Graphic Novel talk:Going Postal
|
New graphic novel checklist
see also current episode and current episode checklist | jump to table of contents |
Episode article: _X_ Graphic Novel screencap (450x350) Update/add other articles: _X_ Update template:imagenav Update Main Page: |
Update Character pages ___ Update Template:PortalGNCharacterNav as appropriate Add new character/group pages as needed: Add references to appropriate recurring themes: Add/update disambigs as needed: Add examples of demonstrated Powers: Add new powers pages as needed: |
Events/Items/Things/References ___ List of Company partnerships Locations Places Timeline Update templates as needed |
Easter Egg
Mr. Bennet, the Haitian and Eden. I don't think it's a still from an episode that's been on tv. Martijnvs 03:37, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
- Since it's a behind-the-scenes image, I've updated the listing to use the actors real-life names. It's cool to see Eden again with her pre-Company appearance. :)--MiamiVolts (talk) 05:36, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
- How do we know when it's behind-the-scene or not? Wouldn't it be a better standard to always use the actor's names? Martijnvs 06:11, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
- We always use behind-the-scenes unless we know for sure it's not. In-character images are screenshots from aired segments. Using the actors' names for ic doesn't make sense to me.--MiamiVolts (talk) 06:48, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
- The most reasonable thing to do is of course to use actors names when it's behind the scenes shots (no matter how we chose to understand the term) and characters names when it's in-characters photos. That is the difference between the two, isn't it? :) Pierre 08:29, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
- I agree with that, but I think it's not always possible to tell whether it's an in-character picture or not. Only when someone look directly in the camera you can be reasonably sure it's an bts-picture. I don't mind if my additions are rolled back or changed, but it would be nice if I can make useful contributions... Martijnvs 09:37, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
- I think you misunderstand. If you can't find the shot in an aired episode, we're calling it behind the scenes. That should make it less difficult for you to distinguish. BTW, welcome to the club. Many contributions on a wiki end up eventually being slightly altered, reworded/reformatted, etc. No hard feelings... that's just how it works. Practice and experience help for your contributions to get less after-edits, but no one's perfect either.--MiamiVolts (talk) 09:53, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
- I agree with that, but I think it's not always possible to tell whether it's an in-character picture or not. Only when someone look directly in the camera you can be reasonably sure it's an bts-picture. I don't mind if my additions are rolled back or changed, but it would be nice if I can make useful contributions... Martijnvs 09:37, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
- The most reasonable thing to do is of course to use actors names when it's behind the scenes shots (no matter how we chose to understand the term) and characters names when it's in-characters photos. That is the difference between the two, isn't it? :) Pierre 08:29, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
- We always use behind-the-scenes unless we know for sure it's not. In-character images are screenshots from aired segments. Using the actors' names for ic doesn't make sense to me.--MiamiVolts (talk) 06:48, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
- How do we know when it's behind-the-scene or not? Wouldn't it be a better standard to always use the actor's names? Martijnvs 06:11, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
Review
Great action in this novel. A shame, though, that they couldn't have filmed Echo's capture for part 3 of the webisodes, or else saved it for a part 4 sometime later. That would have been much better, imho. Anyways, this is still a good novel.--MiamiVolts (talk) 05:36, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
- OK novel, although it's lacking much of the darkness of the webisodes imo. That might be since I'm not convinced in the greatness of artist Marcus To, finding his art too cartoonish. Nice to see Penny though, but I really think that Elle (even though I really like the character) is being a over-used in the novels. Pierre 05:59, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
- Echo continues his rise into my favourite characters. --DocM 06:09, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
The Constrictor?
Although he is pretty much hidden by the title logo on page 2, the Constrictor does appear in the novel. Right? Pierre 08:33, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
- I'd leave him off the appearances for now. We can't really tell if that's him, someone/something else behind the logo. When the animated novel is released, we should know for sure.--MiamiVolts (talk) 09:11, 29 July 2008 (EDT)