User talk:SacValleyDweller/Abilities and the Classical Elements - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: red link

2007-12-10T01:36:39Z

red link

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:36, 10 December 2007
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: red link

2007-12-10T01:36:39Z

red link

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:36, 10 December 2007
Line 19:		Line 19:
	Since you're looking for a short name for the subpage, might I suggest "Abilities by classic element"? The "and" in the name implies that the abilities and the elements are separate. And, the name would be shorter. What do you think?--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 15:18, 7 December 2007 (EST)		Since you're looking for a short name for the subpage, might I suggest "Abilities by classic element"? The "and" in the name implies that the abilities and the elements are separate. And, the name would be shorter. What do you think?--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 15:18, 7 December 2007 (EST)
	* I think if we go with my suggestion, then the article names should be "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Classical Elements" and "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Mohinder's Categories". However, the links from the "[[Portal:Theories about Abilities]]" page could well be titled "Abilities by classical element" (classical sounds better, imho) and "Abilities by Mohinder's category".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:16, 7 December 2007 (EST)		* I think if we go with my suggestion, then the article names should be "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Classical Elements" and "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Mohinder's Categories". However, the links from the "[[Portal:Theories about Abilities]]" page could well be titled "Abilities by classical element" (classical sounds better, imho) and "Abilities by Mohinder's category".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:16, 7 December 2007 (EST)
	** I'm working on my suggestion now and have renamed my user page accordingly to [[User:MiamiVolts/Portal:Theories about Abilities/Mohinder's Categories]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:15, 8 December 2007 (EST)		** I'm working on my suggestion now and have renamed my user page accordingly to User:MiamiVolts/Portal:Theories about Abilities/Mohinder's Categories.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:15, 8 December 2007 (EST)
	*** Actually, I found out that the categories are technically Chandra's since they were there before Mohinder took over the site. Also, your page should use "Air" instead of "Wind" if you are using the Greek [[Wikipedia:Classical element#Classical elements in Greece\|four]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:46, 9 December 2007 (EST)		*** Actually, I found out that the categories are technically Chandra's since they were there before Mohinder took over the site. Also, your page should use "Air" instead of "Wind" if you are using the Greek [[Wikipedia:Classical element#Classical elements in Greece\|four]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:46, 9 December 2007 (EST)

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Name */

2007-12-09T05:46:42Z

Name

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:46, 9 December 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:
	* I think if we go with my suggestion, then the article names should be "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Classical Elements" and "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Mohinder's Categories". However, the links from the "[[Portal:Theories about Abilities]]" page could well be titled "Abilities by classical element" (classical sounds better, imho) and "Abilities by Mohinder's category".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:16, 7 December 2007 (EST)		* I think if we go with my suggestion, then the article names should be "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Classical Elements" and "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Mohinder's Categories". However, the links from the "[[Portal:Theories about Abilities]]" page could well be titled "Abilities by classical element" (classical sounds better, imho) and "Abilities by Mohinder's category".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:16, 7 December 2007 (EST)
	** I'm working on my suggestion now and have renamed my user page accordingly to [[User:MiamiVolts/Portal:Theories about Abilities/Mohinder's Categories]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:15, 8 December 2007 (EST)		** I'm working on my suggestion now and have renamed my user page accordingly to [[User:MiamiVolts/Portal:Theories about Abilities/Mohinder's Categories]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:15, 8 December 2007 (EST)
			*** Actually, I found out that the categories are technically Chandra's since they were there before Mohinder took over the site. Also, your page should use "Air" instead of "Wind" if you are using the Greek [[Wikipedia:Classical element#Classical elements in Greece\|four]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:46, 9 December 2007 (EST)

