This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.

Talk:Angela Petrelli: Difference between revisions

From Heroes Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Mc hammark
(→‎Date of marriage: new section)
imported>Sandubadear
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Name==
{| border="2" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="4" class="wikitable"
Where did it say that [[Talk:Angela_Petrelli|Mother Petrelli]] first name is Angela? <br>'''<span style="color:#FF0000">~ ~ ~ ~ [[User talk:Red|Red]] =</SPAN> 23:10, 17 February 2007 (EST)
|-
*Hmm... I'm not sure, it may have been information originally found at Wikipedia a long time ago.  She's probably credited at the end of an episode somewhere, but I dont know which episode offhand.  Hopefully someone else knows where the original mention of it came from.  If you search Google you find a lot of Heroes results for Angela Petrelli, so I'm pretty sure it's accurate, I just don't know the exact source off the top of my head.  ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 23:23, 17 February 2007 (EST))
! Archives
** Nope, nothing stated in the end credits.[http://www.heroes-forum.com/index.php?showtopic=641] <br>'''<span style="color:#FF0000">~ ~ ~ ~ [[User talk:Red|Red]] =</SPAN> 13:12, 18 February 2007 (EST)
! Archived Topics
* I found a web reference that states it is in the Opening Credits of Genesis  --[[User:Orne|Orne]] 09:36, 21 February 2007 (EST)
|-
<PRE>
| align=center | [[Talk:Angela Petrelli/Archive 1|Feb 2007-Apr 2009]] || <small>{{ArchiveLinks|Talk:Angela Petrelli/Archive 1}}</small>
Starring:
|-
SANTIAGO CABRERA as Isaac Mendez
|}
TAWNY CYPRESS as Simone Deveaux
{{tocright}}
NOAH GRAY-CABEY as Micah Sanders
 
ALI LARTER as Niki Sanders
MASI OKA as Hiro Nakamura
HAYDEN PANETTIERE as Claire Bennet
 
ADRIAN PASDAR as Nathan Petrelli
SENDHIL RAMAMURTHY as Mohinder Suresh
MILO VENTIMIGLIA as Peter Petrelli
 
Guest Starring:
CHRISTINE ROSE as Angela Petrelli
JACK COLEMAN as Mr. Bennet (HRG)
ASHLEY CROW as Sandra Bennet
 
THOMAS DEKKER as Zach
SHISHIR KURUP as Nirad
JAMES KYSON LEE as Ando Masahashi
JOHN PROSKY as Principal
 
DEIRDRE QUINN as Tina
BRIAN TARANINA as Weasel (Thug 1)
and
RICHARD ROUNTREE as Charles Deveaux
 
Music by: WENDY MELVOIN & LISA COLEMAN
Co-Producer: LORI MOTYER
Producer: SKIP BEAUDINE
 
Executive Producer: DAVID SEMEL
Executive Producer: DENNIS HAMMER
Executive Producer: TIM KRING
 
Created by: TIM KRING
 
Written by: TIM KRING
Directed by: DAVID SEMEL
</PRE>
* Additionally, "Angela Petrelli" is referenced in an NBC press release photo [http://search.console.net/photos.shtml?wordsdisplay=Angela+and+Petrelli&config=photos&words=Angela%20and%20Petrelli&method=and&restrict=&sort=]  --[[User:Orne|Orne]] 09:36, 21 February 2007 (EST)
 
==Am I going crazy?==
So there's a bunch of quotes and a reference in the episode for Genesis that I can't find in the episode. Maybe it's the file downloaded from iTunes that is different, but I can't find the part of the conversation between Angela and Peter regarding Nathan being the "alpha" dog and Peter referring to Nathan's accident. It just ends with her saying "I only wanted to feel alive again". --[[User:Baldbobbo|Bob]] 16:54, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
* I'm [[User:Ryangibsonstewart#Random Facts|not an expert]] on ''[[Genesis]]'', but according to [http://www.kilohoku.com/transcripts/heroes/heroes-1X01.html the transcript site], the "alpha dogs" line happens in the station's bullpen, right after the "I just wanted to feel alive again" line. Whether it's there or not in reality, I don't know. &mdash; [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 18:03, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
** I checked my copy of the original airing, and Ryan's right.  It is indeed in there where he said it was.  ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 19:14, 7 April 2007 (EDT))
***Yeah, I guess Apple sells a cut version, because the one that I downloaded stops when Angela says "I just wanted to feel alive again" then cuts to Micah and Niki where Micah says "I hate it here". Weird.--[[User:Baldbobbo|Bob]] 19:17, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
****Bob, that is indeed a cut version. This is what Angela said right after she said "I just wanted to feel alive again."
Peter "Nathan only cares about himself."
Angela "Your father was the same way. Alpha dogs, both of them." --[[User:JLYK|JLYK]] 17:55, 28 February 2009 (EST)
 
