File talk:Anti-Tracker Alliance.jpg

Actually, since groups are going to be an all-new category with their own portal and their own infoboxes, we don't necessarily have to use character portrait-sized images for them. We'd have a lot more room and could probably get better pictures if we used standard 450x350 pictures instead. Heck, even getting a shot of Linderman's thugs together in a 200x250 picture was a pain, and that's only two people. Just something to consider.--Hardvice (talk) 12:53, 17 May 2007 (EDT)

• The 200x250 picture is mainly for the portal thumbnails... we can use the larger size for the the articles.--MiamiVolts (talk) 12:58, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
  • What I'm saying is that the portal doesn't need to use {{PortalCharacter}}. It can use {{PortalPlotPoints}} and have larger-sized images--especially if we're going to use larger images in the infoboxes. There's no point in having two images for each article.--Hardvice (talk) 13:09, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
  • And besides, single character images aren't very illustrative of the group. Kaito for the company is a tough call, particularly since we don't know how or if he's still affiliated with them. On the other hand, a shot of, say, Bennet, Eden, and the Haitian would illustrate the group better. And while Linderman is a good illustration for the Linderman Group, Linderman with Candice and his guards outside the limo is better still.--Hardvice (talk) 13:14, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
    • That, and a picture of a person or people might not be the best choice at all. For instance, on the Linderman template, we have a shot of the fake sword that says "Linderman Group". The Company is represented by Bennet putting his glasses down. We don't necessarily need to use these images, but we certainly don't have to use images of people. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 13:45, 17 May 2007 (EDT)