User talk:MishBaker - Revision history

imported>MishBaker: /* Hmmm... */

2007-11-20T12:54:59Z

Hmmm...

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:54, 20 November 2007
(No difference)

imported>MishBaker: /* Hmmm... */

2007-11-20T12:54:59Z

Hmmm...

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:54, 20 November 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:
	*** So you think Peter will try to save Caitlin? Let's assume that if the future with "the virus" is an alternate universe, which if it stopped existing, so would Caitlin (something I don't agree with)... Peter could send Hiro to rescue his gf from the future. That could make for some good storytelling.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 14:16, 14 November 2007 (EST)		*** So you think Peter will try to save Caitlin? Let's assume that if the future with "the virus" is an alternate universe, which if it stopped existing, so would Caitlin (something I don't agree with)... Peter could send Hiro to rescue his gf from the future. That could make for some good storytelling.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 14:16, 14 November 2007 (EST)
	*** That would be a pretty good episode. Although I'm not sure if I like the parallel timeline theory or the alternate universe theory for time travel. It would be very interesting to know which particular theory the shows creators are subscribing to. Because as it stands Caitlin being stuck in the "Shanti Virus Hell" future isn't really scary since someone can always go and get her. But if the scenario I posted about should be the case then things get a mite hairier. --<strong>[[User:MishBaker\|Mish]]</strong>([[User Talk:MishBaker\|Talk]]) 18:25, 14 November 2007 (EST)		*** That would be a pretty good episode. Although I'm not sure if I like the parallel timeline theory or the alternate universe theory for time travel. It would be very interesting to know which particular theory the shows creators are subscribing to. Because as it stands Caitlin being stuck in the "Shanti Virus Hell" future isn't really scary since someone can always go and get her. But if the scenario I posted about should be the case then things get a mite hairier. --<strong>[[User:MishBaker\|Mish]]</strong>([[User Talk:MishBaker\|Talk]]) 18:25, 14 November 2007 (EST)
			****Well, I guess I was a little off. I thought Bennet was going to be the tie-in to Peter's adventure. Apparently it will happe through Matt and Nathan. <strong>[[User:MishBaker\|Mish]]</strong>([[User Talk:MishBaker\|Talk]])

	== Re: Power names help ==		== Re: Power names help ==

imported>MishBaker: /* Infobox template */

2007-11-17T15:28:15Z

Infobox template

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:28, 17 November 2007
Line 25:		Line 25:

	Hey, just wanted to tell you that you kinda worked backwards doing the infobox. Start with it in your namespace. If you want to use it as a template, simply use the braces around the name of the article (no need to have the word Template). Thanks.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 02:04, 17 November 2007 (EST)		Hey, just wanted to tell you that you kinda worked backwards doing the infobox. Start with it in your namespace. If you want to use it as a template, simply use the braces around the name of the article (no need to have the word Template). Thanks.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 02:04, 17 November 2007 (EST)
			*I kinda thought that, but I wasn't sure it would work. It was getting late and the wife was ready for bed, so I skipped right to the "tried and true". I appreciate the help.--<strong>[[User:MishBaker\|Mish]]</strong>([[User Talk:MishBaker\|Talk]]) 10:28, 17 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Baldbobbo: New section: Infobox template

2007-11-17T07:04:10Z

New section: Infobox template

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:04, 17 November 2007
Line 21:		Line 21:
	* Hey Mish, I had to remove your vote because the option changed. Since "electrical absorption" was used in a secondary source, and "electromagnetism" wasn't, the article needs to either be renamed "electrical absorption" or split. It can't stay "electromagnetism" because we have a name from a higher-level source for the patient's power. Sorry for the mix-up.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 19:00, 15 November 2007 (EST)		* Hey Mish, I had to remove your vote because the option changed. Since "electrical absorption" was used in a secondary source, and "electromagnetism" wasn't, the article needs to either be renamed "electrical absorption" or split. It can't stay "electromagnetism" because we have a name from a higher-level source for the patient's power. Sorry for the mix-up.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 19:00, 15 November 2007 (EST)
	**It's cool, thanks for letting me know. --<strong>[[User:MishBaker\|Mish]]</strong>([[User Talk:MishBaker\|Talk]]) 20:11, 15 November 2007 (EST)		**It's cool, thanks for letting me know. --<strong>[[User:MishBaker\|Mish]]</strong>([[User Talk:MishBaker\|Talk]]) 20:11, 15 November 2007 (EST)

