User talk:Mc hammark - Revision history

imported>OutbackZack: /* Sup */ new section

2010-10-21T19:00:42Z

Sup: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:00, 21 October 2010
(No difference)

imported>OutbackZack: /* Sup */ new section

2010-10-21T19:00:42Z

Sup: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:00, 21 October 2010
Line 26:		Line 26:

	How are you? Long time, no talk :) If you ever want to talk, e-mail me :) ''i.heart.heroes@hotmail.com'' :) {{User:Iheartheroes/sig}} 21:31, 27 September 2010 (EDT)		How are you? Long time, no talk :) If you ever want to talk, e-mail me :) ''i.heart.heroes@hotmail.com'' :) {{User:Iheartheroes/sig}} 21:31, 27 September 2010 (EDT)

			== Sup ==

			Hey just saw your message on my talk page. What's up? Got like an AIM? --[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 15:00, 21 October 2010 (EDT)

imported>Tarot: /* Heroes: The Movie */

2010-09-28T01:39:00Z

Heroes: The Movie

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:39, 28 September 2010
Line 21:		Line 21:
	==Heroes: The Movie==		==Heroes: The Movie==
	I agree that it doesn't belong in the mainspace as it is clear it is fan fiction. In a case like this, I don't think we have to wait to move it so I've moved it and removed the delete tag from the article. If you think it does not deserve an article in the fan creation namespace, please feel free to add back the delete tag and we can continue discussion at [[Fan Creation talk:Heroes: The Movie]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 17:30, 4 September 2010 (EDT)		I agree that it doesn't belong in the mainspace as it is clear it is fan fiction. In a case like this, I don't think we have to wait to move it so I've moved it and removed the delete tag from the article. If you think it does not deserve an article in the fan creation namespace, please feel free to add back the delete tag and we can continue discussion at [[Fan Creation talk:Heroes: The Movie]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 17:30, 4 September 2010 (EDT)
			*Seconded [[User:Tarot\|Tarot]] 21:39, 27 September 2010 (EDT)

	== Hey :) ==		== Hey :) ==

imported>Iheartheroes: /* Hey :) */ new section

2010-09-28T01:31:14Z

Hey :): new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:31, 28 September 2010
Line 21:		Line 21:
	==Heroes: The Movie==		==Heroes: The Movie==
	I agree that it doesn't belong in the mainspace as it is clear it is fan fiction. In a case like this, I don't think we have to wait to move it so I've moved it and removed the delete tag from the article. If you think it does not deserve an article in the fan creation namespace, please feel free to add back the delete tag and we can continue discussion at [[Fan Creation talk:Heroes: The Movie]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 17:30, 4 September 2010 (EDT)		I agree that it doesn't belong in the mainspace as it is clear it is fan fiction. In a case like this, I don't think we have to wait to move it so I've moved it and removed the delete tag from the article. If you think it does not deserve an article in the fan creation namespace, please feel free to add back the delete tag and we can continue discussion at [[Fan Creation talk:Heroes: The Movie]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 17:30, 4 September 2010 (EDT)

			== Hey :) ==

			How are you? Long time, no talk :) If you ever want to talk, e-mail me :) ''i.heart.heroes@hotmail.com'' :) {{User:Iheartheroes/sig}} 21:31, 27 September 2010 (EDT)

imported>Tarot: /* You never answered my question */

2010-09-06T02:17:07Z

You never answered my question

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:17, 6 September 2010
Line 17:		Line 17:

	I had asked where in this wiki was the accepted definition for a significant other? If all that is required is a mere one night stand I imagine some characters will have an extensive list of formers.		I had asked where in this wiki was the accepted definition for a significant other? If all that is required is a mere one night stand I imagine some characters will have an extensive list of formers.
			[[User:Tarot\|Tarot]] 22:17, 5 September 2010 (EDT)

	==Heroes: The Movie==		==Heroes: The Movie==

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Heroes: The Movie */ new section

2010-09-04T21:30:30Z

Heroes: The Movie: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:30, 4 September 2010
Line 17:		Line 17:

	I had asked where in this wiki was the accepted definition for a significant other? If all that is required is a mere one night stand I imagine some characters will have an extensive list of formers.		I had asked where in this wiki was the accepted definition for a significant other? If all that is required is a mere one night stand I imagine some characters will have an extensive list of formers.

