This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.

Heroes Wiki talk:Article of the Week: Difference between revisions

From Heroes Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Ryangibsonstewart
imported>Iheartheroes
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
****So why don't we now?{{User:Iheartheroes/sig}} 22:00, 26 September 2009 (EDT)
****So why don't we now?{{User:Iheartheroes/sig}} 22:00, 26 September 2009 (EDT)
***** :) I'll nominate it. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:02, 26 September 2009 (EDT)
***** :) I'll nominate it. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:02, 26 September 2009 (EDT)
******Yeah! :) {{User:Iheartheroes/sig}} 22:12, 26 September 2009 (EDT)
******* I support as it really seems unnecessary. --[[User:Janrodrigo|Janrodrigo]] 07:06, 27 September 2009 (EDT)
********No one has protested, can we delete it now? {{User:Iheartheroes/sig}} 09:58, 26 November 2009 (EST)

Latest revision as of 14:58, 26 November 2009

Episode AOTWs

I don't think that "next" should appear on the mini episode bar for AOTW, seeing as how it basically leads nowhere. ---- 11:20, 25 January 2007 (EST)

Agree - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 13:53, 25 January 2007 (EST)

Archive section

I'm not sure I understand what articles go here or not...EVERY episode does, right? But a graphic novel only goes there if there wasn't an episode that week..is that right? ~~IHHTalk 20:28, 26 September 2009 (EDT)

  • Personally, I'd like to see the archive deleted. It serves no purpose. Other wikis, like Wikipedia, Lostpedia, or Memory Alpha, frequently feature various articles in their AOTW section. We don't--it's always an episode, or a graphic novel if there is no episode that week. We don't need an archive of the episode and graphic novel titles. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 20:46, 26 September 2009 (EDT)
    • So why do we still have it? ~~IHHTalk 21:57, 26 September 2009 (EDT)
      • I suppose because nobody has ever thought to delete it. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 21:59, 26 September 2009 (EDT)
        • So why don't we now?~~IHHTalk 22:00, 26 September 2009 (EDT)
          • :) I'll nominate it. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 22:02, 26 September 2009 (EDT)
            • Yeah! :) ~~IHHTalk 22:12, 26 September 2009 (EDT)
              • I support as it really seems unnecessary. --Janrodrigo 07:06, 27 September 2009 (EDT)
                • No one has protested, can we delete it now? ~~IHHTalk 09:58, 26 November 2009 (EST)