==Dead?==
 
I thought she was just severly beaten as far as I could see.  She looked alive, but then again, I had to use the restroom ^^.--[[User:DarkPhoenix|DarkPhoenix]] 22:17, 1 October 2007 (EDT)
* I corrected the summary.  Yeah, I'm fairly certain she wasn't dead though I'll go back and look just to be 100% certain.  ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 22:19, 1 October 2007 (EDT))
** Didn't Nathan ask her who did this to her?  Dead women tell no tales.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 00:00, 2 October 2007 (EDT)
*** She didn't die. She was just in a state of shock. So was I because if she was killed, I would've had a heart attack. I love my mean Petrelli mommy. --[[User:AvadaNella|AvadaNella]] 11:22, 2 October 2007 (EDT)
**** She was in a locked room in the middle of the police station and no one saw anything? I suspect she faked it. She definately had the know-how to let Parkman read only what she wanted him to read from her mind.--[[User:MiamiVolts|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts|talk]]) 11:26, 2 October 2007 (EDT)
***** I don't think she was faking anything at all. I don't think she could have (or would have) cut herself the way she did. --[[User:Pinkkeith|Pinkkeith]] 11:33, 2 October 2007 (EDT)
****** The scratches on her cheek aren't that deep. They could be self-imposed. Very curious as it's not at all similar in ''modus operandi'' to Kaito's killer.--[[User:NissanVersaDootDoot|NissanVersaDootDoot]] 00:59, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
***** [[Allan Arkush]]'s comments in the [[episode commentary]] that the attacker "wasn't really there" intrigue me.  There's two ways to read it: the attacker wasn't there because Angela faked it, or the attacker wasn't there because he has the power to attack her remotely.  Personally, I think it's the latter (since that could also tie in to how the attacker survived the fall with Kaito), and I <i>hope</i> it's the latter because that's far, far more creepy.  Being stalked by a killer who can attack you remotely is Not Good.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 01:05, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
****** Yeah, when I saw it originally it looked like the attacker wasn't actually there as well.  My suspicion was that it had to do with the [[Being who can see Molly]], but we'll see! ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 01:07, 4 October 2007 (EDT))
***** It could be that Matt's dad put a nightmare whammy on her. Or else, someone who has absorbed his power. Is there a theory page somewhere about who is going after the original 12? I'm wondering if it's an empath, as this would explain being able to knock Kato off the building without joining him at the bottom (flight or teleport) as well as messing with Angela at the police station. On the other hand, that would be too easy. ([[User:Kief|Kief]] 13:35, 26 October 2007 (EDT)
****** This isn't that far fetched, really.  Claude recognized that Peter was an empath, so he has apparently encountered at least one before. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 13:44, 26 October 2007 (EDT)
******I thought that at first, but that wouldn't explain what happened to the lights and the locked door.--[[User:Ice Vision|Ice Vision]] 13:49, 26 October 2007 (EDT)
******* The lights could be an electrical power absorbed from Elle, or the guy in the comic. The locked door would be telekinesis. [[User:Kief|Kief]] 13:52, 26 October 2007 (EDT)
******** That's all true, but you don't need to be an empath to be multipowered. My theory is still that Angela is multipowered and could thus pull off all-of-the-above.--[[User:MiamiVolts|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts|talk]]) 13:57, 26 October 2007 (EDT)
*I Couldn't Be bothered reading all of that but I'm pretty sure in that part Maury is attacking her and she doesn't know what's going on so she digs her nails into her skin because of the pain as she tries to get the images out?--[[User:ViciousKillgasm|ViciousKillgasm]] ([[User talk:ViciousKillgasm|talk]]) 08:45, 22 December 2008 (EST)
** Could be. It was really ever explained.--[[User:MiamiVolts|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts|talk]]) 12:52, 27 December 2008 (EST)
 
== Powers ==
 
I know it's a bit early, but does anyone have any guesses on her power? --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 22:51, 2 October 2007 (EDT)
*http://heroeswiki.com/Theory:Angela_Petrelli has a lot of theories regarding this. [[User:Megalomania|Megalomania]] 08:27, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
**She might have telepathy, since Peter was able to realize she was his mother after a "Matt-like" power occurred, though it could have been Peter accessing her memories. [[User:Dean Harper|Dean Harper]] 01:14, 6 November 2007 (EST)
***I doubt that Peter just accessed her memory. He is still (again) at the point where he mainly uses his abilities unintentionally, just by instinct. This telepathy thing Matt now (S02E07) learns to controle ist an adept ability and I'm of the opinion that you need some degree of controle over your ability to unlock this potential. Maybe Angela has a similar ability like the Parkmans and just copied her memories to Peter or she can restore lost memory. Maybe an oppositional ability to the Haitian's. [[User:BloodyFox|BloodyFox]]
* Could be something to do with electricity, like the patient in the graphic novel. When she flipped-out in the holding cell the lights went wonky. I'm thinking Maury gave her a nightmare vision which caused her to attack herself, and use her powers. [[User:Kief|Kief]] [[User:Kief|Random Dude]] 09:02, 10 November 2007 (EST)
Four Months Gone I believe makes it clear that Angela Petrelli was not responsible for Peter regaining memories last time but it was the Rapid Cell Regeneration. --[[User:Snow Leapord|Snow Leapord]] 21:10, 12 November 2007 (EST)
* On the contrary, I think the scene with Heidi gives more credence to the persuasion through touch theory. [[User:Kakumei|Kakumei]] 01:58, 13 November 2007 (EST)
* The [[Persuasion]] power theory seems to work well.  It would seem only natural that Angela hold some power to explain why [[Peter_Petrelli|Peter]] and [[Nathan_Petrelli|Nathan]] are gifted.  Angela seems to have the ability to get what she wants by simply touching another person and asking for it.  This is observed in several cases like [[Episode:Genesis|Genesis]] where she gets the prosecutors to drop charges, in the [[Episode:The_Hard_Part|The Hard Part]] where she persuades Nathan to follow the plan, in [[Episode:Out_of_Time|Out of Time]] where she persuades Peter to remember or force his [[Enhanced_memory|Enhanced memory]] power, and in [[Episode:Four_Months_Ago...|Four Months Ago]]  where she's seen directly holding Heidi's hand and persuading her to keep the secrets safe.  Having so much experience with the [[Company]] and [[Group_of_twelve|The Group of Twelve]], it's most likely that she only reveals her power when absolutely necessary to keep matters under control.  Naturally, her ability to quickly recognize [[Matt]] Parkman's gift came from experience of dealing with [[Maury_Parkman|his father]] in the past. --[[User:Dogbert|Dogbert]] 5:13, 13 November 2007 (PST)
* Whenever she talks about people with powers, she always says "we", or am I understanding wrong?  Like, "what we're capable of" or "what we can do" [[User:Webrunner|Webrunner]] 12:10, 27 November 2007 (EST)
*Has anyone considered she might have the power of phasing. The writers did say we have seen [[Peter]] use [[Angela Petrelli]]'s power on the show. [[Peter]] has never met [[DL]] as far as I have seen, so how is he able to [[phase]]? --[[user:dreamsparkle|Dreamsparkle]] 12:25 27th December 2007 (EST)
** Peter met DL in the Season 1 finale in Kirby Plaza, they same time he got Super-Strength from Niki. <small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer|talk]]) 12/27/2007 08:15 (EST)</small>
Hi all - on Angela's page on Wikipedia (as opposed to Heroes Wiki), there's a referenced quote from Jeph Loeb and Jesse Alexander, stating that "viewers have seen Angela Petrelli's powers used on the show, not by Angela but by Peter":
<blockquote>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angela_Petrelli#Powers</blockquote>
Should this be mentioned here as well?  Btw, I find this very interesting, because I was completely convinced that she had Persuasion powers.  But if we've never seen her use her own power, then that apparently can't be true.  Obviously, this last part is not encyclopedic, just an observation -- but the quote itself seems pretty solid. - [[User:Seansinc|Seansinc]] 18:11, 4 February 2008 (EST)
* A user added it to the notes, recently, but, deeming it too spoilerish, we moved it to [[Season_two_spoilers]]. {{User:Lulu/sig}} 18:13, 4 February 2008 (EST)
**Right. It's a terrific quote, and very promising, but spoilers belong on spoiler pages. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:38, 4 February 2008 (EST)
*** Cool, thanks. - [[User:Seansinc|Seansinc]] 19:37, 4 February 2008 (EST)
 
