User talk:PJDEP/Peter's Stupidity - Revision history

imported>Yoshi n1: /* In the family */

2010-03-07T13:22:54Z

In the family

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:22, 7 March 2010
(No difference)

imported>Yoshi n1: /* In the family */

2010-03-07T13:22:54Z

In the family

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:22, 7 March 2010
Line 50:		Line 50:
	** That may also explain Peter's original stupidity, there are sure to be some genetic defects if he's his own father.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] 17:03, 20 December 2009 (EST)		** That may also explain Peter's original stupidity, there are sure to be some genetic defects if he's his own father.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] 17:03, 20 December 2009 (EST)
	* I'm a little confused, wasn't Rene blocking Arthur's powers the whole time? I think he even said that it was either Arthur or Sylar, and he chose to use his ability on Arthur. So how was it stupid of Arthur. Was he supposed to know magically rene no longer blocked his powers? And furthermore, who says Arthur wasn't trying. He doesn't need to look like he's got constipation or something to actually be trying. Or did I miss something and Rene was unconscious. It has been awhile since I saw that episode.--[[User:Dman dustin\|Dman dustin]] 05:02, 7 March 2010 (EST)		* I'm a little confused, wasn't Rene blocking Arthur's powers the whole time? I think he even said that it was either Arthur or Sylar, and he chose to use his ability on Arthur. So how was it stupid of Arthur. Was he supposed to know magically rene no longer blocked his powers? And furthermore, who says Arthur wasn't trying. He doesn't need to look like he's got constipation or something to actually be trying. Or did I miss something and Rene was unconscious. It has been awhile since I saw that episode.--[[User:Dman dustin\|Dman dustin]] 05:02, 7 March 2010 (EST)
			** Rene lost his control over Arthur, Arthur immediately used TK on Peter causing a small slash on his face, but then there was Sylar with his TK :)--{{User:Yoshi n1/sig1}} 08:22, 7 March 2010 (EST)

	== NOTE: Peter's Stupidity is a fan creation, and should not be considered canon. ==		== NOTE: Peter's Stupidity is a fan creation, and should not be considered canon. ==

imported>Dman dustin: /* In the family */

2010-03-07T10:02:01Z

In the family

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:02, 7 March 2010
Line 49:		Line 49:
	* Counter theory: Peter will go back in time and become his own biological father a la Philip J. Fry :))) explains his stupidity, actully. {{User:Altes/Signature}} 05:44, 20 December 2009 (EST)		* Counter theory: Peter will go back in time and become his own biological father a la Philip J. Fry :))) explains his stupidity, actully. {{User:Altes/Signature}} 05:44, 20 December 2009 (EST)
	** That may also explain Peter's original stupidity, there are sure to be some genetic defects if he's his own father.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] 17:03, 20 December 2009 (EST)		** That may also explain Peter's original stupidity, there are sure to be some genetic defects if he's his own father.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] 17:03, 20 December 2009 (EST)
			* I'm a little confused, wasn't Rene blocking Arthur's powers the whole time? I think he even said that it was either Arthur or Sylar, and he chose to use his ability on Arthur. So how was it stupid of Arthur. Was he supposed to know magically rene no longer blocked his powers? And furthermore, who says Arthur wasn't trying. He doesn't need to look like he's got constipation or something to actually be trying. Or did I miss something and Rene was unconscious. It has been awhile since I saw that episode.--[[User:Dman dustin\|Dman dustin]] 05:02, 7 March 2010 (EST)

