Template talk:Sectstub

Do we need this? I would think the "needs" variable of the regular stub template takes care of marking a particular section--plus, it's easier to see than hidden in the middle of a section. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 00:26, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

clearing

Is anybody else having a problem with this template? Whenever it's used near the top of a page, it clears infoboxes, TOCs, and right-floated images. In other words, it makes a huge space, rather than being a flag where text should be. Anybody know a way to fix that? -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 22:10, 9 September 2008 (EDT)

• I've seen it, but I'm not sure. I haven't seen any templates be able to do that to where they can fix around the infoboxes. Same with the wikitables.--Bob (talk) 22:13, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
  • Oh. Before I upgraded my Firefox, the sectstub template used to work around infoboxes very nicely. But I upgraded and I suppose I lost that nice little feature. :( -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 23:38, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
    • I think I got the same problem. --SacValleyDweller (talk) 00:53, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
      • Yeah, I recently upgraded my Firefox and began getting the same problem. Really makes those new GN character pages ugly, with a huge white space. Is there anyway to fix it? --Radicell 07:05, 11 February 2009 (EST)

Full Width / Not Full Width

When we make the width "100%", it seems to push out other navboxes/floated images. When we make it a set amount of pixels long, it only extends to about halfway of the page and stops (if someone with a large monitor, like me, is looking at it). I remember a time when this template could extend to as long as it need; filling up anybody's monitor but stopping if there is a navbox/floated image. What has happened? --Radicell 09:37, 25 August 2009 (EDT)