== Angela and Kaito have made sweet love ==
 
I'm sure she told Matt Parkman that she slept with Kaito a long time ago. Furthermore if it was a long time ago, let's say the 60's, I doubt protection was used, which means that they may have had a child. I wouldn't want it to be Hiro of course, and it doesn't look that way but then again I have never seen or heard of his mother, any thoughts?
*Yeah they had sex, but for everything else, we can't know. But why not, nice thought ^^ --{{User:FrenchFlo/sig}} 07:18, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
**I could've sworn there was mention of Hiro's mother at some point in conversation between Hiro and his sister. I took the reference as posthumous. I think Hiro as a Petrelli is a little far fetched.--[[User:NissanVersaDootDoot|NissanVersaDootDoot]] 00:59, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
*** In ''[[Five Years Gone]]'', Matt says Hiro is the son of Kaito and Ishi Nakamura.  It's <i>possible</i> that Ishi is not his biologicial mother, but "not the real mommy" is a lot less common than "not the real daddy" for obvious reasons.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 01:07, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
**** Please explain. JK. Why is it that the Petrellis are theorized to be so loose on this show? Geez.--[[User:Baldbobbo|Bob]] 02:28, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
***** Nathan is a bit of a slut.  Peter did kinda steal Isaac's woman.  Angela did Sulu.  You do the math. :) --[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 02:36, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
****** Nicely put, Hardvice.--[[User:MiamiVolts|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts|talk]]) 02:55, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
******* I hear in ''[[Kindred]]'', [[Monty]] hooks up with a 3rd grade girl and a 4th grade girl at the same time--and they ''hold hands''! (Slut!) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 07:03, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
"
During a December 2007 Word Ballon podcast, Jeph Loeb and Jesse Alexander stated that viewers have seen Angela Petrelli's powers used on the show—not by Angela but by Peter."  So i have a feeling She has "astral projection". When you first see adam with peter (when peter comes back from the futre) he goes back soon after, verry quickly tho, but when he returned, adam did not see him dissapear like hiro does, but he was just standing there. Only a thaught
 
== Group of Twelve ==
 
The following sentence was removed, with the comment "rem speculation":
 
:Angela and [[Mr. Petrelli|her late husband]] were members of a [[Group of twelve|group of individuals]] who were involved in [[the Company]]'s efforts at locating [[evolved humans]].
 
There's nothing speculative here.  Angela was definitely a member of this group, as evidenced by the [[Group of Twelve]] article and the several recent episodes where the photo is shown / discussed... and both [[Bob]] and [[Noah Bennet]] have said this group was involved involved in finding evolved humans for The Company.  We don't know anything more specific at this point, which is why I didn't say anything more specific. 
 
If there are no objections, I'll put the sentence back, because the current version ("Angela Petrelli is a member of a group of twelve, and the mother of Nathan and Peter") might be a bit confusing.
 
Cheers,
[[User:Seansinc|Seansinc]] 04:45, 24 October 2007 (EDT)
 
*The speculation is the connection between the Company and the group. There is no evidence that the group founded the Company or vice-versa. In fact, there's no connection of Angela and the Company except that the Haitian takes orders from Angela that supersede those of the Company, which would indicate to me that she's separate of the Company. Hope that helps.--[[User:Baldbobbo|<font color=#0F004D>Bob</font>]] {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Baldbobbo| (<span class="plainlinks">[{{SERVER}}/index.php?title=User_talk:Baldbobbo&action=edit&section=new message]</span>) | ([[User talk:Baldbobbo|<font color=#0F004D>talk</font>]]) }} 04:52, 24 October 2007 (EDT)
 
:*Aha, thanks for the clarification.  I'm fairly sure such a connection has been made, but I'm not 100% sure.  Short of going back through all the episodes looking for evidence, how about if I alter the sentence to read as follows?
::::Angela and [[Mr. Petrelli|her late husband]] were members of a [[Group of twelve|group of individuals]] who were involved in locating [[evolved humans]] years ago.
::It's succinct but explains the basic idea without making the reader follow a link.
::[[User:Seansinc|Seansinc]] 10:57, 24 October 2007 (EDT)
::* This is one of those frustrating cases where we're trying to get from A to G and we've got A, C, E, and G but no B, D, or F, if you follow me.  We know who the members of the group were because of the picture.  We know a lot of them were evolved humans because we've seen them use powers.  We know that a group of twelve people founded the company because Bob said so.  However, even though it's so obvious as to seem confirmed, we don't know that the twelve people in the picture all have powers and founded the company.  Even though the reasoning is perfectly sound, and it's been all but confirmed in interviews, etc., we still can't make assumptions that exceed our knowledge without venturing into speculation.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 16:01, 24 October 2007 (EDT)
:::*Oh, no, we definitely can't say that all of them have powers or that they founded The Company.  That would be complete speculation.  Actually, the current introductory sentence (following recent edits by Ted C) covers what I was going to say nicely: "Angela Petrelli is a member of a group of twelve individuals who have been aware of evolved humans for years."  If the reader follows the link to "group of twelve", they'll learn
::::"Of the known members, only Daniel Linderman, Bob, and Maury Parkman have confirmed abilities. It seems likely, however, that others in the group are evolved humans."
:::...from the Notes section on that page, as well as other bits on what we know and don't know about this group so far.  So I think Angela's page is fine as is for now.  -[[User:Seansinc|Seansinc]] 13:56, 26 October 2007 (EDT)
 
