This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Template talk:Image-gfdl: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Admin No edit summary |
imported>HiroDynoSlayer use which? |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*Actually, I don't think we need image-pd, and we could just use image-gfdl. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:25, 19 September 2007 (EDT) |
*Actually, I don't think we need image-pd, and we could just use image-gfdl. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:25, 19 September 2007 (EDT) |
||
** The GNU FDL is incompatible with our license. We cannot use any images with it, so we might as well delete the template. Also there's a huge difference between a GNU FDL licensed image and an image in the public domain. ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 18:28, 19 September 2007 (EDT)) |
** The GNU FDL is incompatible with our license. We cannot use any images with it, so we might as well delete the template. Also there's a huge difference between a GNU FDL licensed image and an image in the public domain. ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 18:28, 19 September 2007 (EDT)) |
||
*** So in this case, should PD have been used? Based on the details of how PD reads, it didn't seem to fit; and how the other read, it did seem to fit. I am fine for using the rite license image, just not sure which one is correct for a personally uploaded and permission given picture that isn't a screenshot or a true PD case. Anyone with clarification on what to use? <small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer|talk]]) 09/19/2007 20:50 (EST)</small> |
|||
Revision as of 00:50, 20 September 2007
I know there's a difference, and maybe I'm being ignorant, but couldn't we just use Template:Image-pd instead of Template:Image-gfdl? -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 18:24, 19 September 2007 (EDT)
- Actually, I don't think we need image-pd, and we could just use image-gfdl. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 18:25, 19 September 2007 (EDT)
- The GNU FDL is incompatible with our license. We cannot use any images with it, so we might as well delete the template. Also there's a huge difference between a GNU FDL licensed image and an image in the public domain. (Admin 18:28, 19 September 2007 (EDT))
- So in this case, should PD have been used? Based on the details of how PD reads, it didn't seem to fit; and how the other read, it did seem to fit. I am fine for using the rite license image, just not sure which one is correct for a personally uploaded and permission given picture that isn't a screenshot or a true PD case. Anyone with clarification on what to use? --HiroDynoSlayer (talk) 09/19/2007 20:50 (EST)
- The GNU FDL is incompatible with our license. We cannot use any images with it, so we might as well delete the template. Also there's a huge difference between a GNU FDL licensed image and an image in the public domain. (Admin 18:28, 19 September 2007 (EDT))