This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Talk:Hiro and the Dinosaur (painting): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Ted C capitalization? |
imported>Admin No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I realize that our convention only capitalizes the first word of a page title, but aren't the titles of paintings normally capitalized fully? --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 10:35, 4 January 2007 (EST) |
I realize that our convention only capitalizes the first word of a page title, but aren't the titles of paintings normally capitalized fully? --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 10:35, 4 January 2007 (EST) |
||
:Titles of paintings should be fully capitalized, I believe. Is this an official name for the painting, though, or a name we've given to it? If it's officially called Hiro and the Dinosaur by the writers/artists then I'd definitely say it should be capitalized. If it's a name we've given to it then maybe it should still be "Hiro and the dinosaur" to reflect that it's not a proper name but instead a descriptive name. ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 10:42, 4 January 2007 (EST)) |
|||
Revision as of 15:42, 4 January 2007
Capitalization
I realize that our convention only capitalizes the first word of a page title, but aren't the titles of paintings normally capitalized fully? --Ted C 10:35, 4 January 2007 (EST)
- Titles of paintings should be fully capitalized, I believe. Is this an official name for the painting, though, or a name we've given to it? If it's officially called Hiro and the Dinosaur by the writers/artists then I'd definitely say it should be capitalized. If it's a name we've given to it then maybe it should still be "Hiro and the dinosaur" to reflect that it's not a proper name but instead a descriptive name. (Admin 10:42, 4 January 2007 (EST))