imported>MiamiVolts: Re: rename

2007-12-09T04:15:52Z

Re: rename

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:15, 9 December 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I'd put anything involving lightning under Wind too.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 23:00, 6 December 2007 (EST)		I'd put anything involving lightning under Wind too.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 23:00, 6 December 2007 (EST)
	* I thought that at first too. But it appears that the abilities are categorized differently. "Energy manipulation or generation" would go under "fire".--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 23:04, 6 December 2007 (EST)		* I thought that at first too. But it appears that the abilities are categorized differently. "Energy manipulation or generation" would go under "fire".--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 23:04, 6 December 2007 (EST)
	** Um, I've got a jump on you... Check out "[[User:MiamiVolts/Portal:Abilities]]". Though my categories are a bit different.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:14, 6 December 2007 (EST)		** Um, I've got a jump on you... Check out "User:MiamiVolts/Portal:Abilities". Though my categories are a bit different.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:14, 6 December 2007 (EST)
	*** Empathic Mimicry would go under all four, and Invisibility and Replication would go under Manipulations and/or Enhancements of One's Own Body.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 23:51, 6 December 2007 (EST)		*** Empathic Mimicry would go under all four, and Invisibility and Replication would go under Manipulations and/or Enhancements of One's Own Body.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 23:51, 6 December 2007 (EST)
	***I saw that. Interesting classifications...I like mine better because they kinda go with what [[Mohinder]] said about there being four power genes in [[parasite]]--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 01:32, 7 December 2007 (EST)		***I saw that. Interesting classifications...I like mine better because they kinda go with what [[Mohinder]] said about there being four power genes in [[parasite]]--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 01:32, 7 December 2007 (EST)
Line 19:		Line 19:
	Since you're looking for a short name for the subpage, might I suggest "Abilities by classic element"? The "and" in the name implies that the abilities and the elements are separate. And, the name would be shorter. What do you think?--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 15:18, 7 December 2007 (EST)		Since you're looking for a short name for the subpage, might I suggest "Abilities by classic element"? The "and" in the name implies that the abilities and the elements are separate. And, the name would be shorter. What do you think?--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 15:18, 7 December 2007 (EST)
	* I think if we go with my suggestion, then the article names should be "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Classical Elements" and "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Mohinder's Categories". However, the links from the "[[Portal:Theories about Abilities]]" page could well be titled "Abilities by classical element" (classical sounds better, imho) and "Abilities by Mohinder's category".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:16, 7 December 2007 (EST)		* I think if we go with my suggestion, then the article names should be "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Classical Elements" and "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Mohinder's Categories". However, the links from the "[[Portal:Theories about Abilities]]" page could well be titled "Abilities by classical element" (classical sounds better, imho) and "Abilities by Mohinder's category".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:16, 7 December 2007 (EST)
			** I'm working on my suggestion now and have renamed my user page accordingly to [[User:MiamiVolts/Portal:Theories about Abilities/Mohinder's Categories]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:15, 8 December 2007 (EST)

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Name */ Re: names and links

2007-12-07T21:16:35Z

Name: Re: names and links

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:16, 7 December 2007
Line 18:		Line 18:
	==Name==		==Name==
	Since you're looking for a short name for the subpage, might I suggest "Abilities by classic element"? The "and" in the name implies that the abilities and the elements are separate. And, the name would be shorter. What do you think?--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 15:18, 7 December 2007 (EST)		Since you're looking for a short name for the subpage, might I suggest "Abilities by classic element"? The "and" in the name implies that the abilities and the elements are separate. And, the name would be shorter. What do you think?--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 15:18, 7 December 2007 (EST)
			* I think if we go with my suggestion, then the article names should be "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Classical Elements" and "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Mohinder's Categories". However, the links from the "[[Portal:Theories about Abilities]]" page could well be titled "Abilities by classical element" (classical sounds better, imho) and "Abilities by Mohinder's category".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:16, 7 December 2007 (EST)

imported>Ice Vision at 20:18, 7 December 2007

2007-12-07T20:18:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:18, 7 December 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:
	==Links==		==Links==
	Is there a reason at least some of the repeated abilities are not linked? Can't they be marked in some other manner? (With a star, perhaps?)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 02:47, 7 December 2007 (EST)		Is there a reason at least some of the repeated abilities are not linked? Can't they be marked in some other manner? (With a star, perhaps?)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 02:47, 7 December 2007 (EST)