			== Infobox template ==

			Hey, just wanted to tell you that you kinda worked backwards doing the infobox. Start with it in your namespace. If you want to use it as a template, simply use the braces around the name of the article (no need to have the word Template). Thanks.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 02:04, 17 November 2007 (EST)

imported>MishBaker: /* Electromagnetism */

2007-11-16T01:11:10Z

Electromagnetism

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:11, 16 November 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:
	==Electromagnetism==		==Electromagnetism==
	* Hey Mish, I had to remove your vote because the option changed. Since "electrical absorption" was used in a secondary source, and "electromagnetism" wasn't, the article needs to either be renamed "electrical absorption" or split. It can't stay "electromagnetism" because we have a name from a higher-level source for the patient's power. Sorry for the mix-up.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 19:00, 15 November 2007 (EST)		* Hey Mish, I had to remove your vote because the option changed. Since "electrical absorption" was used in a secondary source, and "electromagnetism" wasn't, the article needs to either be renamed "electrical absorption" or split. It can't stay "electromagnetism" because we have a name from a higher-level source for the patient's power. Sorry for the mix-up.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 19:00, 15 November 2007 (EST)
			**It's cool, thanks for letting me know. --<strong>[[User:MishBaker\|Mish]]</strong>([[User Talk:MishBaker\|Talk]]) 20:11, 15 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Hardvice at 00:00, 16 November 2007

2007-11-16T00:00:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:00, 16 November 2007
Line 17:		Line 17:
	I saw that you were storing Dave's power names help on your user page. You should know that it's also in [[Help:Naming conventions]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 14:16, 14 November 2007 (EST)		I saw that you were storing Dave's power names help on your user page. You should know that it's also in [[Help:Naming conventions]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 14:16, 14 November 2007 (EST)
	*Well, son of a .....Thanks for the heads up.....--[[User:MishBaker\|Mish]] 14:24, 14 November 2007 (EST)		*Well, son of a .....Thanks for the heads up.....--[[User:MishBaker\|Mish]] 14:24, 14 November 2007 (EST)

			==Electromagnetism==
			* Hey Mish, I had to remove your vote because the option changed. Since "electrical absorption" was used in a secondary source, and "electromagnetism" wasn't, the article needs to either be renamed "electrical absorption" or split. It can't stay "electromagnetism" because we have a name from a higher-level source for the patient's power. Sorry for the mix-up.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 19:00, 15 November 2007 (EST)

imported>MishBaker: /* Hmmm... */

2007-11-14T23:25:18Z

Hmmm...

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:25, 14 November 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	**Pretty much. Although with her trapped in the "possible future" Peter will have to try a rescue (or get Hiro to do so). It would be uncharacteristic for one of them not to try. It was just my theorizing that this will have to happen before the possible future she is in becomes an "impossible future", effectively killing her....kinda.--[[User:MishBaker\|Mish]] 16:28, 9 November 2007 (EST)		**Pretty much. Although with her trapped in the "possible future" Peter will have to try a rescue (or get Hiro to do so). It would be uncharacteristic for one of them not to try. It was just my theorizing that this will have to happen before the possible future she is in becomes an "impossible future", effectively killing her....kinda.--[[User:MishBaker\|Mish]] 16:28, 9 November 2007 (EST)
	*** So you think Peter will try to save Caitlin? Let's assume that if the future with "the virus" is an alternate universe, which if it stopped existing, so would Caitlin (something I don't agree with)... Peter could send Hiro to rescue his gf from the future. That could make for some good storytelling.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 14:16, 14 November 2007 (EST)		*** So you think Peter will try to save Caitlin? Let's assume that if the future with "the virus" is an alternate universe, which if it stopped existing, so would Caitlin (something I don't agree with)... Peter could send Hiro to rescue his gf from the future. That could make for some good storytelling.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 14:16, 14 November 2007 (EST)
			*** That would be a pretty good episode. Although I'm not sure if I like the parallel timeline theory or the alternate universe theory for time travel. It would be very interesting to know which particular theory the shows creators are subscribing to. Because as it stands Caitlin being stuck in the "Shanti Virus Hell" future isn't really scary since someone can always go and get her. But if the scenario I posted about should be the case then things get a mite hairier. --<strong>[[User:MishBaker\|Mish]]</strong>([[User Talk:MishBaker\|Talk]]) 18:25, 14 November 2007 (EST)

