Talk:Portal:References

This portal is currently very incomplete. We need standard-sized images for:

• AA meeting (recommend we move this to Alcoholics Anonymous to fit in better with cat)
• Back to the Future
• Nissan Versa
• Ray Bradbury
• Depression, Suicide, and Dyslexia--Hardvice (talk) 16:41, 26 December 2006 (EST)

Split it up, boys, split it up

I think we're ready to split the references. There's lots of ways we can do this. Movies, books, conditions, companies/organizations, and, um, waffles. I think for now, we should still keep it simple: maybe "Art" or "Works of Art" (meaning movies, books, etc.) and "Other References"? I don't know. We could also split it into multiple categories, but each would be rather small. Ideas? - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 12:31, 31 January 2007 (EST)

I'd say "Media References" to include other shows, comics, etc. --Ted C 12:35, 31 January 2007 (EST)

Ah, yes, that's the term I was looking for. - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 12:44, 31 January 2007 (EST)

If we do it categorically, I think we're stuck with "Media References" and everything else. Maybe just make "Media References" or whatever a subcat, and leave everything else loose in "References", like items? We can also just split it alphabetically, but I think that's better suited to people than things.--Hardvice (talk) 13:20, 31 January 2007 (EST)

I agree. I don't think alphabetical works the best, mostly because the references are so disparate. I like the idea of a subcat - much easier. I'll work on that later tonight or tomorrow, unless somebody wants to do it now. - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 14:21, 31 January 2007 (EST)