 
== Season 2, episode 5 ==
 
Though she didn't make an appearance, it was mentioned that [[Matt]] visited Angela, after episode 4. Should this be related in the article? --[[User:Conspiracy Unit|Conspiracy Unit]] 23:00, 26 October 2007 (EDT)
*If you want, feel free. Plenty of non-appearances are recorded if the character is mentioned. See [[Lyle Bennet#Parasite]], [[Chandra's super#Don't Look Back]] or the entire article for [[Mr. Petrelli]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:36, 27 October 2007 (EDT)
 
== Added Season One Summery. ==
 
I'm new to wiki editting but I got tired of seeing it as a stub. Feel free to clean it up, or scrap it all together if it is unsatisfactory.
If people don't protest it, I'll probably do Simone and then the others later. -[[User:Lulu|Lulu]]
* Actually, I'm wondering if we should lose Simone's Season One history and just put it back where it was. Even if she somehow appears in like, say, five more episodes, it still wouldn't be terribly long. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:05, 27 October 2007 (EDT)
** Considering it, that's probably the best way to do it, since it's rather unlikely she'll be in season two. And even if she is, then we could just add it to the page, I'm sure it wouldn't get terribly large. I just mentioned her because her summery is requested on the [[current events]] page. [[User:Lulu|Lulu]] 21:11, 27 October 2007 (EDT)
***Same goes for our other dead guys, Isaac and D.L. We know that a certain ex-con is going to appear in episode 8, but I still think the page will be just fine without a season one history. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:13, 27 October 2007 (EDT)
**** Agree on all three counts.  I'm not sure why we ever added summaries for season-one only (or mostly, in D.L.'s case) characters.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 21:59, 27 October 2007 (EDT)
***** I'll go ahead and restore those summaries then. Of course, for anybody who disagrees, good luck finding this talk hidden on Angela's page. :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:23, 27 October 2007 (EDT)
****** I took care of Candice too--her entire S1 and S2 summary is even shorter than some of the other characters' S1 summaries alone. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:34, 27 October 2007 (EDT)
 
== Notes ==
 
"During a December 2007 [http://cdn.libsyn.com/wordballoon/WBheroesvol2wrapup.mp3 Word Ballon podcast], [[Jeph Loeb]] and [[Jesse Alexander]] stated that viewers have seen Angela Petrelli's powers used on the show--not by Angela but by [[Peter]]."
I just listed to the commentary, and they mention that it is, indeed a spoiler, so should it be removed? Either way, it's an interesting piece of information. -- ''[[User:Lulu|<font color=purple>Lulu</font>]] <small><font color=red>.:</font color>[[User talk:Lulu|<font color=pink>talk</font>]]<font color=red>:.</font color></small></font color>'' 22:57, 18 December 2007 (EST)
*I haven't heard the podcast yet. It sounds very much like a spoiler that 1) Angela has a power, and 2) we've seen it manifest on the show. I would move it to [[Spoiler:Season Two]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:59, 18 December 2007 (EST)
** Sounds like a much better place for this. Leaving it here encourages edits into Powers part of the template. -- ''[[User:Lulu|<font color=purple>Lulu</font>]] <small><font color=red>.:</font color>[[User talk:Lulu|<font color=pink>talk</font>]]<font color=red>:.</font color></small></font color>'' 23:00, 18 December 2007 (EST)
***Hmm, I thought of posting this in the spoilers, but since I'm here anyways, something just clicked when I thought about the spoiler given above. First of all, when it was confirmed for the second time that Angela had a power and was shown on the show I had immediately guessed that it was some sort of tactile persuasion (such as with Nathan in the first season & and with Heidi in the second season) but then when I continued and it was used by PETER, I was thinking that perhaps - and actually very possibly - the power that she has was the clairvoyant/precognitive dream (I'm not totally sure its definition) power that Peter exhibited when he found out about his brother's accident (and maybe even when we talked to Charles and when he dreamt of flying and Charles Deveaux knew about it). Just a thought :) -- [[User:Ericcarner|Ericcarner]] 21:11, December 19, 2007
****I know that speculation doesn't really belong here, but a spoiler. Regardless, I think that it's either something related to his dreams, or it's something where she can be two places at once or something of that nature. This would explain why Peter is in the past while passed out, or why he's in the future when Adam doesn't notice him disappearing when they're in the middle of a conversation. Just my thoughts. But a cool tidbit. From the [[:Template:Videosplain|video]] of the "Villains" preview, it seems like she'll be more active, so we better see something happen.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 02:15, 20 December 2007 (EST)
*****I'd like to find out her power (and Kaito's, Charles's, and Arthur's, too, since they've all been heavily hinted at)...but I must say I've had a love-hate relationship with the teasing the writers have done so far. :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:15, 20 December 2007 (EST)
******Is the Heroes Official Magazine considered Canon?  Because in Edition 3, there's [http://s244.photobucket.com/albums/gg24/PandoraRose46/?action=view&current=PowersThatBePg4.jpg an article] (that's the 4th page) that someone posted  from the magazine online.  Side box,  the heading is "Beautiful Dreamer."  It seems to confirm, basically, what her power is.  Page one of the article is [http://s244.photobucket.com/albums/gg24/PandoraRose46/?action=view&current=PowersThatBePg1-1.jpg here]. --[[User:Spellingbee|<span style="color:indigo">SpellingBee</span>]][[User talk:Spellingbee|<span style="color:blue"><sup>~Talk to me!~</sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spellingbee|<span style="color:green"><sub>~Contribs~</sub></span>]] 21:14, 6 April 2008 (EDT)
******* It is not [[canon]]. It is considered on par with interviews. Information from the magazine can be included in notes where appropriate. Spoiler information from the magazine (like you noted above) can be included on spoiler pages like [[Spoiler:Season Three]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:36, 7 April 2008 (EDT)
 
