User talk:Trecord - Revision history

imported>Trecord: /* Spoiler stuff */

2007-11-10T09:30:35Z

Spoiler stuff

← Older revision	Revision as of 09:30, 10 November 2007
(No difference)

imported>Trecord: /* Spoiler stuff */

2007-11-10T09:30:35Z

Spoiler stuff

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:30, 10 November 2007
Line 21:		Line 21:
	*No hard feelings taken. I tried to make sure it stayed on the spoiler pages, and not the main page for the upcoming episode. I've also since updated the page to put up the red spoilers banner, just to wear the belt with the suspenders. Also, I didn't "put it straight back" as suggested - I contacted the [[User:Admin]] first to get his verdict, then only updated after he gave the go ahead. Also, the page name is Spoiler talk: Powerless, indicating even from the recent changes page this update is a spoiler. I understand it's more detailed than most, but I just credit it to my good searching ability ;) For example, if you don't want to see Nathan shortly after the nuclear blast, don't view page 2 of the TV Guide article appearing on November 12. Thanks for your input, though. I believe there is a place on here for detailed spoiler information, so long as it's clearly marked as such. If you can think of any additional steps I can take to firewall spoiler information off from the main content, beyond limiting it to spoiler pages and marking the pages with the spoiler tag, please let me know. Thanks! (p.s.: now back to watching Episode 4 of Journeyman) --{{User:Trecord/sig}} 04:12, 10 November 2007 (EST)		*No hard feelings taken. I tried to make sure it stayed on the spoiler pages, and not the main page for the upcoming episode. I've also since updated the page to put up the red spoilers banner, just to wear the belt with the suspenders. Also, I didn't "put it straight back" as suggested - I contacted the [[User:Admin]] first to get his verdict, then only updated after he gave the go ahead. Also, the page name is Spoiler talk: Powerless, indicating even from the recent changes page this update is a spoiler. I understand it's more detailed than most, but I just credit it to my good searching ability ;) For example, if you don't want to see Nathan shortly after the nuclear blast, don't view page 2 of the TV Guide article appearing on November 12. Thanks for your input, though. I believe there is a place on here for detailed spoiler information, so long as it's clearly marked as such. If you can think of any additional steps I can take to firewall spoiler information off from the main content, beyond limiting it to spoiler pages and marking the pages with the spoiler tag, please let me know. Thanks! (p.s.: now back to watching Episode 4 of Journeyman) --{{User:Trecord/sig}} 04:12, 10 November 2007 (EST)
	*Yeah, I read your discussion with Admin; I think the problem there was that he more-than-likely verified it thinking it was one of the aforementioned little spoilers - he said he hadn't read it. But hey, it doesn't bother me too much. I think that we should move the discussion on [[Spoiler talk:Powerless]] above the spoiler itself, and then put a note saying 'Scroll down for major spoiler' or something like that. shrugs* Thanks anyway - I'm glad you took it so well! I had images of a row developing, and I didn't want that! :D--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 04:25, 10 November 2007 (EST)		*Yeah, I read your discussion with Admin; I think the problem there was that he more-than-likely verified it thinking it was one of the aforementioned little spoilers - he said he hadn't read it. But hey, it doesn't bother me too much. I think that we should move the discussion on [[Spoiler talk:Powerless]] above the spoiler itself, and then put a note saying 'Scroll down for major spoiler' or something like that. shrugs* Thanks anyway - I'm glad you took it so well! I had images of a row developing, and I didn't want that! :D--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 04:25, 10 November 2007 (EST)
			**Ah, good, the red warning's now at the top. A wiki thowdown, huh? Hehe, that'd be great if all this wasn't such [http://www.encyclopediaofstupid.com/stupid/images/7/7e/Internet.jpg serious business]. --{{User:Trecord/sig}} 04:30, 10 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Lost Soul: /* Spoiler stuff */

2007-11-10T09:25:19Z

Spoiler stuff

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:25, 10 November 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:

