This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.

Spoiler talk:Adam Monroe

From Heroes Wiki
Revision as of 17:18, 12 January 2008 by imported>Ryangibsonstewart (→‎AFD)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Might explain something with the rumor of insect control.--Bob 22:47, 18 June 2007 (EDT)

  • I assumed he had immortality, what with the description of being "ageless". --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 22:53, 18 June 2007 (EDT)

Kane & Kensei

If Kensei is also Kane then does that mean he is like Peter and has absorbed the ability to heal and control insects assuming that Deathray Magazine is correct or does it mean he naturally has two powers at once, or does it mean that David is pulling double duty and playing Kensei and a seperate character named Kane? The mystery. --Snow Leapord 18:11, 9 October 2007 (EDT)

Is it possible?

Deathray says that David Anders will play "Kane," who is 1,000 years old and controls insects. Now, there is that whole deal with the fact that Anders actually plays Adam, who is a 400-year-old regenerator. But perhaps the age was not an exaggeration, and Adam will gain the alias and power in 600 years time? -- LightSpectra 11:38, 1 January 2008 (EST)

  • The latest graphic novel establishes his birthyear as 1650, so he can't be 1,000 years old unless he has done some time travelling.--MiamiVolts (talk) 11:44, 1 January 2008 (EST)
    • I think what LightSpectra is suggesting is that there will be an episode which will take place in the year 2600 or something, which I highly doubt. The futures shown have been very near futures, and they have served the sole purpose of furthering the plot--either showing Hiro how awful the future will be and catapulting him to stop Sylar even more urgently, or showing Peter the need to stop the virus and giving him a motive (to save Caitlin). I doubt we'll be seeing any stories taking place 600 years in the future, and I doubt we'll ever see anybody named Kane on the show--I think this whole page is just an old spoiler that was changed from Kane to Adam, and from insects to healing somewhere along the way. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 11:49, 1 January 2008 (EST)
      • What if Adam escapes his tomb in 600 years and finds some way to travel to the present? -- LightSpectra 15:22, 1 January 2008 (EST)


Are we ready to axe this?--Bob (talk) 13:58, 12 January 2008 (EST)

  • Fine with me. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 14:54, 12 January 2008 (EST)
    • Why shouldn't it be kept? I'm sure more spoilers on Adam will be coming, given the speculation on the next volume and the mysterious ending to his last GN.--Tim Thomason 16:24, 12 January 2008 (EST)
      • All the spoilers on this page are over and done with. If there are more spoilers, the page could be reestablished. But typically, we put spoilers about established characters on Spoiler:Season Two (or the appropriate season spoiler page). For instance, there are plenty of spoilers about Angela, but we don't have Spoiler:Angela Petrelli, nor should we. One catchall place for spoilers is enough. For some reason we have pages created for upcoming characters (like Spoiler:Benjamin Washington), but I don't think we need individual spoiler pages for each character. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 17:14, 12 January 2008 (EST)
      • I think they were made because there was multiple sources about who David Anders was portraying, similar to who was portraying the Princess (or who the princess was).--Bob (talk) 17:16, 12 January 2008 (EST)
        • Right, I can understand the page before the season started, but now, it is just old and outdated. I really don't see any point. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 17:17, 12 January 2008 (EST)
    • Okay, I understand. I see no problem with deletion, since I simply assumed it was a page for spoilers related to the character. I don't fully grasp the spoiler section of the site, nor should I. If I were you guys, I'd merge any appropriate information, but you tend to frown upon that, as it can be a complicated procedure.--Tim Thomason 18:06, 12 January 2008 (EST)
      • I agree with you about not fully grasping the spoiler sections--I don't think we have very clear guidelines for things like this. I'm not sure what you mean by merging information. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 18:18, 12 January 2008 (EST)