			==Name==
			Since you're looking for a short name for the subpage, might I suggest "Abilities by classic element"? The "and" in the name implies that the abilities and the elements are separate. And, the name would be shorter. What do you think?--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 15:18, 7 December 2007 (EST)

imported>MiamiVolts at 17:00, 7 December 2007

2007-12-07T17:00:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:00, 7 December 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	*** Well, you could add four entries into [[Theory:Abilities in general]] (one for each element), or one long entry, but would that defeat the point? An alternative is that we could provide three portal views for [[Portal:Abilities]], a single listing (no grouping), a classical elements listing, and a Activating Evolution listing. I realize that both are perhaps a bit subjective, but we could note that. What do you think?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 02:32, 7 December 2007 (EST)		*** Well, you could add four entries into [[Theory:Abilities in general]] (one for each element), or one long entry, but would that defeat the point? An alternative is that we could provide three portal views for [[Portal:Abilities]], a single listing (no grouping), a classical elements listing, and a Activating Evolution listing. I realize that both are perhaps a bit subjective, but we could note that. What do you think?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 02:32, 7 December 2007 (EST)
	**** Since it's kind of a standalone theory, I'd rather see it as its own page, sort of like [[theory:time travel]] or [[red]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 06:52, 7 December 2007 (EST)		**** Since it's kind of a standalone theory, I'd rather see it as its own page, sort of like [[theory:time travel]] or [[red]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 06:52, 7 December 2007 (EST)
	***** That's what I'm suggesting, but that the page be linked from one of the portals. Perhaps a new section can be added to [[Portal:Theories about Abilities]] for categorical sortings of the known abilities since they are theories.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 11:59, 7 December 2007 (EST)		***** That's what I'm suggesting, but that the page be linked from one of the portals. Perhaps a new section can be added to [[Portal:Theories about Abilities]] for links to new portal pages containing categorical sortings of the known abilities since they are theories.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 11:59, 7 December 2007 (EST)

	==Links==		==Links==

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Promote? */

2007-12-07T16:59:38Z

Promote?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:59, 7 December 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:
	** OOOOO, you're right! how bout a promote to there somewhere?--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 02:09, 7 December 2007 (EST)		** OOOOO, you're right! how bout a promote to there somewhere?--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 02:09, 7 December 2007 (EST)
	*** Well, you could add four entries into [[Theory:Abilities in general]] (one for each element), or one long entry, but would that defeat the point? An alternative is that we could provide three portal views for [[Portal:Abilities]], a single listing (no grouping), a classical elements listing, and a Activating Evolution listing. I realize that both are perhaps a bit subjective, but we could note that. What do you think?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 02:32, 7 December 2007 (EST)		*** Well, you could add four entries into [[Theory:Abilities in general]] (one for each element), or one long entry, but would that defeat the point? An alternative is that we could provide three portal views for [[Portal:Abilities]], a single listing (no grouping), a classical elements listing, and a Activating Evolution listing. I realize that both are perhaps a bit subjective, but we could note that. What do you think?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 02:32, 7 December 2007 (EST)
	****Since it's kind of a standalone theory, I'd rather see it as its own page, sort of like [[theory:time travel]] or [[red]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 06:52, 7 December 2007 (EST)		**** Since it's kind of a standalone theory, I'd rather see it as its own page, sort of like [[theory:time travel]] or [[red]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 06:52, 7 December 2007 (EST)
			***** That's what I'm suggesting, but that the page be linked from one of the portals. Perhaps a new section can be added to [[Portal:Theories about Abilities]] for categorical sortings of the known abilities since they are theories.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 11:59, 7 December 2007 (EST)

	==Links==		==Links==

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Promote? */

2007-12-07T11:52:05Z

Promote?