	*No hard feelings taken. I tried to make sure it stayed on the spoiler pages, and not the main page for the upcoming episode. I've also since updated the page to put up the red spoilers banner, just to wear the belt with the suspenders. Also, I didn't "put it straight back" as suggested - I contacted the [[User:Admin]] first to get his verdict, then only updated after he gave the go ahead. Also, the page name is Spoiler talk: Powerless, indicating even from the recent changes page this update is a spoiler. I understand it's more detailed than most, but I just credit it to my good searching ability ;) For example, if you don't want to see Nathan shortly after the nuclear blast, don't view page 2 of the TV Guide article appearing on November 12. Thanks for your input, though. I believe there is a place on here for detailed spoiler information, so long as it's clearly marked as such. If you can think of any additional steps I can take to firewall spoiler information off from the main content, beyond limiting it to spoiler pages and marking the pages with the spoiler tag, please let me know. Thanks! (p.s.: now back to watching Episode 4 of Journeyman) --{{User:Trecord/sig}} 04:12, 10 November 2007 (EST)		*No hard feelings taken. I tried to make sure it stayed on the spoiler pages, and not the main page for the upcoming episode. I've also since updated the page to put up the red spoilers banner, just to wear the belt with the suspenders. Also, I didn't "put it straight back" as suggested - I contacted the [[User:Admin]] first to get his verdict, then only updated after he gave the go ahead. Also, the page name is Spoiler talk: Powerless, indicating even from the recent changes page this update is a spoiler. I understand it's more detailed than most, but I just credit it to my good searching ability ;) For example, if you don't want to see Nathan shortly after the nuclear blast, don't view page 2 of the TV Guide article appearing on November 12. Thanks for your input, though. I believe there is a place on here for detailed spoiler information, so long as it's clearly marked as such. If you can think of any additional steps I can take to firewall spoiler information off from the main content, beyond limiting it to spoiler pages and marking the pages with the spoiler tag, please let me know. Thanks! (p.s.: now back to watching Episode 4 of Journeyman) --{{User:Trecord/sig}} 04:12, 10 November 2007 (EST)
			*Yeah, I read your discussion with Admin; I think the problem there was that he more-than-likely verified it thinking it was one of the aforementioned little spoilers - he said he hadn't read it. But hey, it doesn't bother me too much. I think that we should move the discussion on [[Spoiler talk:Powerless]] above the spoiler itself, and then put a note saying 'Scroll down for major spoiler' or something like that. shrugs* Thanks anyway - I'm glad you took it so well! I had images of a row developing, and I didn't want that! :D--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 04:25, 10 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Trecord: /* Spoiler stuff */

2007-11-10T09:12:33Z

Spoiler stuff

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:12, 10 November 2007
Line 18:		Line 18:

	*Hi there, just wanted to make sure there are no hard feelings going on here. I basically felt I should explain myself. As far as I'm concerned, the spoiler pages are for little spoilers - casting calls, details revealed by [http://www.eonline.com/gossip/kristin/index.jsp Kristin], for example, or other such things, like Michael Ausiello, or Spoilerfix. I have never seen a full episodic summary put up like that. The problem was that there was no warning, of any kind, and, as soon as I read the first line, I realised that this wasn't something I want to read. I do agree with you that there is some people who would love this sort of stuff, but I believed that the majority would not want it in such plain sight. Does that make sense?--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 03:57, 10 November 2007 (EST)		*Hi there, just wanted to make sure there are no hard feelings going on here. I basically felt I should explain myself. As far as I'm concerned, the spoiler pages are for little spoilers - casting calls, details revealed by [http://www.eonline.com/gossip/kristin/index.jsp Kristin], for example, or other such things, like Michael Ausiello, or Spoilerfix. I have never seen a full episodic summary put up like that. The problem was that there was no warning, of any kind, and, as soon as I read the first line, I realised that this wasn't something I want to read. I do agree with you that there is some people who would love this sort of stuff, but I believed that the majority would not want it in such plain sight. Does that make sense?--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 03:57, 10 November 2007 (EST)

			*No hard feelings taken. I tried to make sure it stayed on the spoiler pages, and not the main page for the upcoming episode. I've also since updated the page to put up the red spoilers banner, just to wear the belt with the suspenders. Also, I didn't "put it straight back" as suggested - I contacted the [[User:Admin]] first to get his verdict, then only updated after he gave the go ahead. Also, the page name is Spoiler talk: Powerless, indicating even from the recent changes page this update is a spoiler. I understand it's more detailed than most, but I just credit it to my good searching ability ;) For example, if you don't want to see Nathan shortly after the nuclear blast, don't view page 2 of the TV Guide article appearing on November 12. Thanks for your input, though. I believe there is a place on here for detailed spoiler information, so long as it's clearly marked as such. If you can think of any additional steps I can take to firewall spoiler information off from the main content, beyond limiting it to spoiler pages and marking the pages with the spoiler tag, please let me know. Thanks! (p.s.: now back to watching Episode 4 of Journeyman) --{{User:Trecord/sig}} 04:12, 10 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Lost Soul: New section: Spoiler stuff

2007-11-10T08:57:48Z

New section: Spoiler stuff

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:57, 10 November 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:
	****You forgot to put the second {. The cool thing is you only have to edit your sig page if you want to make changes, and all your signatures that use the template will automatically update. Like mine, I have a bunch saved for color schemes.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 02:01, 10 November 2007 (EST)		****You forgot to put the second {. The cool thing is you only have to edit your sig page if you want to make changes, and all your signatures that use the template will automatically update. Like mine, I have a bunch saved for color schemes.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 02:01, 10 November 2007 (EST)
	***** Ah, right. Thanks, Bob. I forgot about the autosig part.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 02:02, 10 November 2007 (EST)		***** Ah, right. Thanks, Bob. I forgot about the autosig part.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 02:02, 10 November 2007 (EST)

			== Spoiler stuff ==

			*Hi there, just wanted to make sure there are no hard feelings going on here. I basically felt I should explain myself. As far as I'm concerned, the spoiler pages are for little spoilers - casting calls, details revealed by [http://www.eonline.com/gossip/kristin/index.jsp Kristin], for example, or other such things, like Michael Ausiello, or Spoilerfix. I have never seen a full episodic summary put up like that. The problem was that there was no warning, of any kind, and, as soon as I read the first line, I realised that this wasn't something I want to read. I do agree with you that there is some people who would love this sort of stuff, but I believed that the majority would not want it in such plain sight. Does that make sense?--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 03:57, 10 November 2007 (EST)

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Signature */ expand on Bob's instructions, thanks Bob!

