This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Talk:Portal:Fan Canon Analysis: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Ryangibsonstewart New page: I deleted Portal:Fan Concepts because I felt it only had very slight differences to Portal:Fan Canon Analysis...and we don't need to split portals based on slight differences, which cr... |
imported>Ryangibsonstewart No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I deleted Portal:Fan Concepts because I felt it only had very slight differences to [[Portal:Fan Canon Analysis]]...and we don't need to split portals based on slight differences, which creates portals of just two or three articles. If we want to talk about renaming this portal so it better suits the articles that are contained here, that's fine. I personally think "Fan Canon Analysis" is fine, but I'm not opposed to other suggestions. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:20, 16 May 2009 (EDT) |
I deleted Portal:Fan Concepts because I felt it only had very slight differences to [[Portal:Fan Canon Analysis]]...and we don't need to split portals based on slight differences, which creates portals of just two or three articles. If we want to talk about renaming this portal so it better suits the articles that are contained here, that's fine. I personally think "Fan Canon Analysis" is fine, but I'm not opposed to other suggestions. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:20, 16 May 2009 (EDT) |
||
*Sorry about that. I got the impression from our [[User_talk:Ryangibsonstewart#Canon_Analysis.2FFan_Concepts|discussion]] that it would be OK to create a new portal for Fan Concepts. Can we at least put sub-headings on the portal to separate the two sections? --<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight:bold;"></span>'''[[User:Elemental Manipulator|Elemental Manipulator]]'''</span> [ [[User:Elemental Manipulator|U]] | [[User_talk:Elemental Manipulator|T]] | [[Special:Contributions/Elemental Manipulator|C]] ]'''</small> - <span style="color:green;">When in doubt, ask BTE </span> 19:56, 16 May 2009 (EDT) |
|||
** I see how you became confused. Completely my fault. I don't think I read your original post on my talk page well enough. I thought you were suggesting a portal that was already created, not splitting one that's kind of small as it is. I'd rather look at renaming this portal to something that encompasses all the articles it contains, rather than splitting it or subdividing it on a micro level. I don't have any name suggestions, though. I think "Fan Canon Analysis" is fine, but I would imagine that there must be better ideas out there. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:20, 18 May 2009 (EDT) |
|||
Latest revision as of 01:20, 19 May 2009
I deleted Portal:Fan Concepts because I felt it only had very slight differences to Portal:Fan Canon Analysis...and we don't need to split portals based on slight differences, which creates portals of just two or three articles. If we want to talk about renaming this portal so it better suits the articles that are contained here, that's fine. I personally think "Fan Canon Analysis" is fine, but I'm not opposed to other suggestions. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 09:20, 16 May 2009 (EDT)
- Sorry about that. I got the impression from our discussion that it would be OK to create a new portal for Fan Concepts. Can we at least put sub-headings on the portal to separate the two sections? --Elemental Manipulator [ U | T | C ] - When in doubt, ask BTE 19:56, 16 May 2009 (EDT)
- I see how you became confused. Completely my fault. I don't think I read your original post on my talk page well enough. I thought you were suggesting a portal that was already created, not splitting one that's kind of small as it is. I'd rather look at renaming this portal to something that encompasses all the articles it contains, rather than splitting it or subdividing it on a micro level. I don't have any name suggestions, though. I think "Fan Canon Analysis" is fine, but I would imagine that there must be better ideas out there. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 21:20, 18 May 2009 (EDT)