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:52, 7 December 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:
	** OOOOO, you're right! how bout a promote to there somewhere?--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 02:09, 7 December 2007 (EST)		** OOOOO, you're right! how bout a promote to there somewhere?--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 02:09, 7 December 2007 (EST)
	*** Well, you could add four entries into [[Theory:Abilities in general]] (one for each element), or one long entry, but would that defeat the point? An alternative is that we could provide three portal views for [[Portal:Abilities]], a single listing (no grouping), a classical elements listing, and a Activating Evolution listing. I realize that both are perhaps a bit subjective, but we could note that. What do you think?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 02:32, 7 December 2007 (EST)		*** Well, you could add four entries into [[Theory:Abilities in general]] (one for each element), or one long entry, but would that defeat the point? An alternative is that we could provide three portal views for [[Portal:Abilities]], a single listing (no grouping), a classical elements listing, and a Activating Evolution listing. I realize that both are perhaps a bit subjective, but we could note that. What do you think?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 02:32, 7 December 2007 (EST)
			****Since it's kind of a standalone theory, I'd rather see it as its own page, sort of like [[theory:time travel]] or [[red]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 06:52, 7 December 2007 (EST)

	==Links==		==Links==

imported>MiamiVolts: Links

2007-12-07T07:47:04Z

Links

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:47, 7 December 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:
	** OOOOO, you're right! how bout a promote to there somewhere?--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 02:09, 7 December 2007 (EST)		** OOOOO, you're right! how bout a promote to there somewhere?--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 02:09, 7 December 2007 (EST)
	*** Well, you could add four entries into [[Theory:Abilities in general]] (one for each element), or one long entry, but would that defeat the point? An alternative is that we could provide three portal views for [[Portal:Abilities]], a single listing (no grouping), a classical elements listing, and a Activating Evolution listing. I realize that both are perhaps a bit subjective, but we could note that. What do you think?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 02:32, 7 December 2007 (EST)		*** Well, you could add four entries into [[Theory:Abilities in general]] (one for each element), or one long entry, but would that defeat the point? An alternative is that we could provide three portal views for [[Portal:Abilities]], a single listing (no grouping), a classical elements listing, and a Activating Evolution listing. I realize that both are perhaps a bit subjective, but we could note that. What do you think?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 02:32, 7 December 2007 (EST)