2007-11-10T07:04:13Z

Signature: expand on Bob's instructions, thanks Bob!

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:04, 10 November 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:
	***Close. Just in your preferences, type verbatim <nowiki>{{User:Trecord/autosig}}</nowiki>. It'll automatically add the subst in and do the hard stuff.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 02:00, 10 November 2007 (EST)		***Close. Just in your preferences, type verbatim <nowiki>{{User:Trecord/autosig}}</nowiki>. It'll automatically add the subst in and do the hard stuff.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 02:00, 10 November 2007 (EST)
	****You forgot to put the second {. The cool thing is you only have to edit your sig page if you want to make changes, and all your signatures that use the template will automatically update. Like mine, I have a bunch saved for color schemes.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 02:01, 10 November 2007 (EST)		****You forgot to put the second {. The cool thing is you only have to edit your sig page if you want to make changes, and all your signatures that use the template will automatically update. Like mine, I have a bunch saved for color schemes.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 02:01, 10 November 2007 (EST)
			***** Ah, right. Thanks, Bob. I forgot about the autosig part.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 02:02, 10 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Baldbobbo: /* Signature */

2007-11-10T07:02:04Z

Signature

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:02, 10 November 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	** Hmm, for some odd reason it worked the second time. Oh well! --{{User:Trecord/sig}} 02:00, 10 November 2007 (EST)		** Hmm, for some odd reason it worked the second time. Oh well! --{{User:Trecord/sig}} 02:00, 10 November 2007 (EST)
	***Close. Just in your preferences, type verbatim <nowiki>{{User:Trecord/autosig}}</nowiki>. It'll automatically add the subst in and do the hard stuff.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 02:00, 10 November 2007 (EST)		***Close. Just in your preferences, type verbatim <nowiki>{{User:Trecord/autosig}}</nowiki>. It'll automatically add the subst in and do the hard stuff.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 02:00, 10 November 2007 (EST)
	****You forgot to put the second { --{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 02:01, 10 November 2007 (EST)		****You forgot to put the second {. The cool thing is you only have to edit your sig page if you want to make changes, and all your signatures that use the template will automatically update. Like mine, I have a bunch saved for color schemes.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 02:01, 10 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Baldbobbo: /* Signature */

2007-11-10T07:01:13Z

Signature

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:01, 10 November 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	** Hmm, for some odd reason it worked the second time. Oh well! --{{User:Trecord/sig}} 02:00, 10 November 2007 (EST)		** Hmm, for some odd reason it worked the second time. Oh well! --{{User:Trecord/sig}} 02:00, 10 November 2007 (EST)
	***Close. Just in your preferences, type verbatim <nowiki>{{User:Trecord/autosig}}</nowiki>. It'll automatically add the subst in and do the hard stuff.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 02:00, 10 November 2007 (EST)		***Close. Just in your preferences, type verbatim <nowiki>{{User:Trecord/autosig}}</nowiki>. It'll automatically add the subst in and do the hard stuff.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 02:00, 10 November 2007 (EST)
			****You forgot to put the second { --{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 02:01, 10 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Baldbobbo: /* Signature */

2007-11-10T07:00:42Z

Signature

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:00, 10 November 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	** Hmm, no dice. Am I doing something incorrect? --{{User:Trecord/sig}} 02:00, 10 November 2007 (EST)		** Hmm, no dice. Am I doing something incorrect? --{{User:Trecord/sig}} 02:00, 10 November 2007 (EST)
	** Hmm, for some odd reason it worked the second time. Oh well! --{{User:Trecord/sig}} 02:00, 10 November 2007 (EST)		** Hmm, for some odd reason it worked the second time. Oh well! --{{User:Trecord/sig}} 02:00, 10 November 2007 (EST)
			***Close. Just in your preferences, type verbatim <nowiki>{{User:Trecord/autosig}}</nowiki>. It'll automatically add the subst in and do the hard stuff.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 02:00, 10 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Trecord: /* Signature */

2007-11-10T07:00:32Z

Signature

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:00, 10 November 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:
	** Well, here's a first shot. Let's hope it works! --{{SUBST:{User:Trecord/autosig}} 01:58, 10 November 2007 (EST)		** Well, here's a first shot. Let's hope it works! --{{SUBST:{User:Trecord/autosig}} 01:58, 10 November 2007 (EST)
	** Hmm, no dice. Am I doing something incorrect? --{{User:Trecord/sig}} 02:00, 10 November 2007 (EST)		** Hmm, no dice. Am I doing something incorrect? --{{User:Trecord/sig}} 02:00, 10 November 2007 (EST)
			** Hmm, for some odd reason it worked the second time. Oh well! --{{User:Trecord/sig}} 02:00, 10 November 2007 (EST)