User talk:Piemanmoo - Revision history

imported>Radicell: /* Image */ new section

2010-05-23T03:16:18Z

Image: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:16, 23 May 2010
(No difference)

imported>Radicell: /* Image */ new section

2010-05-23T03:16:18Z

Image: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:16, 23 May 2010
Line 192:		Line 192:

	Hi. Sorry to bother you, but the issue of whether or not to split the enhanced strength page has re-emerged with overwhelming force in favor of splitting it. Ryan has said that in order to split it, we need to contact those who objected and are still active, and see if their opinion has changed and/or if it ok with you to go ahead and split it. As you are one of the three people he specified contacting, I figured I would do so. I will refrain from presenting arguments here, but the current consensus check is [[Talk:Enhanced_strength#Poll\|here]]. Thanks very much for weighing in on this. --[[User:Stevehim\|Stevehim]] 23:46, 11 February 2010 (EST)		Hi. Sorry to bother you, but the issue of whether or not to split the enhanced strength page has re-emerged with overwhelming force in favor of splitting it. Ryan has said that in order to split it, we need to contact those who objected and are still active, and see if their opinion has changed and/or if it ok with you to go ahead and split it. As you are one of the three people he specified contacting, I figured I would do so. I will refrain from presenting arguments here, but the current consensus check is [[Talk:Enhanced_strength#Poll\|here]]. Thanks very much for weighing in on this. --[[User:Stevehim\|Stevehim]] 23:46, 11 February 2010 (EST)

			== Image ==

			Hey, {{PAGENAME}}. Please add a source to the following {{#if:{{{image2\|}}}\|images\|image}}: [[:Image:Immovability.jpg\|Immovability.jpg]]{{#if:{{{image2\|}}}\|, [[:Image:{{{image2\|}}}{{pipe}}{{{image2\|}}}]]{{#if:{{{image3\|}}}\|, [[:Image:{{{image3\|}}}{{pipe}}{{{image3\|}}}]]{{#if:{{{image4\|}}}\|, [[:Image:{{{image4\|}}}{{pipe}}{{{image4\|}}}]]{{#if:{{{image5\|}}}\|, [[:Image:{{{image5\|}}}{{pipe}}{{{image5\|}}}]]\|}}\|}}\|}}\|}}. All you have to do is go to the image page, click "Edit" at the top, and add a link to the website where you got the image from. {{#if:{{{self\|}}}\|If you created the image yourself, you may simply add "Made by [[User:{{PAGENAME}}]]". \|}} {{#if:t\|After sourcing the image, you may remove the <code><nowiki>{{afd}}</nowiki></code> tag. \|}} If you do not source the image, it will be deleted. Thanks. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 23:16, 22 May 2010 (EDT)

imported>Stevehim: /* Enhanced vs Super strength */ new section

2010-02-12T04:46:48Z

Enhanced vs Super strength: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:46, 12 February 2010
Line 188:		Line 188:
	Hey, on [[Talk:Shattering]] you replaced the previous *****'s you put with the word clusterfuck. Can you please not swear on any of the pages, we try to keep this a family-friendly wiki, thanks. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 06:43, 3 February 2010 (EST)		Hey, on [[Talk:Shattering]] you replaced the previous *****'s you put with the word clusterfuck. Can you please not swear on any of the pages, we try to keep this a family-friendly wiki, thanks. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 06:43, 3 February 2010 (EST)
	*Oh shit, my bad. --[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 21:50, 3 February 2010 (EST)		*Oh shit, my bad. --[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 21:50, 3 February 2010 (EST)

			== Enhanced vs Super strength ==

			Hi. Sorry to bother you, but the issue of whether or not to split the enhanced strength page has re-emerged with overwhelming force in favor of splitting it. Ryan has said that in order to split it, we need to contact those who objected and are still active, and see if their opinion has changed and/or if it ok with you to go ahead and split it. As you are one of the three people he specified contacting, I figured I would do so. I will refrain from presenting arguments here, but the current consensus check is [[Talk:Enhanced_strength#Poll\|here]]. Thanks very much for weighing in on this. --[[User:Stevehim\|Stevehim]] 23:46, 11 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Piemanmoo: /* Swearing */

2010-02-04T02:50:22Z

Swearing

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:50, 4 February 2010
Line 187:		Line 187:
	==Swearing==		==Swearing==
	Hey, on [[Talk:Shattering]] you replaced the previous *****'s you put with the word clusterfuck. Can you please not swear on any of the pages, we try to keep this a family-friendly wiki, thanks. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 06:43, 3 February 2010 (EST)		Hey, on [[Talk:Shattering]] you replaced the previous *****'s you put with the word clusterfuck. Can you please not swear on any of the pages, we try to keep this a family-friendly wiki, thanks. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 06:43, 3 February 2010 (EST)
			*Oh shit, my bad. --[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 21:50, 3 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Mc hammark: /* Deleted Comment on Talk:Shattering */