==Touch based==
 
Thigns seem to happen when she touches someone. Mostly they do as she says. This is a definate possibility since in the videos sylar touches her which seems like a pretty important moment. Its shown descreetly through alot of the show but it hasnt been listed yet.
* Interesting idea, one I probably agree with, but as it hasn't been confirmed on the show yet you could add it to [[Theory:Angela Petrelli|Angela's theory]] page. -- {{User:Friskymuffin/Sig}} 13:40, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
**The NBC commentary states that the touching is all Cristine Rose and has nothing to do with the a power. In heroes magazine CR was asked if she had the power of persuasion by touch and she laughed and said no, "If I did things would have ended a lot different in season one" (I paraphrase). There are a lot more spoilers out there leading to other powers - I can't post them here of course. And I agree with Ryan, we still don't know for sure, so stating her power here is moot - so to speak.
{{User:Nonredhead/sig}} 13:40, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
*** I'm not 100% sure what the level of [[canon]] the ''[[Heroes: The Official Magazine|magazine]]'' is, but hearing it from the actress means its probably true. Although I heard elsewhere that the writers have confirmed Angela does have a power, but they hadn't even decided what it was until they started season 3, so I'm not trusting any information regarding Angela and a possible power to be honest. -- {{User:Friskymuffin/Sig}} 03:29, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
****Oh, totally magazine NOT canon, but as you said the actress saying, "no" when she won't give an answer to "What?" - I'd say its true. The spoiler, where did you find that? I never heard that? I did hear her power is in Peter in the pilot & two years ago Ausellio gave hints and confirmation her power was dreams -- not that the writers can't change their minds, but it looks like they had and an idea of her power in May 2007--[[User:Nonredhead|Nonredhead]] 13:27, 29 June 2008 (EDT)
 
== Angela's Ability ==
 
On the season two dvd the last disc has clips from the lost episodes and i think its the last scene that shows Angela's ability.  Its the "dreaming futures" kind of ability that Peter has showed us several times in season one. Like when he had dreams of flying and nathan being under him, his dreams of exploding. Angela dreams of this major massacre where all of our favorite heroes are dead and bloody everywhere. And directly after the dream it shows Angela waking up in her car and they threw in "spoiler alert" across the screen as she processes what she just dreamt. I don't think they would throw that in unless it was Angela's ability that would have been finally introduced in the upcoming season. So is it safe to say thats her ability?--[[User:Pbmarcano|Pbmarcano]] 11:57, 28 August 2008 (EDT)
*I covered up the spoilers. Sadly it is not save to say this as 1) this is not a cannon source as it is deleted and 2) someone could of put the dream in her head.--[[User:Skywalkerrbf|Skywalkerrbf]] 12:00, 28 August 2008 (EDT)
**...or it could just be a bad dream.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 18:38, 28 August 2008 (EDT)
***yes but she seemed way to comfortable with it, like we would be way freaked out of our mind if that happened to us! lol --[[User:Pbmarcano|Pbmarcano]] 11:56, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
***** I'm afraid it is correct and it will be revealed for canon on Septmeber 22nd.--[[User:Nonredhead|Nonredhead]] 11:01, 4 September 2008 (EDT)
****** It was announced Last night during Both Episodes that Angela Petrelli's Ability is indeed to dream the future, as she states to Peter that is where he inherited his first ability from! [[User:Retroarcade|Retroarcade]] 14:39, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
 
So I watched that deleted scene over the summer and I was really upset how it showed spoiler alert at the end of the scene instead of the beginning, and when it came up in the season 3 season premiere I was pretty angry.-Heroics
 
How Did she know that Peter's "First Ability" was the dreaming anyway?-ViciousKillgasm
:She could have dreamed it. [[User:Intuitive Empath|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath|Contributions]] 08:53, 22 December 2008 (EST)
**** And Peter told her in the pilot - in the police station - that's when she slaps him. --[[User:Nonredhead|Nonredhead]] 23:31, 23 December 2008 (EST)
 
==Sylar's mother?==
So, because she said so in The Butterfly Effect, we should totally assume that she irrefutably is Sylar's mommy? They even changed Virginia Gray's article saying "she's the adoptive mother of Sylar". Well, you all will have to excuse me, but when she TOUCHED SYLAR and said "but I am dear, I am...", it remembered me when she did the same thing with Nathan's wife (remember it's speculated she hypnotizes people somehow). What I'm trying to say is: do we really have solid and reliable sources (the producers, some publication, etc) were it states Angela is Sylar's mom?
[[User:L Lawliet|L Lawliet]] 02:00, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
*There were spoilers indicated that there was a main character who was adopted, and that the Petrelli blood line would be expanded. In all honesty, I don't think Angela would lie to a serial killer, nor would someone who seems to [[intuitive aptitude|understand complex]] issues not recognize the truth when it hits him.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 02:15, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
*What I'm trying to say is that maybe it's too early to assume that Angela is his real mother. Why don't you think Angela would lie? That's the reason of her live! Also, you can't say that Sylar has been fooled if we haven't seen what happens next when Angela says "but I am dear". Doesn't anybody think it's too early to make assumptions? If we don't have reliable sources that say so, we can't assume a fact that hasn't been confirmed inside the events in the series, can we? CAN WE? [[User:L Lawliet|L Lawliet]] 17:19, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
**Amen! I am a firm believer that Angela is lying. We've seen how manipulative she can be. We've also seen she is known to lie, i.e. telling her sons that their father died of a heart attack, rather than from suicide (which might also be a lie). I think she told Sylar that she's his mother for one main purpose: to keep him on a leash. Sylar himself said he wished that one day "a stranger would come to [his] house and tell [him] [his] parents weren't really [his] parents," or something along those lines. Obviously, Angela knew how appealing it would be to Sylar if his "real" mother was special too. Now, by telling Sylar that she's his mother, Angela has won Sylar's loyalty, and thus he continues to serve the Company for dear old mommy. In general, she's a very sneaky character, and I wouldn't put much merit in anything she says. That's what's so appealing about her. X] What I'm trying to say is that we should not have her stated as Sylar's mother, not yet at least. --[[User:Mask-o|Mask-o]] 21:38, 3 October 2008 (EDT)
*** We'll wait until she's proven to be lying rather than just assuming that everything she says is a lie. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:55, 4 October 2008 (EDT)
* "There were spoilers" is enough to say it's too early to assume. We can't make that declaration until it's proven on the show, no?--[[User:Riddler|Riddler]] 17:21, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
** This is a rough area.  One one hand it's risky to go with information disclosed as a cliffhanger until the next episode when there could be some clarifying statement that she'll follow up with.  On the other hand we can't speculate as to whether she was lying or not.  She did say she was his mother.  Regardless of what way we swayed, one group would probably consider it confusing or premature to say one way or the other.  It's kind of a toss up at the moment.  ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 17:26, 26 September 2008 (EDT))
*** I say re-add that "(Claimed)" tag 'til it's explained further.--[[User:Riddler|Riddler]] 17:27, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
***Sylar's lie detection about Arthur's paternity has NOTHING to do with the veracity of Angela's claim.  Angela is known to have had an affair with Kaito and could well have had another one with the father of Gabriel Gray.  Until we have more information, the article should indicate that she claims to be the mother of Sylar.  To assume that is not true is mere speculation.--[[User:Johnnyd1980|Johnnyd1980]] 12:22, 10 December 2008 (EST)
 
