This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.

Talk:Harry Fletcher

From Heroes Wiki
Revision as of 07:06, 5 March 2010 by imported>Radicell
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Since the interactive map doesn't give us any new info on Harry, does he really merit his own article yet?--Hardvice (talk) 14:38, 25 January 2007 (EST)

  • I don't know, I thought it was one of the ones with more information when I made it. -Level 14:56, 25 January 2007 (EST)
    • I have caps of all the sticky notes. Anybody who had even an address is already uploaded and added. Abu Aswan, Byron Bevington, Tracy Chobham, Pam Green, Felipe Acerra, and Penkala Burton all have new info, and Sanjog Iyer and Amid Halebi already have articles for other reasons. Michelle Valcan, Harry Fletcher, Elena LaCarte, and Arthur Dowland all just have their names on the post-its.--Hardvice (talk) 14:59, 25 January 2007 (EST)
      • Harry was mostly unintentional, I put in all the information and went to check the map for the added info, but there wasn't any. So I thought I'd save the page anyway, if it gets deleted, oh well. Michelle Valcek was intentional because there were two entrys on the the evolved humans list, but I have no personal attachment. -Level 16:16, 25 January 2007 (EST)
        • There's probably a good chance that they'll turn up again in the online stuff, so there's no reason to delete them. I just didn't want somebody to go to all the trouble of adding all of the folks from the list for no real gain.--Hardvice (talk) 16:40, 25 January 2007 (EST)

Where?

Has the theories page gone? Who did it and why?--Steelymcbeam 21:37, 21 February 2009 (EST)

  • There has only been one edit made to this page in the last year. I don't think there has ever been a theories link on this page. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 22:24, 21 February 2009 (EST)
    • Does that mean the Harry Fletcher page was the one place there WEREN'T a lot of Harry Fletcher theories?  :) --Cro Magnon 14:01, 2 March 2009 (EST)

Harry's alive

It's just a theory, but in the Heroes universe, sometime before November 2006 in the episode Homecoming, Chandra's list states all deceased evolved humans in red (e.g. Linda Tavara). Harry's name was in white... -- Meteoritu 21:46, 4 March 2009

  • And later when Matt listed the Company fouders he listed him as dead. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 16:51, 4 March 2009 (EST)
    • That's just it, how could he have known he was dead? He wasn't in contact with that much people between Homecoming and Cautionary Tales. -- Meteoritu 22:37 , 4 March 2009
      • Maybe Matt went to his house and found his dead body. - Josh (talk/contribs) 17:50, 4 March 2009 (EST)
        • Matt's a cop, and he was investigating a murder, the victim appears in a photo and other people on the photo are attacked, he investigates, and discovers almost all of them are dead. Simple and logical. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 18:07, 4 March 2009 (EST)

Death date

We don't know when Harry died. We know that he was listed as being a live on the list, but we don't know that he was alive when we saw the list (in 2006). All we know is that he was probably alive when Chandra last updated the list...but we don't know when that was. Therefore, unless I'm missing something, we don't know when Harry died. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 15:31, 8 February 2010 (EST)

  • Ok, Kaito said there were 12, now there are nine, the three that had died were Arthur, Linderman and Charles, meaning Harry was alive. Then, in the same month of march, Matt notes that he is dead. That means he must have died in march. --mc_hammark 15:34, 8 February 2010 (EST)
    • When did Kaito say there are now nine? And if I recall, when Kaito was mentioning the other founders, he also said he hadn't been in contact with them, so it's very possible (and probable) that he didn't know that any had died. It's just too much of a jump for us to assume that any of them were still alive in March 2007 based solely on Kaito recalling. But I could be wrong. I'd like to review that quote--I don't remember it. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 16:33, 8 February 2010 (EST)
      • I've not actually watched the scene in months, I'm just recalling what he said from memory, but if I get time either tonight or tomorrow, I'll have a look for it. :) --mc_hammark 16:38, 8 February 2010 (EST)
        • I remember Kaito saying that as well, it was in Four Months Later, when he discusses the death threats with Angela. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 16:50, 8 February 2010 (EST)
          • Okay, I found the scene. It's from Four Months Later... Angela meets Kaito on the Deveaux rooftop and they compare their death threat pictures. Kaito: "I do not take death threats idly." Angela: "Someone's playing a trick." Kaito: "Are they? Charles Deveaux. Linderman. Your husband. All of them. Dead. Now there are nine." Angela: "So you think one of us sent these?" etc.

            I suppose that Kaito could have known the status of the other founders, but considering he wasn't sure about anything, and considering he didn't know who sent it, (and the fact he thought Arthur was dead), I'm not sure I feel confident saying that Kaito had been in recent contact with (or knew the status of) the other founders. In other words, they could have died at any time. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 16:57, 8 February 2010 (EST)

            • Actually, in Truth & Consequences, Victoria Pratt says, "After Kaito and the others were killed, I figured that sooner or later someone would come after me." That to me is even stronger evidence that the others were alive until about the time that Kaito was killed. That coupled with Kaito's statement is probably enough evidence that Harry and Paula were killed in March of 2007. I'll revert now. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 16:58, 8 February 2010 (EST)
              • Would this then be the same for the others then? --mc_hammark 17:04, 8 February 2010 (EST)
                • Presumably, yes. Hell, we've even got a one-week window when it could have happened. --Ricard Desi (t,c) 17:06, 8 February 2010 (EST)