	== NOTE: Peter's Stupidity is a fan creation, and should not be considered canon. ==		== NOTE: Peter's Stupidity is a fan creation, and should not be considered canon. ==

imported>Dance4thedead: /* The Art of Deception */

2010-02-19T02:51:01Z

The Art of Deception

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:51, 19 February 2010
Line 77:		Line 77:
	*I think so.--{{User:Yoshi n1/sig1}} 16:05, 14 February 2010 (EST)		*I think so.--{{User:Yoshi n1/sig1}} 16:05, 14 February 2010 (EST)
	**On that same note, it was pretty stupid when Peter put his head next to a shaking wall with a crazed and powerful telekinetic stuck behind it... --[[User:Skullman1392\|Skullman1392]] 16:13, 14 February 2010 (EST)		**On that same note, it was pretty stupid when Peter put his head next to a shaking wall with a crazed and powerful telekinetic stuck behind it... --[[User:Skullman1392\|Skullman1392]] 16:13, 14 February 2010 (EST)
			***I think you should note just rescueing Sylar was stupid on his part. Well, that and bringing him out of the vegtable state that he was in. Here is my stupid count for this episode and the ones slightly before and after it: Calling Emma= stupid. Trusting his mother= very stupid. Trusting Matt Parkman (after what he did with Nathan)= just dumb. Trusting Sylar not to make a cadaver out of Emma= I'm not even gonna go there. If Peter's so big and powerful enough to face of Samuel with his new wimpy ability, why couldn't he rescue his girlfriend himself? Not to mention that he so easily forgot that his girlfriends past have been shot as a result of him or lost in time forever. He just doesn't know when to quit, does he?--[[User:Dance4thedead\|Dance4thedead]] 21:51, 18 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Skullman1392: /* The Art of Deception */

2010-02-14T21:13:55Z

The Art of Deception

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:13, 14 February 2010
Line 76:		Line 76:
	Would Peter going in Sylar's head, despite Matt's warnings, qualify for this page? Granted, he had to get Sylar out somehow, but he didn't even TRY and speak to Matt first. You could put something along the lines of "Peter ignores Matt's warnings, and goes into Sylar's mind to retrieve him. He ends up getting stuck with Sylar instead" --[[User:Theocracy\|Theocracy]] 15:53, 14 February 2010 (EST)		Would Peter going in Sylar's head, despite Matt's warnings, qualify for this page? Granted, he had to get Sylar out somehow, but he didn't even TRY and speak to Matt first. You could put something along the lines of "Peter ignores Matt's warnings, and goes into Sylar's mind to retrieve him. He ends up getting stuck with Sylar instead" --[[User:Theocracy\|Theocracy]] 15:53, 14 February 2010 (EST)
	*I think so.--{{User:Yoshi n1/sig1}} 16:05, 14 February 2010 (EST)		*I think so.--{{User:Yoshi n1/sig1}} 16:05, 14 February 2010 (EST)
			**On that same note, it was pretty stupid when Peter put his head next to a shaking wall with a crazed and powerful telekinetic stuck behind it... --[[User:Skullman1392\|Skullman1392]] 16:13, 14 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Yoshi n1: /* The Art of Deception */

2010-02-14T21:05:11Z

The Art of Deception

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:05, 14 February 2010
Line 75:		Line 75:

	Would Peter going in Sylar's head, despite Matt's warnings, qualify for this page? Granted, he had to get Sylar out somehow, but he didn't even TRY and speak to Matt first. You could put something along the lines of "Peter ignores Matt's warnings, and goes into Sylar's mind to retrieve him. He ends up getting stuck with Sylar instead" --[[User:Theocracy\|Theocracy]] 15:53, 14 February 2010 (EST)		Would Peter going in Sylar's head, despite Matt's warnings, qualify for this page? Granted, he had to get Sylar out somehow, but he didn't even TRY and speak to Matt first. You could put something along the lines of "Peter ignores Matt's warnings, and goes into Sylar's mind to retrieve him. He ends up getting stuck with Sylar instead" --[[User:Theocracy\|Theocracy]] 15:53, 14 February 2010 (EST)
			*I think so.--{{User:Yoshi n1/sig1}} 16:05, 14 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Theocracy: /* The Art of Deception */ new section