HA! I KNEW IT! What about that? Nor Angela nor Arthur are the real parents of Sylar! You should listen to me next time! [[User:L Lawliet|L Lawliet]] 16:00, 20 December 2008 (EST)
* That's a very rude response. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:30, 20 December 2008 (EST)
** Yes, L Lawliet. You should respond like I do: give a smug smile and a shrug of the shoulders, as if to say "I told you so." X] --[[User:Mask-o|Mask-o]] 23:12, 27 December 2008 (EST)
* The writers designed the plot to lead him (and thus, us) to believe otherwise until it was revealed. --[[User:Ricard Desi|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi|c]]) 05:11, 28 December 2008 (EST)
** Yes, but L Lwaliet managed to see past their facade, and therefore I'd say he deserves to be a little proud of himself. You'd be happy, too, if one of your theories panned out, right? Yes, that doesn't really give him the right to be rude (although I don't really see anything particularly rude about his response), but it doesn't give others the right to be rude to him, either. --[[User:Mask-o|Mask-o]] 12:37, 1 January 2009 (EST)
*** It was rude in that he was acting as if the other participants in this discussion were idiots for believing that Angela was Sylar's mother, when they had all the reason to. There's absolutely nothing wrong with that. And actually, nobody else was being rude to him. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister|U]] | [[User_talk:Thrashmeister|T]] | [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister|C]] ]'''</small> 13:40, 1 January 2009 (EST)
*Well, I failed at adding an emoticon or some sort of annotation to let you know that I was kidding, I must admit, and I didn't want to sound rude. But as Mask-o said, I deserve a little merit, don't I? Also, I think he knew it was a joke. Whatever, the point that I tried to state when I made my fist comment was that we should be more cautious at making changes to the articles at HeroesWiki too prematurely. At the end, I was right about Angela/Arthur's lie and it made me a little conceited.--[[User:L Lawliet|L Lawliet]] 05:46, 3 January 2009 (EST)
** No, I think we did exactly what we should have done. We used the information we were given by multiple people. Promos touted the relationship. ''[[Heroes: The Official Magazine]]'' printed it. Writers, directors, and producers even referred to Angela and Arthur as Sylar's parents. It was all a big ruse to throw off the audience, in essence making us take that journey with Sylar in realizing we were misled and lied to. I don't want to start ignoring everything that Angela says just because she's lied in the past. If we have good reason to believe otherwise (like a fake birth certificate for Claire, or when we see Nathan telling one person something and another person another something contradictory), then that's one thing. But when we're given reasonable information, we should use it. There is no change here that can't be undone, and everything can be qualified by saying something like "Angela says she is Sylar's mother". -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 11:07, 3 January 2009 (EST)
*L Lawliet, this is unacceptable and must be stopped...now. I am not afraid to have you banned.--[[User:Citizen|Citizen]] 11:30, 3 January 2009 (EST)
** That's an over-reaction. --[[User:DocM|DocM]] 11:47, 3 January 2009 (EST)
 
== Sylar/Gabriel ==
 
"'''Angela Petrelli is a founding member of the Company, as well as the wife of Arthur and mother of Nathan, Peter and Sylar.'''"
Am I being pedantic for thinking it should read "mother of Nathan, Peter and Gabriel Gray"? I mean, Sylar was who he became. --[[User:Matchu|Matchu]] 12:42, 10 October 2008 (EDT)
* That is pedantic because Sylar is still the person who is her son. But it wouldn't hurt to change it to [[Gabriel Gray]], which simply links to Sylar's page. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:16, 10 October 2008 (EDT)
 
== Significant other ==
 
I saw the recent edits on the significant other field and I'd like to know something: is that section meant to show people with whom the character has or has had a marriage or just romantic feelings? Isn't there a "spouse" field in the character infobox? If significant other stands for spouse, Kaito should be removed, if meant for actual feelings, Arthur should be listed as formerly too, she clearly doesn't have feelings for him anymore. Same thing for Arthur's page. [[User:Intuitive Empath|Intuitive Empath]] 09:16, 17 November 2008 (EST)
** I think "feelings" is subjective for he has some feeling for her - technically they are still married - but I guess Angela "asked" for a formal separation when she served him dinner. But they are still married and Arthur did refer to her as "Mrs. Petrelli", not to mention for two people who seem to not "care" they BOTH still wear their wedding rings.
*** I do however think we can say they were married in April of 1964 as in Villains they we're celebrating their 41st wedding Anniversary. And we know 6 months ago started on April 24th, Charlies Birthday, right?--[[User:Nonredhead|Nonredhead]] 17:43, 22 November 2008 (EST)
 
== Persuasion ==
 
We all remember her talking to Heidi in Four Months Ago. She seemed to be acting strange, almost forcing opinions on Heidi. I noticed the same thing in It's Coming, and this time they put more emphasis on it. I wonder if she has two powers, any thoughts? [[User:Dracomaster4|Dracomaster4]] 03:37, 18 November 2008 (EST)
 
