {{User:Altes/Signature}}
			**There are rules here to ensure there is consistency throughout the wiki. It's nothing to do with change it's about making sure the information presented here is accurate. If it's confirmed by the writers then it's cannon, if it's not confirmed then it's speculative. - {{User:Jenx222/sig2}} 15:06, 29 November 2009 (EST)

	== Just wondering... ==		== Just wondering... ==

imported>Altes: /* Moving Pages */

2009-11-29T19:50:03Z

Moving Pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:50, 29 November 2009
Line 46:		Line 46:

	*I do not mean to seem rude, just forceful. I want the quality to rise up, and I'm afraid we cannot wait for those afraid of change to climb aboard. The future waits for no man!--[[User:IDoWhatMustBeDone\|IDoWhatMustBeDone]] 14:42, 29 November 2009 (EST)		*I do not mean to seem rude, just forceful. I want the quality to rise up, and I'm afraid we cannot wait for those afraid of change to climb aboard. The future waits for no man!--[[User:IDoWhatMustBeDone\|IDoWhatMustBeDone]] 14:42, 29 November 2009 (EST)
			** You could say that again. Unfortunately, Tim Kring and his crew are the ones who decide what is what in Heroes, and there were similar cases in the past when everything we speculated was wrong until we received confirmations. Ando's ability, for example, or Sylar's empathic mimicry. Waiting won't make this wiki worse, but hurry may. {{User:Altes/Signature}}

	== Just wondering... ==		== Just wondering... ==

imported>Piemanmoo: wot wot old chap

2009-11-29T19:46:10Z

wot wot old chap

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:46, 29 November 2009
Line 50:		Line 50:
	Do you post while wearing a monocole and tophat? I have this picture of you in my head at the computer sipping tea and challenging other editors to fisticuffs.--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 14:40, 29 November 2009 (EST)		Do you post while wearing a monocole and tophat? I have this picture of you in my head at the computer sipping tea and challenging other editors to fisticuffs.--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 14:40, 29 November 2009 (EST)
	*Picture me as you will, I am here to improve quality. Nothing more, nothing less.--[[User:IDoWhatMustBeDone\|IDoWhatMustBeDone]] 14:43, 29 November 2009 (EST)		*Picture me as you will, I am here to improve quality. Nothing more, nothing less.--[[User:IDoWhatMustBeDone\|IDoWhatMustBeDone]] 14:43, 29 November 2009 (EST)
			**How dare thee, vile ruffian! By the Queen, I challenge thee to duel for thy honour!--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 14:46, 29 November 2009 (EST)

imported>IDoWhatMustBeDone at 19:43, 29 November 2009

2009-11-29T19:43:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:43, 29 November 2009
Line 49:		Line 49:

	Do you post while wearing a monocole and tophat? I have this picture of you in my head at the computer sipping tea and challenging other editors to fisticuffs.--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 14:40, 29 November 2009 (EST)		Do you post while wearing a monocole and tophat? I have this picture of you in my head at the computer sipping tea and challenging other editors to fisticuffs.--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 14:40, 29 November 2009 (EST)
			*Picture me as you will, I am here to improve quality. Nothing more, nothing less.--[[User:IDoWhatMustBeDone\|IDoWhatMustBeDone]] 14:43, 29 November 2009 (EST)

imported>IDoWhatMustBeDone at 19:42, 29 November 2009

2009-11-29T19:42:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:42, 29 November 2009
Line 45:		Line 45:
	To my own surprise, I agree with you. Something needs to be changes there for the better quality of the wiki. However, being as rude as you may be another thing which may lead you to getting blocked. {{User:Altes/Signature}}		To my own surprise, I agree with you. Something needs to be changes there for the better quality of the wiki. However, being as rude as you may be another thing which may lead you to getting blocked. {{User:Altes/Signature}}

			*I do not mean to seem rude, just forceful. I want the quality to rise up, and I'm afraid we cannot wait for those afraid of change to climb aboard. The future waits for no man!--[[User:IDoWhatMustBeDone\|IDoWhatMustBeDone]] 14:42, 29 November 2009 (EST)
	== Just wondering... ==		== Just wondering... ==

