User talk:Riddler/Ability byproducts - Revision history

imported>Altes: /* Hmm */ new section

2009-12-30T11:15:23Z

Hmm: new section

← Older revision	Revision as of 11:15, 30 December 2009
(No difference)

imported>Altes: /* Hmm */ new section

2009-12-30T11:15:23Z

Hmm: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:15, 30 December 2009
Line 31:		Line 31:
	Or am I missing something? If we did away with them, delete this page. :D--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 11:53, 30 March 2009 (EDT)		Or am I missing something? If we did away with them, delete this page. :D--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 11:53, 30 March 2009 (EDT)
	*Almost a month later...--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 03:57, 23 April 2009 (EDT)		*Almost a month later...--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 03:57, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

			== Hmm ==

			I didn't know there already was such a page, so I've made [[User:Altes/Abilities with multiple effects\|one]] on my own. Should we merge them? Because I created mine for the same reason you did, Riddler. {{User:Altes/Signature}} 06:15, 30 December 2009 (EST)

imported>Riddler: /* We got rid of byproducts? */

2009-04-23T07:57:37Z

We got rid of byproducts?

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:57, 23 April 2009
Line 30:		Line 30:

	Or am I missing something? If we did away with them, delete this page. :D--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 11:53, 30 March 2009 (EDT)		Or am I missing something? If we did away with them, delete this page. :D--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 11:53, 30 March 2009 (EDT)
			*Almost a month later...--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 03:57, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

imported>Riddler: /* We got rid of byproducts? */ new section

2009-03-30T15:53:00Z

We got rid of byproducts?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:53, 30 March 2009
Line 26:		Line 26:
	** So, now what? I've added another possibility, and I really think we need to find a standard. Anyone? Also, I'm about to add the absorbing abilities.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:16, 24 December 2008 (EST)		** So, now what? I've added another possibility, and I really think we need to find a standard. Anyone? Also, I'm about to add the absorbing abilities.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:16, 24 December 2008 (EST)
	*** Cough Cough. Opinions? --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:01, 25 December 2008 (EST)		*** Cough Cough. Opinions? --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:01, 25 December 2008 (EST)

			== We got rid of byproducts? ==

			Or am I missing something? If we did away with them, delete this page. :D--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 11:53, 30 March 2009 (EDT)

imported>Riddler: *** Cough Cough. Opinions? --~~~~

2008-12-26T02:01:35Z

*** Cough Cough. Opinions? --~~~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:01, 26 December 2008
Line 16:		Line 16:
	* Anybody? Section below needs comments as well.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 18:24, 11 December 2008 (EST)		* Anybody? Section below needs comments as well.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 18:24, 11 December 2008 (EST)
	** I'm not opposed to your suggestion, Riddler. Also, depending on the results of Ryan's new interview, we might be putting the ''Destiny'' examples of byproducts in their own section.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 18:51, 11 December 2008 (EST)		** I'm not opposed to your suggestion, Riddler. Also, depending on the results of Ryan's new interview, we might be putting the ''Destiny'' examples of byproducts in their own section.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 18:51, 11 December 2008 (EST)
			*** Cough Cough. Opinions? --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:01, 25 December 2008 (EST)

	== Two other notes. ==		== Two other notes. ==
Line 24:		Line 25:
	* Time travel was the first aspect of his ability to emerge. I think we should go with that. If we need to call it "first aspect demonstrated" instead of "core aspect", I'm not opposed to doing so. I agree with you, Riddler, about the mimicries, and that new powers absorbed should mean new byproducts.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 19:06, 11 December 2008 (EST)		* Time travel was the first aspect of his ability to emerge. I think we should go with that. If we need to call it "first aspect demonstrated" instead of "core aspect", I'm not opposed to doing so. I agree with you, Riddler, about the mimicries, and that new powers absorbed should mean new byproducts.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 19:06, 11 December 2008 (EST)
	** So, now what? I've added another possibility, and I really think we need to find a standard. Anyone? Also, I'm about to add the absorbing abilities.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:16, 24 December 2008 (EST)		** So, now what? I've added another possibility, and I really think we need to find a standard. Anyone? Also, I'm about to add the absorbing abilities.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:16, 24 December 2008 (EST)
			*** Cough Cough. Opinions? --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:01, 25 December 2008 (EST)