Nope, this has already been discussed, in FMA, the whole touch thing was the actress improvising, nothing at all related to her ability. [[User:Intuitive Empath|Intuitive Empath]] 10:26, 18 November 2008 (EST)
:That's all well and good but she seemed almost Eden-like in It's Coming with the way she was talking to Arthur, having to reissue commands sort of to get him to understand. [[User:Exproject|Exproject]] 15:08, 20 November 2008 (EST)
*** Every power is based on the core power, persuasion has nothing to do with a dream power, so far we have only seen Angela use a power in a dream like state. Heroes Unmasked, the BBC show, says that the writers say that Arthur only has one weakness, and that's Angela. I don't think it's odd to think he has to have one weakness and that a man may have a love for his wife of 41 years over a love for his children. Still, if Angela's children are her weakness, much like Arthur if it came down to one person or "saving the world and billions of people over one person" in the way they see it, we know what would win out. She just knew how to get to him. And the scene did shift to her office, perhaps she got his weakness and took control of the dream - still NOT Persuasionin the way we have seen it in the show. Why not tell him to stop trying to end the world? Or not put her in the dream in the first place. --[[User:Nonredhead|Nonredhead]] 17:49, 22 November 2008 (EST)
 
== Angela's phone call. ==
 
So lets talk about the phone conversation Angela has at the end of "powerless" about pandora's box and all.  Everyone who has the season 2 dvd's knows that originally she was suposed to be speaking with Howard Lemay, about how they were going to let all of Odessa die in order to cover up The Company's involvement.  The writers said that they left the scene in, but that it has a different meaning in the "sans Exodus" universe.  Am I the only one who thinks they should of deleted this scene with all the other Exodus stuff? It doesn't make any sense anymore.  Whow as she talking to and about what?  It wasn't Future Peter cause she confronts him at the hospital, it wasn't Lemay as the virus didn't get out.  Yet another season 3 error.  [[User:D Toccs|D Toccs]] 23:21, 30 December 2008 (EST)
* They way I interpreted it, it was supposed to be Future Peter but we really don't know who it was. That is one of a few loose ends from Volume 3 I hope get cleared up.--[[User:MiamiVolts|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts|talk]]) 23:26, 30 December 2008 (EST)
** I just hope that if they ever explain that scene, they don't create more plotholes, we've got enough of those already. [[User:Intuitive Empath|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath|Contributions]] 10:55, 31 December 2008 (EST)
 
== Level 3 ==
 
Was just rewatching "Villains" and came across this bit of conversation between Angela and the Haitian.  "Use the incinerator on Level 3.  Use my passcard to grant you access.  Should anyone ask, he's a casualty of a field op."  As far as I know, this is the only time we've heard of Level 3 in the whole show, and presumably it's at the Hartsdale facility.  Not really sure how it could be applied to anything though.  Perhaps a note somewhere here or on the Primatech page? --[[User:Ricard Desi|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi|c]]) 00:52, 2 January 2009 (EST)
* I think it's been mentioned before. A note on [[Primatech Research]] would be okay if it's not already there.--[[User:MiamiVolts|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts|talk]]) 02:54, 2 January 2009 (EST)
 
** Dont worry i added the first time i saw it.i noted it to ryan the first time it came out.[[User:Gabriel Bishop|Gabriel Bishop]] 15:44, 14 January 2009 (EST) Gabriel Bishop
 
==Angela A Mimic==
Hey guys i had an interesting theory about angela being a mimic.it could make kinda sense as in she could of absorbed dreaming from charles ? [[User:Gabriel Bishop|Gabriel Bishop]] 15:44, 14 January 2009 (EST) Gabriel Bishop
 
If she was a mimic she'd have many other powers, and wouldn't have been so afraid of Arthur. [[User:Intuitive Empath|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath|Contributions]] 16:08, 14 January 2009 (EST)
 
Maybe like sylar she has to use empathy. she doesnt seem to have any so maybe thats why she hasnt gt there powers.while she has been empathic to charles. [[User:Gabriel Bishop|Gabriel Bishop]] 16:19, 14 January 2009 (EST) Gabriel Bishop
 
I think you're just trying to see something that's just not there, I'm too focused on logic to consider that theory. [[User:Intuitive Empath|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath|Contributions]] 18:40, 14 January 2009 (EST)
 
We know what Angela's power is: [[precognitive dreaming]].  She tells Future Peter pretty explicitly (and now that I think about it, I'm not certain PRESENT Peter is even aware of it).  To claim that A) she was lying, and B) the power she claims to have was actually taken from another person altogether is pretty far-fetched.  --[[User:Ricard Desi|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi|c]]) 19:44, 14 January 2009 (EST)
* I agree with Gabriel Bishop, I think there is more to Angela than meets the eye, to counter Richard, A) She has lied to her sons before, when she told them Arthur killed himself, also since Angela seems to lie frequently we cannot say one way or another if she is lying. B) Arthur, Peter, Linda and Sylar have all taken abilities from other people, Angela may have taken abilities like Peter and chose not to use them, it isn't so far fetched. Oh and Gabriel did you mean peter when u said "Maybe like Sylar she has to use empathy.". --[[User:Laughingdevilboy|laughingdevilboy]] 11:26, 15 January 2009 (EST)
** Thanks --[[User:Laughingdevilboy|laughingdevilboy]]  i meant when sylar as empathic to elle he gained her power.well maybe angela hasnt got much powers becuase she isnt really empathic.well really im just trying to show that maybe the petrelli family are all mimics,except from nathan whose ability is synthetic. :) [[User:Gabriel Bishop|Gabriel Bishop]] 11:49, 15 January 2009 (EST) Gabriel Bishop
*** I get ya :) --[[User:Laughingdevilboy|laughingdevilboy]] 11:52, 15 January 2009 (EST)
**** Thanks im glad you understand ],im just wondering if anyone else knows what i mean
 
=="Chairwoman"==
 
On the bottom of the screen, Infobox showing who is the current chairprerson of the Company. Chairwoman should change to Chairperson. Iam not sexist, just it look better than chairwoman. What do you think? [[User:Hopwas2007|Hopwas2007]] 04:45, 7 March 2009 (EST)
Roger that, Hopwas2007. Chairwoman is a sexist term, so is Chairman. Blood 3 2:28 p.m AEST 5/05/2009
 
