User talk:Shadowulf1 - Revision history

imported>Shadowulf1: Reverting to normal.

2014-03-06T08:19:44Z

Reverting to normal.

← Older revision	Revision as of 08:19, 6 March 2014
(No difference)

imported>Shadowulf1: Reverting to normal.

2014-03-06T08:19:44Z

Reverting to normal.

Show changes

imported>Shadowulf1: Cititi asta inainte de postare!!

2014-03-06T07:35:46Z

Cititi asta inainte de postare!!

Show changes

imported>Shadowulf1 at 07:37, 8 February 2014

2014-02-08T07:37:01Z

Show changes

imported>Shadowulf1: Dynamokinesis

2014-02-08T07:35:25Z

Dynamokinesis

Show changes

imported>Shadowulf1 at 07:12, 8 February 2014

2014-02-08T07:12:47Z

Show changes

imported>Shadowulf1 at 07:07, 8 February 2014

2014-02-08T07:07:49Z

Show changes

imported>Shadowulf1: /* Attitude */

2010-04-08T20:37:15Z

Attitude

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:37, 8 April 2010
Line 161:		Line 161:
	User:Shadowulf1 13:02, 8 April 2010 (EDT)		User:Shadowulf1 13:02, 8 April 2010 (EDT)
	**** When multiple people in the community believe something is wrong then there's probably something wrong. The best way to achieve anything here is to have a friendly attitude and to have patiences. "The man who yells wont be heard, but the man who talks will be." --[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 16:07, 8 April 2010 (EDT)		**** When multiple people in the community believe something is wrong then there's probably something wrong. The best way to achieve anything here is to have a friendly attitude and to have patiences. "The man who yells wont be heard, but the man who talks will be." --[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 16:07, 8 April 2010 (EDT)
			***** And I don't doubt that, believe me. BUT, when the people are know-it-alls, sometimes the only way to be heard is to MAKE yourself heard...now, I do apologize for the name calling, but I I believe that statement I made was necessary. Maybe it even prompted them to finally choose the ability name they thought was best. Either way, I hope y'all don't think I'm some cantankerous old grouch who enjoys shouting or ranting. I don't I just don't care for long, drawn out arguments about problems that are easily solved. Again, I apologize, it (hopefully) won't happen again. User:Shadowulf1 16:37, 8 April 2010 (EDT)

imported>OutbackZack: /* Attitude */

2010-04-08T20:07:57Z

Attitude

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:07, 8 April 2010
Line 160:		Line 160:
	*** It is not harrassment...if you don't want to read what I have to say, you don't have to. And if you don't like what I write, then it's not like I'm constantly writing things like that. And besides, what does it matter anyway? The name has already been decided for [[Gordon's ability]], so I got my wish. Now, you can get yours. No need for further commenting, especially in an insulting way.		*** It is not harrassment...if you don't want to read what I have to say, you don't have to. And if you don't like what I write, then it's not like I'm constantly writing things like that. And besides, what does it matter anyway? The name has already been decided for [[Gordon's ability]], so I got my wish. Now, you can get yours. No need for further commenting, especially in an insulting way.
	User:Shadowulf1 13:02, 8 April 2010 (EDT)		User:Shadowulf1 13:02, 8 April 2010 (EDT)
			**** When multiple people in the community believe something is wrong then there's probably something wrong. The best way to achieve anything here is to have a friendly attitude and to have patiences. "The man who yells wont be heard, but the man who talks will be." --[[User:OutbackZack\|OutbackZack]] 16:07, 8 April 2010 (EDT)

imported>Shadowulf1 at 17:02, 8 April 2010

2010-04-08T17:02:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:02, 8 April 2010
Line 158:		Line 158:
	***Well, maybe so, but riddle me this, Batman. Without calling folks idiotic, my suggestion IS valid. If they look at the situation they're currently in, the name for Gordon's ability is not just gonna pop up and hit them in the face. Therefore, why don't they stop trying to look for an exact name and stick with the one that's closest to it. It's one of those on that page, but it's not the ones that are so favored by everyone. User:Shadowulf1 14:37, 7 April 2010 (EDT)		***Well, maybe so, but riddle me this, Batman. Without calling folks idiotic, my suggestion IS valid. If they look at the situation they're currently in, the name for Gordon's ability is not just gonna pop up and hit them in the face. Therefore, why don't they stop trying to look for an exact name and stick with the one that's closest to it. It's one of those on that page, but it's not the ones that are so favored by everyone. User:Shadowulf1 14:37, 7 April 2010 (EDT)
	* I think Mc hammark, Leckie, and Radicell are correct. Your input is important. Please though, ranting to the point of screaming at us (CAPS) and calling people names is not appropriate, and will tend to get your message overlooked/not-listened to. I actually think the namecalling is borderline harassment.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 10:24, 8 April 2010 (EDT)		* I think Mc hammark, Leckie, and Radicell are correct. Your input is important. Please though, ranting to the point of screaming at us (CAPS) and calling people names is not appropriate, and will tend to get your message overlooked/not-listened to. I actually think the namecalling is borderline harassment.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 10:24, 8 April 2010 (EDT)
			*** It is not harrassment...if you don't want to read what I have to say, you don't have to. And if you don't like what I write, then it's not like I'm constantly writing things like that. And besides, what does it matter anyway? The name has already been decided for [[Gordon's ability]], so I got my wish. Now, you can get yours. No need for further commenting, especially in an insulting way.
			User:Shadowulf1 13:02, 8 April 2010 (EDT)