imported>Riddler: /* Two other notes. */

2008-12-25T02:16:34Z

Two other notes.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:16, 25 December 2008
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Also, should the mimicries be listed here, or noted? IA, EM, PA, and AA, are all core abilities, and once they absorb a power, they have a new byproduct, no?--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 12:58, 10 December 2008 (EST)		Also, should the mimicries be listed here, or noted? IA, EM, PA, and AA, are all core abilities, and once they absorb a power, they have a new byproduct, no?--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 12:58, 10 December 2008 (EST)
	* Time travel was the first aspect of his ability to emerge. I think we should go with that. If we need to call it "first aspect demonstrated" instead of "core aspect", I'm not opposed to doing so. I agree with you, Riddler, about the mimicries, and that new powers absorbed should mean new byproducts.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 19:06, 11 December 2008 (EST)		* Time travel was the first aspect of his ability to emerge. I think we should go with that. If we need to call it "first aspect demonstrated" instead of "core aspect", I'm not opposed to doing so. I agree with you, Riddler, about the mimicries, and that new powers absorbed should mean new byproducts.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 19:06, 11 December 2008 (EST)
			** So, now what? I've added another possibility, and I really think we need to find a standard. Anyone? Also, I'm about to add the absorbing abilities.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:16, 24 December 2008 (EST)

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Two other notes. */

2008-12-12T00:07:10Z

Two other notes.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:07, 12 December 2008
Line 22:		Line 22:

	Also, should the mimicries be listed here, or noted? IA, EM, PA, and AA, are all core abilities, and once they absorb a power, they have a new byproduct, no?--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 12:58, 10 December 2008 (EST)		Also, should the mimicries be listed here, or noted? IA, EM, PA, and AA, are all core abilities, and once they absorb a power, they have a new byproduct, no?--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 12:58, 10 December 2008 (EST)
	* Time travel was the first aspect of his ability to emerge. I think we should go with that. If we need to call it "first aspect demonstrated" instead of "core aspect", I'm not opposed to doing so. I agree with you, Riddler, about the mimicries, and that new powers absorbed should mean a new ~~byproduct~~.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 19:06, 11 December 2008 (EST)		* Time travel was the first aspect of his ability to emerge. I think we should go with that. If we need to call it "first aspect demonstrated" instead of "core aspect", I'm not opposed to doing so. I agree with you, Riddler, about the mimicries, and that new powers absorbed should mean new byproducts.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 19:06, 11 December 2008 (EST)

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Two other notes. */ reply

2008-12-12T00:06:40Z

Two other notes.: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:06, 12 December 2008
Line 22:		Line 22:

	Also, should the mimicries be listed here, or noted? IA, EM, PA, and AA, are all core abilities, and once they absorb a power, they have a new byproduct, no?--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 12:58, 10 December 2008 (EST)		Also, should the mimicries be listed here, or noted? IA, EM, PA, and AA, are all core abilities, and once they absorb a power, they have a new byproduct, no?--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 12:58, 10 December 2008 (EST)
			* Time travel was the first aspect of his ability to emerge. I think we should go with that. If we need to call it "first aspect demonstrated" instead of "core aspect", I'm not opposed to doing so. I agree with you, Riddler, about the mimicries, and that new powers absorbed should mean a new byproduct.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 19:06, 11 December 2008 (EST)

imported>MiamiVolts: /* What classifies a byproduct? */ reply

2008-12-11T23:51:56Z

What classifies a byproduct?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:51, 11 December 2008
Line 15:		Line 15:
	I think if this page is to exist, we need to decide what makes a byproduct. I suggest only listing abilities that include other known and named abilities. [[Plant manipulation]] has [[Regeneration]], for example, and we know Regeneration to be an ability. Telepathy has [[Illusion]], which we know to be a standalone ability as well. If we go by this, we don't need to assume which abilities are core abilities, and we don't have to go crazy with this page.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 12:56, 10 December 2008 (EST)		I think if this page is to exist, we need to decide what makes a byproduct. I suggest only listing abilities that include other known and named abilities. [[Plant manipulation]] has [[Regeneration]], for example, and we know Regeneration to be an ability. Telepathy has [[Illusion]], which we know to be a standalone ability as well. If we go by this, we don't need to assume which abilities are core abilities, and we don't have to go crazy with this page.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 12:56, 10 December 2008 (EST)
	* Anybody? Section below needs comments as well.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 18:24, 11 December 2008 (EST)		* Anybody? Section below needs comments as well.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 18:24, 11 December 2008 (EST)
			** I'm not opposed to your suggestion, Riddler. Also, depending on the results of Ryan's new interview, we might be putting the ''Destiny'' examples of byproducts in their own section.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 18:51, 11 December 2008 (EST)

	== Two other notes. ==		== Two other notes. ==

imported>Riddler: Anybody??

