This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Template talk:Nbl: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ryangibsonstewart No edit summary |
imported>Admin No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* Yep. :) ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 23:23, 3 February 2008 (EST)) | * Yep. :) ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 23:23, 3 February 2008 (EST)) | ||
** Explain cascading protection to me, then. I'm curious why [[template:stats bottom]] and the other stats templates didn't become protected... -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 23:25, 3 February 2008 (EST) | ** Explain cascading protection to me, then. I'm curious why [[template:stats bottom]] and the other stats templates didn't become protected... -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 23:25, 3 February 2008 (EST) | ||
*** I think you understand it correctly... [[Template:stats bottom]] is indeed currently protected through cascading protection. The link still says Protect, but if you click on it you'll see that it's protected. The cascading protection is still relatively new and this may be an inconsistency. I'd imagine pages protected thru cascading protection '''should''' have an Unprotect link instead of Protect to be consistent with explicitly protected pages. ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 23:29, 3 February 2008 (EST)) | |||
Revision as of 23:29, 3 February 2008
When I protected Heroes Wiki:Site Statistics using cascading protection, is that what made this template become protected? (Oops!) -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 23:17, 3 February 2008 (EST)
- Yep. :) (Admin 23:23, 3 February 2008 (EST))
- Explain cascading protection to me, then. I'm curious why template:stats bottom and the other stats templates didn't become protected... -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 23:25, 3 February 2008 (EST)
- I think you understand it correctly... Template:stats bottom is indeed currently protected through cascading protection. The link still says Protect, but if you click on it you'll see that it's protected. The cascading protection is still relatively new and this may be an inconsistency. I'd imagine pages protected thru cascading protection should have an Unprotect link instead of Protect to be consistent with explicitly protected pages. (Admin 23:29, 3 February 2008 (EST))
- Explain cascading protection to me, then. I'm curious why template:stats bottom and the other stats templates didn't become protected... -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 23:25, 3 February 2008 (EST)