			==Heroes: The Movie==
			I agree that it doesn't belong in the mainspace as it is clear it is fan fiction. In a case like this, I don't think we have to wait to move it so I've moved it and removed the delete tag from the article. If you think it does not deserve an article in the fan creation namespace, please feel free to add back the delete tag and we can continue discussion at [[Fan Creation talk:Heroes: The Movie]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 17:30, 4 September 2010 (EDT)

imported>Tarot at 20:29, 31 August 2010

2010-08-31T20:29:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:29, 31 August 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:
	\| align=center \| [[User talk:Mc hammark/Archive 4\|Feb 10 - Aug 10]] (30)		\| align=center \| [[User talk:Mc hammark/Archive 4\|Feb 10 - Aug 10]] (30)
	\|}		\|}
			==You never answered my question==

			I had asked where in this wiki was the accepted definition for a significant other? If all that is required is a mere one night stand I imagine some characters will have an extensive list of formers.

imported>Mc hammark: Replacing page with ''''''WELCOME, PLEASE JOIN US''''' Image:Heroessamuel.jpg '''''WE HAVE SO MUCH TO DISCUSS''''' {| border="2" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="4" class="wikitable" |- ! Archives ...'

2010-08-31T14:53:36Z

Replacing page with ''''''WELCOME, PLEASE JOIN US''''' Image:Heroessamuel.jpg '''''WE HAVE SO MUCH TO DISCUSS''''' {| border="2" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="4" class="wikitable" |- ! Archives ...'

Show changes

imported>Tarot: /* Definition of a significant other */

2010-08-09T21:50:34Z

Definition of a significant other

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:50, 9 August 2010
Line 188:		Line 188:

	Where is this defined? It really doesn't seem right calling someone that if they were a one night stand. [[User:Tarot\|Tarot]] 19:18, 8 August 2010 (EDT)		Where is this defined? It really doesn't seem right calling someone that if they were a one night stand. [[User:Tarot\|Tarot]] 19:18, 8 August 2010 (EDT)
	And if sleeping with someone once is the only qualification for calling someone a significant other, then Casey Z. Smith, whom Hanna Gitelman slept with to steal his pass key, back when she was after the Lone Star Files, should be listed as a former significant other for her. Since this seems to be the case, I have added Casey Z. Smith to Hana's page. If a rule applies to one character it applies to all.		*And if sleeping with someone once is the only qualification for calling someone a significant
			other, then Casey Z. Smith, whom Hanna Gitelman slept with to steal his pass key, back when
			she was after the Lone Star Files, should be listed as a former significant other for her.
			Since this seems to be the case, I have added Casey Z. Smith to Hana's page. If a rule applies
			to one character it applies to all. [[User:Tarot\|Tarot]] 17:50, 9 August 2010 (EDT)

imported>Tarot: /* Definition of a significant other */

2010-08-09T21:45:40Z

Definition of a significant other

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:45, 9 August 2010
Line 188:		Line 188:

	Where is this defined? It really doesn't seem right calling someone that if they were a one night stand. [[User:Tarot\|Tarot]] 19:18, 8 August 2010 (EDT)		Where is this defined? It really doesn't seem right calling someone that if they were a one night stand. [[User:Tarot\|Tarot]] 19:18, 8 August 2010 (EDT)
			And if sleeping with someone once is the only qualification for calling someone a significant other, then Casey Z. Smith, whom Hanna Gitelman slept with to steal his pass key, back when she was after the Lone Star Files, should be listed as a former significant other for her. Since this seems to be the case, I have added Casey Z. Smith to Hana's page. If a rule applies to one character it applies to all.