2008-12-11T23:24:35Z

Anybody??

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:24, 11 December 2008
Line 14:		Line 14:

	I think if this page is to exist, we need to decide what makes a byproduct. I suggest only listing abilities that include other known and named abilities. [[Plant manipulation]] has [[Regeneration]], for example, and we know Regeneration to be an ability. Telepathy has [[Illusion]], which we know to be a standalone ability as well. If we go by this, we don't need to assume which abilities are core abilities, and we don't have to go crazy with this page.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 12:56, 10 December 2008 (EST)		I think if this page is to exist, we need to decide what makes a byproduct. I suggest only listing abilities that include other known and named abilities. [[Plant manipulation]] has [[Regeneration]], for example, and we know Regeneration to be an ability. Telepathy has [[Illusion]], which we know to be a standalone ability as well. If we go by this, we don't need to assume which abilities are core abilities, and we don't have to go crazy with this page.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 12:56, 10 December 2008 (EST)
			* Anybody? Section below needs comments as well.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 18:24, 11 December 2008 (EST)

	== Two other notes. ==		== Two other notes. ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:01, 26 December 2008
Line 16:		Line 16:
	* Anybody? Section below needs comments as well.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 18:24, 11 December 2008 (EST)		* Anybody? Section below needs comments as well.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 18:24, 11 December 2008 (EST)
	** I'm not opposed to your suggestion, Riddler. Also, depending on the results of Ryan's new interview, we might be putting the ''Destiny'' examples of byproducts in their own section.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 18:51, 11 December 2008 (EST)		** I'm not opposed to your suggestion, Riddler. Also, depending on the results of Ryan's new interview, we might be putting the ''Destiny'' examples of byproducts in their own section.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 18:51, 11 December 2008 (EST)
			*** Cough Cough. Opinions? --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:01, 25 December 2008 (EST)

	== Two other notes. ==		== Two other notes. ==
Line 24:		Line 25:
	* Time travel was the first aspect of his ability to emerge. I think we should go with that. If we need to call it "first aspect demonstrated" instead of "core aspect", I'm not opposed to doing so. I agree with you, Riddler, about the mimicries, and that new powers absorbed should mean new byproducts.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 19:06, 11 December 2008 (EST)		* Time travel was the first aspect of his ability to emerge. I think we should go with that. If we need to call it "first aspect demonstrated" instead of "core aspect", I'm not opposed to doing so. I agree with you, Riddler, about the mimicries, and that new powers absorbed should mean new byproducts.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 19:06, 11 December 2008 (EST)
	** So, now what? I've added another possibility, and I really think we need to find a standard. Anyone? Also, I'm about to add the absorbing abilities.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:16, 24 December 2008 (EST)		** So, now what? I've added another possibility, and I really think we need to find a standard. Anyone? Also, I'm about to add the absorbing abilities.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:16, 24 December 2008 (EST)
			*** Cough Cough. Opinions? --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:01, 25 December 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:16, 25 December 2008
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Also, should the mimicries be listed here, or noted? IA, EM, PA, and AA, are all core abilities, and once they absorb a power, they have a new byproduct, no?--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 12:58, 10 December 2008 (EST)		Also, should the mimicries be listed here, or noted? IA, EM, PA, and AA, are all core abilities, and once they absorb a power, they have a new byproduct, no?--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 12:58, 10 December 2008 (EST)
	* Time travel was the first aspect of his ability to emerge. I think we should go with that. If we need to call it "first aspect demonstrated" instead of "core aspect", I'm not opposed to doing so. I agree with you, Riddler, about the mimicries, and that new powers absorbed should mean new byproducts.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 19:06, 11 December 2008 (EST)		* Time travel was the first aspect of his ability to emerge. I think we should go with that. If we need to call it "first aspect demonstrated" instead of "core aspect", I'm not opposed to doing so. I agree with you, Riddler, about the mimicries, and that new powers absorbed should mean new byproducts.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 19:06, 11 December 2008 (EST)
			** So, now what? I've added another possibility, and I really think we need to find a standard. Anyone? Also, I'm about to add the absorbing abilities.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 21:16, 24 December 2008 (EST)