			==Links==
			Is there a reason at least some of the repeated abilities are not linked? Can't they be marked in some other manner? (With a star, perhaps?)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 02:47, 7 December 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:36, 10 December 2007
Line 19:		Line 19:
	Since you're looking for a short name for the subpage, might I suggest "Abilities by classic element"? The "and" in the name implies that the abilities and the elements are separate. And, the name would be shorter. What do you think?--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 15:18, 7 December 2007 (EST)		Since you're looking for a short name for the subpage, might I suggest "Abilities by classic element"? The "and" in the name implies that the abilities and the elements are separate. And, the name would be shorter. What do you think?--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 15:18, 7 December 2007 (EST)
	* I think if we go with my suggestion, then the article names should be "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Classical Elements" and "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Mohinder's Categories". However, the links from the "[[Portal:Theories about Abilities]]" page could well be titled "Abilities by classical element" (classical sounds better, imho) and "Abilities by Mohinder's category".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:16, 7 December 2007 (EST)		* I think if we go with my suggestion, then the article names should be "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Classical Elements" and "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Mohinder's Categories". However, the links from the "[[Portal:Theories about Abilities]]" page could well be titled "Abilities by classical element" (classical sounds better, imho) and "Abilities by Mohinder's category".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:16, 7 December 2007 (EST)
	** I'm working on my suggestion now and have renamed my user page accordingly to [[User:MiamiVolts/Portal:Theories about Abilities/Mohinder's Categories]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:15, 8 December 2007 (EST)		** I'm working on my suggestion now and have renamed my user page accordingly to User:MiamiVolts/Portal:Theories about Abilities/Mohinder's Categories.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:15, 8 December 2007 (EST)
	*** Actually, I found out that the categories are technically Chandra's since they were there before Mohinder took over the site. Also, your page should use "Air" instead of "Wind" if you are using the Greek [[Wikipedia:Classical element#Classical elements in Greece\|four]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:46, 9 December 2007 (EST)		*** Actually, I found out that the categories are technically Chandra's since they were there before Mohinder took over the site. Also, your page should use "Air" instead of "Wind" if you are using the Greek [[Wikipedia:Classical element#Classical elements in Greece\|four]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:46, 9 December 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:46, 9 December 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:
	* I think if we go with my suggestion, then the article names should be "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Classical Elements" and "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Mohinder's Categories". However, the links from the "[[Portal:Theories about Abilities]]" page could well be titled "Abilities by classical element" (classical sounds better, imho) and "Abilities by Mohinder's category".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:16, 7 December 2007 (EST)		* I think if we go with my suggestion, then the article names should be "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Classical Elements" and "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Mohinder's Categories". However, the links from the "[[Portal:Theories about Abilities]]" page could well be titled "Abilities by classical element" (classical sounds better, imho) and "Abilities by Mohinder's category".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:16, 7 December 2007 (EST)
	** I'm working on my suggestion now and have renamed my user page accordingly to [[User:MiamiVolts/Portal:Theories about Abilities/Mohinder's Categories]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:15, 8 December 2007 (EST)		** I'm working on my suggestion now and have renamed my user page accordingly to [[User:MiamiVolts/Portal:Theories about Abilities/Mohinder's Categories]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:15, 8 December 2007 (EST)
			*** Actually, I found out that the categories are technically Chandra's since they were there before Mohinder took over the site. Also, your page should use "Air" instead of "Wind" if you are using the Greek [[Wikipedia:Classical element#Classical elements in Greece\|four]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:46, 9 December 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:15, 9 December 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I'd put anything involving lightning under Wind too.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 23:00, 6 December 2007 (EST)		I'd put anything involving lightning under Wind too.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 23:00, 6 December 2007 (EST)
	* I thought that at first too. But it appears that the abilities are categorized differently. "Energy manipulation or generation" would go under "fire".--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 23:04, 6 December 2007 (EST)		* I thought that at first too. But it appears that the abilities are categorized differently. "Energy manipulation or generation" would go under "fire".--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 23:04, 6 December 2007 (EST)
	** Um, I've got a jump on you... Check out "[[User:MiamiVolts/Portal:Abilities]]". Though my categories are a bit different.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:14, 6 December 2007 (EST)		** Um, I've got a jump on you... Check out "User:MiamiVolts/Portal:Abilities". Though my categories are a bit different.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:14, 6 December 2007 (EST)
	*** Empathic Mimicry would go under all four, and Invisibility and Replication would go under Manipulations and/or Enhancements of One's Own Body.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 23:51, 6 December 2007 (EST)		*** Empathic Mimicry would go under all four, and Invisibility and Replication would go under Manipulations and/or Enhancements of One's Own Body.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 23:51, 6 December 2007 (EST)
	***I saw that. Interesting classifications...I like mine better because they kinda go with what [[Mohinder]] said about there being four power genes in [[parasite]]--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 01:32, 7 December 2007 (EST)		***I saw that. Interesting classifications...I like mine better because they kinda go with what [[Mohinder]] said about there being four power genes in [[parasite]]--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 01:32, 7 December 2007 (EST)
Line 19:		Line 19:
	Since you're looking for a short name for the subpage, might I suggest "Abilities by classic element"? The "and" in the name implies that the abilities and the elements are separate. And, the name would be shorter. What do you think?--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 15:18, 7 December 2007 (EST)		Since you're looking for a short name for the subpage, might I suggest "Abilities by classic element"? The "and" in the name implies that the abilities and the elements are separate. And, the name would be shorter. What do you think?--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 15:18, 7 December 2007 (EST)
	* I think if we go with my suggestion, then the article names should be "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Classical Elements" and "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Mohinder's Categories". However, the links from the "[[Portal:Theories about Abilities]]" page could well be titled "Abilities by classical element" (classical sounds better, imho) and "Abilities by Mohinder's category".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:16, 7 December 2007 (EST)		* I think if we go with my suggestion, then the article names should be "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Classical Elements" and "Portal:Theories about Abilities/Mohinder's Categories". However, the links from the "[[Portal:Theories about Abilities]]" page could well be titled "Abilities by classical element" (classical sounds better, imho) and "Abilities by Mohinder's category".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:16, 7 December 2007 (EST)
			** I'm working on my suggestion now and have renamed my user page accordingly to [[User:MiamiVolts/Portal:Theories about Abilities/Mohinder's Categories]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:15, 8 December 2007 (EST)