=="Angela's sister"==
 
The sister in Into the Asylum, is probably Linda Tavara or Leona Mills. Any thoughts? Blood3 2:28 p.m AEST 5/05/2009
* You'll want to check spoilers for ''[[Spoiler:1961|1961]]''. :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:56, 5 April 2009 (EDT)
** I'm still hoping that either Angela or her sister turns out to be [[Rollo Fusor's accomplice]]... please don't tell me the spoiler. Thanks.--[[User:MiamiVolts|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts|talk]]) 01:11, 5 April 2009 (EDT)
* Then you'll be disappointed... or maybe not. --[[User:Altes|Altes]] 03:02, 13 April 2009 (EDT)
* Angela can't be Fusor's accomplice, she can't [[Dehydration|suck the water out of people]]. [[User:Intuitive Empath|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath|Contributions]] 15:36, 13 April 2009 (EDT)
 
==Angela's name==
==Angela's name==
Can say Angela's name is Angela Shaw-Petrelli or Angela Petrelli (Shaw) any reference to her full name. :)--[[User:Nonredhead|Nonredhead]] 20:53, 14 April 2009 (EDT)
Can say Angela's name is Angela Shaw-Petrelli or Angela Petrelli (Shaw) any reference to her full name. :)--[[User:Nonredhead|Nonredhead]] 20:53, 14 April 2009 (EDT)
Line 282: Line 20:


Ok, so this page says angela was married in 1964, but the [[Timeline:Pre-eclipse]] says that it was in 1965. Which is it? --[[User:Mc hammark|mc_hammark]] 18:39, 27 January 2010 (EST)
Ok, so this page says angela was married in 1964, but the [[Timeline:Pre-eclipse]] says that it was in 1965. Which is it? --[[User:Mc hammark|mc_hammark]] 18:39, 27 January 2010 (EST)
*It's difficult to tell.  Arthur and Angela were married for 41 years before Arthur's "death" in early 2006, so it would be either 1964 or 1965. --[[User:Ricard Desi|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi|c]]) 20:56, 27 January 2010 (EST)
== HTSAEM ==
Looking back, she doesn't seem to have that relationship she has with HRG that she has now. Also, she's the only person I know that can make burberry look classy. --[[User:Mc hammark|mc_hammark]] 16:58, 24 February 2010 (EST)
*They probably developed some type of a relationship afterword. Also, it was quite a tense situation they were having over the phone, she was probably trying to intimidate him.--{{User:PJDEP/signature1}} 17:02, 24 February 2010 (EST)
== Company Founder ==
Technically, isn't she ''the'' Company founder?--[[User:Boycool42|Boycool42]] 21:32, 8 March 2010 (EST)
*How so? Charles, Bob and Linderman were with her the whole time.--{{User:PJDEP/signature1}} 21:46, 8 March 2010 (EST)
**She's the one that told them what to do.--[[User:Boycool42|Boycool42]] 07:49, 9 March 2010 (EST)
***Just because someone tells you what to do, doesn't mean that you aren't a founder. And if she's a founder of anything, it's Primatech, not the Company, which, as we all know, was founded in 1977. --[[User:Mc hammark|mc_hammark]] 12:10, 9 March 2010 (EST)
****She's the one that created the entire concept of the Company.--[[User:Boycool42|Boycool42]] 16:58, 10 March 2010 (EST)
==Chateau==
How did she live for 15 years in (her own) chateau, but her past self never found out? [[User:Sandubadear|Sandubadear]] ([[User talk:Sandubadear|talk]]) 16:35, 7 November 2015 (EST)

Latest revision as of 16:35, 7 November 2015

Archives Archived Topics
Feb 2007-Apr 2009

Angela's name

Can say Angela's name is Angela Shaw-Petrelli or Angela Petrelli (Shaw) any reference to her full name. :)--Nonredhead 20:53, 14 April 2009 (EDT)

  • No. Her maiden name is Shaw. Her married name is Petrelli. There's no evidence she ever hyphenated her last name. I believe the lead sentence says Angela Petrelli (née Shaw): née is a French term that means "born" and designates a maiden name. I also believe that Angela Shaw (which is how she was born) redirect to this page. :) -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 21:09, 14 April 2009 (EDT)

Did she...

know through her dreams that Nathan was going to set up the capturing of evolved humans? Or was it that Nathan told her about it? Because I know that she was talking to Nathan about it in A clear and present danger, but did how did she originally find out?--Catalyst · Talk · HL 12:31, 21 August 2009 (EDT)

Date of marriage

Ok, so this page says angela was married in 1964, but the Timeline:Pre-eclipse says that it was in 1965. Which is it? --mc_hammark 18:39, 27 January 2010 (EST)

  • It's difficult to tell. Arthur and Angela were married for 41 years before Arthur's "death" in early 2006, so it would be either 1964 or 1965. --Ricard Desi (t,c) 20:56, 27 January 2010 (EST)

HTSAEM

Looking back, she doesn't seem to have that relationship she has with HRG that she has now. Also, she's the only person I know that can make burberry look classy. --mc_hammark 16:58, 24 February 2010 (EST)

  • They probably developed some type of a relationship afterword. Also, it was quite a tense situation they were having over the phone, she was probably trying to intimidate him.--PJDEP - Talk - Polls and Opinions 17:02, 24 February 2010 (EST)

Company Founder

Technically, isn't she the Company founder?--Boycool42 21:32, 8 March 2010 (EST)

  • How so? Charles, Bob and Linderman were with her the whole time.--PJDEP - Talk - Polls and Opinions 21:46, 8 March 2010 (EST)
    • She's the one that told them what to do.--Boycool42 07:49, 9 March 2010 (EST)
      • Just because someone tells you what to do, doesn't mean that you aren't a founder. And if she's a founder of anything, it's Primatech, not the Company, which, as we all know, was founded in 1977. --mc_hammark 12:10, 9 March 2010 (EST)
        • She's the one that created the entire concept of the Company.--Boycool42 16:58, 10 March 2010 (EST)

Chateau

How did she live for 15 years in (her own) chateau, but her past self never found out? Sandubadear (talk) 16:35, 7 November 2015 (EST)