2010-02-03T11:43:48Z

Deleted Comment on Talk:Shattering

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:43, 3 February 2010
Line 184:		Line 184:
	Oops, sorry about that. Didn't notice I had deleted your comment.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:53, 2 February 2010 (EST)		Oops, sorry about that. Didn't notice I had deleted your comment.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:53, 2 February 2010 (EST)
	*No worries, I myself made the same mistake in correcting that one. How ironicaly embarrasing--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 20:55, 2 February 2010 (EST)		*No worries, I myself made the same mistake in correcting that one. How ironicaly embarrasing--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 20:55, 2 February 2010 (EST)

			==Swearing==
			Hey, on [[Talk:Shattering]] you replaced the previous *****'s you put with the word clusterfuck. Can you please not swear on any of the pages, we try to keep this a family-friendly wiki, thanks. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 06:43, 3 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Piemanmoo at 01:55, 3 February 2010

2010-02-03T01:55:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:55, 3 February 2010
Line 183:		Line 183:
	== Deleted Comment on Talk:Shattering ==		== Deleted Comment on Talk:Shattering ==
	Oops, sorry about that. Didn't notice I had deleted your comment.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:53, 2 February 2010 (EST)		Oops, sorry about that. Didn't notice I had deleted your comment.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:53, 2 February 2010 (EST)
			*No worries, I myself made the same mistake in correcting that one. How ironicaly embarrasing--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 20:55, 2 February 2010 (EST)

imported>MiamiVolts at 01:53, 3 February 2010

2010-02-03T01:53:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:53, 3 February 2010
Line 180:		Line 180:
	Jumping is still related to strength, and it wasn't said anywhere Mohinder's power isn't the official ES. Patience, my friend. {{User:Altes/Signature}}		Jumping is still related to strength, and it wasn't said anywhere Mohinder's power isn't the official ES. Patience, my friend. {{User:Altes/Signature}}
	*I'm not your friend, buddy. --[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 15:44, 22 September 2009 (EDT)		*I'm not your friend, buddy. --[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 15:44, 22 September 2009 (EDT)

			== Deleted Comment on Talk:Shattering ==
			Oops, sorry about that. Didn't notice I had deleted your comment.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:53, 2 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Radicell: deleted image

2010-01-16T13:26:30Z

deleted image

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:26, 16 January 2010
Line 141:		Line 141:
	== Uncredited image ==		== Uncredited image ==

	Hey there, PMM. When you get a second, could you add the source for where you got ~~[[:~~Image:Caroline.JPG]]? Thanks! -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:01, 4 April 2009 (EDT)		Hey there, PMM. When you get a second, could you add the source for where you got Image:Caroline.JPG? Thanks! -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:01, 4 April 2009 (EDT)
	*D'oh! I had a feeling I forgot something.--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 18:03, 4 April 2009 (EDT)		*D'oh! I had a feeling I forgot something.--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 18:03, 4 April 2009 (EDT)
	** Thanks, you rock! -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 19:53, 4 April 2009 (EDT)		** Thanks, you rock! -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 19:53, 4 April 2009 (EDT)

imported>Piemanmoo at 19:44, 22 September 2009

2009-09-22T19:44:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:44, 22 September 2009
Line 179:		Line 179:
	== Mohinder's ability ==		== Mohinder's ability ==
	Jumping is still related to strength, and it wasn't said anywhere Mohinder's power isn't the official ES. Patience, my friend. {{User:Altes/Signature}}		Jumping is still related to strength, and it wasn't said anywhere Mohinder's power isn't the official ES. Patience, my friend. {{User:Altes/Signature}}
			*I'm not your friend, buddy. --[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 15:44, 22 September 2009 (EDT)

imported>Altes: /* Awesome job */

2009-09-22T18:03:28Z

Awesome job

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:03, 22 September 2009
Line 176:		Line 176:

	...on those AT images for Cockney Heroes. Thanks for your work, if you ever find yourself bored, [[User:Cockney Heroes/Links/AT Diagram Images\|check out some of the empty ones here]]. :) --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 23:47, 2 July 2009 (EDT)		...on those AT images for Cockney Heroes. Thanks for your work, if you ever find yourself bored, [[User:Cockney Heroes/Links/AT Diagram Images\|check out some of the empty ones here]]. :) --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 23:47, 2 July 2009 (EDT)

			== Mohinder's ability ==
			Jumping is still related to strength, and it wasn't said anywhere Mohinder's power isn't the official ES. Patience, my friend. {{User:Altes/Signature}}