This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
File talk:Future claire.jpg: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Ryangibsonstewart →14:32, 30 September 2008 version: new section |
imported>Pierre |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The [http://heroeswiki.com/images/archive/f/f5/20080930183228!Future_claire.jpg previous version] wasn't great, but the newest one isn't much better. Sure, it's HD, but if the image is such an extreme closeup that you can barely make out who the picture is of, I don't think it matters what the quality is. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:57, 30 September 2008 (EDT) |
The [http://heroeswiki.com/images/archive/f/f5/20080930183228!Future_claire.jpg previous version] wasn't great, but the newest one isn't much better. Sure, it's HD, but if the image is such an extreme closeup that you can barely make out who the picture is of, I don't think it matters what the quality is. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:57, 30 September 2008 (EDT) |
||
:I agree - the previous is much better, despite of the quality. [[User:Pierre|Pierre]] 05:00, 3 October 2008 (EDT) |
|||
Revision as of 09:00, 3 October 2008
This is the image we're using? Doesn't she look a bit ... inebriated? — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 20:31, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
- That's how the kids like Hayden from what I hear.--Bob 20:42, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
- I got a shot of her that doesn't look like she was up partying all night. Plus, I like that you can see her "Sandra" on her name tag. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 22:20, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
14:32, 30 September 2008 version
The previous version wasn't great, but the newest one isn't much better. Sure, it's HD, but if the image is such an extreme closeup that you can barely make out who the picture is of, I don't think it matters what the quality is. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 16:57, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
- I agree - the previous is much better, despite of the quality. Pierre 05:00, 3 October 2008 (EDT)