imported>Ricard Desi at 19:41, 29 November 2009

2009-11-29T19:41:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:41, 29 November 2009
Line 39:		Line 39:
	********** To clarify, it is considered helpful when members do what they can to keep the quality standards up at this wiki. However, there are patrollers here (Catalyst being one, myself being another) that are assigned to maintain quality levels on this wiki. This includes making sure people are not making erroneous or not-agreed-upon edits on the wiki, and reverting any offending edits (yours being one). If you have an issue with the rules of this wiki, you can bring it up with the admin. Until then, we will do our job. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 14:37, 29 November 2009 (EST)		********** To clarify, it is considered helpful when members do what they can to keep the quality standards up at this wiki. However, there are patrollers here (Catalyst being one, myself being another) that are assigned to maintain quality levels on this wiki. This includes making sure people are not making erroneous or not-agreed-upon edits on the wiki, and reverting any offending edits (yours being one). If you have an issue with the rules of this wiki, you can bring it up with the admin. Until then, we will do our job. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 14:37, 29 November 2009 (EST)
	******** It was a typo for "don't". Don't be a jerk. And once again, this is NOT Wikipedia. We do not follow Wikipedia's set of rules (nor do they follow ours. See our consensus guidelines -- which you have thus far been ignoring -- as an example of how we do not operate the same way as Wikipedia.) If you make the edit more than once at all, especially after being asked to stop, you're going to get reported. By the way, I think you meant "lowering its quality". --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 14:33, 29 November 2009 (EST)		******** It was a typo for "don't". Don't be a jerk. And once again, this is NOT Wikipedia. We do not follow Wikipedia's set of rules (nor do they follow ours. See our consensus guidelines -- which you have thus far been ignoring -- as an example of how we do not operate the same way as Wikipedia.) If you make the edit more than once at all, especially after being asked to stop, you're going to get reported. By the way, I think you meant "lowering its quality". --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 14:33, 29 November 2009 (EST)
	********Apostrophees denote possesion, and the article posseses an amount of quality, even if you both seem subject to lower them repeatedly in order to mantain the status quo.--[[User:IDoWhatMustBeDone\|IDoWhatMustBeDone]] 14:39, 29 November 2009 (EST)		*********Apostrophees denote possesion, and the article posseses an amount of quality, even if you both seem subject to lower them repeatedly in order to mantain the status quo.--[[User:IDoWhatMustBeDone\|IDoWhatMustBeDone]] 14:39, 29 November 2009 (EST)
			********** "It's" means "it is". "Its" is the possessive of "it". --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 14:41, 29 November 2009 (EST)
	*********Please speak to an admin about this. I assure you he will tell you something similar.--{{User:Catalyst/sig}} 14:35, 29 November 2009 (EST)		*********Please speak to an admin about this. I assure you he will tell you something similar.--{{User:Catalyst/sig}} 14:35, 29 November 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:46, 29 November 2009
Line 50:		Line 50:
	Do you post while wearing a monocole and tophat? I have this picture of you in my head at the computer sipping tea and challenging other editors to fisticuffs.--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 14:40, 29 November 2009 (EST)		Do you post while wearing a monocole and tophat? I have this picture of you in my head at the computer sipping tea and challenging other editors to fisticuffs.--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 14:40, 29 November 2009 (EST)
	*Picture me as you will, I am here to improve quality. Nothing more, nothing less.--[[User:IDoWhatMustBeDone\|IDoWhatMustBeDone]] 14:43, 29 November 2009 (EST)		*Picture me as you will, I am here to improve quality. Nothing more, nothing less.--[[User:IDoWhatMustBeDone\|IDoWhatMustBeDone]] 14:43, 29 November 2009 (EST)
			**How dare thee, vile ruffian! By the Queen, I challenge thee to duel for thy honour!--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 14:46, 29 November 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:41, 29 November 2009
Line 39:		Line 39:
	********** To clarify, it is considered helpful when members do what they can to keep the quality standards up at this wiki. However, there are patrollers here (Catalyst being one, myself being another) that are assigned to maintain quality levels on this wiki. This includes making sure people are not making erroneous or not-agreed-upon edits on the wiki, and reverting any offending edits (yours being one). If you have an issue with the rules of this wiki, you can bring it up with the admin. Until then, we will do our job. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 14:37, 29 November 2009 (EST)		********** To clarify, it is considered helpful when members do what they can to keep the quality standards up at this wiki. However, there are patrollers here (Catalyst being one, myself being another) that are assigned to maintain quality levels on this wiki. This includes making sure people are not making erroneous or not-agreed-upon edits on the wiki, and reverting any offending edits (yours being one). If you have an issue with the rules of this wiki, you can bring it up with the admin. Until then, we will do our job. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 14:37, 29 November 2009 (EST)
	******** It was a typo for "don't". Don't be a jerk. And once again, this is NOT Wikipedia. We do not follow Wikipedia's set of rules (nor do they follow ours. See our consensus guidelines -- which you have thus far been ignoring -- as an example of how we do not operate the same way as Wikipedia.) If you make the edit more than once at all, especially after being asked to stop, you're going to get reported. By the way, I think you meant "lowering its quality". --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 14:33, 29 November 2009 (EST)		******** It was a typo for "don't". Don't be a jerk. And once again, this is NOT Wikipedia. We do not follow Wikipedia's set of rules (nor do they follow ours. See our consensus guidelines -- which you have thus far been ignoring -- as an example of how we do not operate the same way as Wikipedia.) If you make the edit more than once at all, especially after being asked to stop, you're going to get reported. By the way, I think you meant "lowering its quality". --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 14:33, 29 November 2009 (EST)
	********Apostrophees denote possesion, and the article posseses an amount of quality, even if you both seem subject to lower them repeatedly in order to mantain the status quo.--[[User:IDoWhatMustBeDone\|IDoWhatMustBeDone]] 14:39, 29 November 2009 (EST)		*********Apostrophees denote possesion, and the article posseses an amount of quality, even if you both seem subject to lower them repeatedly in order to mantain the status quo.--[[User:IDoWhatMustBeDone\|IDoWhatMustBeDone]] 14:39, 29 November 2009 (EST)
			********** "It's" means "it is". "Its" is the possessive of "it". --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 14:41, 29 November 2009 (EST)
	*********Please speak to an admin about this. I assure you he will tell you something similar.--{{User:Catalyst/sig}} 14:35, 29 November 2009 (EST)		*********Please speak to an admin about this. I assure you he will tell you something similar.--{{User:Catalyst/sig}} 14:35, 29 November 2009 (EST)