	== Re: Power names help ==		== Re: Power names help ==

imported>MishBaker: /* Re: Power names help */

2007-11-14T19:24:06Z

Re: Power names help

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:24, 14 November 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:
	== Re: Power names help ==		== Re: Power names help ==
	I saw that you were storing Dave's power names help on your user page. You should know that it's also in [[Help:Naming conventions]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 14:16, 14 November 2007 (EST)		I saw that you were storing Dave's power names help on your user page. You should know that it's also in [[Help:Naming conventions]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 14:16, 14 November 2007 (EST)
			*Well, son of a .....Thanks for the heads up.....--[[User:MishBaker\|Mish]] 14:24, 14 November 2007 (EST)

imported>MiamiVolts: Re: Hmm and Power names help

2007-11-14T19:16:35Z

Re: Hmm and Power names help

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:16, 14 November 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	--[[User:MishBaker\|Mish]] 19:32, 8 November 2007 (EST)		--[[User:MishBaker\|Mish]] 19:32, 8 November 2007 (EST)
	** Here's another: welcome aboard, fellow Texan!--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 22:43, 8 November 2007 (EST)		** Here's another: welcome aboard, fellow Texan!--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 22:43, 8 November 2007 (EST)
	**I appreciate it. Look forward to hangin out with ya'll.--[[User:MishBaker\|Mish]] 08:52, 9 November 2007 (EST)		** I appreciate it. Look forward to hangin out with ya'll.--[[User:MishBaker\|Mish]] 08:52, 9 November 2007 (EST)

	== Hmmm... ==		== Hmmm... ==
Line 11:		Line 11:
	**I take it this is pure speculation based on the paintings?--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 14:45, 9 November 2007 (EST)		**I take it this is pure speculation based on the paintings?--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 14:45, 9 November 2007 (EST)
	**Pretty much. Although with her trapped in the "possible future" Peter will have to try a rescue (or get Hiro to do so). It would be uncharacteristic for one of them not to try. It was just my theorizing that this will have to happen before the possible future she is in becomes an "impossible future", effectively killing her....kinda.--[[User:MishBaker\|Mish]] 16:28, 9 November 2007 (EST)		**Pretty much. Although with her trapped in the "possible future" Peter will have to try a rescue (or get Hiro to do so). It would be uncharacteristic for one of them not to try. It was just my theorizing that this will have to happen before the possible future she is in becomes an "impossible future", effectively killing her....kinda.--[[User:MishBaker\|Mish]] 16:28, 9 November 2007 (EST)
			*** So you think Peter will try to save Caitlin? Let's assume that if the future with "the virus" is an alternate universe, which if it stopped existing, so would Caitlin (something I don't agree with)... Peter could send Hiro to rescue his gf from the future. That could make for some good storytelling.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 14:16, 14 November 2007 (EST)

			== Re: Power names help ==
			I saw that you were storing Dave's power names help on your user page. You should know that it's also in [[Help:Naming conventions]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 14:16, 14 November 2007 (EST)

imported>MishBaker at 21:28, 9 November 2007

2007-11-09T21:28:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:28, 9 November 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:
	*''This will of course happen after Mohinder shoots H.R.G. and when he returns things play out a bit differently...''		*''This will of course happen after Mohinder shoots H.R.G. and when he returns things play out a bit differently...''
	**I take it this is pure speculation based on the paintings?--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 14:45, 9 November 2007 (EST)		**I take it this is pure speculation based on the paintings?--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 14:45, 9 November 2007 (EST)
			**Pretty much. Although with her trapped in the "possible future" Peter will have to try a rescue (or get Hiro to do so). It would be uncharacteristic for one of them not to try. It was just my theorizing that this will have to happen before the possible future she is in becomes an "impossible future", effectively killing her....kinda.--[[User:MishBaker\|Mish]] 16:28, 9 November 2007 (EST)