This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.

File talk:Future claire.jpg: Difference between revisions

From Heroes Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Futurepeter
imported>Seclusion
Line 10: Line 10:
**Ok, i thought it wasn't a too bad image, is the name tag important enough to show, if so i'll try to make a better version of it without the closeup and with a name tag. -- [[User:Futurepeter|Futurepeter]] 06:39, 3 October 2008 (EDT)
**Ok, i thought it wasn't a too bad image, is the name tag important enough to show, if so i'll try to make a better version of it without the closeup and with a name tag. -- [[User:Futurepeter|Futurepeter]] 06:39, 3 October 2008 (EDT)
***I uploaded a new version, hope this is a good one. -- [[User:Futurepeter|Futurepeter]] 07:51, 3 October 2008 (EDT)
***I uploaded a new version, hope this is a good one. -- [[User:Futurepeter|Futurepeter]] 07:51, 3 October 2008 (EDT)
* No offence but reverting back to square one seems a bit counter-productive. {{User:Seclusion/sig}} 08:30, 3 October 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 12:30, 3 October 2008

This is the image we're using? Doesn't she look a bit ... inebriated? — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 20:31, 1 May 2007 (EDT)

  • That's how the kids like Hayden from what I hear.--Bob 20:42, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
    • I got a shot of her that doesn't look like she was up partying all night. Plus, I like that you can see her "Sandra" on her name tag. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 22:20, 1 May 2007 (EDT)

14:32, 30 September 2008 version

The previous version wasn't great, but the newest one isn't much better. Sure, it's HD, but if the image is such an extreme closeup that you can barely make out who the picture is of, I don't think it matters what the quality is. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 16:57, 30 September 2008 (EDT)

I agree - the previous is much better, despite of the quality. Pierre 05:00, 3 October 2008 (EDT)
  • I've uploaded a new version; it doesn't have the name tag but I found that too hard to include without losing quality. --  Seclusion  talk / contribs 05:35, 3 October 2008 (EDT)
    • Ok, i thought it wasn't a too bad image, is the name tag important enough to show, if so i'll try to make a better version of it without the closeup and with a name tag. -- Futurepeter 06:39, 3 October 2008 (EDT)
      • I uploaded a new version, hope this is a good one. -- Futurepeter 07:51, 3 October 2008 (EDT)
  • No offence but reverting back to square one seems a bit counter-productive. --  Seclusion  talk / contribs 08:30, 3 October 2008 (EDT)