2010-02-14T20:53:31Z

The Art of Deception: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:53, 14 February 2010
Line 71:		Line 71:
	Peter was really smart in a Brave New World!--{{User:Yoshi n1/sig1}} 17:59, 9 February 2010 (EST)		Peter was really smart in a Brave New World!--{{User:Yoshi n1/sig1}} 17:59, 9 February 2010 (EST)
	*With a limited power like ability replication, the writers don't have to make him so stupid in order to avoid plot holes. Good for the show, bad for this page :(--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 19:15, 9 February 2010 (EST)		*With a limited power like ability replication, the writers don't have to make him so stupid in order to avoid plot holes. Good for the show, bad for this page :(--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 19:15, 9 February 2010 (EST)

			== The Art of Deception ==

			Would Peter going in Sylar's head, despite Matt's warnings, qualify for this page? Granted, he had to get Sylar out somehow, but he didn't even TRY and speak to Matt first. You could put something along the lines of "Peter ignores Matt's warnings, and goes into Sylar's mind to retrieve him. He ends up getting stuck with Sylar instead" --[[User:Theocracy\|Theocracy]] 15:53, 14 February 2010 (EST)

imported>PJDEP: /* Brave New World */

2010-02-10T00:15:49Z

Brave New World

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:15, 10 February 2010
Line 70:		Line 70:

	Peter was really smart in a Brave New World!--{{User:Yoshi n1/sig1}} 17:59, 9 February 2010 (EST)		Peter was really smart in a Brave New World!--{{User:Yoshi n1/sig1}} 17:59, 9 February 2010 (EST)
			*With a limited power like ability replication, the writers don't have to make him so stupid in order to avoid plot holes. Good for the show, bad for this page :(--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 19:15, 9 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Yoshi n1: /* Brave New World */ new section

2010-02-09T22:59:50Z

Brave New World: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:59, 9 February 2010
Line 66:		Line 66:
	***OMG! did he really say that :P?--{{User:Yoshi n1/sig1}} 15:51, 15 January 2010 (EST)		***OMG! did he really say that :P?--{{User:Yoshi n1/sig1}} 15:51, 15 January 2010 (EST)
	**** How about when he just waltzed in and smashed her prized possession that was shown to give her joy? I mean, you'd think he'd have learned about self-fulfilling prophecies before, and someone who can just hand someone a cello for free can likely do that more than once. So not only did Peter ''not'' save anyone, but he also probably doomed them all. --[[User:DigitalCount\|DigitalCount]] 14:36, 25 January 2010 (EST)		**** How about when he just waltzed in and smashed her prized possession that was shown to give her joy? I mean, you'd think he'd have learned about self-fulfilling prophecies before, and someone who can just hand someone a cello for free can likely do that more than once. So not only did Peter ''not'' save anyone, but he also probably doomed them all. --[[User:DigitalCount\|DigitalCount]] 14:36, 25 January 2010 (EST)

			== Brave New World ==

			Peter was really smart in a Brave New World!--{{User:Yoshi n1/sig1}} 17:59, 9 February 2010 (EST)

imported>DigitalCount at 19:36, 25 January 2010

2010-01-25T19:36:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:36, 25 January 2010
Line 65:		Line 65:
	**I made note of it, but if anyone can think of a funny line feel free to change it.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 15:18, 15 January 2010 (EST)		**I made note of it, but if anyone can think of a funny line feel free to change it.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 15:18, 15 January 2010 (EST)
	***OMG! did he really say that :P?--{{User:Yoshi n1/sig1}} 15:51, 15 January 2010 (EST)		***OMG! did he really say that :P?--{{User:Yoshi n1/sig1}} 15:51, 15 January 2010 (EST)
	**** How about when he just waltzed in and smashed her prized possession that was shown to give her joy? I mean, you'd think he'd have learned about self-fulfilling prophecies before, and someone who can just hand someone a cello for free can likely do that more than once. So not only did Peter ''not'' save anyone, but he also probably doomed them all.		**** How about when he just waltzed in and smashed her prized possession that was shown to give her joy? I mean, you'd think he'd have learned about self-fulfilling prophecies before, and someone who can just hand someone a cello for free can likely do that more than once. So not only did Peter ''not'' save anyone, but he also probably doomed them all. --[[User:DigitalCount\|DigitalCount]] 14:36, 25 January 2010 (EST)